Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

New Zealand greenhouse gas levels hit record highs threatening catastrophic glacier melts

New Zealand could be hit with more frequent and intense heatwaves and catastrophic glacier melts in the near future, as greenhouse gas levels hit record highs, a new report about the nation’s climate has revealed. Released on Wednesday, the Our Atmosphere and Climate 2026 report shows New Zealand is experiencing mounting climate pressures, which will have wide-reaching implications for the environment, native species and communities. “The signal is just becoming clearer … there are multiple indicators that are showing increased warming and the likelihood of climate change,” Dr Alison Collins, chief science adviser for the ministry for cities, environment, regions and transport (Mcert) told the Guardian. New Zealand’s annual average temperature has risen by 1.36C since records began in 1909, and seven of the 10 warmest years on record occurred in the last decade, the report said. “Whilst it sounds like a small amount … it is a significant baseline shift that’s having ramifications through nature, through our communities, and through businesses and industry,” Collins said. The report finds that as the climate heats, glaciers are shrinking. New Zealand has roughly 3000 glaciers, and they have shrunk in volume from 56 cubic kilometres in 1997 to 30 cubic kilometres in 2023, the report said. Modelling of glacier retreat shows a high risk of further decline on the horizon. Under the “low climate scenario” – which assumes low emissions – glaciers will very likely lose between 14 and 86% of their volume by 2100. Under the “high climate scenario”, that figure rises to between 69 and 100% of their volume. “We’re talking about substantial loss,” Collins said. Greenhouse gases have increased to record levels in New Zealand’s atmosphere, the report shows. There was a 30% increase in carbon dioxide since monitoring began in New Zealand in 1972. Methane levels had also slightly increased in 2025 to their highest concentration ever. “That additional heat is showing up in rising temperatures, warming oceans, rising seas, shifting rainfall patterns and more intense extremes,” the report said. Among those extremes were heatwaves, which the report said were “very likely” to increase in frequency, length and intensity across the country. The number of days hitting more than 25C was also “very likely” to increase by 2050, which will expose people to heat-related health risks, including physical illness, disease and psychological distress. Marine heatwaves are also becoming more pronounced and affecting some native species, the report said. In 2025, the series revealed New Zealand’s oceans were warming 34% faster than the global average which has been linked to mass sea sponge bleaching, die-offs of southern bull kelp, large scale fish standings and penguin deaths. The three-yearly update from Mcert and Stats NZ collates statistics, data and research across five domains – air, atmosphere and climate, freshwater, land, and marine – to paint a picture of the state of New Zealand’s environment. The report outlined a myriad of issues that will stem from continued warming, including damaging storms and cyclones that pose a risk to life, droughts affecting species and agricultural industries, sea level rise eroding infrastructure and housing and Māori communities having reduced access to culturally significant places. Severe storms, including Cyclone Gabrielle and the Auckland floods in 2023, have battered New Zealand in recent years, causing deaths, widespread devastation and billions of dollars in costs. New Zealand was built and developed around a relatively stable set of climate conditions and the report examines what happens when those conditions begin to change, Collins said. “Climate change is not just an environmental issue. It’s a human story. It’s an economic story.”

