Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Monaco bombing was ‘attempted assassination’, not terror attack, say prosecutors – Europe live

Back to the Monaco bombing, John Bulanadi, a 19-year-old student living near the site of the incident, told AFP TV he had heard a loud explosion last night. “I quickly went out onto my terrace to see what was happening. There was screaming, crying and two people on the ground.” Monaco’s prince Albert II described the incident as a “heinous crime” and “a shock to the entire Monegasque community”. The prefect of the Alpes-Maritimes department also expressed his “deepest thoughts for the victims and their families” after last night’s explosion. “Security forces are very strongly mobilised to search for, apprehend, and bring before the justice system, as quickly as possible, the perpetrator of this horrific act,” he said.

picture of article

Police units deployed across South Africa before anti-immigration marches

South African authorities have deployed police units to towns and cities around the country before planned demonstrations against undocumented foreign nationals. Security personnel were seen patrolling the central business district in Johannesburg, the economic capital, where many shopkeepers decided not to open on Tuesday. Trucks and other assets belonging to the South African National Defence Force were also present, according to local media reports. The protests have been organised by anti-migration vigilante groups, including March and March, who set an unofficial 30 June deadline for undocumented foreigners to leave the country. Organisers insist they are focused on undocumented migrants and will demonstrate peacefully, but foreigners with documentation have also complained of targeted harassment. “We are not calling for violence … No one will be killed on 30 June and no looting will take place in our name,” said Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, the leader of March and March. The police deployment is seen as an attempt to prevent mass-scale looting and mob violence, similar to the 2008 anti-migrant riots that left 62 people dead. In July 2021, more than 350 people were killed in the country’s deadliest unrest since the end of apartheid, after the former president Jacob Zuma was jailed for contempt of court. For weeks this May and June, men carrying sticks and chanting “abahambe” (an isiZulu and isiXhosa word meaning “they must leave”) have been seen going from shops to shops, interrogating and in certain cases beating up migrants across Johannesburg and Durban. So far, five Mozambican nationals have been killed, according to a statement from South Africa’s north-eastern neighbour. Foreign-born migrants make up an estimated 4% of South Africa’s 62 million people, despite claims that they number as many as 15-20 million. Many migrants work in the informal sector, as economic strain in neighbouring countries has caused thousands to seek work in one of Africa’s largest economies. Crime statistics show that only a small fraction of crimes are committed by foreigners, undermining a popular narrative by protest organisers. But in a country with one of the world’s highest unemployment rates and where wealth is concentrated in the hands of the country’s white minority, African migrants are sometimes treated as a scapegoat. Authorities have been accused of responding meekly as the violence has gone largely unchecked. “There is no place for racism, sexism, tribalism, xenophobia, Afrophobia or any other form of intolerance,” the South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, said in a recent forum with traditional monarchs. Several governments including Nigeria, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda have repatriated hundreds of their citizens before the deadline, with some still stranded in South Africa. On social media, footage has emerged of dozens of Malawians camped in the cold outside their consulate in Johannesburg, waiting for processing and transport out of the country before the expiration of the deadline.

picture of article

‘We thought we were safe here’: what New York queer community feels ahead of America’s 250th birthday

