Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: Trump says Iran negotiations could resume in ‘next two days’; US talks between Lebanon and Israel end

More than two-thirds of American farmers say they cannot afford to purchase enough fertiliser to get through the year, according to a new survey from the American Farm Bureau Federation. Of the more than 5,700 farmers who took the survey, representing every US state and Puerto Rico, 70% said fertiliser has become so expensive they will not be able to buy enough for the year. Farmers in the south have been hit hardest, followed by the north-east, west and then midwest. “Spring planting decisions depend heavily on access to fertiliser and diesel fuel, both of which have been impacted by geopolitical risks that have disrupted global markets,” the Market Intel states. “Since the escalation of tensions in the Middle East, nitrogen fertiliser prices have risen more than 30%, while combined fuel and fertiliser costs have increased roughly 20% to 40%.” Ninety-four percent of farmers said their financial situation has worsened or remained the same since last year.

picture of article

Cuba could beat US energy blockade with $8bn investment in renewables, says thinktank

Cuba could beat the US’s crippling energy blockade for ever with just an $8bn investment in renewable energy. And the rest of the world should pay for it. Those are the bold claims of a thinktank analysis of the embattled socialist republic’s energy policy, which claims that Cuba could show its Caribbean neighbours the way to a green energy future. Just $8bn (£5.9bn) could fund the buildout of enough renewable energy to cover 93.4% of Cuba’s electricity generation needs, the report claims. For less than $20bn, Cuba could become the first country in the Caribbean to have a grid powered entirely by renewables. The proposals come as Cuba endures weeks of an energy blockade imposed by the US on the island and its communist-run government, which Washington claims has a “malign influence” on the region. Since January, Cuba has received just one shipment of oil, from Russia, after Donald Trump signed an executive order threatening trade tariffs on any country that sold oil to the island nation. By March, its national electric grid had collapsed, with its 10 million people enduring repeated blackouts. Hospital intensive care units lost power, and transport and industry ground to a halt, as Trump boasted: “I do believe I’ll be … having the honour of taking Cuba.” Analysis by the Common Wealth thinktank’s Transition Security Project (TSP) outlines how Cuba could gain complete energy independence from its volatile neighbour by transforming its grid to run from renewable energy, which would not only eliminate its vulnerability but also serve as a model for the region. “The US’s energy dominance strategy seeks to entrench dependence on fossil fuels, stall the green transition and strengthen US power,” said Kevin Cashman, a researcher with TSP, who wrote the analysis. But increasingly cheap and scalable solar power and battery storage weaken such a strategy. “For countries like Cuba – with enormous renewable potential, but suffering blackouts and widespread suffering under a cruel and illegal US-imposed energy blockade – a transition to green electricity would reduce US leverage and provide a shining example to the world.” Modelling four different scenarios, the TSP analysis found that a fully renewable grid for Cuba would cost $19.2bn, but an $8bn investment would be sufficient to end the country’s reliance on imported fossil fuels. Even a $5bn rollout would reduce Cuba’s reliance on fossil fuels to just a fifth of electricity generation. Under the most ambitious proposal, three-quarters of electricity generation would be provided by solar, with a fifth coming from wind and the remainder provided by hydropower and bioenergy. Cheaper scenarios would have greater reliance on bioenergy and wind. “Electricity is cheaper in every renewable investment scenario than in business as usual: the cost per unit of energy falls from 14.3¢ per kWh in the baseline scenario to 12.1¢ with $1bn of investment, 7.3¢ with $5bn, 6.5¢ with $8bn, and 9.9¢ in the fully renewable case,” the report said. The transition would require a society-wide transformation, but Cuba has managed that before: after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 90s, the country rapidly transformed its agricultural system towards agroecology and self-sufficiency. In the past year, the Cuban government has already brought more than 1,000MW of solar online with Chinese financing and assistance. Which leaves the question: who would pay? “Financing this transition should … be understood as reparative climate finance,” the report argues. Not only would Cubans be able to pay back investments through savings on cheaper energy, but the transformation “would set an important example of a rapid energy transition under conditions of external constraint”.

picture of article

UK to call for end to Sudan bloodshed at Berlin talks on third anniversary of war