picture of article

Israeli settlers beat press photographer as soldiers watch in West Bank

Armed Israeli settlers beat a photographer in the presence of Israeli soldiers, hospitalising him, as he covered worsening settler violence against olive farmers in the occupied West Bank. Jaafar Ashtiyeh, a 58-year-old veteran photographer for Agence France-Presse in Palestine, was assaulted by a group of settlers, who beat him with the butts of their rifles, despite him being marked as press. He was assaulted in view of about a dozen armed Israeli soldiers. Ashtiyeh suffered bruises to his head and torso and was taken to hospital, according to witnesses, his family and fellow journalists. His assault came amid a worsening wave of Israeli settler violence in the West Bank. Every year, settlers attack Palestinian farmers trying to harvest their olives – an economic lifeline for the beleaguered Palestinian economy – with few legal consequences. This harvest season has been particularly violent as the Israeli elections approach at the end of the month. Ashtiyeh and another AFP photographer, John Wessels, were near the northern village of Aqraba when they noticed an Israeli soldier detaining a man as local Palestinians picked olives. A quad bike suddenly raced towards the AFP journalists on top of a hill and a man on it opened live fire, with one Palestinian dropping to the ground. He was also hospitalised, with a gunshot to the foot, according to the Palestine Red Crescent Society. At least six other people then rushed towards the AFP journalists firing guns. As Ashtiyeh attempted to enter a car, which was clearly marked “Press”, two men jumped on him and beat him repeatedly with the butts of their rifles. A group of at least a dozen Israeli soldiers were about 500 metres away at the time of the attack, according to Wessels. “I could hear his screams,” said Wessels, who was also threatened at gunpoint. The assailants also took Ashtiyeh’s camera equipment. Ashtiyeh, who is Palestinian, was conscious in a hospital in Nablus. He underwent X-rays which did not detect broken bones but he will remain in hospital for round-the-clock observation, his son, Zain Jaafar, said. The man who initially fired the gun was wearing a long white shirt as well as military fatigue trousers and boots, which are commonly worn by soldiers, Wessels said. AFP has asked the Israeli military for comment. Settlers are rarely arrested or charged for their attacks against Palestinians. “We strongly condemn yet another serious attack on journalists trying to report on events in the West Bank and demand a full investigation. It is unacceptable that journalists can be beaten and robbed by armed settlers in front of Israeli security forces who made no attempt to intervene,” said Phil Chetwynd, AFP’s global news director. The Foreign Press Association, which represents international media in Israel and the Palestinian territories, said it was “deeply alarmed”. “Israeli authorities must investigate why soldiers present in the area did not intervene in this attack against clearly identified journalists,” it said. “This attack is a blatant attempt to intimidate the press and obstruct accurate reporting from the West Bank. International media have a responsibility to tell all sides of the story and will not be deterred by physical assaults or threats.” Israel was the world’s leading killer of journalists in 2025, and has killed at least 225 journalists in Lebanon and Gaza, according to the UN Human Rights Office. Violence has flared in recent months in the West Bank with near-daily attacks, thefts or vandalism by Israeli settlers against Palestinians. There have also been attacks against Israelis, with a Palestinian shooting dead a settler last month. Extremist Israeli settlers have been seizing olive groves owned by Palestinians, who consider the trees a cultural symbol. About 500,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank – which Israel captured in 1967 – among 3 million Palestinians. Settlements in occupied territory are illegal under international law. Media rights groups say Israeli settlers have increasingly targeted journalists and that authorities have imposed growing impediments to coverage. Israeli authorities have detained 19 journalists in the West Bank, including one AFP contributor, in the three years since the 7 October, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel, according to Paris-based Reporters Without Borders. Agence France-Presse contributed reporting

picture of article

Israeli ambassador to Australia says he hopes for return to ‘traditional friendship’ on 7 October anniversary

