Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: Iranian state media reports that US destroyers have been targeted near strait of Hormuz

Iran has accused the United States of violating the ceasefire by targeting two ships at the strait of Hormuz and attacking civilian areas, the country’s top joint military command said early on Friday (local time in Tehran is almost 1am). The US targeted “an Iranian oil tanker travelling from Iran’s coastal waters near Jask toward the strait of Hormuz, as well as another vessel entering the strait of Hormuz near the Emirati port of Fujairah,” a spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said in a statement carried by state media. “At the same time, with the cooperation of some regional countries, they carried out air attacks on civilian areas along the coasts of Bandar Khamir, Sirik, and Qeshm Island.” Iran’s armed forces responded by attacking US military vessels, “reportedly inflicting significant damage on them,” the spokesperson said. There’s been no word yet from the US military.

picture of article

Two Britons evacuated from hantavirus-hit ship ‘improving’ in hospital

Two Britons who were medically evacuated from the hantavirus-hit cruise ship are improving, global health officials have said. A British passenger, understood to be a 69-year-old man, was taken to South Africa on 27 April and is receiving care at a private health facility in Sandton, Johannesburg. Another Briton, Martin Anstee, 56, an expedition guide, was taken off the MV Hondius on Wednesday and flown to the Netherlands to receive specialist medical care. Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, from the World Health Organization (WHO), said two patients – known to include a Briton – remained in hospital in the Netherlands and another Briton was in intensive care in South Africa. She told a WHO press briefing: “I am very happy to say the patient in South Africa is doing better, and the two patients in the Netherlands we hear are stable. So that is actually very good news.” As of Thursday there are eight suspected cases, five confirmed by lab tests as hantavirus, a rare family of viruses carried by rodents. The outbreak, linked to three deaths, has been connected to a birdwatching trip to Argentina, Chile and Uruguay that two of the passengers went on before boarding the ship. Spanish authorities have given permission for the ship to anchor in the Canary Islands, despite concerns from locals and officials, and the boat left the shores of Cape Verde at 3.15pm local time on Wednesday, the tour operator Oceanwide Expeditions said. It is estimated to arrive at the port of Granadilla in Tenerife in the early hours of Sunday. Morale on board has improved since the ship started its journey to Tenerife, the WHO said. Two doctors are on board along with infectious disease experts from the WHO and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, who are conducting a medical assessment of everyone on board. While the risk to the public is low, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director-general of the WHO, said there could be more cases due to the incubation period of the Andes virus – the variant of hantavirus linked to the outbreak – which can be up to six weeks. He said: “While this is a serious incident, WHO assesses the public health risk as low.” He thanked the ship’s operator for its cooperation, and the passengers and crew, “who are going through a very difficult and frightening situation”. The WHO is not expecting the outbreak to be an epidemic, according to Dr Abdirahman Mahamud, the director at the alert and response coordination department. He highlighted a similar outbreak in Argentina in 2018-19 which led to 34 cases. Seven British people were among 30 from 12 nations who left the ship when it docked in the remote South Atlantic island of Saint Helena, including a Dutch woman who became unwell during onward travel and died. The woman was accompanying her husband’s body, which was being repatriated after he died on the ship on 11 April. On Thursday, a woman in Amsterdam, reported to be a flight attendant who came into contact with the woman who died, came forward with potential symptoms. Oceanwide Expeditions said guests who had disembarked have been contacted. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has been asked whether it can confirm it has been in touch with all seven Britons who left the ship on 24 April. It has previously announced that two Britons who had already returned from the vessel are isolating at home and do not have symptoms. Contact tracing is happening for anyone who may have sat next to them on the flight home. The two people contacted health officials when they heard about the cases on the ship. Nineteen British nationals were listed as passengers on the MV Hondius, which was sailing from Argentina to Cape Verde, with four British crew members. UK health experts said British passengers on board will be asked to self-isolate in the UK for 45 days. Prof Robin May, the chief scientific officer at the UKHSA, said: “For the broader public, not directly involved in this cruise ship, the risk here is really negligible.” The Foreign Office is arranging a charter flight so the remaining Britons on board the ship who are not displaying symptoms can be repatriated once they dock in Tenerife in the next few days. According to the UKHSA, none of the British citizens on board are reporting symptoms, but they are being closely monitored. May said the “most extreme case of incubation” of hantavirus “may be up to eight weeks”, but the general consensus was that people needed to isolate for “probably six weeks, and so that’s the period of isolation, 45 days, that we’re likely to be recommending”. Three people were taken off the ship on Wednesday to the Netherlands for treatment, including Anstee, an expedition guide and former police officer. Speaking from hospital, he told Sky News: “I’m doing OK. I’m not feeling too bad. There are still lots of tests to be done. “I have no idea how long I’ll be in the hospital for. I’m in isolation at the moment.”

