Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

‘The birds will fly away’: can Albania’s flamingo revolution keep its wetlands free from Trumps and tourists?

If the real estate dreams of a billionaire political family come true, an island in one of Europe’s poorest countries will become a luxury hotel complex, sweeping up stretches of the wildlife-rich nature reserve that sits across the water. No public consultation has taken place, but there are signs the idea is on the way to becoming reality. Albania has been rocked by nearly two weeks of fierce protests after fences and heavy machinery came to a sensitive wetland and preparatory work began on the tourism vision of Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner. Domestic anger at the government’s corruption and global interest in the business dealings of the US president’s family have inflamed the unrest. But at its heart, the fight is driven by the same tension between environmental protection and short-term economic growth that is playing out across Europe. The area’s status as a wildlife sanctuary was “something that amid all of this probably gets forgotten, but it’s what sparked the big outrage”, said Aleksandër Trajçe, the executive director of PPNEA, Albania’s largest conservation group. “If you want to see the Mediterranean as it used to be, before it was wrecked by tourism, this is one of the last – if not the last – spots where you would find it.” Marshes, dunes, lagoons and salt pans stretch across the dynamic delta of the free-flowing Vjosa River, which was declared Europe’s first wild river national park in 2023. It sits on a major migratory corridor, hosting about 12% of the country’s wintering waterbirds, and is home to Eurasian otters, loggerhead sea turtles, bottlenose dolphins and Albanian water frogs. Flamingos add bright shocks of pink to striking blue shallows. Unpublished conservation data shared with the Guardian shows 279 of the 2,529 species in the delta are internationally threatened. Aleko Miho, a biologist at the University of Tirana, who monitors the area with his students each year, said: “These are important habitats. It doesn’t matter who is behind it. What matters is the pressure it puts on a protected area.” Machines have been seen in the Pishë Poro–Nartë protected area – which sits within the Vjosa-Narta protected landscape inside the delta – but it is unclear how much of the ecosystem would be affected by the proposed development. The project has not received planning permission or an environmental impact assessment, and the Albanian government, which has welcomed the scheme, said the continuing works were for technical surveys and environmental measurements rather than construction. “In the meantime, the bulldozers are really progressing,” said Trajçe. “They’re destroying the dunes. They’re opening new roads. The area has been fenced off … it’s really a wild west situation.” Albania is among the poorest countries in Europe but boasts some of its wildest landscapes. The combination has drawn in holidaymakers seeking cheap getaways – a record 12 million tourists visited Albania in 2025 – but the government has also successfully enticed elites. In May, Ivanka Trump said she was “just captivated” when she swam up to Sazan Island and hiked barefoot to the top. “It’s not even a business for me, despite the scale of it,” she told the podcast host David Senra about her plans to turn the area into a vast resort. “It feels like a challenge more than anything else: the culmination of all of my experience in real estate, all of my travel, a lot of reflection on how I want to live, how I think people increasingly are wanting to live, and trying to really build something that’s a tangible manifestation of that.” But many fear that Albania’s tourism push has led the government to disregard nature protection. It redrew the borders of the protected area in 2022 to allow the construction of Vlora airport, which had hoped to see its first commercial flight this month but is still awaiting an operating permit. In 2024 it loosened conservation laws to allow the construction of five-star hotels even in protected areas. Albania is under pressure to tighten its environmental laws to meet the requirements of the EU, which it hopes to join by 2030. On Tuesday the European Commission said it should refrain from actions that undermine its bid and urged it to “act without delay” in complying with environmental rules. The same day, 96 civil society organisations wrote to the Albanian parliament to demand they repeal the 2024 amendment to the environmental protection law, citing the risks it posed to joining the EU. The office of Edi Rama, the prime minister, said the fencing of private property was the lawful right of its owner and disputed having reduced the size of the protected area to build the airport. A spokesperson said projects should not be condemned before they existed. “No European country, including Albania, operates on the principle that development and environmental protection are mutually exclusive,” they said. “The challenge is not exclusion but balance.” Affinity Partners, Kushner’s investment firm, referred a request for comment to a PR agency, which said Affinity was not involved in the project and “investors are involved in their personal capacity”. A spokesperson for the partners involved in the project said he could not comment on the scale because it was still in the planning phase. Sazan Real Estate Development LLC, the developer, said it respected continuing public and institutional processes. Asher Abehsera, the chair, said: “Our focus remains on responsible stewardship, environmental enhancement, job creation and creating long-term value for local communities.” Arup, a global engineering firm that consulted on the project, said its scope was to provide “technical advice on the initial masterplanning” but that it had completed its work last year and was no longer involved. The Vjosa-Narta ecosystem is not as unspoiled by human activity as Ivanka Trump or some protesters claim. A defunct oil-fired power plant sits beside the lagoon, while the beaches are home to dozens of guest houses, restaurants and even a music festival. However, scientists say it has been spared much of the pollution that plagues other parts of Albania’s coast, as well as the overcrowding that characterises much of the Mediterranean. The planes, cars and construction that come with a large resort would disturb a special ecosystem that is “relatively untouched” compared with other dunes and lagoons in the Mediterranean, said Miho. “The birds will fly away, for sure.”

