Read the daily news to learn English

Uganda to withdraw from Invictus Games ‘out of respect for King Charles’, says military chief

Uganda is withdrawing from the Duke of Sussex’s Invictus Games, the country’s military chief has said, out of respect for King Charles amid division over the “Harry-Meghan nonsense”. Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, son of the Ugandan president, made the surprise announcement in a post on X on Wednesday. Kainerugaba wrote: “In order not to be construed as being opposed to His Majesty King Charles III of the United Kingdom, whom we deeply revere, Uganda hereby withdraws from the Invictus Games. We shall not participate in anything that does not have His Majesty’s approval.” The timing of the post suggests it may be in response to an official letter to UK senior government and military officials on behalf of Charles that reiterated the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were not working royals and would not use their HRH styles. When asked by the Times about what had motivated the move, Kainerugaba is reported to have said: “I have factions in the Ministry of Defence that support that Harry-Meghan nonsense. I had to quash it straight away. I support the monarch. Period.” The news, first reported by the Uganda Pulse news website, will be a blow to Harry, who two months ago stood alongside Uganda’s defence minister, Kiryowa Kiwanuka, at an Invictus Games event in London to announce that the East African nation would be the 26th country to enter the multisport event for wounded service personnel. At the time, Kiwanuka praised the Ugandan president, Yoweri Museveni for his “visionary leadership” and Kainerugaba, a Sandhurst graduate, for “championing our team’s entry”, adding that their support “marks a new chapter for our servicemen and women”. The Ugandan government spokesperson Alan Kasujja confirmed to the BBC: “Gen Kainerugaba decides whether or not the UPDF [Uganda People’s Defence Force] participates in the Invictus Games. What you saw is his stated position. If it changes, he will let the world know.” The decision to withdraw may be an unintended consequence of the official letter, issued on Monday by the head of the royal household, the lord chamberlain, Richard Benyon, at Charles’s behest, clarifying the position of the Sussexes after their return to the UK two weeks ago. The letter directed that the couple were “no longer working members of the royal family”, that their charitable work “is a personal matter for them both and undertaken in their private capacity” and “their position is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests”. Kainerugaba was appointed army chief in 2024 and is widely seen as his 81-year-old father’s successor to the presidency. He has made several provocative posts on X, including threats to invade neighbouring Kenya, demands that Jay-Z hand over his wife, Beyoncé, so he could marry her, and threats against Bobi Wine, Museveni’s principal political rival. The Invictus Games and representatives for the Duke of Sussex have been approached for comment.

‘It’s a good start’: prominent Israelis welcome UK sanctions on illegal settlements