Most people know that the first Pride was a riot – a 1969 protest outside the New York City gay bar the Stonewall Inn – that changed the course of US history for queer and trans rights. But as America celebrates its 250th anniversary, queer and trans people are watching things go backwards into a more repressive era. Attacks from federal and state governments marred a month of celebration, including in states with explicitly pro-LGBTQ+ elected officials and policies in place. And as other communities face attacks – whether through ICE’s deportation campaign or repression against protesters exercising the first amendment in speaking out against it – the American history LGBTQ+ people seem to be holding up most is one of protest and riot, a legacy that traces back to the country’s founding. “My understanding of what democracy is is not what the American experiment actually did or is currently doing, because of the history of slavery, because of white supremacy, because of the way the federal government is treating immigrants,” said Christen Clifford, who spent the week protesting. “Our freedoms are all intrinsically tied together, and so in an America that is celebrating its 250th anniversary, we deserve more.” While patriotic events celebrating America’s past, present and future reach a fever pitch in advance of the Fourth of July, queer and trans people face a more complicated reality during their own month of celebration. New York is one queer and trans haven facing rollbacks due to the federal government. Between the 2024 election and October 2025 alone, about 400,000 trans Americans moved states from places like Texas and Florida, which have restricted trans access to healthcare and civil rights in the last few years. Many trans people and families with trans youth relocated to places like New York City, where officials like mayor Zohran Mamdani and state attorney general Letitia James have committed both money and legal responses to the Trump administration’s attacks on trans rights. But since Donald Trump retook office, multiple New York City hospitals have pre-emptively stopped providing gender affirming care over the threat of losing federal funding. “We’re longtime New Yorkers. We thought we were safe here,” said Clifford, a queer mom of two. Both of Clifford’s kids received gender-affirming care through local hospital NYU Langone, and she spoke highly of that care – except that her youngest, 17, had their care denied part of the way through after the Trump administration threatened hospitals with federal funding cuts. The administration is also weaponizing anti-trans states against those seeking to support trans citizens by routing many anti-trans federal efforts through federal courts in Texas; currently, federal judges in Texas are subpoenaing east coast hospitals for the medical records of their trans youth clients. Last week, Clifford took her youngest to an appointment at NYU, where their provider was uncomfortable providing the 17-year-old with gender affirming care. They decided to wait until her child was 18 to initiate further care, due to the risk. “It is kind of insane to me that this is happening in New York, and people that I know who have younger trans kids are really scrambling,” she said. Clifford spent the last week of Pride month protesting against the New York City official Pride march because some of the very hospitals that stopped providing care were set to walk in the parade. Four of the five 2026 Pride grand marshals – actor Dominique Jackson, the drag queen Peppermint, Bowen Yang and Jay Walker of Gays Against Guns – and 15 former marshals, including the RuPaul’s Drag Race judge Michelle Visage, signed an open letter calling on NYC Pride organizers to bar hospitals who have stopped providing gender affirming care to trans youth from participating until they change their policy. “You can’t march in a Pride parade while you are damaging the lives of members of our community,” Walker told independent trans news outlet Erin in the Morning. Across the various New York City Pride events over the weekend, queer and trans people of all stripes came out to party, dance and express their solidarity with marginalized people across the country. At Riis, some beachgoers flyered for a campaign to keep the beach safe from developers. Their version of being an American was centered on fighting for their rights and the rights of others, and, when possible, they managed to keep it a party. Protesters at various marches, including the Queer Liberation March and NYC Pride held signs referencing the Prairieland case, in which eight anti-ICE protesters – multiple of whom are trans or queer – were sentenced to a combined 450 years last week by the same Texas federal court targeting trans youth healthcare. The FBI’s evidence in the case was largely based on community organizing and sharing of leftwing information, particularly queer and trans writings. The presence of rightwing counter-protesters and online influencers seeking to harass and goad them was noticeable at many events around New York City. At the anti-establishment Dyke March held on Saturday, 27 June, which eschews police coordination, protesters flooded Fifth Avenue for almost 40 blocks, carrying signs condemning ICE and celebrating trans folks, as a rightwing streamer attempted to work the edges of the march to catch marchers on hot mic. March marshals in KN95 masks and matching T-shirts silently held them back. Footage and photos spread across social media of NYPD officers arresting Pride-goers twerking in Washington Square Park towards the end of the day. That tension was present at Pride parades across the country, such as in Minnesota’s Twin Cities, from the beginning of the month onwards. At the beginning of June in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, police officers reportedly blanketed Pride celebrations before arresting 15 crowd members, leading to community protests. In San Francisco, California, on Friday, at least five people were arrested at the city’s Trans March. On Saturday night, an additional 20 people were arrested at a Pride block party. That city has its own unique history with that dynamic: sixty years ago – three years before Stonewall – a protest at the city’s Compton’s Cafeteria restaurant, a local queer hub, turned into a riot when trans women protested harassment at the venue, leading to several arrests. Activists called that history into today, after Friday’s arrests.

