Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: White House says Iran report on draft deal is ‘complete fabrication’

The White House on Wednesday blasted an Iranian state television report about a framework deal with the United States to end the Middle East war as a “complete fabrication.” The Iranian report cited a draft outline of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that it said included a US commitment to lift the naval blockade on Iran and withdraw its forces from the Gulf region. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards on Wednesday said a return to war with the United States was unlikely, while warning that the Islamic republic stood ready against any attack. The statement came a day after Iran accused the US of breaching the ceasefire in place since April, and warned it was ready to retaliate after the most serious strikes since the truce took effect. The United States is extending the designation of Lebanon for temporary protected status until 27 November, according to a notice posted to the Federal Register on Wednesday. Strikes hit the outskirts of the south Lebanon city of Tyre on Wednesday, state media and an AFP correspondent reported, after the Israeli army issued an evacuation warning for swathes of the city and its surroundings. The state-run National News Agency (NNA) said that “Israeli enemy warplanes launched a strike on the outskirts of Tyre”, also reporting another raid near the city despite a ceasefire. The Lebanese army said on Wednesday that a soldier had been killed in an Israeli air strike near his post in Bekaa and that it had retrieved his body. It said the retrieval was delayed from the previous day due to the security situation in the area. Hezbollah said it traded fire with Israeli soldiers in Lebanon as the Israeli military appeared to push deeper in the country. The Iran-backed group said its fighters engaged in close-range combat with Israeli troops in Zawtar al-Sharqiyah, a town north of the Litani river and beyond the buffer zone that Israel has enforced in parts of southern Lebanon. Israeli airstrikes killed at least 31 people in southern Lebanon on Tuesday, according to health officials, in one of the deadliest attacks since a ceasefire took effect in April. The Israeli prime minister. Benjamin Netanyahu, said he had instructed the military to expand its operations in Lebanon with “large forces on the ground” and take control of new areas north of the Israeli-held buffer zone. South Korea said a probe into an attack on a cargo ship in the strait of Hormuz assessed that it likely involved an Iranian missile. Components in the debris from unidentified objects that were found inside the HMM Namu, which came under attack on 4 May, indicated they were likely made in Iran, according to a South Korean foreign ministry official. Israel has claimed to have killed Mohammed Odeh, head of Hamas’s armed wing, in a strike on Gaza City last night. If confirmed, his death comes just 11 days after the Israeli military killed his predecessor. Hamas has yet to comment on the report.

