Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Putin trying to negotiate an end to Ukraine war as he cannot win it on battlefield, says EU’s Kallas – Europe live

Americans involved in the Ukrainian war effort are embarrassed and dismayed by Donald Trump’s continuing pressures on Kyiv and think his administration’s latest peace plan is tantamount to backstabbing and another catastrophic failure of US foreign policy. “Complete bullshit and a betrayal by Trump,” said an American special forces veteran who has helped train and advise the Ukrainian military since the full-scale Russian invasion began in February 2022. “But are you even surprised?” As soon as Russian bombs were dropping on Kyiv in the early breaths of the war nearly four years ago, thousands of foreigners – soldiers, veterans, trainers, medics and others – poured into Ukraine to help defend what was largely seen as a collective defense of democracy against naked imperialism. Among those international volunteers were hundreds of Americans, if not thousands, many of whom were and are Republicans who’ve had trouble squaring the animosity Trump has with the country they help. Voices in the GOP have also railed against Trump’s latest demands on Ukraine, with Don Bacon, a Nebraska congressman, describing it as “gross buffoonery” and “pushing a surrender plan on Ukraine” that “looks like Russia wrote it.” “Follows Russia’s talking points almost to the letter,” said the same source, who called Witkoff a “Russian sycophant”. Another American working in the defense sector in Ukraine, agreed the latest news of a peace plan was another chapter in the tumultuous relationship between Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but told the Guardian he felt bad for the diplomats at the Kyiv embassy, who he described as not “Maga” and “motivated but totally handcuffed.” A Nato veteran who trains Ukrainian soldiers alongside former US servicemen says money is motivating the US government and called the plan “pathetic”.

picture of article

Can Europe prevent an unjust ‘peace’ in Ukraine – and what is at stake if it fails?

With Ukraine’s future back on the geopolitical carving block, Europe is facing its own moment of truth. Is it ready to defend Kyiv against the imposition of a lopsided “peace” that rewards Vladimir Putin and undermines the entire continent’s security? Not for the first time, European governments were left in the dark about secret US-backed proposals to end Russia’s war. Leaked to the media last week, the latest incendiary 28-point plan was so slanted in Russia’s favour that there are suspicions it was partly drafted in the Kremlin (complete with clunkily translated Russian syntax). The terms of this shockingly punitive plan would freeze battle lines but require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory that it still controls; drastically curb the size of its army; accept amnesty for Russian atrocities and war crimes; and stay out of Nato for good. No wonder President Zelenskyy told his compatriots that it left them facing one of the most difficult moments of their history. Nonetheless, in a hurry to claim credit for peace – seemingly at any price – Donald Trump gave Ukraine an ultimatum: sign off on Russia’s shopping list by Thanksgiving or, it was implied, risk losing US intelligence and military aid: a not-so festive deadline. The days since have felt like a repetition of August, when Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin in Alaska and left sidelined European leaders dashing to the White House en masse, flanking Zelenskyy, to limit the damage. This time, despite Trump upbraiding the Ukraine president for “zero gratitude”, emergency talks in Geneva have reportedly tweaked the plan to “uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty”. Trump has softened his language (and deadline), claiming that negotiations with Ukraine are bearing fruit and his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, will soon be back in Moscow. If a more palatable deal is in the offing, it may be because France, Germany and the UK have helped Ukraine to push back. It is not only about solidarity: these countries may be required to put “boots on the ground” to uphold an eventual deal. *** Foot in the door There is, however, no reason to believe that Moscow will buy into any plan that doesn’t involve Kyiv’s capitulation – or even that Russia seeks to end the war. “Putin sees no problem with continuing the war,” Tatiana Stanovaya, of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, told the Guardian’s Russian affairs reporter, Pjotr Sauer. At such a perilous moment then, the onus is more than ever on Europe to demand that Ukraine gets a just peace – both morally and out of self-interest for the security of Ukraine’s European neighbours. But how can Europe prevent a US stitch-up, particularly if Moscow maintains its most unreasonable territorial demands and Trump loses patience with Zelenskyy? Getting ahead of any Trump/Putin summit is key, say analysts. Ukraine’s European backers need be clearer with Trump that Ukraine’s security is Europe’s security. “Europeans complain about not being at the table, but they have agency,” Jana Kobzova, a Ukraine expert with the European Council for Foreign Relations, said on the thinktank’s podcast. “They can put their foot in the door and say these are the things that we are not going to tolerate.” Europe is already shouldering most of the cost of Ukraine’s resistance, even if it has been too hesitant, divided, or complacent to give Kyiv the negotiating cards it needs. *** Rouble roulette The most game-changing piece of European leverage could turn out to a neuralgic (and Belgium says legally iffy) EU plan for a €140bn “reparations loan” for Ukraine, secured on billions in Russian central bank deposits, frozen in the west by EU sanctions. The confiscated assets (mostly held in a repository in Belgium) could transform Ukraine’s near-bankrupt status and help it win the war. But the proposal also stipulated using $100bn of these Russian assets for investment, with the US keeping 50% of the profits. Now the EU must urgently decide if it wants to move on the assets first, or dig deep to find alternative cash. Brussels suspects that Russia’s economy is in a worse state than it will acknowledge, thanks to such measures as a new EU ban on Russian gas imports. “They [Moscow] want us to believe they can continue this war for ever. This is not true,” Kaja Kallas, the EU high representative and former Estonian PM, told the BBC. The stakes are perilous for Europe if Moscow gets away with changing borders by force. “If Ukraine capitulates as per Russia’s plan, war in the rest of Europe is one step closer, and Europeans understand this. So it’s not out of the goodness of their heart that they would stick with Ukraine, but because they understand that their own security is at stake,” Nathalie Tocci, director of the Italian Institute for International Affairs and a Guardian Europe contributor, told me. For Tocci, the most likely medium-term scenario is not Ukrainian surrender, but one in which the US and Russia (egged on by US hawks, including JD Vance) reach a bilateral deal, leaving Europe to stick with Ukraine. “In this scenario, Europeans should stop deluding themselves that they can work with Trump on Ukraine. They should warmly thank the US president and persuade him to step aside and place his bets on another conflict to get his Nobel peace prize. Either way, the war goes on for now”. To receive the complete version of This Is Europe in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.