picture of article

US and Iran close to temporary truce, Pakistani officials claim

The US and Iran are close to a temporary agreement to halt the war in the Middle East, officials in Pakistan claimed on Thursday, as diplomatic activity gathered fresh momentum after a near breakdown of the current ceasefire earlier this week. Officials on Islamabad said a very basic “interim” deal could be reached as early as this weekend and that Tehran was reviewing a US proposal. However, Trump and Pakistan have consistently suggested a breakthrough was imminent, and weeks of previous efforts to negotiate a permanent end to hostilities have made little real progress. Recent days have seen wild swings from hope to despair as the US and Iran test each other’s resilience and will, seeking leverage in any talks through belligerent rhetoric, defiance and sporadic violence. Despite many observers’ scepticism – and continuing defiance in Tehran – the possibility of even a partial agreement that could lead to the reopening of the strait of Hormuz sent global stocks to near-record highs on Thursday as oil prices dropped steeply. The strategic waterway in normal times carries a fifth of the world’s supplies of oil and fossil gas. Pakistan has been the principal mediator in recent indirect contacts between Washington and Tehran after hosting a round of abortive face-to-face talks last month. “Both sides are now more amenable to suggestions, the distance between their proposals is reducing,” said a diplomat in Islamabad with knowledge of the negotiations. “That’s natural. They start off with maximalist positions and then soften.” On Monday, Iran launched missiles and drones at the United Arab Emirates when Donald Trump launched a short-lived effort to support shipping stranded by the Iranian closure of the strait of Hormuz. And on Wednesday the US military fired on an Iranian-flagged oil tanker hours after Trump issued a fresh ultimatum to Tehran, telling it to accept a deal to end the war or face a new wave of US bombing “at a much higher level and intensity than it was before”. Also on Wednesday, Trump said in an interview with PBS he was optimistic about reaching an agreement with Iran before a scheduled trip to China next week. “I think it’s got a very good chance of ending, and if it doesn’t end, we have to go back to bombing the hell out of them,” Trump told the broadcaster. Trump also insisted that under any deal Tehran would “export” its highly enriched uranium – necessary for making a nuclear weapon – to the US, a demand that experts say Iran cannot accept. The gaps between Tehran and Washington appear to make a broader settlement impossible for the moment, but a temporary arrangement set out in a one-page memo aimed at preventing a return to conflict and securing safe passage for shipping through the strait should be obtainable, officials said. “Our priority is that they announce a permanent end to war and the rest of the issues could be thrashed out once they get back to direct talks,” a senior Pakistani official involved in mediation between the two sides told Reuters. A spokesperson for Pakistan’s foreign ministry told a briefing in Islamabad on Thursday that “we expect an agreement sooner rather than later”. Control of the strait and the threat to restart attacks on nearby countries’ oil and other infrastructure in the Gulf are the two main cards Iran can play in negotiations. The US has blockaded Iran, stopping all Iran-linked shipping seeking to exit the Gulf, to put pressure on Tehran. Senior Iranian officials have rejected concessions in recent days. Some favour dragging out the negotiations to closer to the November midterm elections in the US, when the Trump administration will be under intense pressure to settle the war and Iran may get a better deal. However, regional diplomats believe Iran could overplay its hand, with the current moment offering an opportunity to finish the war and claim a victory – something that could be harder if fighting resumes. If there were no agreement, Washington could also unilaterally end the war and walk away, leaving Iran under suffocating economic sanctions, they said. The Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said on Thursday he had met the country’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not been seen in public since his appointment in early March. Analysts saw the meeting as part of the attempt to align different factions and institutions within Iran behind a unified position for the negotiations. Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, also held a phone call on Thursday with Ishaq Dar, his Pakistani counterpart. Iran’s official IRNA news agency divulged no information about its content, saying merely that the two diplomats had reviewed the “latest developments and current trends in the region, emphasised the importance of continuing the path of dialogue and diplomacy”. Pakistani officials privately hope that an outline agreement could be ready to be signed by Trump next week in Islamabad, where he could stop before or after a scheduled visit to China. “We remain optimistic,” said Tahir Andrabi, the spokesperson of Pakistan’s foreign ministry. “We expect an agreement sooner rather than later.” The latest deal proposed by the US would be in two phases, with the initial accord ending the war and reopening the strait of Hormuz. Iran would also like to see its overseas assets unfrozen, including about $6bn held in Qatar. The second phase would seek to hammer out an agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme over the following 30 days. At the talks last month in Islamabad, Iran had argued for a moratorium on nuclear enrichment of between three and five years, while the US wanted between 20 and 25 years, according to a diplomat briefed on the discussion. Mediators believe the two sides may compromise on about 10 years. Iran is also opposed to handing over its stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium to the US, as Washington has demanded. “Things are moving, but we are not there yet,” said one diplomat in the region. “It sounds like the Americans want to be done with the war.” Iran is facing deep economic challenges, which may escalate if it begins to run out of storage capacity for its oil, but the Washington Post reported on Thursday that a confidential CIA analysis delivered to US officials this week suggested that the US blockade may need more than three or four months to inflict more severe economic hardship. Iran is likely to want to tie any definitive end to hostilities in the Gulf to Israeli strikes in Lebanon. Israel, which has also been fighting the Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, said on Thursday it had killed a Hezbollah commander in an airstrike on Beirut a day earlier, the first Israeli attack on the Lebanese capital since a ceasefire was agreed last month. Hezbollah began its latest conflict with Israel by opening fire in support of Iran on 2 March.

