Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

French education minister says up to 500 schools will remain partially or fully closed on Monday after student protests – Europe live

We’ll draw our live coverage to a close for today. For the full story on the deals announced from the German chancellor’s surprise visit to Ukraine, you can read this report from my colleague in Kyiv. Friedrich Merz arrived in the Ukrainian capital this morning to pledge aid and defence deals to Zelenskyy; his arrival was marked soon after by the Russians striking a key bridge in the city His visit comes as there are near daily bombardments of the Ukrainian capital by the Kremlin, which has hit now both the Northern and Southern Bridges across the Dnipro River which commuters heavily rely on. Russia has also been hitting gas stations in residential neighbourhoods and government and academia sites. Germany has become Ukraine’s biggest provider of military aid since Merz entered office in May 2025, surpassing the US as American support has declined. On Sunday, Merz announced another $1.5bn in aid, over a billion of it going towards military aid including long-range strike weapons, drones and satellite tech to help Ukraine hit Russian launch pads. In France, the government is keeping up to 500 high schools closed tomorrow amid student protests which have “grown out of control”, say police. The French Education Minister said 78 teachers and education staff had been wounded in the protests late last week where there were outbursts of violence and masked protesters damaging property and setting fires in the street. On Sunday, police detained a 16-year-old over the assault of a 59-year-old teacher who had been doused with gasoline and assaulted on the sidelines of a school protest. But students and some human rights groups have also condemned “brutal” policing tactics from riot squads. Students have been protesting since mid-September about poor conditions in school including a shortage of teachers, overcrowded classrooms and dilapidated buildings. The protests, which began in Paris, have spread across the country with a national action day last Friday. Organisers have called for more protests on Tuesday.

picture of article

Brazil goes to polls in decisive election for future of Latin America

Brazilians are going to the polls in the first round of a highly polarised and high-stakes presidential election that could change not only the direction of Latin America’s largest country but that of the entire region. The election on Sunday pits the leftwing president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who is seeking a fourth non-consecutive term, against the far-right senator Flávio Bolsonaro, an ally of Donald Trump and the son of the former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is serving a 27-year sentence for attempting a coup after his failed 2022 re-election attempt. Brazil is one of the few Latin American countries that still has a leftwing government after a wave of rightwing and far-right electoral victories across the region and the US takeover of Venezuela after the capture of Nicolás Maduro. The 80-year-old Lula has positioned himself as one of the last regional leaders still willing to say no to Trump, and has recently accused the US president of trying to interfere in Brazil’s election in Bolsonaro’s favour. Like his father, who was Brazil’s president during Trump’s first term, Flávio Bolsonaro, 45, frequently praises the US president and has pledged to join the US-led anti-drug-cartel coalition that has killed dozens of people in airstrikes and carried out military operations across the region. Lula and Bolsonaro have alternated as frontrunners in the final stretch, making the outcome unpredictable. In recent days, both have focused on persuading undecided voters in hopes of reaching 50% plus one vote; if neither does, there will be a runoff on 25 October. Voting on Sunday morning in São Bernardo do Campo, the industrial city where his political career began nearly half a century ago, Lula said: “People will have to choose between strengthening democracy and barbarism.” The incumbent played down polls released on Saturday that showed the race was wide open – they suggested either candidate could finish ahead and force a runoff, or even win outright on Sunday. “The poll that matters will be carried out today,” he said. Flávio Bolsonaro, who voted in Rio de Janeiro’s north zone, urged supporters of other rightwing candidates to switch to him in a “protest vote”. “Our internal polls show people who would have voted for other candidates, who are also against Lula, already voting for Flávio Bolsonaro … I hope it’s enough to give us victory in the first round,” he said. Claudinei Ferreira Viana, 45, a workshop manager in Pinhais in Paraná state, is one of the senator’s supporters. “My first choice would be Jair Bolsonaro but, since he is under house arrest and there is no other rightwing candidate strong enough to take on the current president, I’m going with Flávio,” he said. At the beginning of the year, polls suggested Bolsonaro voters would have preferred a ticket led by the São Paulo governor, Tarcísio de Freitas, or the former first lady Michelle Bolsonaro. But the former president chose his eldest son. The campaign was also marked by a scandal in which the senator was caught on tape asking a banker accused of corruption for $26.8m (£20m) to fund a film about his father, as well as speculation that Bolsonaro might strip the country’s widely cherished patron saint of her status, but he has nevertheless remained highly competitive. For many analysts, that reflects a combination of a straightforward transfer of his father’s voter base – Jair Bolsonaro lost to Lula by less than two percentage points in 2022 – and an anti-Lula vote, with the president still facing high rejection rates despite strong social and economic indicators. The incumbent’s campaign has also been hit by corruption allegations – still under investigation – involving his son and a former aide, as well as a scandal involving supreme court justices, which, despite having no connection to Lula, is seen as fuelling an “anti-system” vote and by extension an anti-incumbent one. Brazilians will also elect 27 state governors, members of state legislatures, all 513 federal congress members and 54 of the country’s 81 senators in Sunday’s vote. AMC, 40, who asked to be identified only by her initials because she fears reprisals from the local conservative government where she works in the interior of Amazonas state, will vote for Lula on Sunday “because of the many programmes he created to support the most vulnerable groups”. “Jair Bolsonaro weakened protections for Indigenous peoples, and everything Lula has done over the past four years to strengthen those protections and protect the Amazon would be seriously threatened if his son came to power,” she said.