picture of article

Thailand’s Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies aged 47 after years in a coma

The eldest child of Thailand’s King Maha Vajiralongkorn has died aged 47, the palace has said, after nearly four years in a coma. Princess Bajrakitiyabha Mahidol, known in Thailand as Princess Bha, had been in hospital since December 2022 when she became gravely ill after having heart problems while out training her dogs. There had been few updates regarding her health since her hospitalisation, though in early May the palace said her medical condition had worsened as a result of multiple infections in several organs and physicians were unable to stabilise her irregular heart rate. In April, physicians discovered a stomach infection that led to inflammation in her intestines, causing her blood pressure to fall and her heartbeat to become irregular. Her kidney function and breathing had been supported through medical equipment, palace statements said. Born in 1978 to then-Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn and his wife, and cousin, Princess Soamsawali, Bajrakitiyabha held several degrees, including a doctorate from Cornell University. She served as an ambassador to Austria, as well as in the attorney general’s office, the royal security command, and as a goodwill ambassador to the UN office on drugs and crime. Bajrakitiyabha also campaigned for the rights of female prisoners. Her death will raise questions about succession – a sensitive issue in Thailand where public discussion of the monarchy is limited by a strict lese majesty law. Criticism of the royal family can lead to up to 15 years in prison on a single charge. Bajrakitiyabha was considered by many analysts to be a well-suited heir to the throne, though this has never been addressed officially. The king has married four times and has seven children. Bajrakitiyabha was one of only three of his children to hold a royal title, along with Princess Sirivannavari, 38, and Prince Dipangkorn, 20. Some had speculated that Bajrakitiyabha may have acted as a regent for Dipangkorn, who is reported to have learning difficulties, or become queen herself. Thailand has never had a ruling queen. Vajiralongkorn’s four others sons have lived abroad since the mid-1990s after he announced his divorce from their mother, Sujarinee, a former actor, publicly accusing her of adultery. Their sister Princess Sirivannavari was returned to Thailand and raised as a member of the royal family. The estranged sons travelled to Thailand for the first time in decades in 2023, and made several visits to the country until, in 2025, they claimed they had been denied entry to Thailand. The king divorced Bajrakitiyabha’s mother in 1991 but she retains a royal title and is a key member of the monarchy. Dipangkorn’s mother, Srirasmi Suwadee, was stripped of her royal title after her family were accused of corruption.

