Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: Hegseth says today will be the ‘most intense day of strikes’ in war against Iran

Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned on Tuesday that any attack on the Islamic republic’s infrastructure would result in a tit-for-tat response. “The enemy should know that whatever they do, undoubtedly it will have a proportionate and immediate response,” Ghalibaf wrote on X, more than a week into the Middle East war that began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran. “We today go with the rule of ’an eye for an eye’, without compromise, without exception,” he said. “If they start a war on infrastructure, we will undoubtedly target infrastructure.”

picture of article

Family of Tumbler Ridge shooting victim sues OpenAI alleging they could’ve prevented attack

The family of a child critically injured one of Canada’s worst mass shootings is suing OpenAI, arguing the technology company could have prevented the attack on a school last month. The lawsuit comes days after the head of OpenAI said he would apologize to the families of a remote Canadian town after violence shattered the tight-knit community. Eight people – including five school students, aged 12 to 13, and a 39-year-old teaching assistant – were killed by an 18-year-old shooter in the mountain town of Tumbler Ridge on 10 February. It later emerged that the shooter, Jesse Van Rootselaar, who died of a self-inflicted injury, had described violent scenarios involving guns to ChatGPT over several days in June, which an automated review system flagged, according to the Wall Street Journal. But Open AI, which owns the chatbot, said it felt the account activity did not identify “credible or imminent planning” and so banned Van Rootselaar’s account, but did not notify authorities in Canada. The company later said it found a second account linked to the shooter after the first was suspended. On Monday, Cia Edmonds filed a lawsuit against the company on behalf of herself and her two daughters, Maya and Dahlia Gebala, both of whom were present during the shooting. “The purpose of this lawsuit is to learn the whole truth about how and why the Tumbler Ridge mass shooting happened, to impose accountability, to seek redress for harms and losses, and to help prevent another mass-shooting atrocity in Canada,” the law firm Rice Parsons Leoni & Elliott LLP, which is representing the family, said in a statement. The allegations have not been tested in court. Maya, 12, was shot three times. One bullet entered her head above her left eye and another hit her neck. A third bullet grazed her cheek and part of her ear, the lawsuit says. She remains in hospital after suffering a catastrophic traumatic brain injury, permanent cognitive and physical disability, right-sided hemiplegia, scarring and physical deformities, according to the claim. Both Edmonds and her daughter Dahlia, who was not injured physically in the shooting, have experienced PTSD, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbances. Edmonds’ civil claim alleges ChatGPT was rushed to market by OpenAI without adequate safety studies. The family is seeking undisclosed punitive damages, saying the company’s conduct “is reprehensible and morally repugnant” to both the plaintiffs and the “community at large”. Last week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman met virtually with British Columbia premier David Eby and Darryl Krakowka, mayor of Tumbler Ridge amid mounting frustration that existing policies within the tech giant did not require it to report violent content to police. “Everybody on the call recognized that an apology is nowhere near sufficient, but also that it is completely necessary,” Eby said. “And the mayor of Tumbler Ridge is going to work with OpenAI to make sure that any public statements relating to that are done in the way that is appropriate and meaningful, as much as possible, [and] doesn’t retraumatize people in the community.” Asked to comment on the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the company called the shooting an “unspeakable tragedy” and said Altman will work with Eby and Krakowka “to find the best way to convey his apology and support to the Tumbler Ridge community” but did not give a timeline. “OpenAI remains committed to working with provincial and local officials to make meaningful changes that help prevent tragedies like this in the future.” The company did not say if the lawsuit would change Altman’s plans to apologize. “OpenAI had the opportunity to notify authorities and potentially even to stop this tragedy from happening,” Eby told reporters after the meeting with Altman. The premier said while the company could have done more, he flagged a lack of mental health support and the shooter’s access to firearms. Eby, who delivered an emotional speech to the community at a vigil in the days after the shooting has emerged as a staunch critic of the largely non-existent regulatory framework governing how artificial intelligence companies operate in Canada – and how OpenAI handled the situation. “It’s not acceptable that it’s up to the companies about whether or not to report, and that needs to change.” Eby refused meetings with members of the company’s leadership team, demanding instead that he speak directly with Altman. In the 30-minute call, the premier said he did not ask about interactions between the shooter and OpenAI’s chatbot. Already, under pressure from lawmakers, the company has changed how it works to better identify potential warning signals of serious violence. Canada’s AI minister Evan Solomon said he had asked the company to apply their new safety standards retroactively and review previously flagged cases. “This will determine whether additional incidents that would have been referred to law enforcement under OpenAI’s new safety standards were missed, and ensure they are promptly reported to the RCMP.” While Eby said OpenAI’s leadership has been “responsive” to the concerns of governments, he warned other companies with similar chatbots hadn’t yet changed their policies. “The status quo doesn’t work, didn’t work, and it very much presents the threat that it might fail again,” said Eby. “And so change needs to be made quite urgently.”