picture of article

Carlo Petrini obituary

On 20 April 1986, Carlo Petrini was part of a group who cooked and distributed spaghetti to passers-by in Piazza di Spagna in Rome. The huge pot of pasta was their response to the opening, the previous month, of the biggest McDonald’s in the world just metres from where they stood. For Petrini and fellow members of Arcigola, a group dedicated to the pleasures of food and shared political ideals, the opening of McDonald’s in the centre of Rome represented an attack on Italian culinary identity, local biodiversity and the natural rhythms of life: the spaghetti was a declaration of resistance. A few months laters, during a meeting over dinner at Osteria dell’Unione in Treiso, southern Piedmont, the group came up with the idea of trying to stem the fast food invasion, whose single value was profit. The essayist Folco Portinari, then head of the Rai TV company, wrote the text, while Petrini gathered signatures, and on 3 November 1987, a manifesto was published on the front page of Gambero Rosso, a supplement of the communist newspaper Il Manifesto. The manifesto began with the title “A proposal aimed at all those who want to live better” and then gave a name to what they saw as the way to achieve this: “Slow Food”. The words that followed were both simple and revolutionary: a call to defend the pleasure of food, food biodiversity and local producers against the standardisation of the global agri-food industry. The page was illustrated with a snail, a symbol of productive tranquillity, the manifesto signed by 13 writers, intellectuals and artists. Following its publication and the creation of Arcigola-Slow Food, local groups known as convivia began to emerge all over Italy. Marjorie Shaw, an early member of the Rome convivium that met in an insalubrious hall in San Lorenzo, remembers how farmers, journalists, cooks, teachers and students gathered around a table, animated by the sense that something culturally fragile was at stake. Petrini’s Slow Food revolution had begun. Two years later, in Paris, more than 20 delegations from around the world signed the official Slow Food manifesto, and Petrini was elected president of the movement – a role he held until 2022, by which time Slow Food was a global network active in more than 160 countries, with 1,500 local branches and youth programmes, 6,000 products protected by the Ark of Taste catalogue, a publishing house and more than 600 Slow Food “presidia” intended to reintroduce supply chains, animal breeds, and plant varieties at serious risk of extinction. What Petrini created was a global system built around three words – good, clean and fair – that offered new ways of thinking about food: not merely as a source of nourishment, but as a matter of environmental sustainability, cultural identity and social justice. Carlo, known to many by the affectionate diminutive Carlin, was born in Bra, a town in Piedmont, north-west Italy. His father, Giuseppe, a communist from a family of railway workers, who had spent several years in a Russian concentration camp after the second world war, was an auto electrician; his mother, Maria (nee Garombo), a schoolteacher from a farming background. Following his parents’ wishes, Carlo gave up an academic education for professional training, and enrolled in a technical institute for mechanics. Far better suited to humanities, he failed the mechanical components, recalling the comments following his oral exam as: “Petrini, can you promise never to become a mechanical engineer?” He enthusiastically agreed. He did, though, work alongside his father in order to support his studies in sociology, attending evening classes in Turin and travelling to Trento University for exams. In a 2025 interview Petrini described missing four of his final exams because there was too much to do; how he returned to Bra to open a grocery shop; became involved with the independent Radio Bra Onde Rosse and local politics; and wrote his first articles about gastronomy for the communist newspapers I’Unità and Il Manifesto. He became a political and cultural organiser within Arci (the Italian Recreational and Cultural Association), and then was a co-founder with Silvio Barbero of Arcigola. In 1996 Slow Food organised the first Salone del Gusto, a biannual food and wine Expo that brought together food artisans from all over the world in Turin. In 2004 the Salone gained a new dimension in the form of Terra Madre, a gathering aimed at giving a voice to those often marginalised in the global food system. Speaking about the need for Terra Madre, Petrini stressed the importance of food education in a post-industrial society where the transmission of knowledge from generation to generation is no longer physical, and of considering the act of eating as both an agricultural and a political gesture. An environmentalist who isn’t a gastronome is sad; a gastronome who isn’t an environmentalist is foolish, he would say. Later, Petrini would express the same dedication to Orti in Africa, a network cultivating thousands of sustainable community gardens across the African continent, to Slow Food projects in Mexico, to his role as UN special ambassador for Zero Hunger in Europe, and to the challenge to GM foods. In 2004 education was placed firmly at the centre of Slow Food with the creation of the University of Gastronomic Sciences in Pollenzo, near Bra, the first academic institution in the world to offer an interdisciplinary approach to food studies, an achievement Petrini acknowledged as being a particular source of pride. Since its founding, 5,000 students from 100 countries have graduated and are now scattered across the world, young people carrying ideas forward and planting – “those who sow utopia, reap reality”, said Petrini. Not least among them is Edward Mukiibi, a tropical agronomist from Uganda, who succeeded Petrini as the president of Slow Food. A diagnosis of prostate cancer followed Petrini’s decision to step aside from that role in 2022, but he continued to travel in order to listen and communicate about food, always returning to his home in Bra, where he lived with his younger sister, Chiara, who survives him. He also continued to write, adding to his dozens of published books, which included A Taste for Change (2023), with the economist Gaël Giraud, and Terrafutura (2020), in which Petrini addressed some of the most problematic aspects of our time in dialogue with Pope Francis, with whom he shared friendship and respect, a sense of humour, and hope for a world in which everyone has food that is good, clean and fair. • Carlo Petrini, activist and writer, born 22 June 1949; died 21 May 2026