picture of article

Trump shelved ‘Project Freedom’ after Saudis refused use of bases and airspace

A refusal by Saudi Arabia to allow the US to use its bases and airspace to provide a military escort for oil tankers passing through the strait of Hormuz lay behind Donald Trump’s decision to shelve the plan days after it had been launched. Riyadh told the White House it would not allow its Prince Sultan airbase to be used to mount the operation billed as Project Freedom, which the US presented as the successor to the bombing campaign called Operation Epic Fury. Saudi Arabia refused to drop its objections despite a personal call between the crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and Trump, NBC reported. The confrontation – not denied by Riyadh – underlines Saudi Arabia’s desire for a permanent end to the damaging US-Israel war on Iran on almost any terms, in contrast to its more assertive Gulf neighbour, the United Arab Emirates. In a sign of the Emirates’ frustration with Riyadh’s caution, the UAE has already quit the Saudi-dominated oil producers’ club, Opec, and is now considering leaving the Arab League as well. The UAE as a signatory to the Abraham accords has long been closer to Israel, but the tensions within the Gulf have widened as the war has dragged on, causing untold damage to their economies and international image. The Emirates are furious that they have been the biggest target for Iran’s attacks, and felt there was insufficient solidarity across the Gulf. Saudi Arabia also feared Project Freedom did not have clear terms of engagement and could turn into a risky naval confrontation between Iran and the US, marking the effective end of the ceasefire that had been in partial force since 7 April. Iran had explicitly said it would treat the US military escort of oil tankers or attacks on Iranian shipping as a ceasefire breaches, exposing Gulf states to further attack. An end to the ceasefire would not only result in a naval conflict in the strait, but also Tehran resuming its damaging drone and missile attacks on US bases in the Gulf and energy installations in the region. Those attacks have probably caused more damage to Gulf infrastructure than previously reported. The Saudi intervention will also be seen as a late expression of Riyadh’s lack of confidence in how Trump has handled the conflict. Riyadh was often left looking like an aggrieved but powerless victim of a conflict it had never advocated. It was neither impressed by the degree of protection the US provided from Iranian attacks or the coherence of White House strategy. One Saudi diplomat said it was obvious for a long time the US had landed itself in a conflict which it could neither escalate or exit. There had been surprise on Tuesday when, after spending two days building up the significance of Project Freedom, Trump posted a message reversing course. He claimed the operation was being halted for a short period of time by mutual agreement because great progress had been made towards a deal with Iran, partly due to the intervention of China. He said the suspension would allow time to see whether an agreement could be reached. Trump made no reference to Saudi objections, or to the denial of airspace. His surprise decision had also undercut a day of heavy messaging by the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, and the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine – all of whom had said the operation would finally guarantee freedom of navigation for the hundreds of ships stranded in the strait. The plan had been for the US blockade of Iranian ports to continue. Saudi Arabia may have also been concerned that Project Freedom would lead to the Houthis in Yemen getting involved. Riyadh has been working hard behind the scenes to keep the the armed political and religious group out of conflict. Closure of the Red Sea route through Houthi interventions would only make the threat to essential oil supplies worldwide even worse. The Saudis had reached an agreement with Iran that safeguarded their pipeline to Yanbu, ensuring they could export as much as 50% of their output via the Red Sea. The Emirates by contrast had been much bolder than Riyadh in trying to get their oil tankers past the Iran blockade, often turning off their transponders in the hope of not being tracked. Riyadh’s intervention, which has reduced Trump’s options to break the blockade, is likely to prompt a further deterioration in Saudi-Emirati relations Riyadh was already concerned that the deepening UAE-Israel ties could extend to a small number of Israeli troops operating on Emirati soil. Saudi Arabia, with a much larger population, has to tread more carefully over Israel. With France, it had led effort to revive the concept of a two-state solution in which a Palestinian state was recognised internationally. Saudi Arabia has separate points of dispute with the Emirates in Yemen, Somalia and Sudan. None of those will be made easier if the US has to settle with Iran on terms the Emirates and Israel believe fail the minimal objectives of Tehran’s critics.

picture of article

Iran mocks Trump’s ‘Project Freedom’ as adversaries wrestle over talks to end war