picture of article

Pete Hegseth warns of ‘most intense’ day of US strikes on Iran yet

Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has warned that Tuesday would be the “most intense” day of US strikes yet, even as he blamed Iran for civilian casualties by claiming its forces were firing missiles from schools and hospitals. Speaking alongside Gen Dan Caine, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Hegseth alleged Iran was deliberately firing missiles from schools and hospitals, describing the country’s leadership as “desperate and scrambling like the terrorist cowards they are”. “Iran stands alone, and they are badly losing,” he added. Caine said that US Central Command had so far struck more than 5,000 targets to date, destroyed over 50 Iranian naval vessels and hit several drone factories to degrade Iran’s autonomous weapons capability. He said US forces had dropped dozens of 2,000lb GPS-guided penetrating weapons on deeply buried missile launchers. Ballistic missile attacks continued to diminish, he said, adding that US forces and allies in the region had been intercepting one-way attack drones using fighters and attack helicopters. Hegseth said Iran’s neighbors had abandoned them, and that their proxies – Hezbollah, the Houthis and Hamas – have been “either broken, ineffective or on the sidelines”. When pressed on civilian casualties, which involved a strike that killed more than 165 people at an all-girls school, most of them children, Hegseth instead pivoted to accuse Iran of moving rocket launches “into civilian neighborhoods, near schools, near hospitals, to try to prevent our ability to strike”. He added: “That’s how terrorist regimes fight. They target civilians. We do not.” He insisted no nation in history had taken more precautions to avoid civilian deaths, though acknowledged that investigations “take time”. The Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school was struck on the first morning of the campaign, 10 days ago while about 170 girls aged seven to 12 were in class. First responders told the Middle East Eye it appeared to be a “double tap” strike on the school. A preliminary US assessment found that the United States was “likely” responsible, possibly due to dated intelligence that wrongly identified the site as still part of an adjacent IRGC naval base from which it had been physically separated since 2016. Hegseth declined to comment on reports that Iran’s new supreme leader had been wounded, saying only that it “would be wise” for Iranian leadership to heed the president and renounce nuclear weapons. Mojtaba Khamenei was on Sunday elevated to the position after his father, Ali Khamenei, was killed in the opening strikes of the campaign. Hegseth was emphatic that this conflict would not turn into another open-ended forever war that the US is entangled in. “This is not 2003. This is not endless nation-building,” he said. “Our generation of soldier will not let that happen again.” He explained how the “aftermath is going to be in America’s interests”, and added: “We won’t live under a nuclear blackmail scenario of conventional missiles that can target our people.” Donald Trump, he said, “gets to determine the end state” and “our will is endless”. Ahead of the press conference, Trump told Fox News that he heard Iran wanted to talk and that it was possible he’d have a negotiation with them, though it depends on the terms. But days earlier, on Friday, Trump rejected any off-ramp by posting on Truth Social that there would be “no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER”.