Israel’s ambassador to Australia says the third anniversary of 7 October is an opportunity for both countries to return to “traditional friendship” as hundreds gathered in Sydney’s east to mark the day. But, in the lead-up to commemorations on Wednesday marking Hamas’ terror attack, leaders of Australia’s Palestinian community say the federal government should do more to help the diaspora suffering since the war on Gaza. Hillel Newman spoke to the Australian Jewish community at Bondi Pavilion, saying it was moving seeing so many gathered in solidarity with Israel at 6.29am, the moment the massacre in Israel began three years ago. “I will never forget that hour in my entire lifetime … the trauma of that day will be with us for all eternity,” he told the crowd. “The events of the last three years have revealed the deep hatred for Israel and Jews.” Michael Gencher, the executive director of StandWithUs Australia, said the events of October 7 and in the intervening years, notably the massacre at Bondi beach, had shown hatred towards Israel and the Jewish people had become “more visible, and more dangerous”. “It has changed the way many of us have seen the world, and it has changed the way we see our place in the world,” he said. “But the future does not have to be defined by the hatred of the past three years”. Speaking ahead of the anniversary, Newman acknowledged relations had become “strained” between Australia and Israel but wanted to see improvement. “We have challenges, but I have come with a lot of goodwill in order to try and make a positive change in the relationship, perhaps even reset the relationship and return both sides to the initial historical traditional friendship,” the Israeli ambassador told Guardian Australia. “There have been issues between our two countries. We can have differences of opinion, but we should not allow differences of opinion to overshadow and overcrowd the overall relationship. We can understand if Australia has criticism of this issue or another.” Sign up for Guardian Australia’s Politics, really newsletter here The comments come despite Israel’s foreign ministry publicly criticising foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, on social media in recent weeks, branding comments she made to the United Nations about settler violence in the West Bank a “blatant lie”. It follows an earlier intervention into domestic Australian politics, where Israel urged Labor to soften criticism in a draft policy platform that condemned settler violence and a controversial death penalty law. Since the 2023 attack – in which Hamas militants killed about 1,200 Israelis and 250 people were taken hostage, in what is considered the single deadliest day for Jewish people since the Holocaust – there has been a near breakdown in ties between the Israeli government and federal Labor. Israel’s response to the attack and bombardment of Gaza has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians. Australia has joined other countries in taking an increasingly stronger stance against Israel, including action alongside the UK, Canada and New Zealand to sanction Israeli politicians Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing the two of inciting violence against Palestinians. But the federal government last month stopped short of joining the UK and other partners in imposing a ban on goods from illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. Relations deteriorated further when Australian aid worker Zomi Frankcom was killed in a humanitarian convoy struck by Israeli drones in April 2024. Albanese and Wong slammed a decision by the Israel Defense Forces in August not to pursue criminal proceedings over Frankcom’s death. Pressed on Israel’s failure to release audio from the strike, Newman stressed it was an issue for the Israeli military, but that his country remained open to any request for potential reparations for Frankcom’s family and remained in favour of continued discussions. Wong has been working with the Frankcom family on an appropriate response to the decision not to press criminal charges. She said in a statement that the Australian government had condemned the Israeli government’s decision not to pursue criminal proceedings against those responsible for killing Frankcom and her World Central Kitchen colleagues. “The Australian government will not stop pressing Israel for justice for Zomi and her colleagues. We continue to engage closely with the Frankcom family on further action,” Wong said. “7 October is a day of profound grief and remembrance. We mourn those who were killed in the Hamas terrorist attacks, including Australian Galit Carbone, and all those who have suffered from antisemitic violence around the world.” The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president, Nasser Mashni, said the impact from three years of war was measured in two places at once: Gaza and in the diaspora. “In Australia, the impact is a quieter but a relentless erosion of our place in this country,” he said. “Underpinning every discussion that happens about ‘us’, but without ‘us’, is a nagging suggestion that we don’t belong, that we must prove we are Australian, and even human. “This is the domestic footprint of genocide: protesting a demand for its end, and stopping Australia’s complicity in it, is more controversial than supporting it.” In 2025, a UN commission found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, citing tens of thousands of civilian deaths and massive destruction. Israel strongly denies accusations of genocide. The Greens leader, David Shoebridge, said Australians would reflect on the devastating toll of violence. “The attacks on October 7 were condemned by the Greens at the time, as our party has a deep belief in peace and non-violence,” he said. “It is that same core value that means we condemn the ongoing genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank.” The cooler relations between Israel and Australia come against a backdrop of antisemitic attacks in Australia, as the nation prepares to face the first anniversary of the Bondi massacre on 14 December. Fifteen people were killed in an antisemitic terror attack on a Hanukah celebration. A royal commission sparked by the Bondi attack is due to release its final report on 18 December. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said the 7 October attack and the “unsatisfactory responses” to it meant “troubled, uncertain times lie ahead for us all”. “But if the jihadists thought mass terror at home and abroad would bring about some global capitulation by Israel and Jewish communities or that the majority of Australians would turn on their Jewish friends and neighbours, they have failed dismally,” he said. The shadow defence minister, James Paterson, said the 7 October attack had changed Australia in “terrible ways” and culminated in the Bondi attack. “Fixing this societal cancer will take years of sustained effort from the entire community, from the prime minister down,” he said.

picture of article

‘All I want to do is cry’: trauma of 7 October survivors three years after the attacks