When Donald Trump abruptly pulled the plug on “Project Freedom”, the scheme to open the strait of Hormuz, barely a day after it had been announced, he gave the impression that an opportunity for a peace deal had materialised that could not be missed. To the surprise of nobody who has been following the US’s recent adventures in geopolitics, Trump’s spin concealed a lot of the underlying reality. It turns out that Trump suspended Project Freedom after Saudi Arabia stopped the US military from using its bases or airspace to carry out the operation, which involved giving air cover to commercial shipping sailing through the strait. There are different versions of why this happened. NBC News, which first reported the Saudi action, suggested it was because Riyadh, and other Gulf capitals, were not informed beforehand. Elsewhere, Saudi commentary said the shutdown of US operations was only made after an Iranian attack on oil facilities in Fujairah, one of the seven emirates in the UAE – an attack that was played down by the US, which did not respond to it. That showed Riyadh, the commentators said, that Washington was ready to launch major operations in the Gulf without consulting its allies – or protecting them from the fallout. Both versions suggest a lack of preparation underpinning Project Freedom. Two US-flagged ships took the opportunity to travel the strait and escape the Gulf, but the rest of the commercial shipping trapped by the war, estimated by the International Maritime Organization to number 2,000 vessels, stayed put. There was no diplomatic breakthrough – no “complete and final agreement” as Trump put it – behind the sharp change in policy, just a failure of the policy, and Iran’s parliamentary speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, took to X to deliver a derisive one-line epitaph. “Operation Trust Me Bro failed,” he wrote. The US plan that Iran is reviewing has 14 points, perhaps to mirror the 14-point plan that Tehran submitted late last week and which Trump rejected. They amount to a restatement of the US negotiating position, proposing a more permanent end to the war than the ceasefire now in place and a 30-day negotiating period to open the strait and find compromises over Iran’s nuclear programme, US sanctions, and frozen Iranian assets. While Iran’s official position is that the US proposal is pending review, one senior parliamentary official has dismissed it as an American wishlist. The Iranians’ 14 points would require a lifting of the US blockade before talks restart and an early release of at least some of the frozen assets to provide some quick relief to its devastated economy. Iran’s estimated $100bn in frozen assets around the world, immobilised by past sanctions, will be a feature of any deal, but Trump has balked before about agreeing their release. He and other Republican hawks have built careers on lambasting the “pallets of cash” delivered to Iran by the Obama administration as part of the 2015 nuclear deal (known as the JCPOA). They are skittish about the optics of repeating the exercise. Trump has insisted there was “never a deadline” for Iran to respond, and a lull suits him, for now. He is due to fly to China to meet Xi Jinping in a week, and does not want to be at war when he is there. For its part, Iran will not want to be seen as rejecting the US peace proposal out of hand, but will want to shape the terms on which talks resume, not simply go along with Trump’s framing. Iran has little confidence