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: France, Germany and UK make push in Moscow for peace talks

British, French and German ambassadors to Russia urged direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv in a rare meeting at Russia’s foreign ministry on Thursday. The leaders of the UK France and Germany – known as the E3 – this week met with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ukraine’s president, in London. In a joint statement after Thursday’s Moscow meeting, the three countries said they conveyed to the Russians the key conclusions of the UK summit, including “the support for president Zelensky’s urge to hold direct talks between Russia and Ukraine”. European ambassadors have rarely held talks with Russian officials during the war, but have been frequently summoned by the foreign ministry. The E3 grouping have been some of Ukraine’s most staunch allies. Moscow said the ambassadors had been told of their countries’ “destructive” policy on Ukraine, accusing them of wanting to “continue the war against Russia on behalf of and at the expense of” European countries. Several western European countries – including France – have floated the idea of restarting a dialogue with Moscow to end the war. US-led talks to end it have led nowhere and have been sidelined by the Iran war, but Russia has in the past preferred to talk to Donald Trump’s administration, with the Kremlin not wanting European countries involved. Peter Beaumont has documented how Ukrainian forces are crippling Russian supply lines along what has been dubbed the “highway of death”. The R-280 constitutes a crucial route for Moscow’s military convoys as it snakes through Ukrainian territories under Moscow’s occupation, linking Rostov-on-Don in Russia to Melitopol, Mariupol and Crimea via the Sea of Azov coastline. Ukrainian drone operators say dozens of trucks and tankers have been destroyed as part of an intensified effort known as the “middle strike campaign”. Robert Brovdi, the commander of Ukraine’s drone forces, said military cargo traffic along the highway had fallen by 71% over the past two weeks. Traffic was suspended this week on the Chonhar Bridge – a key section of the road connecting Russia-occupied Kherson province to Crimea – after a series of Ukrainian drone strikes. Fuel stations on the Russian-held Crimean peninsula were out of petrol on Thursday, Reuters witnesses said. In Sevastopol, the peninsula’s largest city, there was no fuel at most local petrol stations, even with rationing in place. In the resort town of Yevpatoriya there was a long queue outside the single working petrol station. Trucks had been unable to bring the fuel into the city after recent Ukrainian strikes on supply routes, said the Russian-backed Sevastopol governor, Mikhail Razvozhaev, delaying plans to distribute rationed petrol. Fuel supplies to Crimea by road, rail and sea barge have all been disrupted by Ukrainian drone attacks. In Sevastopol, the Moscow-installed governor said Ukrainian drones had caused damage overnight. The Russian-backed governor of the Moscow-held part of Kherson region, which borders Crimea to the north, said Ukraine had targeted bridges, causing some damage. A Ukrainian commander, Dmytro Filatov, told Ukrainian media on Thursday that Chonhar Bridge had “critical” damage, halting traffic. He said Kyiv’s forces also struck the town of Armiansk, which sits astride the narrow isthmus that is the only overland link between Crimea and the mainland, destroying trucks carrying fuel and ammunition. The Ukrainians also struck in southern Russia, causing damage including a fire at the Afipsky oil refinery. The governor of neighbouring Adygea also reported damage. The fuel crisis in Russia has reached the point that the government is trying to create a forecasting system to deal with shortages. The deputy prime minister, Alexander Novak, called for its establishment after a cabinet meeting on Thursday. Shortages in around a dozen regions of Russia have been reported in the news and on social media, according to Reuters, although only Crimea and two regions of Siberia have officially confirmed them. Two people were killed and another two injured in Russia’s region of Bryansk bordering Ukraine as a result of shelling, the acting regional governor, Yegor Kovalchuk, said late on Thursday. A Russian drone attack on a railway depot in the town of Konotop in Ukraine’s northern Sumy region killed a railway worker, the chief executive of Ukraine’s state railway said on Thursday. Another four workers were injured in the attack, Ukrzaliznytsia CEO Oleksandr Pertsovskyi said. The rail operator said it had increased Ukrainian grain shipments for export by 8% since the start of June despite an intensification of Russian attacks on infrastructure. “It is difficult to bring trains up to the terminals. The enemy is targeting locomotives, and we have also started a maintenance campaign,” said Ukrzaliznytsia. Russia’s seaborne oil product exports fell by 0.2% on a daily basis in May from April. Russia’s southern ports have been hit by drone attacks but it has increased exports from Baltic terminals. Despite sanctions, Russian producers have been able to partly capitalise on the increase in oil prices caused by the US-Israeli war on Iran – though Ukraine has been attacking Russian “shadow fleet” tankers while Kyiv’s allies have been intercepting them at sea.

