Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: Trump casts doubt on Iran war ceasefire over continued closure of strait of Hormuz

JD Vance heads to Pakistan this week with orders from Donald Trump to turn the shaky Iran ceasefire into a lasting peace deal. For the 41-year-old Vance, who has kept a notably low profile during the Middle East conflict, it will be one of the biggest moments of his career. But the man widely regarded as a leading contender in the 2028 US presidential election will face huge challenges too when talks begin Saturday in Islamabad. “I cannot think of a case where the vice president ran formal negotiations like this,” Aaron Wolf Mannes, a lecturer at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy and an expert on the American vice presidency’s role in foreign policy, told the AFP news agency. This is high risk, high reward.” Vance built his political brand as an avowed anti-interventionist who wanted to keep America out of any more foreign wars. That has made for a difficult balancing act after Trump launched the Iran war. The New York Times reported this week that in discussions behind closed doors in the weeks before the war, Vance argued against military action, saying it could cause regional chaos and split Trump’s Maga coalition. But Vance now suddenly finds himself as Trump’s diplomatic closer for an Iran deal. Vance will be accompanied by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. One theory of why the vice-president is leading these efforts is that the Iranians may view him as a more likely partner for diplomacy, given his widely reported opposition to the war and general doubts about US interventionism. “If he can get something that papers it over without dealing with real issues, that’s probably enough,” says Mannes. But if nothing good comes of this, it raises questions about his competence, which is not going to help him electorally. And of course Rubio’s right there as a potential rival for 2028.”

picture of article

Xi tells Taiwan opposition leader people on both sides of strait are Chinese in rare meeting

In a rare meeting with Taiwan’s opposition leader, China’s leader Xi Jinping declared people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are Chinese and want peace. Friday’s meeting in Beijing between Xi and Cheng Li-wun, the chair of Taiwan’s Kuomintang (KMT), is the first such contact in a decade. The visit has sparked controversy in Taiwan, with Cheng’s critics accusing her of being too close to China, a country that many in Taiwan see as a threat. Cheng has previously said that it is a “very natural thing” to identify as Chinese – a stance that is increasingly at odds with mainstream opinion in Taiwan where polling suggests that two-thirds of people see themselves as being primarily Taiwanese. Meeting Xi in Beijing, Cheng said that Taiwan should “no longer be a flashpoint for potential conflict” and should instead become “a symbol of peace jointly safeguarded by Chinese people on both sides of the strait.” Cheng arrived in China on Tuesday and has visited several cities on her way to Beijing, including Nanjing, a former capital of China when it was ruled by the KMT before the Chinese Communist party (CCP) took power in 1949. After their defeat by the CCP, the KMT fled to Taiwan. The self-governing island has since been the subject of intense debate between its local rulers and the CCP in Beijing, which claims it as part of Chinese territory. The visit comes as China has increased military pressure around Taiwan. Xi sees “reunifying” China and Taiwan as an important part of his legacy and has not ruled out the use of force to achieve that aim. Cheng, who was elected as KMT chair last year, is a divisive figure in Taiwan. She has advocated much closer ties with Beijing and has even been nicknamed by some Chinese internet users as the “goddess of unification”. Taiwan’s last three elections have been won by the Democratic Progressive party (DPP), a pro-sovereignty outfit detested by Beijing. The CCP has particular disdain for Lai Ching-te, the DPP’s leader who was elected as Taiwan’s president in 2024. Chinese state media has portrayed Lai as a parasite being roasted over a flaming Taiwan. Cheng has argued that Lai’s strained relationship with Beijing creates more risk for Taiwan than her approach. Since the DPP took power in 2016, China has increased its military activity around Taiwan, including excursions that look like rehearsals for a blockade. Before she departed for China, Cheng described her tour as a “peace trip” and said that it would show “the sincerity and determination of the Chinese Communist party to engage in peaceful dialogue and exchanges across the Taiwan Strait”. The trip comes at a time when Taiwan’s domestic politics is bogged down in a quagmire over a $40bn special defence budget that Lai’s party is trying to push through the legislature. Opposition parties including the KMT have blocked the budget, saying that it is too big and too vague. Cheng has denied accusations from the DPP that her party tried to block the budget ahead of her meeting with Xi. The KMT has proposed a smaller special defence budget of $12bn that is focused on specific military items approved for sale by the US. In hosting Cheng, Beijing “seeks to cast doubt in Taiwan over the Lai administration’s focus on self-defence and to strengthen voices in Taiwan calling for closer cross-strait ties. Beijing seeks to keep Taiwan divided over the question of how best to secure its future,” said Amanda Hsiao, China director at the Eurasia Group thinktank. Hsiao added that growing scepticism of the US in Taiwan may bolster Cheng’s argument that the KMT, which leans towards Beijing more than Washington, is better equipped to maintain cross-strait peace. China strongly objects to US arms sales to Taiwan. Xi told US president Donald Trump in a phone call in February to be “prudent” about such deals. William Yang, a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, said that China hoped to use Cheng’s meeting with Xi “to show Trump that its ally in Taiwan is in lockstep with Beijing” when it comes to key policies. Beijing could “potentially use this impression to influence Trump’s position on US arms sales to Taiwan, which is one of the major issues that Xi will likely put on the table when the two leaders meet,” Yang said. Xi and Trump are expected to meet in Beijing next month in a highly anticipated summit that was delayed from April because of the war in Iran. Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Taiwan, and a former US defence official responsible for China and Taiwan, said that Cheng’s position does not represent the majority viewpoint in Taiwan. Taiwanese people “are clear that the source of military threats is not emanating from the DPP or President Lai. It’s emanating from Beijing,” Thompson said. Additional research by Yu-chen Li and Lillian Yang