picture of article

Trump threatens Venezuela’s Maduro with ‘the easy way … or the hard way’

Donald Trump has warned Nicolás Maduro he can “do things the easy way … or the hard way” as Venezuela’s authoritarian leader responded to the growing US pressure campaign by urging followers to prepare to defend “every inch” of the South American country. Clad in woodland camouflage fatigues, Maduro told a rally in the capital, Caracas, it was their historic duty to fight foreign aggressors, just as the Venezuelan liberation hero Simón Bolívar did two centuries ago. “We have to be capable of defending every inch of this blessed land from any sort of imperialist threat or aggression, wherever it comes from,” Maduro declared in his Tuesday address to “the revolutionary people of Caracas”. “I swear before our Lord Jesus Christ, that I will give my all for the victory of Venezuela,” Maduro said, vowing to protect the skies, mountains and plains of his country. Speaking on Air Force One as he flew to Florida, Trump declined to explain the precise purpose of his four-month campaign against Venezuela, although many suspect it is designed to overthrow Maduro, who is widely believed to have stolen last year’s presidential election. Officially, the huge US military deployment in the Caribbean Sea is part of a crackdown on Latin American drug traffickers “flooding” the US with drugs. Washington has accused Maduro of leading one narco “cartel” – the “Cartel of the Suns”, which was this week designated a foreign terrorist organization – although many experts say the group does not actually exist. “I’m not going to tell you what the goal is. You should probably know what the goal is,” Trump said of his crusade, indicating he “might” talk to Maduro. “If we can save lives, if we can do things the easy way, that’s fine. And if we have to do it the hard way, that’s fine too,” the US president told reporters. Trump’s future plans for South America’s sixth-largest country – and the nation with the world’s largest proven oil reserves – remain shrouded in mystery. “Maduro and most of his cohorts view the US military threats as a bluff,” a source with regular contact with top Venezuela officials told the Wall Street Journal this week. “Maduro believes that the only way the US can oust him is by sending troops to Caracas,” that person added. Given Trump’s reluctance to send US troops into combat overseas, that looks highly unlikely. But many observers suspect that, after conducting more than 10 deadly airstrikes targeting supposed drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean Sea, Trump’s next step will be US strikes on Venezuelan soil. “I think that we’re going to start blowing things up. I think we have to do something because there’s too big a force there [in the Caribbean] to not do something,” said Douglas Farah, a national security consultant and Latin America expert who advised the US government on Venezuela during Trump’s first term. Farah said his biggest fear was that – even if the US did launch some kind of attack, perhaps targeting a major Caribbean port out of which cocaine was smuggled – that would fail to topple Maduro, just as Trump failed to topple him in 2019. “[If that happens] Maduro will feel empowered. He’ll say: ‘Yeah, I defeated the United States,’” Farah said. And any chance of the Venezuelan dictator leaving power “in some sort of orderly fashion will be gone again for another 10 years”.