picture of article

Spain to formally pardon 53 women incarcerated by Franco regime

Spain is to formally pardon a group of 53 women who are among thousands who were incarcerated by the Franco regime on the grounds that they were supposedly “fallen or in danger of falling”. The women were locked up as adolescents by the Board for the Protection of Women, a collection of institutions run by religious orders. The board, which had echoes of Ireland’s notorious Magdalene laundries, was overseen by Carmen Polo, the wife of the dictator Gen Francisco Franco. Originally founded in 1902 to stamp out sex work, in 1941, two years after the end of the Spanish civil war, its role was extended to clamp down on female behaviour that deviated from norms laid down by the Catholic church. The board was not closed down until 1985, 10 years after Franco’s death. In a ceremony next week, the government will pardon the 53 survivors and recognise them as victims of Francoist repression. A statement from the ministry of democratic memory said that any punishment, whether legal or administrative, they had suffered was null and void as it resulted from “the repression and violence exercised by the Board for the Protection of Women for political, ideological reasons or because of their gender”. The government department set up last year to investigate the board has so far received 1,600 declarations from women who passed through the institutions. One woman was locked up on suspicion of being a lesbian – simply because she had written a letter discussing sexuality. Eva García de la Torre, who went on to become the mayor of a small town in Galicia after her release in 1985, was the first woman to be officially recognised as a victim of the board. She died in 2022. Another was detained because she was considered by authorities to be “too fond of the street”. Until now the work of the board has been little discussed, perhaps because of the stigma attached to those who passed through its doors but also because of the complicity of ordinary people who denounced young women to the authorities. “The board could rely on broad public support and people became its ally and accomplice,” said the historian Carmen Guillén, who earlier this year published a book on the institution. “People had assimilated the ideas of what made a ‘good’ or a ‘bad’ woman and what was seen as a deviation from the feminine. It was a form of panoptic control exercised by their families and neighbours as well as the authorities.” Last year a group representing the religious orders that ran the board offered a public apology “to all those women whose rights and dignity were not recognised”. Victims’ representatives rejected the pardon and demanded “truth, justice and reparations”.

picture of article

Police investigate after shots fired at US consulate in Canada

Police in Canada are investigating after shots were fired at the US consulate in Toronto. Officers said evidence was found of a discharged firearm and that no injuries were reported. Toronto police said in a social media post they responded to the reported shots at 5.29 a.m. (0929 GMT) on Tuesday. “The shooting ... is absolutely unacceptable. Canada will never tolerate intimidation and violence of any kind, including towards our American friends in Canada,” the public safety minister, Gary Anandasangaree, said in a post on X. Ontario Premier Doug Ford also described the incident as “an absolutely unacceptable act of violence and intimidation aimed at our American friends and neighbors.” He said: “Everyone at all levels of government and across Canada needs to make clear that there is zero tolerance for this sort of intimidating and dangerous behavior.” In a statement, the state department said it was aware of the incident and was closely monitoring the situation in coordination with local law enforcement. The incident follows the explosion of an improvised device at the US embassy in Oslo on Sunday. Norwegian police were still searching for a suspect, with a possible link to the Iran war among the lines of inquiry. Norwegian police on Monday published two photographs of the suspect they believe to be behind the weekend blast that caused no injuries and minor damage. The suspect, whose face was not visible in the grainy images from surveillance camera footage, was dressed in dark clothing with a hood over his head and wearing a backpack. The suspect is believed “to have placed an improvised explosive device (IED) next to the entrance” of the embassy, police said in a statement. “The individual has still not been identified and we have no specific suspects.” More details soon…

picture of article

The HMS Dragon row: why has it taken so long to get a UK destroyer to Cyprus?

The pace at which HMS Dragon has been readied for deployment to defend a British military base in Cyprus from attacks by Iran has prompted claims that Britain’s proud naval history has been shamed. It has been a week since the government said the Portsmouth-based Type 45 destroyer would be deployed, but it is still at dock and the ship is likely to take another five days or more to reach its destination. Sources within the Ministry of Defence say that the efforts of those involved in making the destroyer seaworthy in such a time period have been herculean. The defence secretary, John Healey, told the House of Commons on Monday that navy crews were working “tirelessly, 22 hours a day” and that HMS Dragon would be out to sail within “a couple of days”. It is claimed by those involved that a process that would normally take six weeks has been near completed within six days. Why was there not a Royal Navy destroyer ready to go? It can take five days or less for a destroyer that is in a high state of readiness to be ready for deployment from dock, according to experts. HMS Dragon was not in such a state. This time last week, it was on dry dock undergoing scheduled repairs before deployment on a Nato mission. As a result, it was rumoured that HMS Duncan would be the ship sent to Cyprus instead. Matthew Heaslip, a senior lecturer in naval history at the University of Portsmouth, said that it was probably the poverty of resources that meant that HMS Duncan was needed to stick around the UK for domestic defence. “Duncan had just done some training exercises, and so may have needed some maintenance of its own,” he said. “But the Iran war is also not the only thing going on in the world right now where you might need air defence in the UK and, quite simply, the UK doesn’t have any air defence other than the Royal Air Force and some short-range missiles. The other year, when a number of dignitaries came into London, they had to put HMS Diamond on to the River Thames, in theory, to provide that air defence. So if you’ve got three of your six destroyers in deep maintenance, and you’ve got three available, you kind of need to have one that’s ready to go in UK waters at any point in time to provide at least nominal coverage.” Why does it take so long to ready a warship for deployment? First of all, all the repairs that were scheduled needed to be completed. As HMS Dragon was on a dry dock in Portsmouth, it also needed to be put back into the water, a process called undocking or refloating. Water is introduced into the dock and that process alone can take several hours. As the water level rises, the destroyer eventually reaches a “critical point” where it begins to lift off the keel blocks that supported its weight. The destroyer is towed backwards out of the dry dock by tugboats. This process can take a day and has to be done with the tidal patterns in mind. The ship was then sent to the upper harbour ammunitioning facility which is used by the Royal Navy to load missiles, ammunition and supplies on to warships. As HMS Dragon was due to be involved in an entirely different type of mission than initially scheduled, it needed to be modified through significant changes in equipment and weaponry, a process called “re-rolling”. This was made more difficult by the foggy conditions. Welding work is required to get the systems in place and operational. This included loading up the Sea Viper air defence system, which is capable of simultaneously taking out 16 missiles and drones. Munitions had to be transported from Gosport. The ship must also take on food, fuel and other supplies. About 80 crates of food were boarded on HMS Dragon in recent days. All this is estimated to take five days, although MoD sources said it was done in four. About 200 personnel are expected to travel with the vessel. The unexpected nature of the deployment means many may have needed to return from leave or training. Given the nature of the mission, there may be special forces involved and the Royal Marines to deploy. Then there is the paperwork. The ship needs to be certified as fit to deploy. HMS Dragon will be moved from the ammunitioning facility to a berth at Portsmouth docks on Tuesday afternoon, ready to sail. Was this a seamless operation then? The union Prospect, which represents tugboat workers and engineers at Portsmouth, has claimed that a new contract with Serco, which runs in-port services for the government, slowed the process. New routine working hours of 9am-5pm on weekdays had made mobilising staff for urgent tasks harder, it was claimed. Both the MoD and Serco deny this. An MoD spokesperson said: “Staff are stepping up to support the operation, and all requests that have been made to Serco to support the preparation of the ship have been fulfilled.” Heaslip said that the need to deploy HMS Dragon highlighted the tough position that deep cuts had left the navy in. He said: “A huge amount is being asked of the Royal Navy at this point in time, all of which is defensive. As much as Trump would talk about Britain joining a war in Iran, we don’t have the resources right now to do that.”

picture of article

Uruguay’s candombe brings streets to life as the once-banned musical tradition roars back

Like the blues in the US, samba in Brazil, rumba in Cuba and plena in Puerto Rico, candombe, Uruguay’s Afro-descendent music, was once reviled, marginalised and even banned – but managed to endure. But while other such genres have for decades formed part of the cultural mainstream across the Americas, only now is candombe experiencing its peak. A drone view of the Rueda de Candombe gathering in the streets of Ciudad Vieja in Montevideo, Uruguay. Once confined to the Black neighbourhoods of the capital, Montevideo, candombe groups have spread to every region of the South American country of 3.5 million people, 10% of whom identify as Afro-Uruguayan. One Montevideo group, Rueda de Candombe, has been drawing up to 2,000 people every Monday to listen to a repertory that is entirely national and rooted in the Afro-Uruguayan rhythm. “I think we are at a turning point,” said Claudio Martínez, 47, one of the group’s singers and percussionists. Claudio Martínez, a drummer of the Rueda de Candombe, performs at Sala de Naciones La Calenda in Montevideo. The session was part of a special event hosted by Jorge Drexler to film a music video and preview his new material. Rueda de Candombe began performing in a bar about a year ago, but as audiences grew, the city council moved it to Plaza España, a public square. “It’s a tremendously meaningful place,” said Martínez. Members of the Lonjas de Ciudad Vieja comparsa prepare their costumes and instruments before the start of the Corso de la Ciudad Vieja in Montevideo. In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was only in the secrecy of homes or at a handful of authorised parades that Africans and their descendants were able to play their drums. One way to escape complaints from neighbours was to practise just outside the city wall – very close to where Rueda de Candombe now performs. Martínez said: “It’s crazy, because when you look around, you realise that in this very place we’re dancing, singing and enjoying ourselves with some of the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of those who were denouncing us from inside the walls.” Candombe’s newfound popularity is such that one of Uruguay’s biggest singers, Jorge Drexler – the first Latin American artist to win an Oscar for best original song, in 2005 – has made it the protagonist of his new album, Taracá, due for release on 12 March. Rueda de Candombe features on three tracks, and the genre’s rhythms run through much of the album, including Ante la duda, baila (If in doubt, dance), which describes how, in 1807, Uruguayan authorities banned candombe: “They considered it a lewd and impure dance / for the way it moved the hips.” Uruguayan singer-songwriter Jorge Drexler sings with musicians and performers during a Rueda de Candombe session at Sala de Naciones La Calenda in Montevideo. The gathering was part of a special event hosted by Drexler to film a music video and preview his new material. Drexler, 61 – who describes himself as aficionado of candombe, not an expert – said the rhythm “is a trance, a spiritual tool” and that, “in a world in which polarisation is only getting worse, candombe has the ability to build bridges between people”. He continued: “Candombe has expanded enormously in recent years, which makes me very happy, because I grew up in a country where it was looked at with profound discrimination.” Drexler hosts an exclusive track-by-track preview of his upcoming album, Taracá, at Elefante Blanco studio in Montevideo. Candombe emerged from the more than 200,000 enslaved Africans sent to Uruguay during 250 years of slavery, most of them from central Africa. Its name is believed to derive from the Bantu language family and was roughly used at the time to denote something “of Black people”. Performers from the Lonjas de Ciudad Vieja comparsa dance to candombe music, during the Corso de la Ciudad Vieja in Montevideo. The public interacts with the Lonjas de Ciudad Vieja comparsa playing and dancing candombe during the Corso de la Ciudad Vieja. Its spelling closely resembles that of candomblé, the Afro-Brazilian religion, but although Uruguayan drum gatherings had religious elements, candombe is not a faith. It occasionally incorporates other instruments, such as an acoustic guitar or accordion, but it is primarily defined by the use of three drums: piano, chico and repique. Performers from the Lonjas de Ciudad Vieja comparsa dance to candombe music during the Corso de la Ciudad Vieja in Montevideo. “They each have a distinctive sound that corresponds to the human voice,” said the researcher, writer and artist Tomás Olivera Chirimini. “That is why candombe can be defined as a dialogue between ‘human’ voices.” Despite the ban, candombe gradually gained broader acceptance within Uruguayan society, particularly thanks to artists such as Rubén Rada. It was granted protection under national law in 2006 and, in 2009, was recognised by Unesco as an intangible cultural heritage of humanity. Drummers from the Lonjas de Ciudad Vieja comparsa perform during the Corso de la Ciudad Vieja. Chirimini said: “And here we are now, in 2026, with candombe – which was born in a tiny part of Montevideo – having spread across the entire country.” Candombe’s success also brings challenges, Chirimini added: “It’s changing colour: more than half of what is done today is by white people”. Drummers Diego Paredes, Claudio Martínez, and Darío Terán, musicians from the Rueda de Candombe, pose for a portrait and play their drums at Cubo del Sur in Montevideo. Diego Paredes, 41, another musician with Rueda de Candombe, said this was also evident when negotiating events or shows. He said: “While we inherited spirituality, the swing and the strength from our ancestors, we also inherited poverty. So when an entrepreneur comes along, he is clearly not Black.” Paredes’s connection to the music “comes from the womb”, as his mother, Chabela Ramírez, 68, is one of the country’s leading candombe artists and Afro-feminists. “Uruguay is a very racist country,” Ramírez said during an interview in Palermo, one of the capital’s most traditional Afro-Uruguayan neighbourhoods, but which, amid gentrification, is becoming increasingly white. Chabela Ramírez is one of Uruguay’s leading candombe artists and Afro-feminists. “Sometimes I’m afraid that what happened to tango [in Argentina] could happen to candombe,” said Ramírez, noting that the neighbouring country’s emblematic rhythm has “Black roots that no one speaks about”. She argues that candombe cannot only be thought about in terms of entertainment when it has origins in resistance and spirituality. Ramírez said: “The drums take the place of the human voice, because singing was not permitted, nor were enslaved people allowed to speak to one another. Candombe had, and still has, a very important role in communication.”