picture of article

Russia strikes Kyiv bridge as German chancellor visits Ukraine in show of support

Russia has struck another major bridge in Kyiv as the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, arrived in the capital in a show of support for Ukraine. A Russian drone hit Kyiv’s key Northern Bridge over the Dnipro River, marking the fourth consecutive day that Russia has targeted bridges used by thousands of residents commuting between the city’s two banks. Video footage showed cars driving across the bridge as the drone plunged into the roadway and exploded in a burst of fire. Two people were injured in the strike, said Kyiv’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko. The attack came shortly after Merz arrived in the city on an unannounced visit intended to underline Germany’s backing of Ukraine, as the country enters one of the most precarious periods since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. Germany has become Ukraine’s biggest provider of military aid since Merz entered office in May 2025, surpassing the US as American support has declined. Kyiv has come under near-constant attack from Russia’s new jet-powered drones in recent weeks, as an intensifying strike campaign increasingly disrupts everyday life in the capital and threatens to leave the city without power this winter. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, told Merz that people in Kyiv were suffering “terrible nights and days” from the relentless attacks, and called Ukraine’s Russian adversaries “absolute barbarians”. “We can see the entire pointlessness of this war at this place,” said Merz, adding as he arrived that Ukraine “needs all our support in the coming weeks”. “If Russia is not stopped, its war machine will sooner or later turn against us,” he said. Russia had already damaged Kyiv’s Northern Bridge and repeatedly struck its Southern Bridge. Although the crossings remain standing, repeated attacks and the threat of further strikes have prompted the city’s authorities to restrict or suspend traffic on five of the city’s six road bridges over the Dnipro, causing temporary closures and large traffic jams. The attacks form part of a broader Russian campaign against civilian and industrial infrastructure inside Ukraine. In recent weeks, strikes have hit logistics hubs, railway lines, datacentres, medical storage facilities and steel plants, alongside a sustained assault on the country’s energy system that is expected to intensify over the winter. Russia’s foreign ministry on Saturday warned foreign nationals and diplomatic staff against remaining in or travelling to Ukraine. “Responsibility for any possible adverse consequences lies entirely with those who choose to disregard this warning,” the ministry said. A number of foreign ambassadors, including Germany’s, responded on social media that they intended to remain in Kyiv. In Moscow, some pro-war commentators noted with glee that the Russian strikes had continued despite Merz’s arrival. “Russia used to pause strikes on Kyiv during visits by European politicians. Not any more,” wrote Sergei Markov, a prominent pro-war commentator. The trip is Merz’s second to Ukraine since becoming chancellor. He has been among Kyiv’s most outspoken supporters in Europe and a leading voice warning about Russia’s hybrid campaign against other nations. Last month, Germany formally accused Moscow of being behind a suspected plot targeting Leipzig/Halle airport, a key logistics hub for western military aid to Ukraine. But Merz is also facing growing discontent at home over his support for Ukraine, as his approval ratings fall. Germany’s far left and far right are sceptical of support for Ukraine and want Berlin to scale back aid. The pressure has intensified as the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has made big electoral gains. Alice Weidel, the AfD’s co-leader, wrote in a social media post: “Merz is travelling to Ukraine on Germany’s national holiday and promising further billions in German taxpayer money that is missing from the pension and health insurance funds, while Germany is mired in its worst energy crisis.”