picture of article

UK will get no special treatment from EU, European ministers say

The UK will get no special treatment in its future economic relationship with the EU, European ministers have said, in a further blow to Keir Starmer’s hopes of negotiating a single market for goods. The EU’s ministers for Europe, who met on Tuesday, said they wanted deeper cooperation with the UK, but this had to be in line with fundamental principles, including no cherrypicking of EU policies, according to three diplomatic sources, who spoke about the private discussions. The Guardian revealed last week that the government had pitched the creation of a single market for goods between the UK and EU to Brussels, but the proposal was rejected by EU officials. A single market for goods, long hinted at by the prime minister and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, would be a radical departure for the EU. Since the Brexit vote nearly a decade ago EU leaders have said that the single market encompassed four freedoms: free movement of goods, services, capital and people. Europe ministers had no appetite for the British proposal of free movement of goods only, although the idea was only briefly mentioned at Tuesday’s meeting, EU sources said. “Member states reaffirmed the established legal framework underpinning the relationship and negotiations, with continued emphasis on the indivisibility of the four freedoms, balance of right and obligations, autonomy of EU decision making and the avoidance of cherrypicking,” an EU diplomat said. The diplomat said the EU commissioner in charge of UK relations, Maroš Šefčovič, had concluded “that the EU remains united in its ambition to deepen ties, while the UK’s red lines are increasingly constraining progress”. The European Commission was contacted for comment. France has said it would be willing to welcome the UK back to the European single market and customs union, reflecting the changed geopolitical landscape since Brexit. EU officials have also stressed that a customs union or alignment with the single market remains available to the UK. But some member states are sceptical about the UK’s willingness to be a rule taker. Joining the single market, minus EU membership, would leave the UK without a vote when new rules are being drawn up. A second EU diplomat said the relationship with the UK was “the best that we have had in a very long time” but “the UK still wants to have the cake and eat it”. EU member states, the person said, “value and cherish” stable relations and want to work with the UK, but “this does not mean the UK and the EU are equal partners”. Questions are growing about Starmer’s reset with the EU, with no date announced for a long-expected EU-UK summit, which is tentatively pencilled in for 13 July. The summit is meant to finalise a sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement to ease trade in food, drink and farm products, an accord on linking emissions trading systems (ETS), and a youth experience scheme enabling young Europeans to work, study and travel across the UK and the EU. It is also seen as a moment to launch a future agenda for cooperation, with both sides interested in deepening ties on defence. Asked about the future EU-UK relationship, Ireland’s Europe minister, Thomas Byrne, told reporters: “We have matters to agree now: the ETS, SPS and youth experience scheme. Let’s focus on them before we get on to any other discussions, which also present difficulties. We certainly want to be as open as possible in the relationship.” Asked specifically about the UK’s single market for goods proposal, he said: “It presents challenges.”