Keith Siegel spent many of his long hours in Hamas captivity in Gaza etching everything that happened after 7 October 2023 into his memory. For 484 days, he recited to himself every place he was held, the dates he was moved and every attack or humiliation he endured or witnessed. He aimed to store intelligence that could help Israeli forces free other hostages if he was released, to keep track of time as the days slid by and be able to tell his family what happened to him. Now his body is free, but he cannot loosen those memories. “I’m living a kind of dual life,” he said in an interview in Tel Aviv. “I’m here for some of the time, and I’m in Gaza some of time. It’s very challenging to convey in words what it was like.” Siegel and his wife, Aviva, were among 251 people taken captive to Gaza on the deadliest day in Israel’s history, when Hamas militants broke across the border to launch a wave of attacks on kibbutzim, border towns, military bases and music festivals. Israel’s security forces were caught by surprise, and by the time they regained control of the area, 1,209 people had been killed, the majority of them civilians, including 36 children, according to records kept by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. The cemetery at Nir Oz contains two lines of fresh headstones, marking lives that all ended on that same date. A shared plot for a family of five – a mother, father and their three young children – has been made into a garden with space left for their still-living grandparents. Caretaker Shlomo Margalit, who will soon turn 89, points to the graves of three of his oldest friends, founding members of the kibbutz who came to Nir Oz from Haifa with him in the 1950s. “This is my life project, as well as my home,” Margalit said, explaining why he has come back to a place of such loss. He is waiting for a new house but, for now, staying in the former home of Gadi Moses, 82, who survived 482 days as a hostage. The graves he tends are a silent testament to the brutality of the attacks and the scale of the state’s failure, which in Nir Oz was staggering, even on a day of terrible failures. A five-person volunteer defence force held Hamas at bay for at least two hours, Margalit said. When they had all been shot, the kibbutz was taken over and sacked, homes burned, families slaughtered and kidnapped. Then, before the first Israeli soldier arrived, the Hamas forces, other Palestinian gunmen and civilian looters all left. Nir Oz had been forgotten by the army and ripped apart without the military firing a single shot to defend it. In total, 47 people were killed and 76 taken to Gaza, including Shiri Bibas, her 10-month-old baby Kfir and four-year-old Ariel, who were killed in Gaza. The dead and hostages represented more than a quarter of the small community. Revisiting that terrible day, and the trauma that followed, is painful and exhausting for Margalit, but he still accepts interviews for a simple reason. “I want people to know what really happened here,” the 89-year-old said. The third anniversary of the 7 October attacks falls a few weeks before national elections, and much of the country is caught up in a furious debate about responsibility for the deadliest day in Israel’s history and the conduct of the war that followed. Survivors and bereaved relatives are avoiding the political fray, still grappling with the trauma and the struggle to rebuild something like normality. In Nir Oz, there is a terrible, almost irreconcilable struggle between re-establishing the kibbutz as a living community, and preserving physical testimony of the attack. The cemetery echoes with the sound of construction and families have already moved into several rows of new houses near the kibbutz entrance. But on the other side of the compound, paths still lead between blackened ruins and memorials to the dead. Some bereaved survivors want the homes of loved ones preserved this way as permanent monuments to mark their loss. “There are families that can’t [bear to] live here, but want a memorial place to come to visit,” Margalit said. “On the other hand, can you build a new kibbutz where children grow up running around between burnt houses?” He is on the remembrance committee and, two years on, they are struggling to reach a decision on this impossible choice. “Is there right or wrong here? No,” he said. “We are dealing with that, trying to find an answer.” One compromise might be a memorial garden on the border of the kibbutz. For now, there are plaques with the stories of families attacked on that day and a memorial house to remember the dead and kidnapped. When the kibbutz took a collective decision to return and rebuild, Margalit and his wife, Hanna, knew they wanted to join. His only concession to the trauma was asking for a new home that did not face Gaza. “I’ve found myself building this place for the second time,” he said. “I know when I’m gone, I will have done something with my life. I took part in putting this spot on the map.” The Siegels, who lived in the nearby kibbutz of Kfar Aza, also among the worst hit, have decided not to return as they focus on mental and