picture of article

Trump claims US and Iran on verge of signing peace agreement, but Tehran says no final decision made

Donald Trump claimed on Thursday that Washington and Tehran were on the verge of signing a peace agreement, and announced that he was cancelling fresh missile strikes, after two days of escalating attacks on Iran that threatened to collapse the fragile ceasefire. His comments followed a new bout of public diplomacy by social media, but were dismissed by Iran’s foreign ministry, which said a final decision on an agreement had not been reached. “Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, the social network he owns. While the White House has long sought a peace agreement with Iran – and it would mark a major achievement for this administration – Trump has claimed dozens of times to be close to a deal without any agreement eventuating. The Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, said large parts of the text under negotiation had been finalised but Iran would not compromise on its red lines “So far, Iran has not reached a final conclusion on the agreement,” Baghaei said. Tasnim, the semi-official Iranian news agency, wrote that “until a potential understanding is announced by Iran, any news from Trump on this matter should be dismissed”. A diplomat briefed on the talks said that the deal had largely been agreed to several weeks ago but that there was still a “50% chance” that it will collapse. “There are a lot of potential spoilers,” the diplomat said. The new agreement would provide for a timeline for demining the strait of Hormuz, during which the US naval blockade would remain in place. It also discusses mechanisms for further nuclear talks and the release of frozen Iranian assets but does not contain concrete agreements about how that will take place. Trump however, continued to claim that a deal had been reached, telling reporters at the White House that the strait of Hormuz would open “as soon as we sign, which could be soon … maybe over the weekend in Europe.” Trump claimed the negotiations had been approved by other parties to the conflict, including Israel, which has been publicly skeptical about any deal with Iran. Others included the Gulf states of Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as regional powers Turkey and Pakistan. Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in a statement that Israel was not a party to the memorandum of understanding with Iran, but the prime minister “expressed his appreciation” for Trump’s commitment that the final deal would include the removal of enriched material, limits on missile production, and the cessation of support for proxies in the region, measures that have proved to be red lines for Iran in the past. Just hours earlier, Trump had said the US would take control of Iran’s oil and gas infrastructure and launch further strikes on Iran on Thursday night, after the countries exchanged fire for the second consecutive day despite a nominal ceasefire being in place. In a post on Truth Social, Trump had said the US would hit Iran “VERY HARD, TONIGHT”, claiming that most of Iran’s offensive capacity had been destroyed. He also said the US would seize Kharg, an island in the Gulf that handles about 90% of Iran’s oil exports and hosts vast storage facilities. Trump said: “At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island and other oil infrastructure points, and assume total control of their oil and gas markets, much like we have with Venezuela, which is working out brilliantly for both Venezuela and the United States of America.” He later appeared to walk back his threats to seize Kharg, telling Fox News that though his preference had always been to take the island, he did not know if “America has the stomach for it”. He also said he would rather avoid hitting Iranian bridges and power plants despite having threatened to do so earlier in the week. The UN ⁠secretary-general, ⁠António Guterres, on Thursday called on the US and Iran to return to a full implementation of the ceasefire negotiated in April and to avoid further violence that could “trigger ⁠a full resumption of the conflict, with