picture of article

Lack of inspections at fish slaughterhouses a ‘disgrace’, says Animal Equality UK

Up to 77m fish are slaughtered each year in the UK but there are no routine or mandatory inspections of fish slaughterhouses in England and Wales, it can be revealed. Concerns within government about the way fish are slaughtered date back decades but all of the official bodies responsible for animal welfare and food standards in England and Wales said they do not undertake regular inspections. When Animal Equality UK contacted the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), it referred the charity to the Fish Health Inspectorate (FHI). In response to a previous inquiry, the APHA had said it does not carry out mandatory inspections of fish slaughterhouses and suggested contacting the Food Standards Agency (FSA). Both the FSA and the FHI told Animal Equality UK that they did not carry out routine or mandatory inspections. Abigail Penny, the executive director of Animal Equality UK, said: “Fish are thinking, feeling beings, capable of pain. It is a disgrace that not a single government agency will take responsibility for checking on their welfare at slaughter. This is a huge blindspot, and it leaves these animals all the more vulnerable behind closed doors.” In 1996, the government’s expert advisory body, the Farm Animal Welfare Council – now called the Animal Welfare Committee – suggested there should be legislation governing the slaughter of farmed fish. The committee returned to the issue in 2014 and again in 2024. On the latter occasion it urged governments across the UK to legislate for fish to be stunned before slaughter, and for inspection systems to be put in place to enforce those standards. In its Animal Welfare Strategy for England, published in December 2025, the government committed to introducing humane slaughter requirements for farmed fish but draft legislation has yet to be published. Penny said: “For 30 years, people in power have known that farmed fish need legal protection when they are slaughtered, yet for 30 years decisionmakers have failed to act.” She added: “The government promised to change the law, and we welcome that promise, but promises don’t protect animals. Every month of delay leaves millions of fish at risk of prolonged, painful deaths. Ministers must bring forward species-specific slaughter legislation now, backed by a proper inspection regime, so that what happens to these animals is no longer left to chance. It’s the least they deserve.” Animal Equality UK estimates that about 7,742 tonnes of trout a year are killed in England and Wales. The British Trout Association says the UK has almost 290 trout farms, including hatcheries, concentrated in northern England, southern England and southern Scotland. An APHA spokesperson said: “It is incorrect to suggest fish farms aren’t regulated or inspected by government bodies. APHA investigates reports of suspected cases of poor welfare at fish farms, and the Fish Health Inspectorate inspects them on behalf of the government. We do not hesitate to take further action if we find evidence of cruelty or neglect.”