physical recovery. Aviva was 62 when she was kidnapped. Keith was 64. “What happened to me in Gaza, what happened with Keith in Gaza, it’s there all the time,” said Aviva. “I understand that it’s going to be a process of healing. There’s always things that remind me, and if I don’t remember, then he reminds me. If I’m cooking lunch or making a cup of tea and I turn around and see Keith with tears in his eyes, because he just read something or let himself feel.” The days approaching the anniversary have been particularly difficult, she said. Last year, at this time, she was still campaigning for the release of other hostages, her own emotions held at bay by the urgency of that campaign. For a time, she tried to deal with the trauma by telling herself, over and over again “I must feel lucky,” simply because she had made it back alive. Now she has allowed herself to feel again, and as 7 October approached, she has realised how raw the wounds still are. “Getting ready [for the anniversary] has been very very painful,” she said. “The last couple of weeks all I want to do is cry. Now I’m feeling things I didn’t feel before.” “When I hear my grandson say he is afraid of being kidnapped in the middle of the night, it breaks my heart.” She has written a book, Survived to Tell, about the ordeal, which she describes as therapy and an act of celebration. She wrote so her grandchildren could read about what she and Keith endured, for other hostages who couldn’t tell their own stories and to inspire a broader audience in Israel and beyond. After the exhausting campaign to get Keith and other hostages home, she said she had struggled to concentrate on the election. Keith’s political focus is an independent inquiry into 7 October to prevent other families suffering as his has. He said: “There needs to be an investigation to understand how this happened, in order to do everything possible that it won’t happen again. So many people were killed, injured, traumatised.” Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, has fiercely opposed an independent state commission of inquiry. Critics say he is afraid it would expose his own failings. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, few people inside or outside Israel expected him to stay in power long, particularly as the country’s coalition governments have rarely served out their full terms. Netanyahu had for years championed a foreign and security policy based on the premise that Hamas was “contained” in Gaza, behind unbreachable layers of fortifications. The security officials who were in command that day have all stepped down yet, three years on, Netanyahu is still in power, having deflected all demands for his resignation. Yaakov Godo, a bereaved father, interrupted Netanyahu’s speech at the official commemoration event this year to accuse him of negligence. “You did not protect my son on 7 October, you did not protect 1,200 people murdered in one day. Shame!” he shouted, before being ushered away. Both US and Israeli officials have said Netanyahu rejected ceasefire deals that could have halted the war in Gaza and brought many Israeli hostages home sooner. But criticising the prime minister means venturing into a vicious political debate where age and loss offer little protection. Yocheved Lifshitz, 88, was taken hostage from Nir Oz with her husband Oded, whose magnificent cactus garden blooms at the heart of the kibbutz. He died in Gaza, she survived and since her return she has been a vocal critic of Netanyahu. A candidate for Netanyahu’s Likud party, Itzik Bonzel, said last month that he wished he could turn back the clock and return her to Hamas captivity. He later apologised, blaming grief for his son who died fighting in Gaza, but Lifshitz denounced it as a proxy attack driven by the prime minister. Netanyahu, who is battling a corruption trial and could be more vulnerable legally if he loses power, is pushing to intensify Israeli attacks on Gaza and his coalition partners are calling for ethnic cleansing and annexation of Palestine. The war Israel launched in response to 7 October has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians, including about 20,000 children. Netanyahu has also waged a years-long campaign to dismantle institutions protecting democracy inside Israel’s 1967 borders. Palestinians under Israeli military rule in the occupied West Bank do not have the rights of Israeli citizens. Many Israelis opposed to this rightwing vision of perpetual war in a state with diminished institutions consider this election the most critical since Israel was founded in 1948, among them Margalit. Nir Oz, like many communities targeted by Hamas, had its roots in the leftwing Zionist movement, and although the brutality of 7 October pushed some to the right, others saw their pain as bitter proof that war alone cannot offer long-term security. “I don’t believe we can ignore the fact that Palestinians live here,” Margalit said. “We have to find a way we can live here with them and be secure. I don’t have an answer, I just know we are here to stay and they are here to stay. Maybe we need someone from the outside.”

picture of article

Riot police fire teargas as 250,000 take part in schools protests across France

Police have fired teargas at ⁠protesters as more than 250,000 pupils, teachers and parents demonstrated across France on the biggest day yet of a campaign for better high school conditions that has been marred by often violent clashes with police. The French prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, said at least 215 teenagers and 85 school staff had been injured since the protests began more than a fortnight ago, calling the figures “the heaviest ⁠toll in decades paid by the school system”. The country’s president, Emmanuel Macron, called key ministers to the Élysée Palace for talks on Tuesday night, French media reported. The interior ministry said 200,000 people had taken part in mainly peaceful marches in cities including Marseille, Nantes ⁠and Lyon on Tuesday, with 56,000 more joining the biggest demonstration in Paris. Organisers put the total at 450,000. Most passed off without serious incident, but some – including in Paris – ended in sporadic vandalism and running skirmishes with riot police, with officers firing teargas and carrying out baton charges to disperse protesters. 488 people were arrested on Tuesday, according to figures from the Interior Ministry reported by newspaper Liberation. The ministry also said 43 police officers were injured. Trade unions and rights groups have accused the police of using unnecessary force against the young protesters in recent days, with Amnesty International saying French authorities should “put an end to the disproportionate police repression”. At Tuesday’s demonstration in Paris, students held aloft smoke flares and placards with slogans including “under our text books, anger” – a nod to a celebrated “under the paving stones, the beach” slogan from the May 1968 student riots. Other slogans included “schools with no money = country with no future”. One student, Anna, told reporters at the capital’s Place de la Nation: “Our demands are simple: better study conditions, enough teachers, decent school buildings. The authorities’ response has been catastrophic. There’s enough violence already.” Tuesday’s marches came after two weeks of protests that ⁠began in the northern suburbs of Paris and have snowballed nationwide. Besides the injuries to protesters and staff, 715 police officers have been wounded in the clashes, Lecornu’s office said. Demonstrators have set dustbins on fire outside their schools, destroyed bus shelters and hurled projectiles at riot police, who have responded with batons, teargas and riot-control rounds. Twenty-four schools have been burned or ransacked since mid-September, while more than 6,100 people have been arrested, almost all of them minors. More than 1,800 are being prosecuted, nearly 1,500 of them under 18, the justice ministry said. The education ministry said more than 900 of the country’s 3,700 high schools were blockaded or had been closed for the day on Tuesday, although student groups put the number at 1,800. Some local education authorities moved classes ‌online. Océanne, 18, was among the marchers in Marseille. “We just want to save our education and be educated,” she said, adding that she had suffered from absent teachers who were replaced either by “pointless substitutes” or not at all. Many teachers were also demonstrating. In the western city of Rennes, Romain Dubourg said he and “about 30 colleagues” had “talked about the police brutality that we’ve witnessed, and decided to be there for our students if they need us”. Trade unionists were also on the marches, with the head of the CGT union, Sophie Binet, urging members to “protect high school students”. The Green party leader, Marine Tondelier, urged local officials and parents to wear white and “go and protect our children during demonstrations”. Anne Savinel-Barras, the president of Amnesty France, said: “The images and testimonies widely circulated over the past week raise alarming concerns about the dangerous use of teargas, batons and policing techniques by the police.” The interior minister, Laurent Nuñez, said police had launched 10 internal investigations into allegations of brutality since the protests started. On Monday, a 15-year-old’s hand was blown off as protesters battled riot police in northern France. A 16-year-old lost the use of his right eye after he was seriously injured in the head on Wednesday during the blockade of a high school in Tours. The local prosecutor, Catherine Sorita-Minard, said the wounds were “compatible with the impact of a defensive bullet of the blast ball type”. In another incident, a 14-year-old lost most of his teeth on Monday when a police officer appeared to fire a grenade at him at close range during a protest north-west of Paris. “His jaw is sealed shut, he can no longer speak and he eats through a straw,” his mother told reporters. Lecornu has ordered his ministers to tackle the students’ core demands, which include ensuring absent teachers are replaced, reviewing the length of the 8am to 6pm school day and repairing ‌ageing buildings. He denied accusations of routine excess force by police, saying officers had mostly acted proportionately. He told MPs on Tuesday that “extreme violence” had come “knocking on high-school doors, and must be condemned”. “Setting fire to a school will not help repair it. Attacking a teacher will not help replace missing staff,” he said. The protests, seven months before crucial presidential elections to choose a successor to Macron, have piled pressure on a government trying to reduce a ballooning budget deficit amid mounting investor concern over France’s mountainous debt and weak economic growth. The government has accused the radical-left La France Insoumise party of encouraging and even orchestrating the movement after numerous LFI MPs attended school blockades. The party’s veteran leader and presidential candidate, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, has strongly supported the protests, while urging non-violence.