picture of article

Who is Péter Magyar, the man leading the polls as Hungary prepares for election?

As a child growing up in Budapest, Péter Magyar had a poster of Viktor Orbán – at the time a leading figure in the country’s pro-democracy movement – hanging above his bed. Orbán was one of several political figures that adorned his bedroom, Magyar told a podcast last year, hinting at his excitement over the changes sweeping the country after the collapse of communism. Now Magyar, 45, is the driving force behind what could be another momentous political change in Hungary: the ousting of Orbán, whose 16 years in power has transformed the country into a “petri dish for illiberalism”. Few could have predicted the meteoric rise of Magyar and his Tisza party. “He has built an opposition movement at amazing speed,” said Gábor Győri of Policy Solutions, a Budapest-based political research institute. “Never, since the history of this post-transition Hungary, have we seen a party rise this quickly.” Conversations with those who know Magyar often alternate between admiration and antipathy. Many praise the tremendous movement he has built and the discipline he has shown as he crisscrosses the country, giving up to six speeches a day, while also describing him as someone with a short temper and a style that can be abrasive at times. Others see him as the perfect fit for the magnitude of the moment. “I think, like all politicians, he can be a difficult person,” said Tamás Topolánszky, a film-maker who was part of a team that spent the past 18 months following Magyar for a film on the wider change sweeping Hungarian society. Topolánszky described Magyar as authentic and passionate, but also someone who could be impatient at times. “I think that this is something that we Hungarians now see was necessary to get us to this point.” From behind his lens, Topolánszky tracked Magyar as he began turning up in villages and towns across Hungary, steadily chipping away at the apathy that had long characterised Hungarian politics. “The energy at these rallies was something I’ve never experienced before,” he said. Adding to Magyar’s singular rise are his deep entanglements with Orbán’s Fidesz party. Much of his life has been spent hobnobbing among its elite inner circles. His close friends have included Gergely Gulyás, Orbán’s chief of staff, and in 2006 Magyar married Judit Varga, a former justice minister for Fidesz. He served as a Hungarian diplomat in Brussels and held senior positions in state entities. Magyar catapulted into the limelight in 2024 after it emerged that Orbán’s government – which for years had built its brand on defending Christian families and protecting children – had pardoned a man convicted of helping to cover up a sex abuse scandal at a children’s home. Varga, who by then was Magyar’s ex-wife, resigned, along with Hungary’s president, Katalin Novák. Magyar responded to the news with a blistering post on social media accusing Fidesz officials of scapegoating the two women, or as he wrote: “hiding behind women’s skirts”. He then continued to speak up, rattling Hungarian society as a prominent insider who was now laying bare the working of what he described as a rotten system. In Magyar’s telling, Fidesz was a “political product” that had been marketed to citizens while officials expanded their power and wealth at the expense of ordinary Hungarians. The message resonated strongly, landing as many in the country were grappling with the soaring cost of living, fraying public services, and salaries that had long been stagnant. After an estimated 35,000 people turned up to a protest helmed by Magyar in March 2024, he launched his movement. While his status as a former Fidesz member had grabbed people’s attention, it proved complicated for his new political life. In Topolánszky’s documentary, Spring Wind, Magyar was asked: “Who are you friends with now?” After a pause, he answered: “That’s a good question. It’s