picture of article

Revealed: Government quietly dropped plan to prepare England for wildfires

The government quietly scrapped plans to prepare the countryside in England for wildfires, it has been revealed. This was despite new data showing fire crews do not have the proper protective gear to tackle them. This summer has been a potent reminder of the scale of the threat posed by the climate crisis, with the UK experiencing record-breaking wildfires after punishingly hot and dry weather turned large parts of the countryside into a tinderbox. In the third national climate adaptation programme, published in July 2023, the Conservative government, then headed by Rishi Sunak, said it would run a wildfire risk programme in England from 2023 to 2027 so land management would be adapted for the risk. However, it has now emerged the programme was never implemented, with the current government stating the commitment “was made by the previous government but was not brought into effect”. The environmental campaigner and author Guy Shrubsole, who obtained the information via a freedom of information request, said it was “appalling” the government “couldn’t be bothered to pay attention to wildfire risks until jolted into doing so by Britain burning this summer”. After a wildfire spread across an area including several homes in Stourbridge in the West Midlands in August, the prime minister, Andy Burnham, convened an emergency Cobra meeting and issued a temporary ban on the sale of disposable barbecues, criticised as being too little too late. “Successive governments have been asleep at the wheel in preparing us for the impacts of the climate crisis,” Shrubsole said. Alistair Carmichael, a Scottish Liberal Democrat MP and the chair of the Commons environment food and rural affairs committee, said it was alarming that ministers had not prioritised work to adapt land for wildfire risk. “It begs further serious questions about whether this summer’s wildfires could have looked different with more resources on the ground,” he added. Shrubsole said the government must agree a plan to re-wet the UK’s peat bogs, restore lost ponds in farmers’ fields, and stop grouse moor owners setting fire to moorland. New data obtained by the Country Land and Business Association has also revealed that more than half of the 29 fire services that responded to requests for information had no wildfire personal protective equipment (PPE). They included the Suffolk fire and rescue service, which had to deal with an “apocalyptic” wildfire earlier this summer that burned close to the Sizewell B nuclear power station and destroyed vast areas of a protected nature reserve. Standard particle-filtering respirators do not protect against dangerous gases such as carbon monoxide, which are heavily present in wildfire smoke. Standard PPE can also be too hot and heavy for wildfire conditions. This can cause crews to overheat, or remove their PPE altogether, exposing them to greater danger from heat, smoke and radiation. The data also revealed that training for wildfires was limited. For example, in Cleveland just five staff (1.2%) were qualified to give tactical advice or command wildfires, and in Cheshire just 8.62% of employees were trained to undertake wildfire operations. In response to these findings, the Fire Brigades Union is calling for correct PPE to be provided to all members combating wildfires, alongside adequate training programmes. Steve Wright, the union’s general secretary, said: “It is vital for our country’s wildfire resilience to have better land management, stronger public awareness campaigns and long-term prevention measures. Only by proper investment and a wildfire strategy can we make the country more resilient.” A government spokesperson said: “We have made wildfire preparedness a government priority and, following incidents this summer, we are convening a summit with fire and rescue service partners to make sure we are as resilient as possible. This includes making sure services have the right equipment and resources, building on the £100m we previously gave to upgrade our national resilience assets. “Land management and landscape adaptation play an important part in this, and we work closely with land managers and experts to support the restoration of peatlands, the creation of firebreaks and other adaptations that help to prevent fires from starting or from spreading as quickly during incidents.”