Prominent Israelis have welcomed new UK sanctions as a necessary response to settlement expansion and spiralling violence in the occupied West Bank. The intervention was described – by the president of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, a former prime minister, an ex-head of the army and former ministers and diplomats – as an “inevitable consequence” of Israeli government and security failures. “Sanctions [are being imposed] against Jewish terrorists, and not against the legitimacy of the state of Israel,” they wrote in a joint statement. “There is no basis to the [Israeli] government’s response that the decision to impose sanctions against Jewish terrorists is an expression of antisemitism.” Ed Miliband, the foreign secretary, had indicated Britain was planning new sanctions but the strength of his language and the scale of the controls he announced on Tuesday were a surprise. It was the most significant attempt in many years, from a close Israeli ally, to leverage economic power to force change in the occupied West Bank. “Israel’s government has caused a rupture in the longest-standing diplomatic convention of all: using obfuscation and plenty of ‘very concerned’ statements instead of actually doing anything,” Esther Solomon wrote in the Haaretz newspaper. The impact was multiplied when France and Canada announced plans for trade bans on settlement goods and 10 other European countries backed similar measures. Nor did any senior figure in the Trump administration, which was briefed in advance on the UK plans, criticise the measures. “Jerusalem had prepared for rain, but what arrived yesterday was a full-blown storm,” Itamar Eichner wrote in Yedioth Ahronoth. “Yesterday Israel was caught off guard, to the point that senior Israeli officials used the term ‘an intelligence-diplomatic failure’.” Nearly three-quarters of Jewish Israelis favour partial or total annexation of the occupied West Bank, a poll for the Jewish People Policy Institute found. All leading candidates in the upcoming election reject a Palestinian state. However, there is increasingly vocal opposition to settler violence and expansion from some members of the country’s security, political and cultural elites. They threatened legal action against their government this summer over its support for Jewish terrorism and an “ideology of ethnic cleansing” in the occupied West Bank. Prof David Harel, British-born president of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, is among those who signed a statement backing the UK measures. He said the sanctions offered urgently needed support for Israelis like him, who are trying to stop attacks on Palestinians and end the occupation. “I personally would fight until my last breath against antisemitism and against anti-Israelism. For that reason, I’m against general wall-to-wall boycott, divest, sanction-style sanctions on the state of Israel,” the leading scientist told the Guardian. “But what is justified, and I do support, is being anti things that Israel is doing, and these days in particular what it is doing in the West Bank.” He said that Israelis calling for a delay until after the elections were ignoring both the escalating violence that Palestinians faced every day and the risks the occupation posed to Israel’s future. “Getting out of there [occupied Palestine], or, at least for the present, stopping these things from happening and starting to really talk about a two-state solution is not only good for the Palestinians. It’s not that we’re doing these poor people a favour. We’re doing a favour to ourselves, no less, maybe even more.” The joint statement backing the UK sanctions was also signed by former prime minister Ehud Olmert, former commander of the Israeli military Dan Halutz, former ministers Yuli Tamir and Roni Bar-On and former ambassador to Germany Yoram Ben Zeev. “This decision is precisely what the state of Israel should have received in order to remove the disgrace of Jewish terrorism from the face of the country,” they wrote. Nadav Tamir, a former diplomat, also described the measures as good for Israel. “Any move to prevent annexation and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians in the West Bank [and Gaza] is serving the long-term interests of the Zionist vision of Israel as the democratic homeland of the Jewish people,” he said. “It will help us to be more secure and moral.” The value of goods exported from occupied territories to Britain last year was only $45m (£33m) out of total $4.4bn trade in goods and services, according to Roey Fisher, head of Israel’s Foreign Trade Administration. However, plans to place sanctions on any company that finances or facilitates settlement expansion could force Israel’s main banks and insurance companies to choose between their business interests in the UK and those in occupied Palestine. Miliband has not provided details of the new measures but the move has the potential to slow or stop construction. Avraham Burg, a former speaker of the Knesset, thanked Miliband for setting a global example. “Like many Israelis and Palestinians I am grateful for the courageous moral leadership of Miliband. It’s a good beginning. Do not stop,” he said. But Israel’s foreign minister, Gideon Sa’ar, attacked Miliband for “blatant interference” in his country’s domestic affairs before a late October election. Opposition politicians suggested instead that Benjamin Netanyahu might weaponise the UK sanctions to bolster his campaign to remain prime minister. Dahlia Scheindlin, one of Israel’s leading political analysts, said the UK move was very unlikely to affect the October election, because Israeli voters were more focused on domestic issues. “Since 7 October [2023], Israel has become much more inward-looking and provincial, and generally the attitude to the rest of the world is just that ‘they all hate us’,” Scheindlin said. “If you are a Netanyahu supporter you might take this as evidence that they are against us because of antisemitism, and if you are in the opposition camp you might take this as further evidence that the world is turning against us because of Netanyahu’s policies. But it’s hard to see how these policies change the breakdown of the electoral map.” Miliband made his speech on a day when political parties finalised their candidate lists and Haaretz had a bombshell story about security warnings delivered to Netanyahu – and apparently ignored – before the 7 October attacks. Fourteen Israeli human rights organisations welcomed the sanctions. “This is an important and necessary first step to meet states’ legal obligation,” said the statement from groups including B’Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights Israel and Breaking the Silence. “We urge the international community to take further concrete measures to ensure that its relations with Israel no longer enable Israel’s settlement enterprise, forced displacement and ethnic cleansing in the occupied West Bank, or its broader assault on Palestinian human rights across all territories under its control.”

The Bayeux tapestry: why more women should be stitched into the fabric of history | Letters

I enjoyed your photograph of Andy Burnham, Macron and King Charles admiring the Bayeux tapestry and the king’s comment about the “entente amicale” between France and the UK (Bayeux tapestry loan symbolises ‘entente amicale’ between France and UK, says King Charles, 2 September). I also enjoyed Burnham’s wry reference to a tapestry that “shows a new leader emerging from a northern territory, travelling to the south of England in search of the crown. Something clearly that couldn’t happen today.” There is a certain irony, however, in there being, I gather, 93 penises portrayed in the tapestry, and six women – three known and three anonymous. Yet all the beautiful and exquisitely observed needlework was done by women. Observation, detail and creativity – significant and often unremarked. It would be good to hear more about the women involved and less about male leadership, power grabs and violence. Surely we are living too much with this legacy of an over-concentration on only one half of the world’s population? Jane Kearey Bristol • This exchange of treasures is indeed a welcome symbol of friendship and cooperation – at least for now – between our respective elites. Yet the tapestry itself, and the history around it, portray the recurrent theme of history shaped by (pretty much exclusively) male ego, greed and lust for power; thence deceit, treachery, war, massacre, misogyny and psychopathic levels of inhumanity. Looking around the world today, one muses (perhaps in a Norman accent), “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.” I wonder if we’ll ever find a solution. Richard O’Brien Highbridge, Somerset • Let’s hope Jonathan Jones’s vivid review of the Bayeux tapestry will encourage people to engage with English and British history (The Bayeux tapestry: a stupefying, thrilling, horrifying masterpiece that shakes the earth, 3 September). However, discussing the invasion by the Normans, he states that “William succeeded where those later would-be cross-Channel invaders – Philip II of Spain, Napoleon and Hitler – would all fail.” True (although the Germans did occupy the Channel Islands during the second world war), but he overlooks the successful invasion of 1688 when another William, the Dutch William of Orange, or William III, invaded with 500 ships and 20,000 soldiers and after some skirmishes forced James II to flee to exile in France, with profound consequences for the religion, constitution and monarchy of England and later Great Britain. Jones is not alone in forgetting, or misunderstanding, what happened in 1688. In an editorial (28 August), you quoted Nigel Farage as saying, in 2014, that the Bayeux tapestry depicted “the last time we were invaded and taken over”). Let’s hope such ignorance is not widespread and that the loan of the Bayeux tapestry leads to a revival of interest in the study and teaching of history. Richard Ross London • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Spyware can easily fall into the wrong hands – investors should take note | Letter

The targeting of Serbian activists with advanced spyware (Report, 4 September) is the latest warning in a mounting record of abuse that makes the systemic and foreseeable risks of the commercial spyware industry increasingly impossible to ignore. Investors who aren’t paying attention are leaving their portfolios exposed to growing financial, reputational and human rights risks. Despite industry assurances that its technology is intended only for investigating terrorists and criminals, spyware has repeatedly been linked to the targeting of journalists, activists, elected officials, opposition leaders, lawyers, judges, academics and civil society. The fallout for the companies involved has been serious: costly litigation, criminal complaints, crippling sanctions, judicial investigations, tightening export restrictions, executives being convicted, severe reputational damage and, in some cases, financial collapse. That’s before accounting for the damage spyware can inflict elsewhere in an investor’s portfolio. Companies more profitable than spyware firms are forced to defend against attacks, respond to breaches and protect their users and commercially sensitive information. Funding spyware often means funding an attack on their far more valuable portfolio companies. Investors shouldn’t wait for the next scandal to discover their exposure. They should screen commercial spyware companies from their investment universe, require fund managers to identify and prevent exposure across investment chains, and urge portfolio companies to take action to prevent spyware proliferation. This is particularly important for development finance institutions, pension funds and other responsible investors whose mandates and reputations rest on creating long-term social value. Financing companies whose products can be used to silence journalists, intimidate civil society and undermine democratic institutions creates risks that extend far beyond any single investment. The Serbian case should prompt investors to question whether their firm is exposed to commercial spyware. And citizens should be asking, are my tax dollars or pension savings funding this? Meredith Veit Technology and human rights researcher, Business and Human Rights Centre • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Iran claims to have attacked 10 ships near strait of Hormuz after US strikes

Tehran has said it attacked 10 ships around the strait of Hormuz after the US sunk five Iranian tankers, as escalating strikes between the two countries sent the oil price above $100 a barrel for the first time since July. The attacks were the sharpest flare-up of strikes in weeks, as the two sides struggled to break a deadlock in the six-month-long war. Fighting in recent weeks has largely revolved around who controls the strait of Hormuz, as Iran attempts to close off the waterway and Washington enforces a blockade of Iranian ports. The strait is a critical route for global energy supplies, with up to 20% of the world’s oil and gas transiting it before the US-Iran war. The rising price of oil, above the psychologically significant $100 mark, is likely to raise inflation and the price of goods. Stocks fell on Wall Street while rising fuel and food prices in the US will further frustrate the Trump administration, which faces a midterm election with an unpopular war and a cost-of-living crisis. Among the vessels struck by Iran were two US vessels and eight oil tankers, the Iranian’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said on Wednesday. The IRGC said the 10 vessels were “noncompliant” – a likely reference to ships that tried to traverse the waterway without its permission. At least one sailor was killed and another was missing. The US denied that its vessels were hit, with US Central Command saying on social media that all “attempted attacks failed”. A tanker in Iraqi waters carrying 2mi barrels of fuel oil was also struck by a drone, according to Iraqi officials. There were no reports of casualties among the crew and the Iraqi government said there were no reported oil leaks. Iran said it also fired missiles at US bases in Jordan – 18 of which authorities said were intercepted while two fell in unpopulated areas. The US had said it destroyed five Iranian oil tankers overnight, publishing videos of ships on fire. The US military said the attacks were a response to Iran targeting a US navy warship twice in the previous two days. Iranian state TV said the US strikes had followed a “complex intelligence and operational action at dawn” to seize a US underwater drone in the strait. The US said the seized craft was a “defective” older model that did not carry any sensitive data. The back-and-forth strikes signalled an intensifying escalation between the two sides as Washington announced a new policy of attacking Iranian tankers if Iran targets its warships. “Iran continues to try to hit US naval ships, and for every time they do that or try to do that, they’re going to lose tankers,” the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, told reporters. Iran said it would also escalate its attacks, and that for every two or three tankers struck it would respond by hitting 20. The IRGC said it would also release maps of a new, much-larger area near the strait that it considers forbidden for ships to traverse, extending as far as the Gulf off Chabahar for the first time. The conflict has also taken on an increasingly regional dimension as the Iran-aligned Houthi movement in Yemen traded strikes with Saudi Arabia. The Houthis launched a wave of attacks on four cities in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, causing large fires at oil installations and wounding 73 people. The Houthis said dozens of people have been killed in Saudi airstrikes, something unconfirmed by Riyadh. Fighting re-ignited between the two sides after the Houthis launched an offensive against the Saudi-backed government of Yemen in south Yemen last week, aimed at reaching the Red Sea. The group is trying to enforce a Red Sea blockade against Saudi Arabia, announced in July. If enforced, it would cut off another route for the kingdom to export its oil.

Air traffic control boss given a week to report after UK flight chaos causes 2,000 cancellations

The head of the air traffic control provider Nats has been given a week to report back on the reasons for a technical failure that grounded thousands of flights, as the transport secretary said she did “not believe the issue was unavoidable”. Heidi Alexander said on Tuesday she had also commissioned an independent review by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) into the latest Nats meltdown, which severely disrupted travel for hundreds of thousands of passengers. The comments will pile pressure on the Nats chief executive, Martin Rolfe, despite Downing Street saying the government still had confidence in him after a morning meeting with Alexander, and as the number of flight cancellations passed 2,000. The minister told the Commons: “Safety must remain air traffic controllers’ overriding priority, and this morning I have spoken to Nats chief executive, Martin Rolfe, who informed me this outage was due to a technical issue at their Swanwick site. “So, while my understanding from Nats is that we can rule out a cyber-attack on this occasion, I do not believe this issue was unavoidable.” The CAA said passengers were “unlikely to be entitled to compensation for delays and cancellations” as the problem was likely to be considered the result of “extraordinary circumstances”. Airlines have urged action, with Rolfe facing increasing pressure to quit, after the third large-scale stoppage to flights in just over three years. Latest industry estimates say about 330,000 passengers had their travel disrupted and delayed, with many stuck on grounded planes for hours during the incident . Other passengers were stranded overnight at airports in the UK and abroad. More than 155,000 passengers had flights cancelled, while flights were delayed for more than 180,000 passengers. A Downing Street spokesperson earlier said Alexander had asked Rolfe to “carry out a full investigation into what happened to make sure that lessons are learned, so that this doesn’t happen again”. Alexander said she would “leave absolutely no stone unturned in understanding what has happened here, and what can be done to drastically reduce the likelihood of something like this ever happening again. “I do think we need to ask tough questions about the resilience of Nat systems … We also need to think about consumer redress issues as well.” The prime minister’s spokesperson added: “We have confidence in him and he’s been tasked with the investigation, which will report in a week’s time.” Airlines including Ryanair and Wizz called for Rolfe to resign or be sacked by Alexander. He had earlier defended the resilience of the systems run by Nats, which provides services to 15 UK airports. “We will be doing a very thorough and full investigation,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “We have at this point ruled out a cyber-attack … This will be something we haven’t seen in more than 50 years of operation.” Nats said the problem occurred in its flight processing system but was not the same fault as the issues that caused outages and mass disruption in 2023 and 2025. Ryanair queried the explanation and said lessons had not been learned. The carrier, which on Tuesday said more than 65,000 of its passengers had been disrupted when 50 flights were cancelled, said it had now cancelled more than 250 flights and that its costs would run into millions. The airline’s chief executive, Michael O’Leary, said: “Martin Rolfe’s position as Nats CEO is untenable. We don’t need more investigations, we don’t need more reports, and we don’t need another parliamentary committee hearing where Martin Rolfe will promise change, will promise resilience, and will promise an effective backup system.” He said the UK’s air traffic control services were one of the most expensive in Europe “and yet it keeps repeatedly failing”. O’Leary said Alexander should “today demand that failing Martin Rolfe must quit, or be dismissed”. Yvonne Moynihan, the managing director of Wizz Air UK, called on Rolfe to consider resigning. “In any industry when you’ve had three failures, you need to consider three strikes and you’re out,” she told Today. “A third time and a third excuse is not enough any more. What we need to see from leadership is accountability.” Luke Petherbridge, the director of public affairs at the travel association Abta, said: “While the immediate priority is supporting customers … the industry and the public will want answers as to what has gone wrong.” Nats said the fix it eventually implemented on Tuesday, almost four hours after the incident first occurred, had been a “very complex recovery and has created difficulties for the whole aviation network, from which it will take time to recover”. More than 300 flights were cancelled on Wednesday in the continuing fallout from the outage. According to data from the analysts Cirium, nearly 2,100 flights in and out of UK airports have been cancelled because of the failure, including 1,750 on Tuesday out of 5,800 scheduled flights. Of these, 541 were at Heathrow. A spokesperson for British Airways said: “Tuesday’s air traffic control issue has forced us into cancelling almost 550 of our flights, affecting more than 85,000 of our customers. We’re incredibly sorry for the experience they’ve endured because of an issue that has been entirely out of our control.” The airline operated nearly 80% of its typical flight schedule. Rail passengers affected by flight disruption could use booked tickets on a different date or to a different airport if needed, or apply for a refund, the Rail Delivery Group said. The airport breakdown started at about 1pm on Tuesday and affected departing flights at many of Britain’s biggest airports, including Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester and Stansted. London airports as well as Manchester were among the most directly affected, with operations in effect suspended for hours in the afternoon. While Heathrow said the fault initially only stopped takeoffs, the airport was soon too full to accommodate more planes, with arriving flights diverted to other European airports. Flights to and from other airports around the UK, including Birmingham, Edinburgh and Belfast, were also disrupted. The air traffic control problems follow an “isolated event” a year ago that caused widespread disruption, and appeared less severe than the full grounding of flights in August 2023, which prompted a parliamentary inquiry.

Germany’s Merz cancels phone call with Trump after social media post celebrating AfD win – as it happened

And, on that note, we will be closing the blog for today. German chancellor Friedrich Merz cancelled a planned phone call with US president Donald Trump on Wednesday, hours after Trump publicly celebrated a regional election win by Germany’s far-right Alternative für Deutschland party (14:02). The news came hours after a fierce exchanges between Merz and AfD’s leader Alice Weidel during a parliamentary debate in the Bundestag, during which the chancellor accussed the far-right party of seeking “ethnic cleansing” (10:05), and his defence minister Boris Pistorius pointed out its links with Russia (15:07). Celebrating her party’s win in the Saxony-Anhalt election over the weekend, Weidel said Merz “failed to understand the message” from the voters, but his time was “up anyway”. In other news, Norway bid farewell to King Harald V in a ceremonial funeral attended by royals and leaders from several other countries (12:03, 13:04, 14:33, 17:01). Moldova’s president Maia Sandu warned that “Russia’s frontline is moving further west” after a Russian strike on the Moldovan-Ukrainian border overnight, a day after a drone incursion into Moldovan airspace (10:59). Two people were killed in an explosion at a power plant in southern Switzerland, which police said was “a serious workplace incident” (11:49, 17:16). One person died and four were seriously injured after a passenger train collided with a cement truck in Poland (12:47, 17:16). Serbian president Aleksandar Vučić dissolved ⁠parliament and announced snap elections for next month as he seeks to extend his ⁠hold on power by ⁠running for prime minister (12:49). If you have any tips, comments or suggestions, email me at jakub.krupa@theguardian.com. I am also on Bluesky at @jakubkrupa.bsky.social and on X at @jakubkrupa.

Tens of thousands line the streets as Norway bids farewell to King Harald V

Norway has observed a minute’s silence as it takes leave of King Harald V in a series of ceremonies, bringing to a close 13 days of national mourning that followed the popular monarch’s death last month at the age of 89. Tens of thousands of people lined the streets of Oslo and foreign heads of state and government converged on the Norwegian capital for the funeral of the late king, a light-touch and unassuming reformer who ruled for more than three decades. With the king’s casket carried on an artillery carriage, draped in Norway’s red royal banner and topped with white flowers, the funeral cortege made its way on foot along Oslo’s main avenue from royal palace to the cathedral, as a 21-gun salute rang out from the Akershus fortress. King Haakon VIII, who succeeded his father on Harald’s death, and other royal family members walked in the cortege, with Harald’s widow, Queen Sonja, 89, and Haakon’s wife, Queen Mette-Marit, who is recovering from a lung transplant in June, following in a car. The procession was followed by a church ceremony attended by royals including Britain’s Prince William and Princess Anne; Spain’s King Felipe and Queen Letizia; ‌Sweden’s royal family; Denmark’s King Frederik and Queen Mary; the Netherlands’ King Willem-Alexander and Queen Maxima; and Japan’s Crown Prince Akishino. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and political leaders and dignitaries from more than 20 countries were at the service, at which the speaker of Norway’s parliament, Masud Gharahkhani, recalled a monarch who was “not afraid to meet his people with his rubber boots on”. The prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre, said Harald “struck a balance between being stately and being down-to-earth. He made Norway greater. He spoke of a ‘we’ in Norway where everyone is there for each other.” After the service four F-35 fighter jets flew over the cathedral, one breaking away to symbolise the king’s passing. The casket was then carried to the Akershus fortress where it was due to be lowered into the royal crypt, next to Harald’s parents and grandparents, in a private ceremony. Norwegian police said securing the funeral had been the largest planned operation in the force’s history. More than 46,000 Norwegians have filed past the king’s casket in the past week and schoolchildren were allowed to miss ⁠classes for the occasion. Harald’s death came at a time of numerous crises for the Norwegian royal family, with Mette-Marit, 53, in particular coming under heavy criticism – including from the prime minister – for her association with the late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The new queen’s son from a previous relationship, Marius Borg Høiby, who is under house arrest and wearing an ankle monitor pending his appeal against a conviction for rape and domestic violence, was given permission to attend the funeral and was a pallbearer during the transfer to the royal chapel. Despite its recent scandals, however, the monarchy remains broadly popular: 72% of Norwegians support it, while 20% favour a republic or another form of government, according to a poll for the public broadcaster NRK.