picture of article

WHO chief calls for DRC ceasefire to tackle Ebola outbreak

The head of the World Health Organization has called for an immediate ceasefire in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo to help tackle the Ebola outbreak there, as Uganda closed its border with its neighbour in an effort to stop the spread. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus posted on social media that the region was in the midst of a “catastrophic collision of disease and conflict with the Ebola outbreak in Ituri province outpacing the response”. Tedros said on Monday that he would travel to the DRC this week. As of Sunday there had been 900 suspected cases and 223 suspected Ebola deaths in the DRC and seven confirmed cases and one death in Uganda, WHO data shows. The outbreak was confirmed on 15 May in Ituri, the DRC’s most north-eastern province, which borders South Sudan and Uganda. Diana Atwine, a senior Ugandan health official, told a press conference on Wednesday that Uganda’s border would be closed for four weeks, except to Ebola response teams, humanitarian and security operations and food and cargo transport. Any person who was authorised to enter Uganda from the DRC would be required to undergo mandatory self-isolation for 21 days, she said. Earlier this month, the WHO advised countries against closing their borders, saying it would push people to use informal border crossings, making it harder to monitor and stop the spread of the disease. Eastern DRC has a number of armed groups. Though the government still largely controls Ituri, insecurity had been worsening there before the Ebola outbreak. Almost 1 million people in the province have been displaced by conflict, according to the UN humanitarian office. The outbreak has spread south to rebel-held areas of North Kivu and South Kivu provinces, where the Rwandan-backed M23 group controls large swathes of the region. Tedros said: “Stopping this Ebola transmission depends entirely on humanitarian access. Yet ongoing clashes are driving mass displacement, pushing exposed contacts into overcrowded camps and severing critical containment corridors. “Frontline workers are risking everything, while attacks on health facilities make tracking cases and their contacts nearly impossible. We cannot build community trust or isolate the sick while bombs are falling. We urge all warring parties to agree to an immediate ceasefire to contain this outbreak.” The response to the outbreak has been complicated by the transient nature of many communities in Ituri, where goldmines attract migrant workers, as well as by international aid cuts. Philippe Guiton, the DRC director of the aid organisation World Vision, said: “For children, the risks are especially acute. Years of conflict have weakened community systems, and acute malnutrition has left many young bodies too fragile to withstand a virus as aggressive as Ebola.” The response has also been hindered by attacks on health facilities by people wanting authorities to release Ebola victims’ bodies for burial. Traditionally, burials involve families washing and touching the body. However, the bodies of Ebola victims are highly contagious and have been a key vector for spreading the disease in previous outbreaks in the region. On Saturday and Sunday, people attacked a hospital in Mongbwalu, in Ituri. Its medical director, Dr Richard Lokodu, told Reuters that 18 Ebola patients fled the facility on Saturday when “unidentified individuals” burned tents where patients were being isolated. On Sunday, seven more patients fled and an individual suspected of having Ebola died haemorrhaging in the attempt, he said. In Uganda, all seven confirmed cases were reported in Kampala, the WHO said. They included a driver who had transported another case; a Congolese woman who had travelled to Uganda for medical care; a Congolese health worker who worked with other Congolese people seeking healthcare in Uganda; and two Ugandan health workers who had cared for an Ebola patient. Reuters contributed to this report.

picture of article

Zelenskyy asks Trump for help with air defences as Russia continues attacks – as it happened

… and on that note, it’s a wrap for today! Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has asked the United States for more ammunition for its Patriot air defence systems to counter Russian ballistic missiles (15:48). The request came in a letter written by Zelenskyy to the US president, Donald Trump, and the US Congress, arguing that Ukraine needs to be ready to defend itself amid continuing attacks from Moscow. Belgium has become the latest country to summon Russia’s ambassador over the Russian threats to strike Kyiv, after similar moves by Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the EU earlier this week (17:01). Separately, the head of the UK’s spy agency GCHQ Anne Keast-Butler said that Russia’s Vladimir Putin is “going backwards on the battlefield” in Ukraine, with “almost half a million Russian soldiers” killed since the conflict began (16:22). In other news, Iceland’s foreign minister has said she fears her country faces a “Brexit moment” in its looming EU referendum amid warnings over misinformation, foreign interference and AI (13:53). Lawmakers in Hungary have voted overwhelmingly for the country to remain a member of the international criminal court, reversing a decision made by the previous government of Viktor Orbán (15:27). Climate scientists have warned of “new reality” of heat extremes in Europe as the May heatwave continues across the continent (10:58, 14:39). Spanish police entered the ruling Socialist Party’s headquarters in Madrid on a judicial order to gather information on a possible illegal financing scheme (10:03), as the country’s prime minister Pedro Sánchez faces an anxious time as scrutiny grows over his family, party, administration and allies (10:30, 12:06). If you have any tips, comments or suggestions, email me at jakub.krupa@theguardian.com. I am also on Bluesky at @jakubkrupa.bsky.social and on X at @jakubkrupa.

picture of article

Thirty-five people want to be the next president of France. What could possibly go wrong?