picture of article

Grieving relatives still seeking answers as US normalises ‘drug boat’ strikes

It has been more than four months since Ricky Joseph left his home for the last time. His partner, Lucille Charles, and their chidren were still asleep at home on the Caribbean island of St Lucia, when Joseph, 35, set out to sea early in the morning on 13 February to fish for tuna, ballyhoo and snapper. When Joseph failed to return hours later, Charles grew increasingly worried, calling and messaging his phone with no answer. “I started calling people and asking if they had seen him. I kept trying to reach him,” she said. “I sent messages. I kept telling myself he would come back, but then I began to feel that something had happened to him.” The truth emerged in bits and pieces: media reports, rumours of an explosion – and then the news that the boat he was on had been blown up in the Trump administration’s military campaign against vessels allegedly transporting drugs to the US. For Joseph’s family – who knew him as a son, a brother and a father, a man who made time to play with his children at the beach – the reports were as confusing as they were devastating. Joseph had no criminal record, said Charles, adding: “I never knew him to be involved in anything like that.” To date more than 200 people are thought to have been killed in more than 60 strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific – the latest on 21 June. Human rights organisations, national governments and the UN have condemned the attacks as “extrajudicial killings”, and argue that even if people on the boats were involved in smuggling – as Donald Trump claims without evidence – drug trafficking was not an offence punishable by death in the US or under international law. Analysis from the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), a US-based NGO, found that news coverage of the attacks was dropping off as media interest waned. “It’s so normalised now that it doesn’t even get much attention when there is a new strike … I think people are getting somewhat numb to it,” said Adam Isacson, the director for defence oversight at WOLA. After Joseph disappeared, the police came by the family home to take statements and collect a photograph, but they did not give the family much information, said Charles, who finds it hard to speak about her loss. Although the family was told that Joseph’s remains had been found, they still do not have his body. Without a body to bury, without a clear explanation of his death, and without a trial to contest the accusations against him, they said they were suspended in raw grief. The family is asking for clarity and support. “I had to tell [the children] that their father was gone,” said Charles. “That was very hard … they never got the chance to see him, to say goodbye, or to have closure.” For Joseph’s brother Titus, the pain hit when he saw the charred remains of the boat that his sibling had been on. “When I got close to that boat, I felt like my brother was still there. I felt his spirit. It hurt me badly. I started crying. I could not even really handle it,” he said, adding that he was struggling to come to terms with the loss. “What reminds me of him most is passing by the sea … I would remember seeing him walking from the sea or going to the sea. Every time I pass there, I think about him. I still feel like I am seeing Ricky … that is how much he is missed.” He said his brother was not a criminal: “If the boat was carrying so much cocaine and then it exploded and caught fire, where is the evidence? Where is the cocaine? That is what I want to know. I know Ricky. He was a fisherman. That was his life.” Ricky Joseph was one of 13 people killed in Trump’s boat attacks to be identified in a joint investigation by 20 journalists led by the Latin American Center for Investigative Journalism. The report found that several of the victims showed no indication of involvement in drug trafficking. US Southern Command (Southcom), which oversees US military activities in Latin America, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Cameron Taliam, the owner of the boat that Joseph was on, said he did not know the fisher but knew the captain, who was known locally as “Nafi”. “I never knew him to be anything out of the way, no problems with the law … one of the nicest guys,” Taliam said of the captain. No official accounts have been given of the attack on the boat, which took place in the waters of St Vincent and the Grenadines. Taliam said he was left to piece together scanty reports from authorities and accounts from witnesses who described seeing a US drone circling then hitting another vessel then going towards his boat. Taliam, who operates a fleet of fishing vessels, said fishers were afraid to take his boats out. “They’re asking me to change the colour of my boats because almost all my boats are in green and black … They feel like my boats are being targeted.” In St Lucia, an investigation was launched, said the prime minister, Philip Pierre. But in May – three months after the attack – he said he had yet to receive further information from Washington. “We cannot insist that the US gives us answers … And the sad thing is that we have had no further information on this matter,” Pierre said. Isaacson said Caribbean governments were struggling to get answers partly because they might not “have much interface with the part of the US government” that was carrying out the attacks. He added: “But the bigger reason is that the Trump administration has been very clear that it is going to wield all of its political and economic tools against anybody who challenges these.” Taliam said he did not feel St Lucia’s prime minister was to blame. “He wasn’t the one who did anything to my boat,” Taliam said. “The world just needs to realise that we have a psycho on the loose … Trump is a psycho.”