picture of article

Incinerated novels and destroyed warehouses: Russia’s war on Ukrainian books

On a Saturday morning in August, Viktor Kruglov, the co-founder and chief executive of the publisher Ranok, was at his headquarters in Kharkiv – the eastern Ukrainian city that, along with Kyiv, is the centre of the country’s publishing and printing industry. Built 15 years ago on the site of a former bread factory, the footprint of the premises is about 10,000 sq metres (107,640ft). Books were stacked 12 metres high on rank after rank of shelves. Kruglov, along with five senior colleagues, were on the warehouse floor to discuss the approaching school year. The warehouse was holding 628,000 new schoolbooks. “It was the high season of distribution,” he said, “so we were checking all our processes: how to do it more successfully, how to do it in time.” The meeting was scheduled for 11am. But a couple of moments after it began, there came “the sound of an explosion, and almost simultaneously I saw a huge fire”, said Kruglov. The impact was about 30 metres from where the staff were gathered, and, as colleagues set about trying to put out the flames, “there came a second strike and I understood that there could be a third, and a fourth, so we started to evacuate”. The munitions used in the attack were jet-powered Shaheds, a recent and insidious escalation of Russian drone technology, faster and harder to intercept than their predecessors. These are the weapons that have been lately terrorising Kyiv during daylight hours, ploughing into the National Academy of Sciences and a working medical clinic in the past week. “Fifty people were on shift that day,” said Kruglov of the warehouse strike, “and I don’t know how to explain how nobody was injured.” The combination of an explosion, jet fuel and a warehouse full of paper was catastrophic. None of the books could be salvaged and 8m were destroyed. It took firefighters a week to bring the flames under control. Several weeks on, smoke still rose from parts of the warehouse. The roof seemed on the verge of collapse, metal beams listing alarmingly, twisted out of shape by the heat. Shafts of sunlight slanted through the damaged roof, illuminating the catastrophe. The smell was terrible, clinging to clothes and hair. As far as the eye could see, the wreckage of books lay in mounds. In some places, engulfed by the firefighters’ water, they had dissolved into a thick, stinking, mud-like slurry. In others, they were charred at the edges but recognisable as what they once were: children’s picturebooks illustrated with animals and flowers, geography textbooks, young-adult fiction. Others were nothing but swollen millefeuilles of blackened pages that flaked away to the touch. A couple of editorial staff, visiting the wreckage for the first time since the attack, looked shaken as they recognised fragments of books they had written or edited. “When you see what was produced with your brain, with your hands, with your imagination, spoiled by Russia, it’s an awful feeling,” said Kruglov, a trim, bald, blue-eyed man in his early 60s. Those 8m books represented more than 85% of Ranok’s total stock, he said. In the main branch of Ranok’s own Knyholand bookstore in Kyiv, the display still looked cheerful and dense in late September – but, predicted Kruglov, there will be shortages this autumn when the books instore run low and there is nothing to replace them. In total, this summer, 13m Ukrainian books have been destroyed by Russian missiles or drones – a third, estimates the government, of all books printed in Ukraine this year. *** Books, literature, culture and language are not peripheral to Russia’s war on Ukraine – they are bound up in it. The full-scale invasion in February 2022 was prompted, at least in part, by Vladimir Putin’s conviction that Ukraine and Russia have no true separate cultural identity. Kruglov said he was sure his warehouse full of Ukrainian-language, Ukraine-produced books had been deliberately targeted. “It is nowhere near any military facilities and everyone knows it is a book warehouse,” he said. Bohdana Laiuk, a Ukrainian deputy minister for culture, who works on literature and publishing, takes a slightly different view: the recent attacks on books should not be seen in isolation, but as part of the invaders’ recent campaign of attacking warehouses, depots and fulfilment centres of any kind. “They cannot occupy Kyiv,” she said. “So they target warehouses around Kyiv to take the possibility of everyday life from us – and books are part of everyday life.” But books are also part of language, and language is part of identity and, often, nationhood. Books are, said Laiuk, certainly considered important by the Russians invaders. “When the Russians occupy, the first thing they do – and we know this from the areas that were occupied and then liberated in 2022 in the Kherson and Kharkiv regions – is to go to the libraries, take the Ukrainian language books out, and destroy them,” she said. Until 2022, about 70% of the Ukrainian book market was Russian-language titles – most imported from Russia, some published in Ukraine. The dominance of Russian publishing had a long history. Its seeds lay in 19th-century decrees under the tsars against publishing in Ukrainian and continued through the Soviets’ promotion of Russian as the language of aspiration, education and culture. Ukrainian writers were purged and Ukrainian literature left in the shadows, shut out from a canon that lionised the Russian novel. After Ukraine’s independence in 1991, the idea of a commercially successful Ukrainian-language novel that tackled modern social issues was so unthinkable that publishers initially suggested to Oksana Zabuzhko that her 1996 novel Fieldwork in Ukrainian Sex be published in Russian translation. She insisted it was published in the language it was written. It became a bestseller, paving the road for waves of contemporary Ukrainian literature. Laiuk characterised the dominance of Russian book imports as a kind of colonialism. “It should be compared to how Russians invested in Ukrainian media outlets, Ukrainian TV channels, Ukrainian newspapers and magazines.” It was a conscious