unpredictable consequences for the region and the world”. Analysts have said that taking Kharg Island would require the US to put boots on the ground, exposing US soldiers to Iranian attacks. Ruben Gallego, a Democratic senator and former US marine, said of Trump’s threats to take Kharg Island: “I think he’s putting our men and women in very harsh danger … Kharg Island is a very small, dense place, it’s not that hard to target [our] military formations.” Responding to Trump’s threats, the head of the Iranian parliament’s national security commission, Ebrahim Azizi, said the US president would receive a stronger and more painful response if he made any “uncalculated” moves. Iran and the US have traded strikes for two consecutive days, triggered by the downing of a US helicopter above the strait of Hormuz. The ceasefire, established in early April, has been undermined by sporadic retaliatory strikes, with both sides accusing the other of violating the temporary truce. Trump said Thursday’s assault was prompted by Iran stalling in negotiations aimed at turning the temporary ceasefire into a permanent peace. The most intense strikes yet took place on Thursday morning, with the US launching a wide-ranging salvo against what it described as “military surveillance capabilities, communication systems and air-defence sites across Iran”. The US military said it also struck an oil tanker near the strait of Hormuz that it claimed was attempting to breach a blockade of Iranian ports, firing Hellfire missiles at the vessel. An Indian official said a US strike had killed three Indian crew members on a ship, though it was unclear whether it was the same one referenced by the US military. Iran launched missiles and drones at Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan on Thursday, as it had the previous morning. Bahrain’s interior ministry said an 11-year-old girl had been injured, while homes and vehicles had been damaged by falling debris from interceptions. Despite the strikes, Iranian officials told Reuters that talks on a preliminary deal had intensified. They said the US and Iran were exchanging messages on a memorandum of understanding, although significant obstacles remained, including how to unfreeze billions of dollars in Iranian assets. “This war, from a military standpoint, is a dead end,” one Iranian source told Reuters. “The Americans could not achieve their goals by attacking Iran. There has been progress in negotiations.” The mechanism for releasing frozen Iranian funds remains a significant sticking point. Iran wants the money to be released all at once directly to Tehran, while the US favours a phased approach focused on funding humanitarian goods. Unfreezing the funds and creating broader economic relief was the priority, according to the Iranian source, rather than an all-encompassing settlement. Other unresolved issues include the conflict in Lebanon, which Iran insists must be included in any ceasefire framework. Israeli strikes there have reportedly killed more than 3,600 people, while Hezbollah attacks have killed at least 30 Israeli soldiers in Lebanon and Israeli civilians. Trump wants Iran to end its restrictions on shipping through the strait of Hormuz and guarantee that it will not develop a nuclear weapon – something Tehran has long denied pursuing. Iran tightened its control over the strait of Hormuz after Wednesday’s attacks, warning that ships transiting the waterway must be patient. The strait is a chokepoint for about 20% of the world’s oil supply and its closure has sent prices of energy and inflation soaring. The US military denied that the strait had been closed or that its ships had been attacked, despite Iranian claims to the contrary, insisting that vessels were continuing to move through the strait. Trump is seeking a deal with Iran at a time when the conflict is becoming increasingly unpopular in the US. The president faces midterm elections, rising inflation and plummeting approval ratings. Gallego said: “It’s never that easy and we certainly shouldn’t be telegraphing our moves or intentions. I think [Trump] is being just way too cavalier about how he’s talking about this.”