picture of article

Delhi plans to ban petrol rickshaws and scooters in effort to cut toxic fumes

The unruly chaos of Delhi’s roads would be unrecognisable without the rickshaws and scooters that zip through India’s capital in their millions, emitting toxic fumes in their wake. But now, ambitious policies aim to give the city’s most recognisable vehicles an environmental makeover. On Monday, Delhi’s government announced plans to eventually ban petrol scooters, motorbikes and autorickshaws in favour of those running on electricity, in an attempt to bring down dangerously high pollution levels in the city by the end of the decade. The policies, which will phase out new petrol and gas scooters, trucks and buses in the capital over the next two years, have been hailed by some environmentalists as a “gamechanger” in the fight to bring down toxic emissions. In recent years, transport has been one of the highest contributors to Delhi’s air pollution, which is consistently at levels dangerously high to human health and has become an emergency in the capital, linked to tens of thousands of deaths each year. Scooters and rickshaws – which largely run on petrol and compressed fossil gas – account for more than two-thirds of the tens of millions of vehicles on Delhi’s roads. Under the new policy, India’s capital will now issue new licence plates only to electric small trucks and three-wheelers, known as e-rickshaws, from 2027, and to e-scooters and electric motorbikes from 2028. The Delhi government said it hoped the move would lead to an electrification of at least 30% of the capital’s vehicle fleet by 2030. “The policy focuses on pure EVs, which offer superior environmental benefits as zero-emission vehicles,” Delhi’s government said in a statement on Monday. Amit Bhatt, the managing director or the International Council on Clean Transportation, said: “The proposed phaseout of two- and three-wheelers could be a gamechanger in Delhi’s fight against air pollution.” Emphasising that scooters, rickshaws and trucks accounted for most of the vehicles on Delhi’s roads, Bhatt added that “accelerating their transition to zero-emission vehicles can significantly reduce vehicular emissions, improve public health, and pave the way for a broader transition to zero-emission transport across all vehicle segments”. The Delhi state government, run by the Bharatiya Janata party, which also governs at national level, had faced significant criticism and numerous protests during the winter after it was accused of doing nothing to tackle the dangerously high pollution levels that lasted for months. According to the government’s own figures, vehicle emissions count for an average of 23% of pollutants in the air, making it the highest single source of emissions, particularly during the toxic winter months when a thick smog routinely cloaks the city. E-rickshaws have become an increasingly familiar site on Delhi’s roads over the past two years, but the lack of charging points has made drivers reluctant to switch over. Under the new policy, the government has pledged to establish more than 30,000 public charging points across the capital. Vikas Nimesh, an assistant professor at the School of Public Policy at IIT Delhi, also used the phrase “gamechanger”. He emphasised that the availability of affordable Indian electric vehicles was rapidly expanding, with Delhi already India’s largest market. Nimesh expressed optimism that the new policy would provide impetus for manufacturers to invest in new green technology and “come up with more EV models” to provide greater consumer choice and competition. The policy also introduced significant road and vehicle tax exemptions for people buying new electric cars, in an attempt to incentivise drivers to switch over by choice. However, some critics expressed concern that two years was too short a window to phase out new petrol scooters and rickshaws and ensure there was enough consumer choice. Others raised concern that the policy should have a wider focus beyond just private vehicles. Bhavreen Kandhari, a prominent environmentalist, said the government should also commit to expanding green public transport in the city. While Delhi has a substantial metro system, it is often criticised for lack of connectivity across the vast city, which keeps people reliant on flagging down rickshaws and driving their own scooters between their homes and metro and bus stops. “More cars on the road is not a solution,” said Kandhari. “To reduce traffic jams and dust in the city, the government should work on improving public transport and last-mile connectivity with green solutions. This EV policy falls short on that aspect.”