picture of article

‘Fearing for our lives’: Australians tell of Chilean mountain horror where five hikers perished

About 100 metres below the most challenging summit in a remote nature reserve in Chilean Patagonia, Australian woman Emily Dong was among a group of hikers who thought they were going to die. Less than a day later, five hikers would be confirmed dead in the Torres del Paine national park after winds hit 190km/h and temperatures plummeted to –5C. Taking into account wind chill, it felt like –20C. Dong, a keen hiker from Sydney, remembers crawling across an ice sheet on all fours, the wind howling around her. She was unable to put on her spikes because of the freezing conditions. The 24-year-old had walking poles, but every step she took the wind “battered you from left to right”, forcing her on to her knees, she says. “I remember holding my hands over my head because that’s how heavy the storm was, that’s how bad the wind was, and it was impossible to move forward. “In my head I was just thinking, ‘I need to get to the next hut, I need to get to that hut so I can finally rest.’ After speaking with other hikers, it became clear many of us were fearing for our lives.” But the next hut was locked, Dong later found out. That was despite the hikers having been told by staff who operate the private campsites in the national park that they could stop there for lunch and to warm up before pushing on to the next campsite. There were no rangers in that area of the park due to mandatory voting in Chile’s presidential election that day, Mauricio Ruiz, the regional director of Conaf, Chile’s national forestry corporation, told local news media later. It was one of a series of communication failures that survivors believe may have contributed to the deaths of a British woman, a German couple and a Mexican couple, who all succumbed to hypothermia during the snowstorm on Monday 17 November. Dong was among a group of about 30 people, including 13 Australians, who tried over several hours to save them on the O Circuit trail at Torres del Paine, a popular spot that attracted 367,000 travellers last year. Police and emergency services would not arrive until the following day – by then it was too late. Survivors are now asking why the trail was open if the rangers were absent and the weather was so severe. ‘They were screaming at staff’ On the Monday morning hikers planned to set out from Los Perros campsite on their fourth day of a week-long trail circling the Paine massif in the national park. The 15km hike to the next campsite, Grey, includes the most strenuous climb of the trail over the John Garner Pass which reaches an altitude of 1,220 metres. When Dong and her partner had asked staff whether the conditions would be safe before heading out, they told them: “It’s just Patagonia, hikers have done the pass in much worse conditions.” About 30 hikers set off in small groups between 6am and 6.30am. As conditions deteriorated during the day, they slowly converged under informal leadership of groups at the front of the trek, including an Australian couple, Sid Bildmann, 33, from Brisbane, and Renae Casini, 36, from Melbourne, who have more than a decade of experience in the ski industry. They made the difficult decision to turn the group back before reaching the summit. Later, they found out their two friends who had completed the trail days before them had warned staff at the Grey campsite to shut the pass. “They were screaming at staff on the other side, ‘You need to close this, we’re lucky to be alive,’” Casini says. “Because they didn’t have internet the whole time, they weren’t able to get in contact with us … and that message was never received. “The pass was still open, even though camp attendants on the other side were warned.” Bildmann says if they had known how severe the weather conditions would be, including how much snow had amassed and compacted over several days, there is no way they would have pushed forward. As it turned out, their GPS device would later show they were within 50 metres of the summit when they turned around. “The wind was so high you couldn’t directly look into it to see where you’re going,” he says. “We thought: if we’re struggling climbing the first part of the trail, what’s to follow? “But we all know descending is worse than ascending. The wind was now on our backs, pushing on the ice.” As they descended to return to Los Perros, people started to fall, including Dong’s friend, who slid about 50 metres down an icy slope, “disappearing into nothing”. “I couldn’t see her and I didn’t know if she was alive or not until I made it down to the bottom. She had lacerations on her face from hitting the rock … people were literally just slipping down,” she says. “At some point I had no idea where we were … the trail markers weren’t visible in the storm. I remember just looking at people’s packs thinking, ‘I need to keep going because if I don’t see them any more, I’m going be lost on this mountain.’ “It was terrifying. Every single one of us was so grateful to be alive when we got down.” ‘We were in shock’ When the hikers made it back to the Los Perros campsite at about 12.30pm, some suffering from frostbite, hypothermia and cuts, they had to demand access to the campsite’s staffroom, which they turned into a makeshift medical area. They were initially charged for additional sleeping bags and food, they say. “We were in shock,” Bildmann says. “People would return at different times, and whenever they did, the tears started falling uncontrollably.” It soon became clear people were unaccounted for. The alarm was first raised over Victoria Bond, a British woman who failed to return to camp with her four friends. A distress post was issued via an SOS function at 2pm, and a group of volunteers headed out – a friend of Bond’s and a group of Canadians who had chosen not to make the ascent that day and weren’t fatigued or in shock. One staff member accompanied volunteers back up the mountain, but otherwise no assistance was given, they say. Soon they came across Cristina Calvillo Tovar, a Mexican citizen, and her partner, Julián García Pimentel. He was dead, and Tovar was suffering from hypothermia. Backup was requested to camp via Garmin watches, and Bildmann put his wet gear back on and ascended the mountain for a second time. Over the next five hours, the group of volunteers attempted to transport Tovar back to camp using a makeshift stretcher constructed from trekking poles, duct tape and rope. Among them were two medical practitioners from Australia, who monitored Tovar’s vitals and attempted CPR when they were within 150 metres of camp. “They did everything they could to try and get a response,” Bildmann says. “We pushed as hard as we could. But unfortunately, after about an hour, they had to call the time of death.” Bildmann had spent more than 10 hours exposed to the elements. ‘It’s a huge systemic failure’ About two hours later, rangers finally arrived in response to the SOS call and informed the survivors that the pass was closed. Their campsite’s hut was opened, revealing a stretcher that had been behind a locked door the whole time. It wasn’t until the following afternoon that police and additional backup made it on the scene – about 24 hours after an SOS was first issued. The five bodies were found scattered over a 2km area near the pass, with Bond the highest up, partially sheltered by rocks, and the German couple, Nadine Lichey and Andreas Von Pein, behind her. A collective statement written by the hikers who survived the blizzard said it was a “terrible, avoidable tragedy”. They questioned why no rangers were present to support hikers during the trek or subsequent rescue efforts until it was too late, forcing them to act as their own first responders. Twenty-seven people required medical treatment after the disaster. “Nobody should have been allowed, let alone encouraged to attempt the pass that day,” the statement said. “There’s been a lot of victim blaming, but hikers were encouraged to head out in extremely dangerous conditions, and told there would be rangers present … it’s a huge systemic failure.” The group called on the Chilean government, parks administration (Conaf) and Vertice, the private operator within the national park, to introduce essential safety measures to avoid future “senseless loss of life”, including a hiker log at each campsite and access to medical equipment. Vertice did not respond to detailed questions. Conaf said it had ordered an internal investigation “to determine any potential liability” and would “review the safety and communication protocols in the park’s circuits … with the aim of strengthening prevention and emergency response capacity”. Bildmann and Casini were flown out of the park by helicopter on Wednesday 19 November. A week later, the 130km O Circuit remained closed for investigation. Casini still fears people may be unaccounted for due to the absence of sign-in sheets or tracking. “It was hard to leave the camp,” she says. “You could see the people, the faces that were still on the hill … We wanted to do more to help. It plays in my mind.”