picture of article

Unemployment and the rise of the Nazis | Letter

Philipp Ruch believes that the impact of the 1929 Wall Street crash cannot explain the Nazi breakthrough at the 1930 Reichstag election, as the full effects of Black Thursday “didn’t fully arrive in Germany until July 1931” (‘Hitler was a lazy criminal who slept in until noon’: why most of what we think we know about the rise of the Nazis is wrong, 1 October). But unemployment more than doubled between 1928 and the 1930 election, and that fact alone might be thought sufficient to explain the change in Nazi fortunes. Not so, says Ruch, for “in regions where unemployment was high, the Nazi party performed relatively poorly. If anything, unemployment was a factor contributing to anti-fascist resilience.” This, however, marks a failure to appreciate how rising unemployment was seen by most Germans at the time. Not only did they see it as signifying one aspect of the failure of the coalition parties in government to manage the economy competently, but they also rightly regarded it as fuelling the rise of the Communist party of Germany (KPD) – with it being the other great political beneficiary of the Wall Street crash along with the National Socialist German Workers’ party. As the KPD grew, so the Nazi party grew – as it was perceived as the only party with the resolve and the numbers (thanks to the brownshirts) to stop the communists seizing power on the streets. The fact that the KPD proved a damp squib should not blind us to the fact that the party once inspired genuine, strong and very widespread fear. John Plowright Repton, Derbyshire • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

picture of article

Outcry in Trinidad and Tobago after passing of police bill that could threaten press freedom

Journalists in Trinidad and Tobago have called for an urgent amendment to a sweeping new bill that increases police powers of search and seizure, which they argue threatens the country’s much-vaunted freedom of the press. The government says the special operations bill 2026, passed on 24 September, is designed to tackle alarmingly high crime and murder rates in the Caribbean nation. The country has spent more than a year in an almost perpetual state of emergency, with police empowered to bypass normal constitutional rights around arrest, detention, and search and seizure. But journalists in Trinidad and Tobago have called for explicit exemptions in the new legislation to prevent police from searching and seizing their notebooks, phones and laptops. In the past, journalists have been forced to challenge warrants empowering police to raid their homes and offices. Although the country prides itself in honouring freedom of speech, ranking 19 out of 180 countries in the 2025 Reporters Without Borders press freedom index, this year it fell 13 places to 32, and journalists say they are deeply concerned about whether they can protect whistleblowers and vulnerable sources who share information on the understanding that they will be protected. The president of the Media Association of Trinidad and Tobago (MATT), Prior Beharry, said the organisation had called for clause 15 of the bill to be urgently amended “to explicitly shield our devices and materials … and confidential source information from standard police seizure”. Clause 15 prevents police from seizing “a tool of a lawful trade or business” or material protected by legal professional privilege. But MATT says journalism is not explicitly recognised as a protected trade, nor does the bill establish a procedure for handling confidential journalistic material discovered during searches. It wants the clause changed to “expressly name journalism as a protected lawful trade and safeguard journalists’ devices, materials and confidential sources”. Beharry said the bill’s search‑and‑seizure powers were particularly worrying in a digital era where “the tools of a journalist is … usually [a] cell phone”. Though he said journalists had not been directly threatened under recent states of emergency, he warned that other restrictions were worsening. “One of the issues we are having is the access to the government, the executive, including the prime minister, who has not had an official press conference for more than a year,” he said. “Ministries use state resources and we are not invited, but state media is invited.” The independent journalist Pearce Robinson said the combination of surveillance capability, expanded search powers – without explicit protection for journalistic practice – and declining access to government ministers created a “concrete” threat to press freedom, with a particularly significant impact on investigative reporting. “If your phone, your laptop and your notes can be searched or seized without explicit protection for journalistic material, that raises serious constitutional concerns,” he said. “Investigative journalism depends on people being able to speak confidentially.” He also raised concerns about phone tapping and surveillance, pointing to an investigation by the Trinidad and Tobago Guardian which said that “judges approved 314 warrants to intercept communications in Trinidad and Tobago between 2020 and May 2026”. “My concern is not that press freedom has disappeared,” he said. “It is that several of these pressures … are accumulating at the same time.” Pedro Cárdenas, of the press freedom and human rights organisation Article 19, expressed concern about the clause in the new bill. “It empowers law enforcement officers to seize any vehicle, article or document deemed likely to be of substantial value. We find this clause particularly problematic because it is vague and opens up to discussion what is substantial value or not,” he said. He added that it “might directly counter” existing international human rights laws. The office of the prime minister did not respond to a request for comment. Stuart Young, Trinidad and Tobago’s former prime minister, labelled the bill “unconstitutional and very dangerous”, adding that it “breaches fundamental and entrenched constitutional rights” and was passed “without a required constitutional majority in highly questionable circumstances”. He said the government’s past use of emergency powers – including detaining citizens without charge – showed “the real likelihood of abuse” under the new legislation.