picture of article

Europe and US on collision course over next high representative for Bosnia

Diplomats from around the world are due to meet in Sarajevo on Tuesday in an attempt to resolve a deep rift between the US and Europe over a top envoy appointment that could have a powerful influence on the future of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Disagreement has erupted over who should become the next high representative for the international community, a post with significant powers, in an overt test of political wills. The Trump administration is assertively pushing a business-driven agenda, potentially at the expense of Bosnia’s delicate postwar political balance. Ambassadors from the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy and the EU, as well as envoys from Canada, Japan and Turkey, are scheduled to meet in the Bosnian capital to make a second attempt to agree on a new high representative, after the first try broke up amid acrimony in early June. In the run-up to that meeting, the Trump administration had rattled European capitals by insisting that the current high representative, the German politician Christian Schmidt, be removed, and then reportedly reneging on an agreement that Schmidt stay on until expected Bosnian elections in October, for reasons of continuity and his personal dignity. In May, US officials demanded that Schmidt depart immediately, and began campaigning aggressively for a 76-year-old Italian diplomat, Antonio Zanardi Landi, to replace him, much to the bewilderment of most other members of the peace implementation council (PIC), whose steering board is due to convene on Tuesday. Landi has no significant previous experience or knowledge of Bosnia. In the past, he has expressed fondness for Serbia, where he was once posted as a diplomat, but he has not shown much interest in its neighbour. There has been no clear explanation from Washington for its abrupt manoeuvring, but European officials in Sarajevo suspect it is closely related to the new US priority in the region: to clear the way for a $1bn gas pipeline contract, the Southern Interconnection. This has been provisionally awarded to AAFS Infrastructure and Energy, a US-based company with minimal infrastructure experience but strong personal connections to Donald Trump. Last month, the Trump administration unveiled a new policy for the Balkans stating that henceforth US actions in the region would be guided by the need to pursue “direct return” for American companies, in place of what it called “open-ended institution building”. Jim O’Brien, a former US diplomat, writing on the European Council for Foreign Relations website, said the announcement “reflected what is already happening in the region under the second Trump administration” as “politically connected Americans seek to earn money by weakening … international institutions”. “This behaviour undermines the peace that has held for 30 years,” O’Brien said. The pipeline deal was awarded without tender, prompting a warning from the EU that this could jeopardise Bosnia’s long-term European integration, and generating a confrontation that has culminated in the row over Landi and the high representative’s job. Landi is serving as the ambassador to the Vatican of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. Contacted by the Guardian, he said it would be “unwise for me to step into the heated debate”, but argued his “key points and focus” manifesto that has been circulated among PIC steering board members was “perfectly in line with the European positions”. The Landi manifesto, seen by the Guardian and first published by the Bosnian investigative journalism website Istraga, promises not to overturn the decrees of previous high representatives, to consult the PIC before taking substantial actions, and not to unilaterally close down the office of the high representative. London, France and Berlin have been unconvinced by the Landi campaign and as of Monday were aligned behind a French candidate, René Troccaz, France’s Balkans envoy. The tussle among erstwhile allies has underlined how far Bosnia’s current realities are still defined by the 1992-95 war which killed 100,000 people, mostly Muslim Bosniaks slaughtered by much better-armed Serb forces, and, to a much lesser extent, Croats. The US-brokered Dayton peace deal in late 1995 stopped the bloodshed but enshrined the dominant role of ethnic politics and the division of the country into two halves, a Bosniak-Croat Federation and a Serb-run entity, the Republika Srpska. The office of the high representative was established with substantial powers to oversee the Dayton agreement and help guide Bosnia towards greater ethnic integration. That latter mission has largely been a failure, with the country as divided as ever and the Republika Srpska under the sway of a Serb separatist, Milorad Dodik. Successive high representatives, all Europeans, have been reluctant to invoke their powers to shape the Bosnian political system, but Schmidt stepped in last year to annul Dodik’s separatist actions, leading to the Serb leader’s ousting last September. It momentarily seemed that the hardliner’s 28-year grip on power in Republika Srpska had been broken, but in the following months the Trump administration came to Dodik’s rescue, abruptly lifting sanctions imposed by the Biden administration on Dodik and his associates for corruption and “divisive ethno-nationalistic rhetoric”. In the months that followed, during which the US president’s son Donald Trump Jr visited Republika Srpska’s main city, Banja Luka, Dodik gave his approval to the Southern Interconnection pipeline. The remaining obstacles to the project going ahead were EU objections and the fact that about a third of the pipeline would be built on state property. Ownership of Bosnia’s lands, forests and other plentiful resources is one of the thorny issues that was supposed to be resolved after the war. Dodik insists that everything on Serb-controlled property should belong to the Republika Srpska, not the Bosnian state. One possible scenario, outlined by an official in Sarajevo, was that on taking office, Landi would issue a special law dividing state property between the Republika Srpska and the Federation, which would bring the pipeline a big step closer to reality. Landi’s manifesto did not mention state property, but an AAFS company official has reportedly briefed leading Bosnian parliamentarians that the issue would be resolved if and when Landi took over as high representative. The US has threatened to reconsider its “role in the current international presence” if Landi was not given the job at Tuesday’s PIC meeting, and it was still unclear on Monday evening if European capitals would give in to the pressure, or coalesce around Troccaz or a third compromise candidate. The steering board had pledged to reach a decision by the end of June, but one participant said it could be postponed if absolutely necessary. The US state department declined to comment on Monday, on the grounds that negotiations were still under way. For the Bosniak majority, the collapse of western cohesion is worrying. For decades they have chafed against Dayton’s political straitjacket and the inaction of past high representatives, but most see it at the same time as an essential safety net keeping Bosnia from a return to conflict. For Ćamil Duraković, a Bosniak survivor of the Srebrenica genocide who now serves as Republika Srpska’s vice-president under the Dayton power-sharing arrangements, the prospect of US abandonment of the agreement is deeply unsettling. “They’re just giving up on everything, including democratic values, for the sake of business,” Duraković said. “If the United States doesn’t empower democratic institutions in this country or an independent judicial system, then we are really in trouble.”