“The real risk,” France’s prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, reportedly said last month, “is that this tangle of ambitions reflects such a lack of engagement with reality on the part of all these candidates that voters find the whole thing grotesque.” He has a point. By this time next year, France will have a new president and Emmanuel Macron, who is constitutionally barred from serving more than two consecutive terms, will have left after a decade in the Élysée Palace. The number of candidates jostling for position in the race to succeed him – whether formally declared, plainly preparing to do so, known to harbour presidential aspirations or merely on record as “interested” – currently stands at (wait for it) 35. The obvious danger, as Paul Taylor observes, is that with so many runners and riders from the moderate left, centre and centre-right, the presidential race ends up being a shoo-in for the far right, currently comfortably ahead in all first-round polls. For the EU, the blow would be immense. A nationalist leader in Paris could paralyse the bloc’s decision-making, challenge the supremacy of EU law and push a “France First” agenda that undermines the single market and Schengen free-travel zone. Yet unless the mainstream parties get their act together, the prospects for the EU’s second-largest economy and only nuclear power being run by a far-right president from this time next year look alarmingly high. The latest to throw his hat in the ring is former prime minister Gabriel Attal, declaring (as would-be French presidents must) that he loved France and the French “with a passion” and was “fed up with 50 shades of managing decline”. But Attal – France’s youngest prime minister when he was appointed in 2024 – faces two major obstacles: not just his perceived proximity to the outgoing president, currently languishing on a 75% disapproval rating, but centrist rivals. The leader of Macron’s Renaissance party is trailing another of the president’s former prime ministers, Édouard Philippe, the popular, moderate-right mayor of the port city of Le Havre and head of the hitherto Macron-allied Horizons party. Both may well be challenged by yet a third centrist, the justice minister, Gérald Darmanin, who has said that he too intends to play a role in the election “either as a candidate, or by supporting the person best placed to represent” the centrist camp. Attal and Philippe have reportedly set up a “mechanism” to assess by early 2027 whether one or the other should step aside. But the centrists are not alone in their confusion. Similar if not worse chaos reigns on the fractured centre-right (whose presidential candidate in 2022, Valérie Pécresse, scraped just 5% in the first round), which has backed successive Macron governments since 2024. There, three candidates have already declared, and another may soon. Bruno Retailleau, a hardline recent interior minister, will run for his Les Républicains party – but a regional president and a mayor are challenging him to represent the broader right. Also likely to join the race is Dominique de Villepin, prime minister all of 20 years ago. Again, there are calls from both the centre and the centre-right for a single candidate to run for both camps – but zero agreement on how they might be chosen. The field on the left is even more hopelessly tangled. Among 17 potential or declared candidates are a former president (François Hollande), prime minister and cabinet minister, plus an assortment of (ex-)MPs and an MEP. Some among the Socialists (currently feuding among themselves), Greens and smaller left groups want to field a joint candidate, but cannot decide how. The Greens, Communists and a pro-EU independent, Raphaël Glucksmann, do not. The left is further split over whether to hook up in any way with Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the veteran radical leftist making a fourth run for the Élysée. Some argue the moderate left will be annihilated without him; others say he’s toxic to most voters. There’s even an element of doubt on the far right: the National Rally (RN) will learn on 7 July whether Marine Le Pen’s legal woes definitively prevent her from running – in which case her hand-picked protege, Jordan Bardella, will do so in her place. *** The stakes are high To be fair, most analysts are confident the field will narrow by autumn. French presidential races often do not really get under way until the New Year, they note, and very few are won by the early frontrunners. But the stakes could hardly be higher. The bottom line: if the centre and the centre-right cannot agree on a joint candidate, the chances of either Le Pen or Bardella – both polling at more than 35% for the first round – seizing the presidency surge. If the moderate left also cannot field a single candidate, they will – as in the past two presidential elections – fail to reach the run-off. And if both mainstream camps are unable to unite, France faces a run-off pitting Bardella or Le Pen against Mélenchon. Polling suggests either far-right candidate will comfortably win the first round, likely to be on 11 or 18 April – while the only candidate so far predicted to be remotely capable of beating either far-right candidate in a run-off is Philippe. As Angelique Chrisafis points out, polling also suggests 74% of French voters want either a “radical transformation” or “deep changes in France” – a big increase over the past few years that clearly cries out for serious policy initiatives. But, warned Brice Teinturier of the Ipsos polling agency, the dominant feeling among voters is simply: “No one is bothered with them – politicians are giving the strong impression they are only interested in themselves and their candidacies.” It is all a potential recipe for disaster. Joseph de Weck of the Foreign Policy Research Institute reckons the game is not yet up: France may have a “fatalist and depressive streak”, he said, but also “a deep voluntarist and idealist tradition”. Will it rise to the occasion to keep the RN out? The French, wrote Alexis de Tocqueville back in 1856, are “the most brilliant and the most dangerous nation in Europe – in turn an object of admiration, hatred, pity or terror, but never indifference”. It would be nice, come next summer, if the sentiment was admiration. To receive the complete version of This Is Europe in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.