picture of article

Auckland sits near an active faultline, new research suggests, so what next for New Zealand’s biggest city?

A fault line south of New Zealand’s most populated city, Auckland, is active and could trigger a devastating earthquake new research shows, dispelling the region’s long-held belief it was largely immune from intense seismic activity. The research has also raised questions over the recent decision to exempt Auckland from earthquake building regulation. The Mangatangi Fault, which runs along the Hunua ranges is situated roughly 50km south-east of Auckland’s central city and is close to the southern suburbs Pukekohe, Drury and Takanini. Research published in the New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics shows the fault has ruptured in the past 10,000 years and could cause a 6.8 magnitude earthquake. A fault that has moved in the past 125,000 years is considered active. “If the whole fault ruptured, there would likely be serious consequences for people living in South Auckland, and possibly further into central Auckland as well,” said geologist Dr James Muirhead, a senior lecturer at the University of Auckland and co-author of the research. Auckland has a lower risk of shaking compared to other regions, according to the national seismic hazard model, which was updated by crown research institute GNS Science in 2022. A single study may not change those results. However, it marks the first time a faultline in Auckland or the Hunua Ranges has been radiocarbon dated, which reveals exactly when a fault last ruptured. The study showed how little is known about the region’s seismic history, Muirhead said. Anna Kaiser, the chief scientist for earthquake hazards at Earth Sciences NZ, a public research organisation, said the study alone may not change the bigger picture of Auckland’s seismic risk relative to other regions but was important for building local knowledge and refining the national seismic hazard model. “It’s best not to worry if we can but it is best … to really use the evidence, the information we have, to be better prepared for the case of future earthquakes.” New Zealand sits on the boundary between the Australian and Pacific tectonic plates, and the country experiences roughly 20,000 earthquakes a year. Of these, roughly 250 will be strong enough to be felt. Some have been catastrophic, including the 6.3-magnitude earthquake that struck Christchurch in 2011, killing 185 people and reducing 80% of the city centre to rubble. Most earthquakes occur in the South Island and the lower parts of the North Island, and while Auckland experiences very small earthquakes, it was thought to be at low risk of greater seismic activity. That belief led Auckland’s mayor, Wayne Brown, to lobby the government to change building regulations for Auckland in 2023 saying there had been no earthquakes in the past 100,000 years. In 2025, the government announced it would exempt the city from rules for earthquake-prone buildings, meaning no strengthening work will be required. But Auckland’s hazard risk may be now be “significantly higher” than the public and policymakers believe, Muirhead said, and further research into Auckland’s faultlines is needed to determine whether the government’s settings are fit for purpose. “We could see that the risk is actually lower than what we think right now, but we could also collect data and find actually it’s a little bit higher, and at that stage…we should really think about whether we have the right legislation for buildings in the city.” In a statement, the minister for building and construction, Chris Penk said emerging research on Auckland’s fault lines will be considered but “a single study does not in itself warrant an immediate change to the proposed classification or regulatory approach”. Brown, meanwhile, called the research “nonsense” in a statement to the Guardian.He said: “What you’ve got around the harbour is sedimentary sandstone right along the cliffs. That’s the same stuff that’s underneath my city. There may be a fault line a long way from here, but it’s quite different geology from what’s in my city.” For researchers like Muirhead, investigating whether other faultlines are active and looking for evidence of prior earthquakes in Auckland is a way to safeguard the city from what happened in Christchurch. “We currently don’t know if there is another Christchurch-style event waiting for our city, and we really need to check that.”

picture of article

China has long sought to control women’s bodies. Increasingly, they’re making their own choices