picture of article

Trump’s ‘free flow of energy’ vow fails to restart shipping in strait of Hormuz

Only two vessels not linked to Iran or Russia have made the “chicken run” through the strait of Hormuz since Donald Trump said he would “ensure the free flow of energy to the world”, according to maritime records. One of those that braved the journey since the US president’s announcement of emergency measures on Friday went “dark” by switching off its transponder and a second signalled it was Chinese owned and crewed. The Hormuz sea passage, one of the world’s most strategically important choke points, would normally have about 100 vessels a day either exiting or entering the Gulf. In response to the US and Israeli attacks, Iran has effectively shut the strait, attacking at least 10 ships which were seeking to traverse it in the early days of the crisis. On Friday, Trump announced a $20bn (£14.85bn) reinsurance scheme to revive shipping through the strait, which he said would come into effect immediately. He followed up by saying that shipowners should “show some guts” by sailing through the war zone. A small number of tankers and bulk carriers of dry goods have braved the crossing since Friday using a variety of methods to mitigate the risk, records show. The Shenlong, a Chinese-made vessel operated by Greece’s Dynacom Tankers Management but sailing under a Liberian flag, crossed the narrow strait to exit the Gulf on Friday, according to the data agency Kpler. The vessel switched off its transponder as it approached the strait and then began signalling again near India’s coastline on Monday as it made its way to Mumbai. A second, Sino Ocean, a bulk carrier that also sails under a Liberian flag, signalled it was “CHINA OWNER_ALL CREW” as it traversed the strait after picking up its cargo from the United Arab Emirates’ Mina Saqr port on Thursday. Only eight other vessels are believed to have entered or exited the Gulf through the strait over the weekend and they all appear to have links to Iran or Russia. They include an oil tanker named Dalia that sails under the Iranian flag and an oil/chemical tanker known as Parimal that has been identified by the US authorities as having transported Iranian oil. On Monday, a tanker known as Cume that has been hit with US sanctions for shipping Iranian crude oil left the Gulf through the strait. Two vessels carrying liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) also passed through the strait over the weekend: Danuta I, which has been identified by the US as being part of the Iranian “dark fleet”, and HH Glory, which was put under US sanctions for its role assisting the Russian energy industry. Three other bulk carriers passed through the strait, of which one sails under the Iran flag and two came from an Iranian port. Other ships may have been passed through by turning off their transponders and using tactics to conceal their movements but the trickle of activity highlights the impact of the war. Before the US and Israeli attacks on Iran, about 20% of the world’s petroleum consumption and roughly one-fifth of the world’s liquefied natural gas passed through the strait of Hormuz each day. On Monday oil prices jumped to as high as $119 a barrel, the highest since 2022, before dropping below $90 after Trump said the war with Iran could end “very soon”. As well as announcing his plan to insure ships making the journey on Friday, Trump had also suggested that naval escorts could be used to provide safe passage for tankers in the Gulf. Insurers have warned that such an escort would probably make the tankers more of a target. Matthew Wright, the lead freight analyst at Kpler, said the high freight rates that companies could charge meant the insurance premiums were not the main problem. “Even record-high freight rates have failed to break the deadlock,” he said. “Shipowners are primarily concerned with the risk of missile or drone attacks, and until there is a material improvement in the security environment, flows are likely to remain extremely limited. Iran is still displaying pretty comprehensive capabilities to strike targets and vessels if they want to. “A diplomatic solution would get flows back in the next one, two, maybe three weeks. China would be the main negotiator there, because the Asian economies are at huge risk. Otherwise we are looking for more than a month to wait for a deterioration of the Iranian capability. “Then there’s also a scenario in which if Iran operates a more decentralised warfare approach, more akin to what the Houthis did, where they have very, very flat command structures, in which you can take out leaders and they continue to operate very effectively, then this could take months. It’s particularly concerning from energy flows point of view.” On Monday, finance ministers of the G7 nations said they were ready to take the “necessary measures” to support the global supply of energy but ended a meeting without agreement on the release of strategic crude reserves. If such reserves were released it would be the first time since 2022 after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.