The British foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper, will urge Sudan’s warring parties to “cease bloodshed” during a major conference on Wednesday, which analysts believe is unlikely to deliver a significant step towards peace. The talks in Berlin – held on the third anniversary of the start of Sudan’s ruinous war – are expected to help address a catastrophic funding shortfall that is compounding the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. Overall, just 16% of the humanitarian funding needed for Sudan this year has been provided by the international community as the crisis in Iran continues to dominate diplomatic channels. Britain is among the countries attending the conference that are set to announce new funding for Sudan. Cooper will unveil a doubling of UK aid to £15m for Sudanese frontline responders such as the grassroots volunteer network known as Emergency Response Rooms. With the war now entering its fourth year, and with no sign of hostilities abating between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese army, latest assessments indicate more than 19 million people face acute hunger as a result of the fighting, while some areas are at risk of famine. The latest assessment from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) found “emergency” levels of hunger across much of North Kordofan, West Kordofan, South Kordofan and North Darfur, while levels in some communities remained “catastrophic”. It added that emergency levels of hunger were expected to spread over the coming months and that the number of people needing humanitarian aid was expected to reach 22-23 million. Despite the scale of the suffering, Cooper hopes that an end to the fighting is achievable. “Today, in Berlin, I will call for the international community to join in a shared resolve: to secure a ceasefire and a diplomatic solution, to stop the suffering, and allow the people of Sudan to determine their own peaceful future,” she said. Political momentum appears to have stalled as sources say talks between the so-called Quad nations, headed by the US along with Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which back the army, and the UAE, the RSF’s principal patron, have failed to yield “meaningful progress”. Relations between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi in particular have deteriorated with acrimony emerging after clashes in Yemen over their respective proxy forces in December. However, the expected appearance in Berlin of Donald Trump’s political adviser on Africa, Massad Boulos, has prompted hopes that they can be galvanised. One source attending the conference said: “We don’t expect anything major, certainly not on the political level.” In the absence of any diplomatic breakthrough, the expert consensus is that Sudan’s war will worsen, particularly in the Kordofan region, which is at the centre of the fighting. Paul Byars, Sudan director of the Danish Refugee Council, said: “I think there’ll be a worsening of the conflict in the Kordofan. Neither side will give up, which means they’ll keep taking and retaking territory.” Technology is also likely to intensify bloodshed, with the increasing use of drones meaning that the traditional halt in fighting during Sudan’s imminent rainy season is less likely. On Tuesday the UN said nearly 700 civilians have been reported killed in drone strikes in Sudan since January.