picture of article

Tuesday briefing: Inside Shabana Mahmood’s new UK asylum reforms

Good morning. Last night home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, set out further planned reforms to the asylum system. A new means-tested scheme, which will see asylum seekers ordered to pay about £10,000 each for their state-funded living costs or be denied settled status in the UK, has been condemned by refugee charities for placing a tax on refugees fleeing war, torture and famine. Over the weekend, briefings suggested Mahmood also plans to speed up the opening of safe and legal routes to claim asylum, like employer sponsorship, as she bids to quell backbench critics, including former deputy leader Angela Rayner – a belated acknowledgment that the absence of such routes has forced many to make the perilous Channel crossing in those small boats that have become a totem for public and political anxieties around immigration. Both proposals are part of the immigration and asylum bill, which will go before MPs today as the home secretary faces both ways on what she’s described as a “moral mission”. For today’s newsletter, I spoke to Sunder Katwala, director of the British Future thinktank, about the challenges facing Mahmood, and whether Andy Burnham can tell a better story about immigration than Keir Starmer. (Fun fact: Katwala is, like Burnham, a lifelong Everton supporter.) First, the headlines. Five big stories UK politics | Andy Burnham has set out his blueprint to transform the UK with a promise to improve living standards and restore faith in politics through the “biggest rebalancing of power our country has ever seen”. Finance | Crypto firms operating in the UK will be forced to prove they can weather market shocks and hold capital against risky assets as part of sweeping new rules announced by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Germany | Four women and two men have been killed in a shooting at a youth welfare facility ⁠in northern Germany, police said. Two people including the suspected ⁠shooter were arrested. Heatwave | The heatwave wreaking chaos across Europe is a “dramatic warning” to reject climate naysayers, a European Commission vice-president says. World news | A strong aftershock has rattled northern Venezuela, sending terrified residents racing on to the streets five days after the twin earthquakes that killed 1,719 people, left tens of thousands missing and triggered a growing humanitarian emergency. In depth: This bill is, in part, ‘a communication tool’ – but what exactly is it communicating? Shabana Mahmood was made home secretary in September 2025 with the express purpose of projecting a tougher line on immigration, as Keir Starmer struggled to counter Reform’s corrosive rhetoric on Labour weakness. Soon after, she described illegal immigration as “tearing our country apart” – language which was immediately rebuked as inflammatory. Leaning heavily on her origin story as the child of legal migrants, Mahmood lost no time is setting out sweeping proposals, influenced by the strict framework brought in by Denmark’s centre-left government. Mahmood’s proposals include speeding up the removal of families, including children, whose asylum claims have been refused, curbing certain claims made under the European convention on human rights, axing the legal duty on councils to provide asylum seeker support and strengthening age assessments. Earlier this year, Mahmood made refugee status temporary, to be reviewed every 30 months. Described as draconian by charities, veteran Labour peer Alf Dubs, who fled the Nazis as a six-year-old, last week denounced their “performative cruelty” and called on Andy Burnham to rip them up should* he become prime minister next month (*modal verb we’re required to employ until 16 July). *** The politics It’s often overlooked, Katwala tells me, that the government has the power to make significant changes to immigration policy without resorting to legislation. This bill is, in part, “a communication tool”, he says. But communicating what precisely remains contested , because of the “cross-pressure” from two very different election results barely six weeks apart. The lesson from the English local, Scottish and Welsh elections in May was that Labour faced “an existential threat” to its fragmenting coalition on the left and right, he argues; but after the Makerfield