hard to say whether you have real friends in a situation like this.” While many across the country have enthusiastically rallied behind Magyar and his Tisza party, a segment of his own voters continue to view him with scepticism. “Magyar is not a saint, but Fidesz needs to go,” said Anita, 33, as she walked her dog in a park in Kecskemét, a small city about 50 miles south of Budapest. She readily admitted that her vote for Tisza was a gamble, one born out of desperate hope that Magyar would prove to be fundamentally different from the other members of Fidesz. But she saw no other choice, she said, given the rampant graft that had resulted in the country becoming the most corrupt in the EU, clawing away funds for public services and leaving ordinary Hungarians such as herself struggling to make ends meet. “Anything is better than this quiet death,” she said. Topolánszky sees Magyar’s unusual background as an asset, as it makes him relatable in a country where the government’s deep reach into local politics, culture and universities has made many fearful of speaking out. “He’s an inside man who gave up everything – all the benefits – of going along with Fidesz,” the film-maker said. Despite more than two years of campaigning and a 240-page election manifesto, the details of what exactly Magyar will do if he gains power remain vague. Much of this is by design: he has run a tight campaign, staying on-message as he has sought to avoid providing fodder for the estimated 80% of Hungary’s media that is controlled by Fidesz loyalists. “He is very much a dark horse,” said Győri. “We don’t know much about him.” With the exception of migration, where he has vowed to take a harder line than Orbán by scrapping the country’s guest worker scheme, Magyar has committed to doing away with many of the most problematic parts of Orbán’s programme. He has vowed to restore democratic checks and balances, repair relations with the EU to unlock frozen EU funds, and crack down on corruption. He has promised to end the dependence on Russian energy by 2035 while striving for “pragmatic relations” with Moscow. When it comes to Ukraine, Magyar would continue Orbán’s opposition to sending arms to the country and fast-tracking EU entry for Kyiv. Even so, it would not take much to reset Hungary’s relationship with the bloc, said Győri. “I think what people underestimate is that if Hungary stops vetoing vital EU action in the European Council, that’s a major breakthrough,” he said. “You don’t have to have Péter Magyar go out and say: ‘We’re enthusiastic about helping Ukraine or everything the EU does.’” When it comes to other key issues, such as the efforts by Orbán and his government to ban Pride events, Magyar has steered clear. “So gender and sexual minorities, he just doesn’t address,” said Győri. “Everybody assumes that he will be a lot friendlier on these issues than the Fidesz government was, and it’s probably true, but he just doesn’t talk about them. So this is speculative.” Looming over the campaign is the question of what a Tisza-led government would realistically be able to do, were it to win the election. During Fidesz’s 16 years in power, the party stacked the Hungarian state, media and judiciary with loyalists; how they would respond to a potential change in government remains up in the air. And then there is the two-thirds majority needed to amend the constitution and key laws, meaning Tisza’s ability to change Hungary could be limited if the party wins but falls short of a supermajority. Despite all this, Hungarians had rallied around Magyar in huge numbers, said Ákos Hadházy, a Hungarian independent MP and longtime critic of Orbán. For many in the country, Magyar – flaws and all – was now the best hope of dismantling the deep changes wrought by Orbán and his Fidesz party. “When it comes to Péter Magyar, there are both question marks and exclamation marks,” he said. “But Hungarian society has accepted this.”

picture of article

Islamabad prepares to host historic negotiations between Iran and the US

The streets of Islamabad were on strict lockdown as Pakistan’s capital prepared to play host to historic negotiations between Iran and the US that have dangled the promise of an end to war that has devastated the Middle East. Even as the US-Iran ceasefire looked increasingly precarious, amid Israel’s continued bombardment of Lebanon and disputes over the terms of the talks, Pakistani officials insisted that the make-or-break peace negotiations would be going ahead over the weekend as planned. The conflict, which began when Israel and the US attacked Iran in late February, has left thousands dead and caused global economic devastation. Iran’s retaliatory blockade of the critical shipping route, the strait of Hormuz, has led to a global shortage of oil and gas and triggered the worst energy crisis in history. It was Pakistan’s mediation efforts on Tuesday night that finally pushed the two warring countries to agree to a two-week ceasefire, after US president Donald Trump had threatened that a “whole civilisation will die” if Iran did not meet his demands. As part of the ceasefire deal, the two sides agreed to meet in Islamabad for talks to negotiate a lasting peace, which was seen as a resounding diplomatic victory for Pakistan. However, critical questions remain over the ceasefire and the basis of the talks. While Iran and Pakistan stated that the ceasefire included Lebanon, the US and Israel have since insisted that is a separate issue. Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, has said that any peace negotiations would be “meaningless” if they took place as bombs continued to fall on Lebanon. According to Iran’s deputy foreign minister Saeed Khatibzadeh, Pakistan’s interventions to maintain the peace and protect the fragile ceasefire had continued behind the scenes. Khatibzadeh claimed that Pakistan had intervened to stop Iran retaliating against the strikes on Lebanon. Ahead of the first round of discussions in Islamabad, which are due to take place on Saturday, army personnel and paramilitary rangers were deployed and security was beefed up across the capital. A public holiday was declared on Thursday and Friday and the streets were eerily empty. Pakistani officials remained tight-lipped about the arrangements for the negotiations, citing security and diplomatic concerns, but said the preparations were full steam ahead. “Our priority is that the talks go smoothly,” said one official involved in the arrangements. “We don’t want to be seen as a spoiler. Our role is as a facilitator and mediator. We will leave it to both parties, Iran and the US, to share any developments with the media if they want.” The official confirmed that the key delegations were due to arrive on Thursday night and Friday morning. On the US side, the White House confirmed their negotiating team would be led by vice-president JD Vance, with special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner also travelling to Islamabad. Iranian officials said their delegation would include foreign minister Abbas Araghchi and parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who were both part of the ceasefire negotiations. Senior figures from Iran’s revolutionary guard are also expected to attend. Officials said that delegations from Gulf countries, including Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which have faced heavy bombardment from Iran since the war began, would also be travelling to Islamabad and may take part in sideline talks. Due to the high security risks involved, Pakistani officials confirmed that there were three to four possible venues being lined up for the critical meeting between Iran and the US. The most high-profile attenders are expected to stay in Islamabad’s exclusive five-star Serena hotel, which may also play host to the talks. The hotel was cleared of its guests and the surrounding 3km of roads were shut off to cars and put under army control. Other possible venues cited by officials were the prime minister’s secretariat, Islamabad’s convention centre or a secure military location. Officials said there was no set timeline for how long the talks would take. However, guests who were evicted from the Serena hotel on Wednesday were informed the hotel would be occupied until Sunday night. In a meeting on Thursday between prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and Pakistan’s army chief, Asim Munir, who was credited with helping to broker the ceasefire, the pair “expressed satisfaction over the de-escalation achieved so far”.

picture of article

Cuban president tells NBC he won’t resign under US pressure, as Russia backs old ally

The Cuban president, Miguel Diaz-Canel, said he would not resign under US pressure in his first television interview with an American broadcaster, while Russia insisted it would never abandon or betray its ally. Diaz-Canel told NBC News on Thursday: “We have a free sovereign state, a free state. We have self-determination and independence, and we are not subjected to the designs of the United States. “The US government that has implemented that hostile policy against Cuba has no moral to demand anything from Cuba,” the 65-year-old said in remarks that were translated to English. “The concept of revolutionaries giving up and stepping down – it’s not part of our vocabulary.” Washington has waged a pressure campaign on communist-ruled Cuba, imposing a virtual oil blockade on the island by threatening tariffs on any country that attempts to sell oil to the island. An energy crisis has crippled Cuba since January when its main supply from Venezuela was cut off after the US seized Nicolás Maduro. Trump has openly floated the idea of “taking” Cuba and his administration labels leaders in Havana a threat to US national security. As the tensions simmer between Washington, Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov visited Cuba on Thursday, holding talks with Diaz-Canel. Quoted by Russian news agencies, Ryabkov said Moscow had no intention of walking away from its interests in the western hemisphere no matter what the US might say. Ryabkov said Moscow’s help for Cuba would go beyond the large shipload of oil it had sent to the island last month. “I am certain that the events of recent weeks in our relations will have us moving forward to find solutions to the toughest problems … emerging from the illegal and absolutely unacceptable blockade of the island by the US,” Ryabkov was quoted as saying. “We cannot betray Cuba. That is out of the question. We cannot leave it on its own. “It is too early to say what the next steps will be. But it is clear we will not be limiting our supplies to the load that was aboard the tanker Anatoly Kolodkin. “Russia has no plans to walk away from the western hemisphere, no matter what Washington might say.” In late March, the tanker Anatoly Kolodkin carrying 730,000 barrels of crude oil reached Cuba, marking its first oil delivery in three months. Despite threatening tariffs in early January on countries that sell or provide oil to Cuba, the Trump administration allowed the tanker to proceed. “Cuba’s finished,” Trump said at the time. “They have a bad regime. They have very bad and corrupt leadership and whether or not they get a boat of oil, it’s not going to matter.” Cuba produces only 40% of the fuel it consumes, and it stopped receiving key Venezuelan oil shipments after the US attacked Venezuela in early January and arrested Maduro. With Reuters, Agence France-Presse and Associated Press

picture of article

Hezbollah launches rockets at Israel – as it happened

This live blog has now closed. Our coverage of the Middle East crisis continues here.

picture of article

Netanyahu says there is no ceasefire in Lebanon as Israel launches fresh strikes

Benjamin Netanyahu has said there is “no ceasefire in Lebanon” and Israel would continue “to strike Hezbollah with full force” as the country’s military launched fresh strikes. The Israeli prime minister’s remarks and latest attacks on what the IDF called “Hezbollah launch sites” came shortly after Donald Trump said he had asked Netanyahu to be more “low-key” in Lebanon. Later on Friday, a US state department official said Israel and Lebanon will hold talks in Washington next week. The announcement came as Netanyahu ordered his ministers to seek direct talks with Lebanon focused on disarming Iranian-backed Hezbollah. Neither Israel nor Lebanon have publicly confirmed the US talks for next week. Earlier, the Lebanese government had said a ceasefire must be agreed before any talks could begin. In a written message, Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, said the Islamic republic did not want war with the US and Israel, but would protect its rights as a nation, state television reported on Thursday. “We did not seek war and we do not want it,” he said. “But we will not renounce our legitimate rights under any circumstances, and in this respect, we consider the entire resistance front as a whole,” he added, in an apparent reference to Lebanon. More than 300 people were killed by Israeli bombing in the 24 hours after the announcement of a ceasefire in the Iran war on Tuesday night. The bombardment, ostensibly aimed at Hezbollah targets, included strikes with heavy munitions on densely populated areas, which drew outrage from the International Committee of the Red Cross and other international humanitarian organisations. The ferocious attack on Lebanon threatened to derail hopes of a negotiated end to the war in Iran, which began with a US-Israeli attack on 28 February. Despite claims by the US president, Donald Trump, that the Pakistani-brokered ceasefire had marked significant progress towards bringing a durable peace to the Middle East, the truce looked in danger of collapsing on its first day. Iran warned that, in response to the Israeli attacks after the ceasefire, it would once more close the strait of Hormuz, the economically critical waterway it had agreed to open for the two-week duration of the ceasefire. The country’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said negotiations were “meaningless” as long as Israel continued to bomb Lebanon, placing in doubt US-Iranian talks in Pakistan scheduled for Saturday. Pezeshkian vowed Iran would not abandon the Lebanese people. According to Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Saeed Khatibzadeh, Iran had been held back from responding forcefully to Israel’s escalation in Lebanon by Pakistani intervention urging restraint in the interests of a broader peace agreement. Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, condemned Israel’s “ongoing aggression against Lebanon”. Netanyahu had insisted Lebanon was not included in the Tuesday night ceasefire agreed by Donald Trump, and vowed the Israeli military would continue to strike Hezbollah targets “wherever necessary”. The Israeli prime minister said his forces had killed the secretary of Hezbollah’s leader, Naim Qassem. Trump himself backed Netanyahu’s version, telling the public broadcaster PBS that Lebanon was “not included in the deal” because of Hezbollah’s role. He referred to the conflict in Lebanon as a “separate skirmish” from the Iranian war and added: “That’ll get taken care of, too. It’s all right.” CNN reported that Netanyahu’s announcement of peace talks with Lebanon had come at the urging of the US president, who is keen to extricate the US from a war that he was persuaded to join by Netanyahu, according to multiple accounts of the lead-up to the conflict. The US vice-president, JD Vance, assigned to lead the US delegation to peace talks in Pakistan, suggested there had been a “legitimate misunderstanding” on the geographic reach of the ceasefire deal. Pakistan, which accelerated its mediation efforts after Trump threatened a civilisation-ending onslaught, has said Lebanon had been part of the agreement. Robert Malley, a former American envoy who led earlier US-Iranian negotiations, said: “I would trust the Pakistani mediator that Lebanon was included. They put out a statement that it was included and we did not hear any American correct the Pakistani version for many hours. “It looks like a case of the US reneging and giving the Israeli prime minister [permission] to go ahead [with bombing] for another 24 hours before they are ‘restrained’”. Malley said the best-case scenario for peace talks in Pakistan was that the region was returned to the status quo before the US-Israeli attacks began on 28 February, with the strait of Hormuz open, and options for limiting Iran’s nuclear programme on the table along with some form of financial compensation for Tehran. Authorities in Islamabad began implementing strict security measures in anticipation of the arrival of delegations for talks, expected to begin on Saturday. As the future of the ceasefire looked in peril, Trump issued his latest ultimatum on social media, vowing a return to US attacks (as he put it, the “Shootin’ Starts”) if Iran failed to comply with “the real agreement”. He made clear that Tehran had to reopen the strait of Hormuz fully to international shipping, and that it should have “no nuclear weapons”. He did not mention Lebanon. US allies have insisted the ceasefire should be comprehensive. A joint statement by the UK, EU countries, Canada and Japan called on “all sides to implement the ceasefire, including in Lebanon”, where Israel is seeking to destroy the Iranian-backed Hezbollah movement. Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign policy chief, said on Thursday: “Hezbollah dragged Lebanon into the war, but Israel’s right to defend itself does not justify inflicting such massive destruction. Israeli strikes killed hundreds last night, making it hard to argue that such heavy-handed actions fall within self-defence.” France’s foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, condemned the Israeli strikes as “unacceptable” and his British counterpart, Yvette Cooper, described them as “deeply damaging”, adding that failure to include Lebanon in the ceasefire would “destabilise the whole region”. A Downing Street spokesperson said Keir Starmer spoke to Trump on Thursday about the “next stage of finding a resolution” for reopening the strait of Hormuz. “The prime minister set out his discussions with Gulf leaders and military planners in the region on the need to restore freedom of navigation in the strait of Hormuz, as well as the UK’s efforts to convene partners to agree a viable plan. “They agreed that now there is a ceasefire in place and agreement to open the strait, we are at the next stage of finding a resolution.” Diplomatic efforts worldwide have focused on reopening the strait of Hormuz, the gateway to a fifth of the global flow of oil and liquefied natural gas. Only 11 ships – four Iranian, four Greek, one Chinese, one Omani and one unknown – were allowed to pass through the strait in the 24 hours after the ceasefire, less than a tenth of the prewar flow. About 1,400 ships remain anchored in the Gulf, trapped first by the war then the uncertainty that has accompanied the vague and shaky truce. After an initial plunge in the global oil price after the announcement of the ceasefire, it began to creep up again towards $100 a barrel on Thursday.

picture of article

New Zealand ‘comfort women’ statue could jeopardise diplomatic relations, Japan says

Diplomatic relations between Japan and New Zealand could be jeopardised if a statue symbolising the thousands of women Japan forced into sexual slavery before and during the second world war is erected in an Auckland garden, the Japanese embassy has warned. The bronze statue depicts a seated girl next to an empty chair and was given to New Zealand by the Korean Council for Justice and Remembrance, a non-government organisation, to commemorate survivors of wartime sexual violence. If local authorities approve the proposal at a meeting on 28 April, it will be installed in the Korean cultural garden at Barry’s Point reserve in Auckland. Some historians say as many as 200,000 women – mostly from Korea, but also China, south-east Asian, as well as a small number from Japan and Europe – were forced or tricked into working in military brothels between 1932 and 1945. They were euphemistically referred to as “comfort women” – a term Japan continues to use, despite survivors having taken issue with the label. The women were forced to have sex with Japanese soldiers in frontline, makeshift brothels. According to testimony from surviving women, they were forced to have sex with 10 to 30 men a day in dimly lit rooms furnished only with beds. Condoms were washed and reused, and offered little protection against sexually transmitted diseases. Medical examinations were infrequent, and many women became addicted to the mercury 606 used to treat syphilis. Forced abortions were commonplace. In a submission to Auckland council, the Japanese ambassador, Makoto Osawa, said “needlessly stirring up interest” in the issue could become a burden not only for Japan and South Korea’s cooperation but for Japan-New Zealand relations. Osawa argued the government’s funding of water and electricity for the development of the garden in 2015 could “give the impression that the New Zealand government is also supporting the installation”, were it erected. A spokesperson from the Japanese embassy, who did not wish to be named, told the Guardian the statue would create division and conflict within Japanese and Korean communities and could result in Japanese cities cutting ties with New Zealand cities. The relationship between Japan and South Korea has become strained since the first survivor went public with her story in the early 1990s. The first “peace statue” honouring the women was erected in Seoul in 2011. Since then dozens more have been erected overseas, prompting Japan to call for their removal. In 2018, Osaka ended its 60-year “sister city” relationship with San Francisco after the city agreed to recognise a similar statue – erected by a private group in San Francisco’s Chinatown district – as public property. In 2020, Japan reacted angrily to statues in South Korea that appeared to depict the former Japanese prime minister, Shinzo Abe, prostrating himself before a young woman. In 2025, a peace statue was removed from Berlin, after a years-long dispute over its presence. Japan insists that the “comfort women” issue was settled “finally and irreversibly” by a 2015 agreement reached by Abe – who agreed to provide 1 billion yen (US$9m) in “humanitarian” funds to a foundation set up to support the survivors – and then-South Korean president Park Geun-hye, who agreed not to raise the issue in international forums. Park’s liberal successor, Moon Jae-in, effectively dissolved the fund in 2018, saying it did not take into account the feelings of survivors and the South Korean public. Successive Japanese administrations have refused to provide official recompense, insisting that all compensation claims were settled under a 1965 bilateral peace treaty. Japan had no intention of denying or underestimating the experiences of the women, its embassy in New Zealand said, but it believed the statue was part of an “anti-Japan” movement led by a group of Korean people who wanted to make the issue “more sensational”. “This statue actually has brought division and conflict to the community in [other] countries, instead of reconciliation between Japanese people and the Korean people.” The Guardian contacted the Korean embassy and the office of New Zealand’s minister of foreign affairs for comment. The proposal for Auckland’s statue received 672 submissions, with 51% of individuals strongly opposing it, and 13 out of 21 organisations also against it, according to Auckland council. New Zealand-based Japanese submitters accounted for 36% of submitters while 34% were Korean. Many supporters believed the statue would serve as an appropriate way to highlight sexual violence, while those opposing it felt it would be too politically charged. The Aotearoa New Zealand Statue of Peace committee – a group working with the Korean Garden Trust to install the statue – told the Guardian the project was about “acknowledging the violence inflicted on these girls and young women” and remembering the humanity of all survivors. Rebekah Jaung, the chairperson, said it was shocking that Japan “would so blatantly try to silence a monument honouring women on the other side of the world”. “Every one of the girls and women who were taken, and their families, have their own heartbreaking story and many of the survivors also have legacies of reclaiming their power through activism,” Jaung said. “The statue is a small way to unite and share their stories.” Additional reporting by Justin McCurry in Tokyo