picture of article

Nicolas Sarkozy convicted of illegal campaign financing in failed 2012 re-election bid

The former French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been convicted of illegal campaign financing in his failed 2012 re-election bid, after the country’s highest court rejected his final appeal. Sarkozy, who was the country’s rightwing president between 2007 and 2012, was convicted of hiding illegal overspending for his unsuccessful re-election campaign that was shaped by vast American-style rallies. The case was labelled the “Bygmalion” affair because of the name of the events company that organised Sarkozy’s elaborate and artfully filmed stadium gigs in front of thousands of flag-waving fans when he was fighting for re-election. He ultimately lost to the Socialist party’s François Hollande. In a 2021 trial, the state prosecutor had highlighted Sarkozy’s “couldn’t care less” attitude in demanding one rally a day in the form of vast “American-style shows” and allowing costs to rise substantially above the legal limit for a presidential election campaign. The prosecution said accountants had warned Sarkozy he was about to pass the official €22.5m spending cap but that he insisted on holding more events to fend off Hollande, who was gaining ground as a “Mr Normal” seeking to crack down on the world of finance. In the end, Sarkozy’s campaign spending came to at least €42.8m, nearly double the legal limit, prosecutors said. Sarkozy, who denied all wrongdoing, lodged an appeal process that took several years. France’s highest court, the Cour de Cassation, which focuses on whether the law has been applied correctly rather than on the facts of the case, has now upheld an earlier ruling, making Sarkozy’s conviction final. Sarkozy, who was released from prison earlier this month in connection with a separate conviction, will now have to serve his sentence. He had been sentenced on appeal to a one-year prison term, half of which was suspended. That six-month prison term can be served through means such as wearing an electronic tag, without going to jail. Sarkozy has faced a series of legal challenges since leaving office. He is appealing against his conviction for criminal conspiracy over a scheme to obtain election campaign funds for his 2007 presidential attempt from the regime of the late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. That is the conviction that in October resulted in him going to in La Santé prison in Paris, where he spent 20 days, an experience he described as “gruelling” and a “nightmare”. He was released on 10 November.

picture of article

Americans helping Ukrainian war effort decry US peace plan as a ‘betrayal by Trump’

Americans involved in the Ukrainian war effort are embarrassed and dismayed by Donald Trump’s continuing pressures on Kyiv and think his administration’s latest peace plan is tantamount to backstabbing and another catastrophic failure of US foreign policy. “Complete bullshit and a betrayal by Trump,” said an American special forces veteran who has helped train and advise the Ukrainian military since the full-scale Russian invasion began in February 2022. “But are you even surprised?” Last week, a 28-point peace plan reportedly drafted by Steve Witkoff, a Trump envoy negotiating with Kremlin adviser Kirill Dmitriev, was leaked to the press and then revealed to be an apparent repackaging of Vladimir Putin’s maximalist demands on Ukraine. As soon as Russian bombs were dropping on Kyiv in the early breaths of the war nearly four years ago, thousands of foreigners – soldiers, veterans, trainers, medics and others – poured into Ukraine to help defend what was largely seen as a collective defense of democracy against naked imperialism. Among those international volunteers were hundreds of Americans, if not thousands, many of whom were and are Republicans who’ve had trouble squaring the animosity Trump has with the country they help. Voices in the GOP have also railed against Trump’s latest demands on Ukraine, with Don Bacon, a Nebraska congressman, describing it as “gross buffoonery” and “pushing a surrender plan on Ukraine” that “looks like Russia wrote it.” “Follows Russia’s talking points almost to the letter,” said the same source, who called Witkoff a “Russian sycophant”. He continued: “I’m worried they really are getting forced into this one. But too much blood has been spilled. I don’t think Zelenskyy can take anything close to that deal if it means giving up territory and giving up its own sovereignty to make decisions like joining Nato or the size of the military.” Confusion has also surrounded who exactly wrote the alleged peace plan, with Republican senator Mike Rounds claiming at the Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia last week that secretary of state Marco Rubio called it a preliminary offer from the Kremlin, which Rubio quickly and publicly denied. Another American working in the defense sector in Ukraine, agreed the latest news of a peace plan was another chapter in the tumultuous relationship between Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but told the Guardian he felt bad for the diplomats at the Kyiv embassy, who he described as not “Maga” and “motivated but totally handcuffed.” Steve Andre, a Michigan-native who served in the Ukrainian military as a press officer and is now in Kyiv re-enlisting, thinks it’s an example of the US’s decaying global interests, something he has seen first-hand for years in Ukraine. “The administration doesn’t want to take the time and figure out what is actually happening here in the country,” he said. “I’m disappointed in the American people. If they had even an eighth of the bravery and willpower of the Ukrainians, America might still be a great place.” Major concessions in the plan are being asked of Ukraine. Namely, completely ceding the oblasts of Donetsk and Luhansk, constitutionally affirming it will never join the Nato alliance, and severely cutting the size of its military and arsenal. A Nato veteran who trains Ukrainian soldiers alongside former US servicemen says money is motivating the US government and called the plan “pathetic”. “I think they believe that they can get the kind of payout that Cheney and Rumsfeld did, by doing business with Russia while trying to control all of the ‘recovery’ efforts here,” he told the Guardian, referencing the rapprochement efforts with the Kremlin during the Bush years. He described the US trainers and veterans of the global “war on terror” he trains with as “pretty angry” and long, “resigned to losing US support.” “Trump’s [administration] is full of idiot boomers who’ve never dealt with actual stakes in their entire lives,” he said. “I’d say they’ve cooked up some idiotic peace fantasy, but I’m certain they are aware of what surrender means for us.” This article was amended on 26 November 2025 to correct that Don Bacon represents Nebraska, not Mississippi.