picture of article

Hungarian MPs vote to remain member of ICC, overturning decision made by Orbán

Lawmakers in Hungary have voted overwhelmingly for the country to remain a member of the international criminal court, reversing a decision made by the previous government of Viktor Orbán. Wednesday’s vote came days before the country was poised to become the only EU member state not to recognise the jurisdiction of the global tribunal, which aims to prosecute those accused of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. In April last year, Orbán announced that Hungary would begin the process of pulling out of what he decried as a “political court”. He made the comments while hosting his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, a longtime ally and the subject of an ICC arrest warrant, in Budapest. After Péter Magyar was elected as prime minister in a landslide victory last month, the new leaderrepeatedly vowed that his government would reverse the withdrawal before it took effect on 2 June. On Monday, Magyar’s government submitted a bill to the parliament, setting in motion a fast-tracked procedure that resulted in 133 of the 199 lawmakers voting to back the bill. The legislation must now be signed into law by the president, Tamás Sulyok, an Orbán-era appointee whom Magyar has repeatedly called on to resign. Earlier this week, the ICC’s legislative body hailed Hungary’s plan to reverse the withdrawal, describing it as “essential” to ensuring accountability for the world’s gravest crimes. The U-turn marks a bright moment for the beleaguered institution. Since Donald Trump’s return to power in the US last year, his administration has worked steadily to hobble the Hague-based court, imposing sanctions on 11 of the court’s officials. Several of the judges and the chief prosecutor have been left grappling with the fallout, from cancelled credit cards to disappearing Amazon and Google accounts, in what one judge described as a “direct and flagrant attack” on one of the world’s most prominent courts. For weeks, Magyar had made it clear that his Tisza party would work to ensure that Hungary, a founding member of the ICC treaty, would not join the ranks of countries, such as China, Israel, Russia and the US, that refuse to recognise the court’s jurisdiction. This week’s legislation framed the decision as one aimed at maintaining global peace and protecting human rights, noting: “It is essential that those who commit the most serious international crimes be held accountable before an international judicial forum.” Reversing the ICC withdrawal would mean that Netanyahu would be arrested if he stepped foot in the country, Magyar told reporters last month, indicating that the end of Orbán’s time in power meant Israel had lost one of its staunchest allies in Europe. “I believe that if the country is a member of the international criminal court, and a person who is wanted by the court enters our territory, then that person must be taken into custody,” Magyar said. In 2024, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes – including starvation as a method of warfare – in Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza. His office has rejected the court’s “false and absurd” accusations, describing them as fuelled by antisemitism and the politically motivated move of “a biased and discriminatory political body”. In July last year, a panel of ICC judges determined that Hungary had failed to comply with its legal obligation to arrest Netanyahu during the visit to Budapest. Noting that the obligation to cooperate had been made sufficiently clear to Hungary, the judges said the “failure to arrest suspects severely undermines the court’s ability to carry out its mandate”. Before the visit, Hungary had not shared any concerns over the arrest warrants with the court, the judges noted. “Hungary did not engage with the court before or during Mr Netanyahu’s visit and instead decided to unilaterally withhold cooperation,” they said.