Ever since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, women’s bodies have been the business of the state. In the 1950s, labour for state-controlled work units was organised according to women’s menstrual cycles. Then for decades, there was the one-child policy. Across vast swathes of the country the policy was enforced with a brutal severity. As well as fines for additional children, women were forced to have abortions and subjected to forced sterilisations. Now, women in China are facing new forms of pressure from the government as China battles a fresh challenge – a falling birth rate. Women are under pressure to devote their bodies to childbearing as the government tries to encourage more pregnancies. Increasingly, women are pushing back in ways that weren’t possible in the past, while the painful legacy of the one-child policy continues to echo and reshape expectations around family today. “For people of my generation, born at the end of the 1980s, everyone is from a one-child family,” says Guligo Jia, 36-year-old filmmaker based in Beijing. “Nowadays, Chinese women have more control over their bodies because they can decide to get an abortion or have babies, they have more freedom.” In a four-part series, the Guardian analysed the changing status of women across Chinese society. The series examines how women are responding to government restrictions and shifting social and economic conditions, in different aspects of their lives. Echoes of ‘childless 100 days’ Between 1980 and 2016, the state worried about overpopulation, and banned most couples from having more than one child. The one-child policy was abandoned a decade ago but for many women, the scars of that time live on. In Shen county, a small, poor town on the fringes of Liaocheng, a city in north-east China’s Shandong province, it is not hard to find them. Standing in Shen’s central plaza, Ms Li*, now in her 60s, pulls up her top to reveal her dimpled belly. In 1991, she was forced to have a tubal ligation , a procedure she describes as “agonising”. Li was sterilised because she had given birth during a period which experts say represents one of the worst excesses of the one-child policy. Dubbed the “childless 100 days”, it was a policy enforced in Shen which dictated that from 1 May 1991, no child should be born for 100 days. Because 1991 was the year of the sheep in the zodiac calendar, locals called it “the slaughtering of the lambs”. As with other parts of China, women were often sterilised after giving birth to ensure that they couldn’t have more children. Shandong, China’s second most populous province, has a reputation for enforcing central government directives with particular vigour. “People in Shandong, especially the officials, always take policies and orders from above more seriously than other provinces,” says Yang Jianli, a human rights activist from Shandong, who describes the childless 100 days as “among the most extreme cases” of the one-child policy that he has encountered. The childless 100 days did not have a 100% hit rate. In the summer of 1991, Li was heavily pregnant when local officials rounded her up along with other women from her village and loaded them onto trucks to be taken for forced abortions at the local hospital. A doctor was due to see her at 2pm to terminate her pregnancy but she went into labour early and gave birth to a baby boy in the hospital’s boiler room. “They tried to stop people from giving birth, but once the baby was actually born, they wouldn’t go as far as to kill him,” Li said. She was ordered to pay a 6,500 yuan fine – the equivalent of several years of income for the farmer – and to be sterilised. But her son survived. Everywhere around her, infants died, Li recalls. “Infants from the forced inductions were all dead, there were a lot of them, they were burned and thrown in the trash,” she said. “Those women were all crying.” The Guardian was not able to independently verify the details of Li’s story but her experience tallies with the limited other accounts that are available from that period. Another woman from Shen, now in her 70s, said that she was one month shy of giving birth to a baby boy in 1991 when she was given an injection to induce labour, killing the foetus. “If you refused the injection, they would tear down your house, break into your home to arrest you, and bar you from going to work,” she said. “So many women were dragged away”. Although official censorship has limited wider knowledge of the violent 100 days, locally, it is notorious. The local official in charge of the policy was known as “the slaughterer of the lambs”. The Shandong local government did not respond to a request for comment. ‘We failed the women of China’ In 2013, Zhang Erli, a retired official from the National Family Planning Commission, said that the one-child policy had gone too far. “Looking back, I feel we really failed the women of China; to be honest, I feel a deep sense of guilt,” he said, in a documentary that aired on Chinese state television. “Chinese women made an enormous sacrifice. As a responsible government, we ought to repay them, right?” The programme was later removed from public platforms. There are no reliable estimates of how many women were affected by the 100 days policy. But analysis by Yi Fuxian – senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and vocal critic of the one-child policy, who tracks China’s population data – shows that in Shen and Guan, a neighbouring county that was also reported to enforce a “childless 100 days policy”, there seem to have been drastically fewer births that year. China is now battling the opposite problem: its birth rate is plummeting. Last year the birth rate fell to 5.63 per 1,000 people, a record low. For most women of childbearing age today, the traumas of the previous generation do not play a conscious role in family planning decisions. But research suggests that the decades of the one-child policy profoundly reshaped people’s family expectations, reducing the desire to have bigger families. A study published last year found that for a generation of people, growing up as an only child “led to a significant decrease in the ideal family size”. The cost and competitiveness of child-rearing in modern China are the biggest deterrents, despite the government’s offers of subsidies and tax breaks for having more children. Wang Yixuan, a 26-year-old traditional Chinese medicine practitioner, says that “people now don’t care as much” about having bigger families. “I don’t particularly want to have children,” she says. “I need to be financially independent first.” Jia, the filmmaker, who has made a documentary about women turning to AI boyfriends, says: “Women don’t feel obligated to have a baby any more.” Another recent study found that nearly 50% of 18- to 24-year-old women said they don’t want children, up from 6% in 2012. The share of men who don’t want children has also increased, but only to nearly 20%. “In the past, people were fined for having second children,” says Chen Ying, a 40-year-old restaurant worker in Shen. Nowadays, people “simply can’t afford it”. Yun Zhou, a social demographer at the University of Michigan, says that the one-child policy created a “general sense that reproductive rights are not something that has ever been inalienable”. And in very real terms, the consequences of that period are evident in playgrounds across the country. In Shen, Li is playing with her two-year-old grandson, one of China’s much-needed new babies. His father is the lucky boy who survived in 1991. *Name has been changed Additional research by Lillian Yang and Yu-chen Li