in the US negotiating team: the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner; and his friend and special envoy, Steve Witkoff; both of whom are real estate developers with limited experience or understanding of nuclear negotiations and their history. Both Kushner and Witkoff both have extensive business interests in the Middle East and ties to Israel, and Tehran depicts them as pro-Israel provocateurs. Iranian confidence will hardly be enhanced by the addition to the US team in recent days of Nick Stewart, an analyst drawn from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which was founded as a pro-Israel lobbying group and which campaigned intensively against the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal. The Iranian regime that will eventually come to the table is considerably more hardline and – unsurprisingly – more distrustful than it was when it agreed that deal 11 years ago. The negotiators are after all survivors of the surprise US-Israeli attack on 28 February, launched in the middle of an earlier round of negotiations. “In Iran’s case, external pressure did not fracture the system; it reinforced the position of its most hardline figures,” Danny Citrinowicz, the former head of the Iran desk in Israeli military intelligence and now a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, wrote in the journal Foreign Affairs. “The result is an Iran that is less predictable, less restrained, and probably more dangerous.”

picture of article

Hantavirus outbreak ‘not start of pandemic’ says WHO, as Canaries secure concessions over cruise docking plans - as it happened

Authorities around the world are racing to trace dozens of passengers who disembarked from the cruise ship at the centre of a deadly hantavirus outbreak before isolation measures were implemented. It emerged for the first time on Thursday that at least 29 passengers of 12 nationalities left the MV Hondius on 24 April after the first fatality, prompting a scramble to identify and track their movements since then. World Health Organization experts stressed the hantavirus cruise outbreak was “not the start of Covid pandemic” as they pointed several differences between the two viruses and insisted the public health risk remained low. Spain’s head of civil protection, Virginia Barcones, provided details at a press conference in Madrid about what those on board the cruise ship can expect after arriving in the Canary Islands at around midday on Sunday. She said: “From the moment when we see that asymptomatic people are ready to be evacuated from our country, there will be a quick process. They will not leave the boat until the plane is there to take them to their countries. Once they leave the boat, they will be taken by road, it’s about a 10-minute drive.” Barcones added: “Mechanisms are being put together, but they will be completely isolated from the public. Fernando Clavijo, the regional president of the Canaries, said he persuaded the central government not to allow the MV Hondius to dock in Tenerife. Clavijo had objected over the boat’s arrival, saying it could threaten public health in the archipelago, and had demanded a meeting with the prime minister, Pedro Sánchez. After a meeting between Pope Leo and US secretary of state Marco Rubio earlier today, the Vatican said the pair “renewed the shared commitment” for good relations between the US and the Vatican.

picture of article

Where did the cruise ship hantavirus come from and what happens next?