picture of article

Von der Leyen warns against ‘carving up’ of Ukraine amid crunch US-led talks

The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has warned against “the unilateral carving up of a sovereign European nation”, as Europe scrambles to assert influence over a US effort to end the war in Ukraine. Speaking to European lawmakers in Strasbourg on Wednesday, von der Leyen said Russia showed “no signs of true willingness to end the conflict” and continued to operate in a mindset unchanged since the days of Yalta – the much-criticised and misunderstood 1945 summit to settle the post-war order. “So we need to be clear that there cannot be unilateral carving up of a sovereign European nation, and that borders cannot be changed by force. If today we legitimise and formalise the undermining of borders, we open the doors for more wars tomorrow, and we cannot let this happen.” She welcomed Donald Trump’s efforts to find peace, describing them as “a starting point”, but made clear that Europe had many concerns about the details outlined in the original 28-point US-Russian plan. Some of the maximalist Russia-friendly demands have since been removed, Ukraine has said, and the US president has rowed back on his Thursday deadline tied to the US holiday of Thanksgiving, amid little sign of progress on key sticking points. Describing the situation as volatile and dangerous, von der Leyen also said she saw “an opportunity here to make real progress”, while adding that “so far we have seen no signs from Russia of true willingness to end this conflict. So we have to keep up the pressure on Russia.” EU foreign ministers were holding a hastily arranged video conference on the situation on Wednesday. As well as opposition to changing borders by force, von der Leyen said there should be no limits on Ukraine’s armed forces – such a restriction would “leave the country vulnerable to future attacks”. Ukraine also needed “robust, credible and long-term security guarantees”, she added. She was speaking after a leaked recording to Bloomberg showed that Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff told a senior Kremlin official last month that achieving peace in Ukraine would require Russia gaining control of Donetsk and potentially a separate territorial exchange. The original 28-point plan called on Ukraine to cede the entire Donetsk region to Russia, including areas under Ukrainian control. The Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said on Wednesday that it was premature to speak about striking a peace deal in the near future on Ukraine, Reuters reported. Von der Leyen also promised the European Commission would present a draft legal proposal on using Russia’s frozen assets to fund Ukraine in 2026 and 2027. EU leaders failed to endorse the idea last month, because of legal doubts from Belgium, which hosts about €183bn of assets, most of Russia’s sovereign wealth in the EU and two-thirds of the worldwide total. Trump’s proposal for the US to take 50% profits on a US-led venture to “rebuild and invest in Ukraine” based on $100bn from the Russian frozen assets, is adding to pressure on European leaders to resolve the issue. The US also wants Europe to contribute $100bn to the reconstruction investment fund. Von der Leyen reiterated her support for the frozen assets plan – an EU loan to Ukraine secured on the assets and the idea that Russia would pay reparations to Kyiv – saying: “I cannot see any scenario in which the European taxpayers alone will pay the bill.” EU leaders will discuss the frozen assets question next month as they seek to nail down a 2026-27 funding deal for Kyiv, which is expected to run out of money from next spring. Von der Leyen said another European priority was the return of Ukrainian children forcibly deported to Russia. Von der Leyen, who is due to host an international conference on the issue in 2026, said: “There are tens of thousands of boys and girls whose fate is unknown, trapped in Russia by Russia. We will not forget them.” Ukraine’s government has identified nearly 20,000 children who have been unlawfully deported or forcibly transferred to Russia since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. A Ukrainian organisation working on the issue, Bring Kids Back, has said 1,835 children have returned from deportation, forced transfers and occupied Ukraine. The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, is wanted for war crimes by the international criminal court over the abductions. The original 28-point plan proposed a full amnesty for the actions of all parties involved in the conflict.