picture of article

Chiang Mai’s New Year revelry hit by smog and war-related price spikes

The Doi Suthep temple in northern Thailand is known for its spectacular views of Chiang Mai and the lush forested mountains that surround it. Over recent weeks, though, visitors can see little of the city beyond a thick cloud of grey haze. Persistent wildfires have caused intense air pollution across the north of Thailand, forcing three provinces to declare emergencies and triggering spikes in pollution-related illnesses. The haze is yet another blow to tourism businesses already affected by the US-Israel war on Iran, which has disrupted flights and driven up operating costs, prompting Thailand’s tourism authority to revise down the national target for international arrivals by as much as 18%. But people fear the pollution crisis could have an even more costly impact on their businesses. “Chiang Mai’s selling point is the chance to stay in the mountains, breathing fresh air. But when the dust comes, it destroys everything,” says Pitsamai Tuprit, 37, who runs the tour company Kai Rider travel. The haze has plagued Chiang Mai for weeks in the run-up to Songkran, Thailand’s new year holiday, a key tourism date, which started on Monday. In the city centre, the streets are lined with shops selling water pistols and plastic buckets for tourists taking part in Songkran’s famous water fights. Business groups have warned of a slowdown in bookings ahead of the festival, and tour operators such as Pitsamai say they have lost customers because of the pollution. Half of her customers have cancelled over recent weeks, she says. She has cancelled most tours during the Songkran holiday because “it isn’t worth it, with the traffic and gas prices”. The authorities have deployed artificial rain to try to clear the haze, but the pollution has persisted. On Monday, Thailand’s Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency, which tracks the fires, reported 4,579 wildfire hotspots across the country. Chiang Mai remains among the world’s top five most-polluted cities monitored by the group IQAir. The air pollution is a recurring annual problem, caused by wildfires and by farmers setting fire to their fields to quickly clear the land after harvesting. The practice is illegal but campaigners say it continues to happen because farmers, who are often contracted to supply large agribusinesses, lack expensive machinery. “It’s linked to the financial strain that they’re under,” says Weenarin Lulitanonda, the co-founder of the Thailand Clean Air Network. “What is cheaper than a matchstick to manage these things?” High-profile cases, where people have been diagnosed with lung cancer, have shaken the public in Chiang Mai. Among them was Krittai Tanasombatkul, a 29-year-old doctor and clean-air campaigner, who died in 2023. He had never smoked and lived a healthy lifestyle, exercising, sleeping and eating well, media reported at the time. “I’m very sensitive when I hear about cancer, especially after the news of the doctor’s death,” says Pathanika Poonchai, who sells food at a school. “I don’t drink, I don’t smoke. So I feel, why should I be at risk of getting lung cancer? We should all have clean air.” Since the end of March, her five-year-old daughter Aerin has had daily nose bleeds – a common symptom for children living with air pollution, say doctors. A particularly heavy nosebleed this month felt like a wake-up call, she says. “Have we just accepted this situation as normal, when this is not how it should be?” Growing up in picturesque Chiang Mai, she remembers enjoying camping with her family, and sitting outside chatting until evening time – something that is no longer possible during the annual haze season. Instead, her children are kept indoors with air purifiers turned on. The family sets money aside so they can travel to the seaside to escape the dust every year. “I feel sad, I feel bad that they have to breathe in this polluted air. I know that in the long run, it will definitely have some kind of effect on their health,” she says. Some families send their children away to other provinces. Those who have the means to do so install positive pressure systems in their homes to filter the air, though this is extremely costly. Atikun Limsukon, a doctor specialising in chest and lung care, who runs a private clinic, says his patient caseload has more than doubled over recent weeks. “Even usually healthy people get sick and have acute effects from the very polluted air,” he says, giving a long inventory of possible effects – from blurry vision and even corneal ulcers, to nosebleeds and chronic rhinitis. Patients with underlying conditions are especially vulnerable. It is depressing, he says, to see people who were previously stable being readmitted, coughing up blood, and requiring oxygen. “The more air pollution and the longer the time of exposure, there’s going to be more health impacts, both short term and long term,” he adds. Limsukon says there is more and more evidence linking pollution not only to cancer, but also strokes, metabolic problems like diabetes and even neurocognitive problems and dementia. The Clean Air Network is pushing for a Thai Clean Air bill to be pushed into law, which would levy fines against big polluters, with money used to form a Clean Air Fund that will in turn help businesses transition to cleaner technologies. The bill has faced numerous legislative challenges, however, and faces opposition from groups that have labelled it anti-business. Weenarin says a failure to act will, in fact, be economically damaging. “Even if you don’t care about the environment, this is the goose that will lay your golden egg,” she says. Tourists travel to Thailand to experience its landscapes and beauty, she adds. “They come for the nature.”