byelection, the narrative appears to have flipped back to general election 2024 territory: win over Reform voters, win the country. “You have the home secretary’s team saying, ‘Andy Burnham knows I’m right because he’s had to fight Makerfield’” – though Burnham fought a very specific campaign that largely avoided taking on immigration. There is also an escalating row between Mahmood and home office minister Mike Tapp. Tapp evoked her ire by writing an article arguing migrant care workers should be excluded from plans to retrospectively change the length of time people must work in the UK before they can permanently settle here. Mahmood was reportedly working on similar proposals when Tapp published his op-ed without her knowledge. Katwala sums this up neatly: “He’s copied my homework and shown it to the new person before I could do it first.” But it’s also a row that exposed the very human costs of the new plans – and how politicians skate over them. Workers’ rights campaigners and unions have fiercely objected to the plans, which essentially change the rules mid-game for people who prop up our ailing care sector – and they’ve been heard, says Katwala. “There’s a secret plan to back down, and then there’s this fight about who’s allowed to admit it.” Meanwhile, consider the scale of people directly affected; migrant care workers close to the current five-year threshold for securing settled status told the Guardian yesterday they were devastated by the plans. How do you stop the boats? British Future research from May found that only one in six people know that net migration fell last year. So when Keir Starmer referenced a reduction in small boat crossings in his resignation speech, he was referencing a trend this government has singularly failed to make heard above the noise of the right. As of mid-June, 9,852 people had made the journey across the Channel so far this year – 40% fewer compared with the same period in 2025. This reflects a fall across Europe, prompted by “tough external border policies by the European Union”, says Katwala. He’s sceptical that Mahmood’s proposals alone will make any further dent in crossing numbers: “What will change people’s decisions are a combination of there being an accessible route you can apply for and knowing that the unauthorised route is unlikely to succeed.” It’s an approach Katwala fleshed out in a report last autumn, based on an underreported policy breakthrough from the Biden presidency, which reduced illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border by 81% in the course of a year by integrating swift returns of asylum seekers who arrive without permission alongside safe, controlled and capped legal routes. It recommends a scaling up of the “one in, one out” agreement on cross-Channel migration between the UK and France, which has been heavily criticised by NGOs as random in its application and inhumane. But the report argues an expanded routes/returns model would not only put the smugglers out of business but encourage broader cooperation between European neighbours that could ultimately “save the principle of asylum and refugee protection from the pressures of populism”. Telling a better story In his years as Manchester mayor, Andy Burnham repeatedly argued that the government’s dispersal system for asylum seekers has been “unfair and bad for communities”, says Katwala, especially for underfunded areas such as Makerfield where housing is cheapest. “The way you get a grip on that would be to accelerate the exiting of hotels, say something quite big about ‘never [using them] again’, and leaning into a community sponsorship plan, so immigration comes from the bottom up from now on”. Involving local people with decisions about who they welcome fits with Burnham’s devolution agenda,and is a sell for voters who want to see compassion exercised fairly. “Potentially, it’s a bridging argument to make, rather than saying we need to sound more like Denmark to make sure we put people off”. But for Katwala, Burnham’s centrepiece should be “a proper immigration plan every year in parliament” – one that addresses “budget, why it’s good to have some people, help with controlling the impacts, what the numbers are, how they’ve fallen”. It’s an idea that also speaks to criticism regularly coming from the civil service: immigration policy is siloed with the Home Office when it