picture of article

Israel launches more than 120 airstrikes against Lebanon in a day

Israel launched more than 120 airstrikes against Lebanon on Tuesday in one of the heaviest days of bombing in weeks, as the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said his military was escalating its offensive against Hezbollah. A ceasefire brokered by the US last month between Israel and the militant Islamist movement now appears close to total collapse, complicating negotiations to bring a definitive end to the war with Iran. Tehran, which has a close relationship with Hezbollah, has repeatedly signalled that an end to Israel’s offensive in Lebanon is a condition of any deal with Washington. Donald Trump told reporters at the White Houseon Wednesday that Iran wanted to make a deal, but that the US was not satisfied with it yet. “Iran is very much intent, they want very much to make a deal,” he said. “So far they haven’t gotten there … we’re not satisfied with it, but we will be. We will be either that or we’ll have to just finish the job,.” Observers said Israeli officials and military commanders want to inflict as much damage as possible on Hezbollah before a deal between Tehran and Washington imposes new limits on or stops the current offensive. Israel’s military said it targeted 100 sites linked to Hezbollah across southern Lebanon and the eastern Bekaa valley area, including storage facilities, command centres and observation points that Israeli officials say are used to attack troops and residents in northern Israel. Lebanon’s national news agency said at least 10 people, including women and children, were killed in one strike on the town of Burj al-Shamali in southern Lebanon, while another strike on the eastern village of Mashghara killed 12 people including several members of the same family. Netanyahu said in a statement that the Israeli military was “operating with large forces in the field and capturing and controlling areas”. “We are fortifying the security strip to protect the northern communities [in Israel],” Netanyahu said in a reference to a self-declared security zone occupied by Israeli troops several kilometres inside southern Lebanon. The veteran Israeli leader, who faces a tough battle for re-election later this month, is under pressure to show results against Hezbollah, especially as few of the apparent aims of the war Israel launched with Iran in February have been achieved. Politicians and commenters in Israel have called in recent days for Netanyahu to ignore any pressure from Washington to limit its military operations in Lebanon. Writing in the Maariv newspaper, Avi Ashkenazi called for “sustained around-the-clock attack waves of strikes using hundreds of aircraft simultaneously”. “The ground in Lebanon must tremble. Residents of Beirut, Tyre and Sidon must sit in shelters just as residents of [Israel’s] north are being forced to remain confined to their homes,” he wrote. Beirut has so far been spared Israeli strikes since the start of the ceasefire, but the prospect of an escalation of the offensive has caused widespread concern. “By just saying a few words on TV, [Netanyahu] causes everyone to panic and flee their homes,” said Tony Aboud in Beirut’s bustling Hamra district. “I don’t know what’s going to happen and how long we can live like this.” There were reports on Wednesday of new fighting in southern Lebanon between Israeli troops and Hezbollah. Hezbollah said its fighters clashed with Israeli forces in a town north of the strategic Litani River in southern Lebanon – the current de facto boundary in Lebanon, with large areas to the south under Israeli military control. Strikes hit the outskirts of the southern city of Tyre on Wednesday, state media and an Agence France-Presse correspondent reported, after the Israeli army issued an evacuation warning for much of the city and its surroundings. Israel’s military has ordered residents not to return to dozens of villages in the buffer zone it is seeking to establish between five and 10 kilometres into Lebanon, where its troops have been destroying homes. An Israeli military official said the military was “operating in a targeted manner beyond the Forward Defense Line in order to remove direct threats to the citizens of the state of Israel [and Israeli soldiers]”. In recent weeks, Hezbollah has boasted that it is using new fibre-optic drones, which Israeli troops have struggled to intercept, hitting Israeli forces and northern Israeli villages. Israel has told people there not to gather in large numbers. On Wednesday, air raid sirens were activated in the area of Shlomi in the western Galilee after reports of a drone infiltration. “What this requires of us now is to increase the blows, to increase the intensity. We will smite them hip and thigh,” Netanyahu said earlier this week. Over 1 million people in Lebanon have been displaced in the latest round of hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel, which began when the Islamist movement fired rockets into northern Israel in March, two days after Israel launched strikes against Tehran which killed the then Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. At least 3,213 people have been killed in Israeli strikes since the start of the war, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry, with more than 9,700 wounded. According to Netanyahu’s office, 23 Israeli soldiers and a defence contractor have been killed in or near southern Lebanon, and two civilians have been killed in northern Israel. The Israeli military said that 10 of its soldiers had been killed since the 16 April ceasefire, six of them by Hezbollah’s explosive drones. Hezbollah has not released figures for its own casualties. Israel’s defence minister, Israel Katz, said the military had killed Mohammed Odeh, the new leader of Hamas’ military wing, during airstrikes in Gaza City, less than two weeks after killing his predecessor. At least five people were killed and 12 injured, according to local hospitals. Reuters, Agence France-Presse and Associated Press contributed to this report