picture of article

US-Iran peace talks could resume in next two days, Trump says

Donald Trump has said that US-Iranian peace talks could resume in Islamabad over the next two days, and complimented the work of Pakistan’s army chief as mediator. The US president was speaking on Tuesday to a New York Post reporter who had gone to Islamabad for the first round of ceasefire talks over the weekend. After an interview discussing prospects for negotiations, the reporter said the president had called her back “with an update”. “You should stay there, really, because something could be happening over the next two days, and we’re more inclined to go there,” Trump said. He added that Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, was doing a “great job” in arranging the talks. “He’s fantastic, and therefore it’s more likely that we go back there,” Trump said. Munir is a powerful figure in Pakistan and has good relations with Trump, who has called him his “favourite field marshal”, and with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. A Pakistani official said on Tuesday that he expected talks to restart soon, but it may take a day or two longer than Trump suggested. “The game is on,” the official said. Islamabad is racing to arrange a meeting date that provides enough time for negotiations before the two-week ceasefire ends on Wednesday 22 April. Trump’s comments followed a wave of speculation about a new round of negotiations, after 21 hours of talks on the weekend. Those ended with the US vice-president, JD Vance, walking out on Sunday morning, claiming that Iran had failed to make an “affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon”. After the talks ended, Trump declared a US naval blockade on ships using Iranian ports in the Gulf in an effort to increase pressure on the country’s economy, and as a counter to Iran’s near-total closure of the strait of Hormuz to ships using other Gulf ports soon after the US-Israeli attack began on 28 February. US Central Command reported that over a 24-hour period “no ships made it past the US blockade and six merchant vessels complied with direction from US forces to turn around to re-enter an Iranian port on the Gulf of Oman”. Independent reports confirmed that some tankers that had been approaching the strait on Monday had turned around; one tanker, the Rich Starry, reversed course again and passed through the waterway. The closure of the strait, a gateway through which a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas flows, had led to a spike in oil prices well above $100 a barrel. Crude prices dipped to about $95 after reports of a possible second round of talks on Tuesday. Meanwhile, Israel and Lebanon have held unprecedented negotiations in Washington about the cross-border conflict, which erupted as a consequence of the US-Israeli attack on Iran. Hezbollah sided with Iran and launched rockets at Israel, which responded with intense bombardment of Beirut and other cities, and launched an invasion of southern Lebanon. In a statement after the two-hour session ended, the US state department praised the two sides for what it called “productive discussions on steps toward launching direct negotiations between Israel and Lebanon”. Hezbollah has said it will not abide by any agreements made by Israeli and Lebanese government negotiators in Washington. Asked about the possible restart of US-Iranian talks, Vance appeared to be open to the possibility. “The big question from here on out is whether Iranians will have enough flexibility,” he told Fox News on Monday evening. He said Iran had shown some flexibility in Islamabad but “didn’t move far enough”. On the question of whether there would be additional talks, he replied it was a question that would be “best put to the Iranians”. US reports on the Islamabad talks said the key sticking point had been the demand from Vance’s delegation for a 20-year suspension of Iran’s enrichment of uranium. Iran was reportedly offering a shorter moratorium, of less than 10 years. An Iranian official accused the US delegation of making maximalist demands at the Islamabad talks. “Iran did not surrender at the battlefield, neither will it surrender behind the table,” the official said. It is unclear where negotiations stood when the Islamabad meeting broke up over the other major proliferation concern: Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium (HEU). It is close to weapons-grade purity and is believed to be buried in deep shafts under mountains in central Iran. At negotiations in Geneva before the war, Iran offered to dilute the HEU, which would extend the period it would take to produce a nuclear warhead, but the US has called for its complete removal. A Pakistani official said Iran was insisting that Vance lead the Iranian delegation to any future talks, as Tehran does not trust Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as reliable interlocutors. Senior officials from Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey were in Islamabad on Tuesday for talks with Pakistani officials on the next moves in mediating the conflict. Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, is due to depart on Wednesday on a trip to Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar to build support for the peace process, and to seek help with proposals to reopen the strait of Hormuz and discuss Iran’s demand for war reparations. Sharif’s regional tour might have to be cut short, however, if there is a quick return to the negotiating table.

picture of article

‘A pope who uses his brain’: Vatican locals and visitors take sides in Leo v Trump spat

On the wall of the back room of an optician’s in Borgo Pio, a neighbourhood in Rome that borders the Vatican, hang the photos of five popes dating back to the late 1970s, charting both the recent history of Catholic church leaders and the shop itself. As its owner, Walter Colantini, who fitted glasses for one of the pontiffs, gestured towards them, he recalled the diplomatic strain between the Vatican and White House over the 1991 Gulf war. But, he said, nothing compared to the rupture provoked by Donald Trump in response to Pope Leo’s criticisms of the US-Israeli strikes on Iran. In a tirade on social media, Trump said Leo, the first ever US pontiff, was “weak on crime” and “terrible on foreign policy” and was only elected pope because Trump himself was in the White House. Trump then shared an AI-generated image of himself depicted as Christ-like before deleting it. “Trump is off the wall, he has no limits,” said Colantini. It is a sentiment shared by fellow shopkeepers in Borgo Pio, who have a long history of providing services to the Vatican, as they struggle to absorb the deterioration in its relations with Washington. Trump’s outburst was followed by the US vice-president, JD Vance, a Catholic, telling Fox News the Vatican should “stick to morality” and church affairs and let the president “stick to dictating US public policy”. Raniero Mancinelli, a tailor who produces ecclesiastical robes and jewellery, said: “The issue with Trump is that we don’t know what he is thinking or doing from one day to the next. He is saying and doing very strange things. When he was elected, he spoke about peace and ending wars, instead the world is in this very worrying situation.” People visiting St Peter’s Square on Tuesday were also troubled by the clash and expressed solidarity with Leo. “Trump has crossed every moral border, but I am no longer surprised,” said Andries DeWinter, a choir director from Belgium. “He insisted on making America great again, but instead he’s sinking it. Pope Leo, on the other hand, speaks with truth, value and meaning – the total opposite to Trump.” Rhoda, a visitor from the UK, said: “Trump is just out for himself. I think Leo is great and I just hope he keeps standing up to him.” However, two US Catholics who the Guardian spoke to said that while they respected the pope and the church, they supported Trump. “We want peace but we believe he’s making the world safe,” said Susan. “He is a little arrogant, but that’s just the way he is.” Leo, considered more mild-mannered and tactful than his often hasty and divisive predecessor, Francis, was elected pope in May last year and since then has moved from careful stewardship, such as urging ceasefires and diplomacy to end wars, to striking a bolder moral tone. He has increasingly condemned the US-Israeli war in Iran and wider conflict in the Middle East, especially after Trump’s threat last week to wipe out “a whole civilisation” in Iran. The church’s cardinals have also made harsh criticisms. In an interview with CBS on Monday night, Trump confirmed he lashed out at Leo after watching an interview with three influential US cardinals on the networks’s 60 Minutes who called out Trump’s policies and backed up Leo’s remarks. “He’s wrong on the issues,” Trump said. “I don’t think he should be getting into politics. I think he probably learned that from this.” But Leo is not expected to back down. In response to Trump’s verbal attack, he said he did not fear the US administration and would continue to speak out against war. The clash generated widespread solidarity towards the pontiff from European politicians across the spectrum. Italy’s prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, one of Trump’s main allies in Europe, said the president’s remarks towards Leo were “unacceptable”. In response, in an interview with the Italian daily Corriere della Sera on Tuesday, Trump said Meloni was the one who was “unacceptable” due to her unwillingness to join the Iran war. “I’m shocked at her. I thought she had courage, but I was wrong,” he said. It has taken some Italian Catholics time to get used to Leo, especially after the era of Francis, who was admired for his humble yet charismatic demeanour. “But Leo has been a good pope so far, very calm,” said Mancinelli. Colantani said Leo differed in style from his predecessor, but was possibly more effective. “Leo was chosen for the role because he’s the right person to lead the church during this period,” he said. “He needs to act in order to find peace in a world where there is war. I really like him; from what he says in his declarations and homilies, he’s a pope who uses his brain.”

picture of article

Trump accuses ally Meloni of lacking courage for not joining attacks on Iran

Donald Trump lashed out at one of his closest allies on Tuesday, saying Italy’s Giorgia Meloni lacked courage in light of her failure to join the US in attacking Iran. “I’m shocked at her. I thought she had courage, but I was wrong,” the US president said in an interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera. The attack came as Meloni said that her far-right government would suspend the automatic renewal of its defence cooperation agreement with Israel “in light of the current situation”. “Giorgia Meloni doesn’t want to help us in the war. I’m shocked,” Trump said. “Do people like the fact that your president isn’t doing anything to get the oil [in Iran]? Does she like it? I can’t imagine.” Tensions between Italy and the US have intensified in recent days after criticism from Trump directed at Pope Leo, marking a dramatic shift in relations between the US president and Meloni, whose political alliance and personal rapport had long been openly embraced – with the Italian leader having said earlier this year that she hoped he would one day receive the Nobel peace prize. Trump said he did not think the Chicago-born pontiff was “doing a very good job”, while also suggesting he should “stop catering to the radical left”. Meloni criticised remarks by Trump targeting the pope, calling them “unacceptable”. She added that she would not feel comfortable in a society where religious leaders were expected to follow the direction of political leaders. “She is the one who is unacceptable,” Trump replied, “because she doesn’t care if Iran has a nuclear weapon and would blow up Italy in two minutes if it had the chance.” Despite the diplomatic strain, Meloni described Washington as a “priority ally”. But, she added, alliances require candour: “When you are friends, particularly strategic allies, you must also have the courage to say when you disagree.” Italy’s government has entered a turbulent phase in recent days after its defeat in a justice referendum backed by Rome. According to several analysts, the outcome was less a rejection of the proposal itself than a broader vote of no confidence in Meloni’s leadership. The Italian prime minister has faced mounting criticism, including from segments of her own electorate, over her alignment with Trump and her reluctance to openly condemn Israel’s actions. The backlash comes at a time of growing unease among the Italian public with the wider implications of the conflict, particularly fears of economic fallout. Concerns have intensified in recent weeks over disruptions to global energy supplies, with the effective blockade of the strait of Hormuz contributing to a sharp rise in diesel prices. “It’s a repositioning,” Lorenzo Castellani, a political historian at Rome’s Luiss University, told Reuters. “She’s afraid that a sizeable portion of the electorate, even among the centre-right, will become highly critical of Trump and Netanyahu and of the effects of this war on Iran on the economy.” Trump appears to be losing the backing of European allies as the Iran war escalates, exposing fractures within Nato. He previously called the alliance a “paper tiger” after members ignored calls for military support in the strait of Hormuz. The US president also threatened consequences for countries such as Spain, including troop withdrawals, and accused allies including the UK of not “stepping up”, saying they were “abandoning” the US. He added that those unwilling to support Washington should “go get your own oil”. Alongside rising tensions with Washington, relations between Italy and Israel also risk deteriorating after Rome’s decision to suspend the memorandum on defence cooperation. In 2003, Italy and Israel began expanding defence ties through arms deals, technology sharing and joint industrial projects. The memorandum, which has governed defence cooperation between the two countries, was formally signed in April 2016 and provided a framework for military exchanges, technological collaboration and had previously been renewed automatically every five years. Meloni’s decision marks the first time her government has intervened directly to halt the agreement, despite months of mounting criticism over Israel’s conduct and alleged violations of international law. Until now, the Italian prime minister had limited her response to condemning specific incidents, including Israeli strikes affecting churches and Italian troops serving with the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, while continuing to defend the broader framework of bilateral cooperation. Italy’s ambassador to Israel, Luca Ferrari, was summoned by Israel’s foreign ministry after Italy’s foreign minister, Antonio Tajani, during a visit to Beirut, condemned Israeli air raids that have caused thousands of casualties in Lebanon since early March. Just days earlier, Tajani had himself summoned the Israeli ambassador after an incident in southern Lebanon in which Israeli forces fired warning shots near Italian UN peacekeepers, with one round landing metres from a soldier.

picture of article

Britain’s complicity with Israel in Lebanon and the West Bank | Letters

You report that Donald Trump asked Benjamin Netanyahu to be more “low-key” in Lebanon (Netanyahu says there is no ceasefire in Lebanon as Israel launches fresh strikes, 9 April). As someone who is Palestinian Lebanese, I know exactly what that means. The West Bank is low-key. The world isn’t watching, so the killing and dispossession continues – door to door, quietly enough that most people won’t realise until Israel has taken the whole of the West Bank. Lebanon is different. Three hundred people killed in 10 minutes is hard to ignore. So the message from Washington is simply: not like that. Keep it quiet. Take the land. Just don’t let people notice. Britain’s response is condemnation. But words are not enough. We remain complicit for as long as Britain continues to grant Israel preferential trade terms and supply components for the warplanes and weapons systems being used in these strikes. What has to happen before our government acts – rather than simply condemns? Alexandra Lucas London • I have never thought of the writer Alan Bennett as a prophet, but in the latest volume of his diaries, Enough Said, he seems to have a flair for it. On page 167, at the end of an entry for 7 January 2019, is the following: “When Trump destroys the world those who are left will look at one another and wonder why nobody stopped him.” John Deards Warminster, Wiltshire • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.