The cruise ship hit with a deadly outbreak of hantavirus is on its way to the Canary Islands, where the remaining passengers are expected to be repatriated provided they have no symptoms. Here we look at the investigation into the outbreak and what comes next. When did the outbreak start? The first passengers became ill onboard the Dutch-flagged MV Hondius, a cruise ship sailing from Argentina to Cape Verde, in April, with symptoms including fever, gastrointestinal problems, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and shock. Three people have died since 11 April, including a Dutch couple and a German woman. As of Thursday there are eight suspected cases, five confirmed as hantavirus by lab tests. Where are those with the virus? The body of the Dutch man who died onboard was taken off the ship at Saint Helena. He was not tested for the virus. His wife later became ill and deteriorated on a flight to Johannesburg. She died on arrival at a hospital there. Tests confirmed she had the virus. Authorities are now tracking people with whom she came into contact en route. The body of the German woman who died is still onboard. A man who presented to the ship’s doctor with symptoms was evacuated from Ascension to South Africa, where he is in intensive care but believed to be improving. He also tested positive for the virus. Another man who disembarked at Saint Helena had returned to Switzerland, but sought medical care in Zurich after developing symptoms. He has now been admitted and tested positive for hantavirus. A further three cases were evacuated to the Netherlands for treatment. One was a Dutch crew member, another a German woman who flew on to Düsseldorf. Martin Anstee, a 56-year-old retired British police officer who worked on the ship as an expedition guide, is in hospital in Leiden. On Thursday, a woman in Amsterdam, reported to be a flight attendant who came into contact with the woman who died in South Africa, came forward with potential symptoms. Two Britons who left the ship at Saint Helena in late April have returned to the UK and are self-isolating. Neither have reported any symptoms. Close contacts of those on the boat are also self-isolating. What is hantavirus? Hantaviruses are a large group of viruses that circulate in rodents such as mice and rats. Distinct strains are found in different parts of the world. The viruses can spread to humans, typically through inhalation of droplets or dust contaminated with urine, faeces or saliva from infected animals. In people, hantavirus infection can cause life-threatening illness. The old world strains, found in Europe and Asia, tend to cause haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), a kidney disease that is fatal in about 10% of cases. The new world strains, found in the Americas, are more virulent, causing hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), which can kill more than a third of those infected. Can it spread between people? Most hantaviruses do not spread between people, but there have been cases of the Andes strain spreading from person to person. Lab tests have identified that strain as the cause of the outbreak on the MV Hondius. The virus is endemic to Argentina, where its host is the long-tailed pygmy rice rat. Infections are most likely through close and prolonged contact with someone in the early stages of the disease. In a previous outbreak in Argentina, in 2018-19, three people who came into contact with infected rodents spread hantavirus to 34 others, 11 of whom died. Is any more known about the strain? Three laboratories in South Africa, Switzerland and Senegal are working to read the whole genome of the virus. That will be compared with the genetic makeup of previous hantaviruses that have caused outbreaks, including the 2018-19 cases in Argentina. Anaïs Legand, the World Health Organization’s technical lead on viral haemorrhagic fevers, said: “It will give us a sense of whether we are seeing some changes.” Maria van Kerkhove, an infectious disease epidemiologist with the WHO, said: “From the information we have so far, and they are still doing the sequencing, we haven’t seen anything unusual, but that’s why we bring together the best minds, to be able to do that.” Where did the virus on MV Hondius come from? This is the big question. As part of the investigation, public health officials are compiling travel histories for all of the passengers prior to boarding, about 140 of whom are still on the ship. On Thursday, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, head of the World Health Organization, said the Dutch couple, who were the first two cases, had travelled through Argentina, Chile and Uruguay on a bird-watching trip “which included visits to sites where the species of rat known to carry the virus was present”. What happens next? The MV Hondius is bound for the Canary Islands and is expected to arrive in Tenerife this weekend. Once docked, the 19 British nationals thought still to be onboard will be repatriated on a flight chartered by the UK Foreign Office, if they are symptom-free. All are being closely monitored. On returning to the UK they will be asked to self-isolate for 45 days, reflecting the long incubation period of hantavirus. Most symptoms develop in one to six weeks. What is the risk to the public? Given the long incubation period, more cases could arise among the crew, passengers and contacts of infected people who left the ship. But the UK Health Security Agency and the WHO have stressed that the risk to the wider public is low. “This is not Covid, this is not influenza; it spreads very, very differently,” said Kerkhove.