should be agreed across government. As well as assessing which immigration policies actually work, Katwala has spent decades considering how best to talk about immigration to the electorate – a task ever more pressing amid the onslaught of online misinformation. “Certainly if you localise and personalise the story of migration in Britain, most people are balanced and see both sides,” he says, giving the example of how the Welsh coastal town of Fishguard welcomed Syrian refugees under a community sponsorship scheme. “But we’ve currently got an online ecosystem and media and political debate that is the opposite”. “So Burnham’s got to set the agenda more than Keir Starmer, who was always responding to an agenda set by other people.” What else we’ve been reading Quique Kierszenbaum and Julian Borger have written a harrowing piece about the dozens of children killed by Israeli forces in the West Bank in the wake of the 7 October attack. Patrick Beeban Kidron was one of the first and most consistent voices speaking up for young people against big tech. Here she sets out – with some input from Pope Leo – how the next prime minister should handle Silicon Valley. Libby Paula Cocozza has spoken with finance expert Martin Lewis, among the most trusted people in Britain, about financial scams – and why so many fraudsters use his image to trick people. Patrick On the pitch Germany 1-1 Paraguay | Germany crashed out of the World Cup at the hands of a thrillingly dogged Paraguay, following the most extraordinary of penalty shootouts. Brazil 2-1 Japan | Japan took the lead in the first half but Casemiro equalised with a header and Gabriel Martinelli scored in stoppage time to send Brazil through to the last 16, where they face a tough assignment against either Norway or Côte d’Ivoire. Netherlands 1-1 Morocco | Morocco also advanced to the last 16 where they face co-hosts Canada after their match against the Netherlands finished 1-1 and was decided by another scarcely believable shootout. Off the pitch England | Our data visual journalist Andrew Beasley has been looking into the growing partnership between Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham ahead of their last 32 tie against the DR Congo. Scotland | Steve Clarke has said he was always going to leave the Scotland job if the World Cup went badly, despite signing a new deal ahead of the tournament. Podcast | Want to hear about how last night’s games went? Look no further than the Guardian’s Football Weekly podcast with Max and Barry, which is running every day this tournament. Today’s Fixtures Côte d’Ivoire v Norway, 6pm on BBC France v Sweden, 10pm on ITV Mexico v Ecuador, 2am on ITV The front pages “Burnham puts No 10 North at heart of bid to ‘rewire’ Britain”, is the Guardian’s front page today. The Times says “Burnham pleads for ten years to ‘rewire’ UK”, the Mail has “Burnham wants to ‘rewire’ Britain from Manchester base” and the i Paper writes “Burnham pledges growth, housing and No 10 North in his vision for ‘rewired Britain’”. The FT, on the same topic, says “Burnham pledges rewiring of state in bid to spread growth across country” and Metro has “Sparks fly over Andy’s ‘radical rewiring’”. Elsewhere, the Telegraph leads with “Junior doctors’ pay to hit £100,000”, the Express has “Britain facing summer of ‘no plan’ chaos”, and the Sun leads on its own investigation with the headline “Migrant street”. The Latest How would PM-in-waiting Andy Burnham change Britain? Andy Burnham has set out his vision for the UK in his first big policy speech since launching a bid to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister. The Makerfield MP confirmed he would set up “No 10 North” and pledged to “bring about the biggest rebalancing of power the country has ever seen”. Lucy Hough speaks to the Guardian’s north of England editor, Josh Halliday. Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad There is nothing quite like a meal by the beach. Whether it’s fish and chips under the watchful eyes of greedy seagulls or fresh ceviche on the Pacific coast in Peru, dozens countries have their own seaside rituals with food. Jimi Famurewa has spoken with five of the most well-travelled chefs he could find and quizzed them about their favourite seaside snacks. The fried red mullet in Cyprus looks particularly delicious. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply