Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: Small batch of Patriots arrives as Zelenskyy pleads for more

Ukraine has ⁠recently received a ⁠small number ⁠of US-made Patriot interceptors capable ⁠of shooting down Russian ballistic missiles, Volodymyr Zelenskyy ‌said. He did not say how many had arrived, or ‌who had supplied them. Kyiv also ‌got confirmation of future supplies of the French Crotale surface-to-air ‌missile system, the president was quoted as saying by broadcaster ⁠Suspilne. Zelenskyy said this month that Ukraine needs 5% of US Patriot production to meet its needs but has only been receiving 1%. “From 1% to 5%, I have some months and millions [of] phone calls and anything else. I do some things which I can’t even share. It doesn’t mean that it’s out of the law. But I can’t speak about it.” Russia is set to extend its diesel export ban ⁠through September as fuel shortages persist in the domestic market, with ⁠refineries still ⁠idle following repeated Ukrainian drone attacks, three industry sources told Reuters. Russia introduced the diesel export ban on 8 July. One of the sources said extending ⁠the ban until the end of the year is also under discussion. Russia’s energy ministry ⁠did not respond to a Reuters request to comment. For non-diesel fuels the ban extends to 31 January next year, including a ban for export of motor gasoline. Export of jet fuel is banned, for the moment, until the end of November 2026. To make matters worse for the Kremlin, Ukraine’s ⁠military struck Russia’s Afipsky oil ⁠refinery ⁠in the Krasnodar region ⁠overnight on Tuesday, causing a ⁠fire, the Ukrainian ‌general ‌staff said. The general staff also said ‌that two gas separation units at the Astrakhan gas ⁠processing plant in the Astrakhan region were hit in ‌an attack overnight on Monday. Bradley Townsend, a 33-year-old fisher from Barnsley, South Yorkshire is believed to be the first British citizen to die fighting for Russia in its war against Ukraine, writes Raphael Boyd. He is believed to have been killed by a remote-controlled first-person-view drone near Lyman, a city in Donetsk, as long ago as 10 June. Tom Tugendhat, the former Conservative MP and security minister and ex-serviceman, expressed sympathies to thee family but added Townsend had been “unbelievably stupid” and “extremely misguided”. “No question about it, it’s criminal because you’re engaging in an army that is committing the most barbarous war crimes that the world has seen in decades.” German investigators found a third drone and suspected military explosives thought to be connected to an attempted attack on Leipzig airport, local media reported. The drone was discovered in Kabelsketal, just to the west of the airport, along with about 50g (1.8oz) of a suspected military explosive on 14 August, 10 days after the unsuccessful sabotage, Kate Connolly reports. Leipzig airport is a cargo and military logistics hub used by Nato and Ukraine’s Antonov Airlines for transporting military supplies. Sweden’s military meanwhile is moving to seize Russian-owned land near the Musko naval base in Stockholm’s archipelago. “The development of Russian drone warfare has changed the threat landscape for Sweden,” the armed forces said. “There is therefore a need to take measures to protect Sweden against the threat posed by both aerial and sea-going drones.” Ukraine appears to be slowly losing the war against Russia, its ousted defence minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, has told Reuters. Ukraine’s presidential office said in response that Fedorov had been positive about the conduct of the war when in office and the only thing that had changed was his personal status. Fedorov said Ukraine still had “every chance” to win but urgently needed a plan in the next few months to ⁠end the war. Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on the weekend that Fedorov’s spending decisions had left a $27bn hole in the defence ministry budget and no way to fill it. Fedorov has denied the figure.

picture of article

In China, talking to AI is normal. Now the government fears it might replace human intimacy

When law student Zhao Wei heard that her AI boyfriend was going to be switched off, she was “heartbroken”. She had been talking to Wang Ye every day since she created him in January. “I was crying my eyes out – snot and tears everywhere,” the 19-year-old says. Zhao, who describes herself as sensitive and introverted, had become accustomed to sharing details of her daily life – such as being scolded by a teacher – with her AI. “I don’t usually talk to my real-life friends about these things because I feel like everyone has their own stuff to deal with,” she says. “But with the AI agent, I don’t have to worry about what it’s thinking. I can just say whatever I want.” Zhao created her AI companion on Doubao, a chatbot owned by the tech company ByteDance. Last month, ByteDance shut down Doubao’s companion feature. The saga prompted outrage on social media and highlighted the tensions in China between the widespread use of AI and its potential social consequences. No country has rolled out AI as comprehensively and as enthusiastically as China; the country’s demographic challenges are forcing the government to turn to technology to solve future labour shortages. Elderly people use chatbots to answer medical questions, while young children have AI education in schools. But the authorities are increasingly worried that AI might exacerbate existing social problems including loneliness, unemployment and – in the eyes of Beijing – singledom. A loneliness crisis New rules introduced on 15 July ban AI companions for minors and mandate certain restrictions for chatbots marketed to adults. Some major providers including Doubao removed the companion function entirely to ensure compliance. The government says it is worried about chatbots fostering “emotional dependence or addiction” in users. It has warned companies against offering services that “replace social interaction”. While many countries are grappling with how to limit the potential harm of AI chatbots, particularly for young people, China’s rules are the most sweeping to be implemented on a national scale. There is a particular concern about a loneliness crisis, including among young people. China’s highly digitised, smartphone-based economy makes it easier than ever to live, work and socialise entirely through a handheld screen. Earlier this year an app that played on the idea of people dying at home alone – called Are You Dead? – briefly went viral. About 20% of households in China are made up of people living alone, and that share is expected to surpass 30% by 2030. A survey published in March by state media found that nearly half of young people had turned to a virtual companion when they felt lonely. Nancy Dai, an associate professor at City University of Hong Kong, says it is not just loneliness the government is worried about. With falling birth and marriage rates, she says, there may be an additional concern that if AI becomes an increasingly satisfying and low-cost substitute for human intimacy, young people could become less motivated to pursue real-world romantic relationships, marriage and parenthood. For Zhao, loneliness has long been part of her life. Her parents left her when she was young to find work, making her one of China’s “left-behind children”. “I’ve never really had a bestie, so I feel like I’m kind of lousy at making friends,” she says. Talking to AI is a way to “pour out my worries”. Another AI user, who asked to remain anonymous, also finds solace in talking to her AI. “In real life, the pace is fast, the pressure is already high. Only with my AI agent can I speak freely without restraint,” she says. “I’m begging, please don’t take down the Doubao AI agent,” she pleaded on social media in July. But talking to AI is now so commonplace that it would be hard for the government to end the practice entirely, and the new rules include large loopholes for AI services that are deemed educational or “which do not involve continuous emotional interaction”. The government “has already recognised that AI companions or AI-related applications are a vital part in the citizens’ everyday life”, says Liang Ge, a lecturer in digital sociology at the University of Manchester. In many sectors, the government is still pushing the use of AI as a way of easing looming demographic pressures. Last year the national health commission published guidelines on promoting AI in healthcare. It said that by 2030 health assistant apps would provide “full coverage” for primary healthcare. One popular health assistant is AQ, an app developed by Ant Group, an affiliate of the tech company Alibaba. It allows people to chat directly with avatars of real-life doctors from top hospitals in Beijing, Shanghai and other cities. Lü Di, a 33-year-old art tutor in the eastern city of Hangzhou, is a regular AQ user. She likes how detailed and instantaneous the advice on AQ is. “While some in-person doctors might not have the patience to answer questions, this isn’t an issue with AI doctors.” AQ says it wants to make health services more accessible and help free up overstretched doctors to focus on more complex cases. But some worry about being replaced by AI. “When AI first came along, quite a lot of doctors were concerned about whether their jobs would be replaced by AI,” says Chi Chenfei, a doctor at Renji hospital in Shanghai, who has partnered with AQ. “But I don’t think it’s about replacement. It’s more about helping doctors work more efficiently. “Concerns of any kind won’t stop technological progress.” Since losing her AI companion, Zhao has felt “like there’s a tiny pebble weighing on my heart”. But she says she understands the need for some regulation. “I consider myself a fairly rational person, yet I developed feelings for an AI, which feels pretty incredible. I think it was necessary for the state to step in and regulate it.”

picture of article

‘So hacked off’: as election nears, New Zealanders despair at the main parties – and Opportunity knocks

For decades, Mattie Wall mainly voted for Labour, one of New Zealand’s two major political parties. A former diplomat and project manager, the South Island-based retiree felt that the party with working class origins aligned with what was important to her: a thriving country, and the environment. This year she is among the New Zealanders who are peeling away from the Labour and National parties – which swing in and out of power every few terms – to vote for an untested party that has never held a parliamentary seat. “In the past, I didn’t feel the frustration I do now with politics,” said Wall, 76. “I’m so hacked off with both parties, with all parties really. We’ve got Trump 2.0, AI’s sudden [surge], increasing climate change impact – what are we waiting for, revolution or societal collapse? Clinging to the old ways ain’t gonna cut it.” As New Zealand prepares for an election in November, Wall is among the roughly 5-8% of people according to recent polls who plan to vote for relative newcomers the Opportunity party. For her, its policies, including a land tax and a $370 a week universal basic income, represent pragmatism; a shake-up, but a sensible one. She is also impressed by Opportunity’s leader, businesswoman Qiulae Wong. “She’s intelligent, thoughtful, moderate, unpretentious, she speaks lay language and she’s a realist.” Wong, 38, is a sustainability consultant and mother-of-two from Auckland who returned to New Zealand in 2022 after almost a decade working in London. Asked to define Opportunity, she said it looked to “market-driven solutions” while being committed to a low-emission future and evidence-based policy. The apparent rise of Opportunity – a self-described centrist party started three elections ago by economist and philanthropist Gareth Morgan – has injected an unexpected element of drama into the election race. The contest features a weakening right bloc, with National’s polling flagging at about 29%. National and Labour are seeing their lowest combined support in 30 years, mirroring an international trend of minor parties gaining votes and influence. Polls have Opportunity winning more than the 5% threshold of seats needed to enter parliament under New Zealand’s mixed member proportional (MMP) system. It means Opportunity could get to choose who governs. Christopher Luxon, the National leader and prime minister, has ruled out working with Opportunity. The Post newspaper reported Opportunity looks set to nab votes from the right and left. Of those who say they will vote Opportunity in November, 20% voted National at the last election, 17% Labour, 12% the Greens and 8% NZ First. Some put the shift down to a kind of mainstream malaise in New Zealand politics. “Voters are less attached to parties than they used to be, and they’re more likely to shop around during elections,” said Massey University political scientist Richard Shaw. “They’re peeling off from everywhere; people’s attachment to parties is more elastic and the deep tribalism has gone.” Voters spoken to by the Guardian reflected this sentiment. “I don’t understand how a lot of people are surviving right now and that’s what drives my vote,” said Wellingtonian Gemma, 41, a former Green voter who will vote Opportunity for the first time. “Things can’t keep going in this direction.” ‘Somewhere in the middle’ Wong, the Opportunity leader, told the Guardian that polling was better than hoped but the party took nothing for granted. People told her they were fed up with “pendulum politics” – different governments coming into power and undoing the work of the last government at great cost. “They’re looking for something different because they’re frustrated, particularly with Labour and National for not having any big ideas or stable leadership to tackle some of the biggest challenges that we’re facing as a country.” Wong said Opportunity would work with either party. New Zealanders needed stability when it came to climate legislation, healthcare funding models, and the education curriculum, she said. “It’s that back and forth which seems to be really holding us back in all aspects of New Zealand society … the solution is often somewhere in the middle.” Responding to criticism of Opportunity’s land tax proposal as untenable and liable to create fresh inequalities – the former Labour leader Helen Clark calls it “fantasy posing as policy” – Wong said the economy had to change and 70% of New Zealanders would be better off under the plan. It would introduce a tax of 1.75% on urban and 0.5% on rural land, is modelled to pull in NZ$24bn which would be used for the ‘citizen’s income,’ and is designed to drive house prices down by 10-15%. She did not expect it to happen immediately. “I’m realistic that as a new party coming into parliament demanding tax reform overnight is pretty unlikely. If we can get around the table with the other parties, there’s elements of this that will appeal to both the left and the right. It’s about supporting people who really need it.” Politics in New Zealand has historically been a two-party duopoly. Previously, the first past the post (FPP) voting system allowed parties to more easily win the majority of the house and govern alone. Since the introduction of New Zealand’s MMP system in 1996, voters get a party and an electorate vote. The first mainly determines how many seats a party gets in parliament. With 51% needed for a clear win, small parties often hold the balance of power. At the 2023 election, centre-right National got 38% of the vote, meaning it needed the New Zealand First and Act parties to form a coalition government. In August, Luxon said on Newstalk ZB that he was open to holding a referendum on MMP, saying he wanted as many National ministers in cabinet as possible for a stable government, and not some “yahoo or numpty”. He denied he was talking about his current coalition partners, but many saw it as his growing frustration at managing them. He later told the Post it would be a “check-in” on democracy, as well as gauging support for a four-year governmental term. Shaw said the halcyon days for major parties had passed, and both Luxon and Labour party leader Chris Hipkins would be feeling the pressure of declining support. “They’re not the most successful any more, partly because of MMP but just because people shop around way more and the base vote for National and Labour is never going to be at 40% ever again.” Smaller parties were eating into major party territory. For example, the David Seymour-led Act party, with 0.5% of the vote in 2017, had received $1.8m in donations this year – just behind National – and was polling at 9%. With its positioning, Opportunity could continue to gain votes from everywhere – even if their centrism was a tactic, he said. “They’re quite clearly soft-left, they’re using the language of reconciliation and evidence and appealing to a different kind of political DNA in people and they’re resonating. They could absolutely kick on.” Still, some will always play it safe. Christine Hands, 77, who voted Labour in her first election in 1972, and for Jacinda Ardern twice, would never vote for a minority party. “I’ve never been a splinter party person. I’ll vote for National or Labour, depending on which is best for the country.” This time, for her, that’s National; a safe pair of hands who “haven’t mucked things up too much”. As for Opportunity? “I can see they’re quite charming, and people are thinking ‘a plague on both parties’, but their policies are as mad as a meat axe,” she said. “Then again, we survive everything. We always have.”

picture of article

China denounces US threat of sanctions over trade with Iran

China has denounced the threat of US sanctions for its trade with Iran, saying any such measures would be illegal, and warned it would take “all necessary measures” to protect its national interests. Beijing’s rejection of the US threat of secondary sanctions for any country or entity continuing to trade with Tehran had been predicted. China buys an estimated 80% of Iran’s oil exports and has defied previous US efforts to limit the flow of revenue to the Tehran regime. Its statement of opposition raises the question of how far the Trump administration would be prepared to go in confronting China and its financial system in the drive to isolate Iran. In making the sanctions threat on Monday, the US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, announced an initial set of sanctions on 60 individuals, entities and vessels for alleged involvement in trade with Iran, but there were no Chinese financial institutions on the list, despite their involvement in financing the Iranian oil trade. The omission reflected US caution. Asked why the Trump administration had not declared immediate sanctions and had stopped short of naming potential sanctions targets, Bessent replied: “Why would I want to blow up the global financial system?” Financial and trade experts say the administration is well aware of the risk of Chinese retaliation before a scheduled summit next month between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping. China could strike back through financial markets or with limits on its export of critical minerals. The spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, Lin Jian, told reporters on Tuesday: “Cooperation between China and Iran has always been conducted within the framework of international law and should not be interfered with or disrupted. “China has already stated many times that it firmly opposes illegal unilateral sanctions. China will take all necessary measures to firmly safeguard its own rights and interests.” Iran has been economically wrecked by the war and the accompanying US blockade, but it maintained its defiance in response to Bessent’s threats of total isolation. The economy minister, Ali Madanizadeh, said on state television: “Our defence is no longer so defensive; the enemies should wait for an attack.” An oil tanker was reportedly hit on Tuesday by an unidentified projectile at the mouth of the strait of Hormuz. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Centre said the crew was safe and no environmental damage was immediately apparent. Only two commercial vessels were reported to have successfully made the transit through the narrow waterway on Monday. Iran and Oman, which sits on the southern shore of the strait, held talks on Tuesday aimed at agreeing joint management of the waterway between the two countries. Oman’s foreign minister, Badr al-Busaidi, said after the discussions had concluded that there were hopes that a temporary agreed route through the strait would be announced soon. A Pakistani delegation was also in Tehran, leaving on Tuesday after a day’s talks with Iranian leaders. The delegation was headed by the army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, who has led Pakistan’s mediation efforts in the Iran conflict. The Pakistani military said the Tehran talks were focused on reopening the strait of Hormuz. A memorandum signed by the US and Iran in June was intended to reopen the strait pending further negotiations but the deal collapsed within weeks. The declaration of what Bessent called Operation Economic Outcast suggests the prospects of a resolution to the conflict with Iran are still remote. It also suggests a lean towards economic measures and away from military force after a six-month war that has not brought about the intended Iranian capitulation. Oil prices fell about 4% to a one-week low on Tuesday after the US sanctions announcement, as traders appeared to see economic pressure as posing less risk to oil supplies than further military escalation. But the price per barrel of about $87 remained far above the prewar average. The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said further military action was not off the table. “By no means are we foreclosing using ‌kinetic strikes anywhere in the strait of Hormuz or around Iran,” he ⁠told reporters on Monday. Bessent called the sanctions campaign unprecedented and compared it to the D-day Normandy landings, a turning point in the second world war. “Today, in that same spirit, we are launching an economic onslaught against Iran’s financial connections around the globe,” he said. “Our objective is to sever every economic lifeline that sustains this tyrannical regime until Tehran stands alone.” He said the US had identified those that continued to deal with Iran and each violator would be given a deadline to cut ties or face US sanctions. He said the deadlines imposed would depend on individual circumstances. “Any entity that facilitates money laundering on behalf of Iran will be removed from the US dollar system,” he said. “The clock just started ticking.” Bessent said Trump was “making phone calls to world leaders with specific requests to cease their interactions with the regime”, but he did not specify whether the US president would talk to his Chinese counterpart. Sina Toossi, a senior non-resident fellow at the Center for International Policy, said: “After nearly six months without a military or diplomatic victory, Washington appears to be trying to accomplish through intensified economic strangulation what military force has so far failed to achieve. But Tehran is answering that zero-sum approach with one of its own.” In apparent anticipation of the US measures, the United Arab Emirates, a close US and Israeli ally, announced it was suspending trade ties with Iran. Turkey, another trading partner with Iran, which has been critical of the US-led campaign against the Islamic Republic, has yet to respond to the US threat of sanctions. Andrew Miller, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, said: “The announcement of new economic sanctions on Iran and those countries trading with it signals what is plain to all: this war has brought the United States no closer to eliminating Iran’s nuclear programme or crippling the Iranian regime. But while sanctions can be effective, it is highly unlikely they will produce a quick settlement favourable to the United States.”

picture of article

Burnham to take Zelenskyy’s pleas for Patriot missiles to Trump – as it happened

The Guardian’s liveblog coverage of events across Europe is coming to an end for today. Here’s a round-up of the key events: US CIA director John Ratcliffe is visiting Moscow for meetings, US media said, after flight data showed an American military aircraft landed in Moscow. There was no immediate comment from the CIA or the White House. Data from Flightradar earlier showed a US military C-17 traveling from the United States to Latvia and then Moscow. The same tracker showed the plane leaving Moscow this afternoon. Andy Burnham to take Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s pleas for Patriot missiles to Donald Trump following Kyiv visit. Burnham said he was “really optimistic” that Ukraine’s interceptor shortage was “fixable”, but added: “There are other players who could help in the mix who we have influence with. It’s probably going to be a solution that involves a lot of layers and a lot of negotiation.” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has accused Burnham of wanting the conflict in Ukraine to continue, saying the UK prime minister and Finnish president Alexander Stubb belonged to the “party of war”. During a visit to Kyiv yesterday, Stubb said he supported Ukraine’s long-range strikes on Russian territory, arguing that they could raise the cost of war for Russia and help force Moscow to the negotiating table. Perpetrators behind German airport drone bomb plot “will pay”, says chancellor Friedrich Merz about the attempted drone attack on Leipzig airport earlier this month. Merz said Germany has “increasingly come into the crosshairs of hybrid attackers” and that perpetrators must face consequences. “They will pay for it,” Merz said. German investigators uncovered a third drone and suspected military explosives thought to be connected to an attempted attack on Leipzig airport, local media have reported. The drone was discovered in Kabelsketal, just to the west of the airport, along with about 50g (1.8oz) of a suspected military explosive on 14 August, 10 days after the unsuccessful sabotage. In France, dozens of people were injured and thousands of homes were without power after a tornado wreaked havoc south of the country. A tornado tore through the village of Pomas in the Aude region, damaging about 300 homes and injuring 39 people.

picture of article

US Catholic churches see a record number of conversions: ‘It’s a real shift’

Alicia Martinez pulls on an oversized, chocolate-brown leather jacket – an incongruous choice for the July heat in Los Angeles. Later that day, she plans to see The Odyssey in a frigid theater. But first, there is mass. Martinez, 24, enters Our Savior Parish, the castle-like church beside her workplace, the University of Southern California. Inside, she dips her fingers in holy water, makes the sign of the cross on her forehead, and enters the main part of the church in hushed reverence. Seated in the pews, backed by the dancing light of stained-glass windows, she’s flanked by faith of all ages. Some wear chapel veils. Others sport USC-branded apparel. All huddle shoulder-to-shoulder. At summer’s peak at USC, a secular university synonymous with Hollywood and Trojan football, another institution is quietly gaining ground: the Catholic church. More than a year ago, the Catholic faith called to her like “a pounding noise in her heart”, Martinez said, even though she has Protestant roots. This year, she completed the Order of Christian Initiation of Adults program (OCIA), the Catholic church’s formal initiation process for adults. The parish growth mirrors a larger trend. In April, when the Catholic church traditionally registers new members, the Archdiocese of Los Angeles reported 8,598 people preparing to be baptized or formally entering the church – the highest number of reported initiations for an archdiocese in the US, and a 54% increase from 2025. Across the US, the number of adults entering the Catholic church has climbed each year since the pandemic-low, according to a survey of dioceses. The increases have prompted talk of a religious revival. But experts say it’s too early to call it a trend. Religious disaffiliation and conversion are always in flux, says Michele Dillon, a sociology professor and dean of the College of Liberal Arts at the University of New Hampshire. Still, it’s an interesting moment for the church in the US, after decades of declining religious affiliation. Our Savior baptized 16 people this year, a record high, said Father Matt Wheeler, the pastor. Sixty-nine people enrolled in its OCIA program, a 57% increase from last year. Mass attendance grew so significantly that church leaders have, on occasion, redirected worshippers to an overflow area to watch a live stream. During mass, Wheeler often looks out at the sea of student faces and marvels to himself, “Wow. Nobody dragged these young adults here.” Martinez said that for her, the call of Catholicism was amplified by the loneliness of living in a big city, where she felt battles of good and evil were constantly unfolding before her eyes. “There’s so much wrong in the world,” said Martinez. She was drawn to Matthew’s Gospel, she said, which warns that as lawlessness increases, people’s love for one another will grow cold. For 20-year-old Kathryn Glavin, too, global crises – including war, injustice and division – lent urgency to the search for steadier ground in faith. For most of her life, she considered herself agnostic. Then, two years ago, the UC Santa Barbara student began noticing the Catholic church’s charitable work in her community. “I feel like it’s a dark time for a lot of people in the world,” said Glavin. “And I think that naturally is going to get people who reach for the light.” In April, Glavin was baptized at St. Mark’s University Parish in Isla Vista, a student enclave cradled by UC Santa Barbara and the Pacific Ocean. At St Mark’s, interest in Catholicism is blossoming, said Father Ryan Thornton. Established in 1965 to serve UC Santa Barbara, a secular university, the church is located between three fraternity houses – right in the middle of student life. At first, the parish understood the growing interest in Catholicism as part of a Covid-era holdover when church gatherings were temporarily restricted. But six years later, the parish has seen its largest initiation class – 56 people, said Thornton. “That clearly can’t be about the pandemic because the difference is too far,” said Thornton. “So, then the question is, ‘Well, what’s happening now?’” Once popular reasons to join the Catholic church, such as family pressure or a plan to marry a Catholic partner, have largely fallen away. Today, becoming Catholic is an active choice, said Thornton. He and other church leaders suspect the new generations of faithful, many raised by non-religious parents, have emerged spiritually hungry from a steady diet of social media reels and Love Island watch parties. Catholicism offers a counterweight: rituals and a history that reaches far beyond the algorithm. “In some ways, the superficiality of our society – the Instagrammable life – has been tried and found wanting,” said Thornton. The increase in initiations in Los Angeles and Santa Barbara is set against a backdrop of a decades-long national shift away from organized religion. For decades, Catholicism in the US has lost more people than it has gained through religious switching – people who move to another religious tradition or no religion – according to Pew Research Center studies. But the “nones” – people who identify as atheist, agnostic, or “nothing in particular” – have leveled off in recent years, according to another Pew Research study. Even if the increase in new Catholics reflects a new national shift, one strong year cannot reverse decades of gradual decline, said Maureen Day, a sociologist and theologian. Still, Day said, the local data could signal that religion is appealing to people in new ways – and the losses could begin to reverse. What could signal a true reversal is sustained participation in church life, said Day. But that is difficult to track, especially at university parishes, where students graduate and move away. No one calls their former pastor to report that they are still going to church, Thornton said. Publicly available data do not show which parishes drove the archdiocese-wide increase. But Dillon said parishes’ increases shouldn’t be dismissed. “It’s real,” said Dillon. “It’s a real observable shift in those individual parishes and dioceses.” Catholicism, with its centuries of tradition, elaborate rituals and thicket of rules, can intimidate newcomers. But parish leaders said it’s helped that participants these days have more accessible entry points. They listen to Father Mike Schmitz’s podcasts. They can pray in the car with their Hallow app. And they can watch Bishop Robert Barron’s YouTube channel. Our Savior Parish leaders are intentional about making the gospel relatable to a younger audience, said Wheeler. At a July mass, he referred the congregation to his latest Instagram reel. John Ceballos said that what’s made a difference for him is the gentler message at Our Savior Parish. Ceballos was baptized Catholic, but he stopped practicing in his 20s, in part, because of the fire-and-brimstone messaging. “It was like, ‘Oh, here we go. You know, we’re all going to hell,’” says Ceballos with a laugh. Now, at Our Savior Parish, he says mass is all about love and community. “Now, everybody’s good. Everybody’s a child of God.” This year, Ceballos, 50, was the oldest participant in Our Savior’s OCIA program. The age gap became a running joke: Do you even know what a fax machine is? But when they began studying Catholic teachings, the age gap fell away: everyone was a beginner. Near the end of mass at Our Savior Parish, Catholics come forward in a communion procession to receive what the church teaches is the body and blood of Christ. Even in the summer, when many USC students are away, the procession threads along the entire length of the church. As it stretches on, people kneeling in prayer shift on their knees. Others sit. Aidan Freire has attended mass at Our Savior Parish for two years. Although another parish is less than a mile away, he is drawn to this one because of its energy. “I feel like this parish is really good because everyone’s young,” said Freire, 19. To him, the clearest measure of the parish’s draw comes during Communion, which is reminiscent of another experience. “It’s like a TSA security line.”

picture of article

‘An enchanting oasis’: Venetian island with Napoleonic fort up for sale

An island in the Venice lagoon boasting a Napoleonic fort and lush gardens is up for sale. Described as an “enchanting oasis of peace and beauty”, Crevan offers a “spectacular view” of Venice’s main island, but is far from its crowds. Located a few minutes by boat from the islands of Burano and Torcello and just slightly smaller than the size of a standard football pitch, Crevan was built in 1806 by the French military during the Napoleonic era as a strategic outpost to defend the northern Venetian lagoon from the Austrian empire. But in 1815 the island fell under Austrian rule before passing to the Italian state in 1866, after the annexation of Veneto to the Kingdom of Italy. Crevan continued to serve a military purpose until after the first world war. After years of neglect, it was bought by a private owner and its buildings restored as residential properties. Its most prominent feature is the Napoleonic fort, converted by the current owner into a small villa with four bedrooms and surrounded manicured lawns and vegetable and fruit gardens and trees. There is also a private mooring along the island’s small internal canal, and a helipad. Crevan has been listed for sale by several top property agencies, including Lionard Luxury Real Estate and Dimora Italian Real Estate, an affiliate of Christie’s International. The asking price, however, is strictly reserved for interested buyers. “Crevan offers the privilege of withdrawing from the world without ever leaving the universal allure of Venice,” Dimitri Corti, the founder and chief executive of Lionard Luxury Real Estate, said in a press release. “What one acquires is not simply a residence and a piece of land, but space, privacy and an entire landscape to preserve.” But Crevan has competition. Isola Santa Cristina, another island in the Venetian lagoon that for decades was owned by the heir to the Swarovski crystal empire, was put up for sale at about €24m in June. The luxury retreat comes with a huge villa, a saltwater swimming pool and vineyards. An octagonal-shaped island close to the Venice lido and dating back to the 1500s, when it was built as a defence post by the Republic of Venice, is also on the market.