picture of article

UK Scientology buildings targeted for ‘speed runs’ as TikTok trend spreads

Hundreds of teenagers have attempted to “speed run” Scientology buildings in different parts of the UK as part of a TikTok trend that started in Los Angeles. Scientology speed running is where people rush into buildings and see how far they can get before being ushered out by staff. The Church of Scientology said using its spaces for viral stunts was “trespass, harassment, and disruption of religious facilities”. A single post on Snapchat last week about a London run snowballed. “First UK raid of Scientology. Happening this Saturday 2nd May. Bring face coverings and GoPros. Spread the word,” it read. The post was shared on TikTok and by Saturday about 100 people were laying siege to London’s main Scientology centre near Blackfriars. Rizak Abdullahi, 19, who watched the events unfold, said: “Some of them were dressed as dinosaurs, some had cat masks, it was quite funny.” He said by the time the group had gathered, two City of London police vans were waiting to rebuff them. “You know the UK police, they know everything,” Abdullahi said. City of London police said officers spoke to the crowd, who left after a short while. No arrests were made. Levi Telford, 16, who had come to London from Carlisle – a four-hour trip – to join in said that aside from the “mysterious” nature of Scientology, the trend itself was a good enough reason to go. “I think people want to do it here just to be part of the trend, to be part of something,” he said. The speed run trend began at the end of March with a TikToker called Swhileyy, who posted a video showing him running through the lobby of the Church of Scientology’s LA headquarters. After gaining 90m views, the video was deleted. Scientology buildings in Vancouver and New York were also raided by young people competing to see how far they could get. For some, the idea was to map out the insides of the buildings, learning more and more each time they went. Other attempts were more overtly surreal: one person ran in dressed as Jesus; a group dressed as Minions attempted entry, saying they were looking for Tom Cruise. Videos of Scientology speed runs have gathered millions of views online, and this weekend copycats began to appear in the UK. A group of 30 or so teenagers tried to speed run a Scientology building in Edinburgh but were also stopped by the police. Drenched by rain, the group took refuge in a Greggs and then went home. Alexander Barnes Ross, who has led protests against Scientology in the UK, expressed concern about the speed runs. Having spent the last year fighting for the right to protest outside Scientology buildings, he said this trend “risks giving the church an opportunity to reopen the case”. While he welcomed any efforts to expose what he described as “harmful practices” of the church, he said: “There is nothing funny about Scientology. This is a dangerous, harmful organisation.” He said attempts to break in with force undermined his peaceful efforts to protest. But the people involved insist speed runs are done in the spirit of fun and curiosity. “It’s so secret that people just love to find out what’s happening and explore,” said a TikToker called Hiddenurbex, who went to the London speed run with his friends. The Church of Scientology said individuals had repeatedly forced their way into church locations, damaging property and endangering staff. It said it was reviewing “all available remedies” to protect personnel, visitors and property. It said: “The church welcomes lawful visitors. It does not welcome mobs forcing entry, damaging property, disrupting religious spaces or endangering people for views.”