policy, she argued. “This is how Russians think: when they arrive on tanks, everything will be ready for them because they already have this information space.” But in 2022, Ukrainian booksellers abruptly stopped selling Russian imports, in line with the rupture of all commercial ties between the countries. At the same time, swathes of the Ukrainian population switched their day-to-day language from Russian to Ukrainian. They switched reading matter, too, and Ukraine’s publishers fed the appetite with new editions of classic Ukrainian literature from the 1920s, poetry, translations, and new Ukrainian writing. The country’s publishers may publish Russian-language books, as long as at least half their titles are in Ukrainian; in practice the social barriers to doing so, at the moment, would be prohibitive. (Death and the Penguin author Andrey Kurkov, for example, writes his novels in Russian, but they are published only in Ukrainian translation; he writes nonfiction and children’s books in Ukrainian.) “People began to understand that the Russians came here to kill people simply because they were Ukrainian,” Laiuk told me in 2023. “So people are asking: what does it actually mean to be Ukrainian? Literary culture gives us the place to understand who we are.” Oleksiy Erinchak opened the first of his chain of Ukrainian-only bookstores, Sens, in 2021. In 2024, while the city was under fire, he opened a second, in a huge building on Khreshchatyk, Kyiv’s grandest boulevard, to which he has recently added a third floor, with an expansive events space. He has another branch in the western city of Ivano-Frankivsk and he has just opened a fourth, in a former cinema in Lviv. “When you go to a bookstore like Sens,” said Laiuk, “you feel that you have dignity. You have the right to buy a new book and to choose which one you like. And when you have drones above your head, it gives so much space, inner space in your heart and soul, and in your mind.” The rapid expansion of Sens is a symptom of something unlikely: a Ukrainian publishing boom amid a full-scale invasion of the country. And now, that boom is threatened by the force and frequency of Russian attacks. *** Kateryna and Artem Sova started their imprint in 2023, in the thick of the new Ukrainian publishing boom. By then Artem had been in the army for nearly a year and Kateryna was several months pregnant, living in her hometown of Kremenchuk, on the River Dnipro in central Ukraine. It was their dream: they had both worked in bookstores and at arts festivals for years. Part of the point for Artem was to keep some chink of his old self alive. “I realised,” he said, speaking in Zaporizhzhia during a break from his military duties, “that I was detached from everything I love.” They began with Lonely City, a nonfiction work about art and the experience of urban isolation, by the British author Olivia Laing. They had loved it since they read it a decade ago, and were bemused it was not already translated. They wrote to Laing’s agent asking whether they could acquire the rights. “We tried to explain why this book is important for Ukrainians now, and to me personally,” Artem said, recalling. “This experience of being lonely is kind of universal, but it has been multiplied because a lot of people went into the army, and there are so many displaced people in Ukraine: separated couples, destroyed lives.” Laing, to their surprise, agreed: only then did they actually go through the legal process of setting up the company. They called it Krapky – Ukrainian for “ellipsis”, the three dots being their favourite punctuation mark, signifying, said Kateryna, as she sipped coffee in an independent bookshop in Kremenchuk, that they wanted reading their books “to be an ongoing conversation. Something that doesn’t stop when you close the book.” Their aim was for every book they published to be expertly translated and wonderfully illustrated. In 2025, they finally went to Kyiv Book Arsenal – the great annual gathering for publishers, writers and readers in the capital – with a beautifully designed edition of Lonely City. By this year’s Book Arsenal they had several titles already out, and translations of Laing’s To the River and Karen Blixen’s classic, Out of Africa, in the pipeline. In preparation were also works by Flannery O’Connor, among others. “We wanted to get to a position where we were publishing eight to 10 titles a year,” said Kateryna. Recently, they had signed a contract with Nova Poshta, the Ukrainian postal service, to handle fulfilment – so that Kateryna was not sending out the books herself to customers and bookstores. She was driving her sister to university on the morning of 28 August when Artem rang. The warehouse where their books were held, on the periphery of Kyiv, had been attacked. Kateryna had to pull off the road in her distress. At the Lviv BookForum, a fortnight later, their stand was empty but for a QR code so visitors could preorder their forthcoming titles. They had nothing physical to sell. All of their books had been destroyed. *** Ranok is now rushing to reprint textbooks and bestsellers, hoping to get precious teaching materials into schools – and plug the shortfall in cashflow with sales of popular titles. Vivat, a large Kharkiv-based publisher, which lost 16m Ukrainian hryvnia (about £270,000) worth of books in a hit on one of its warehouses this summer, is doing the same. “We’ll definitely continue publishing Ukrainian authors, and the schedule for 2027 is already finalised,” said Vivat’s spokesperson, Kateryna Ilchuk, between events at Lviv BookForum. “But probably yes, it will mean going with more mainstream titles.” Small literary publishers such as Krapky are the most vulnerable in the current crisis. Another small independent press, Who is That?, recently announced a pause in its operations until the end of the war, after the destruction of all of their stock this summer in two separate airstrikes. For debut authors, or writers of less commercial or more experimental titles, this is a bleak moment. Even before the summer drone hits, there had been delays in some books’ publication owing to attacks on printing infrastructure. Ksenia Shpak’s debut young-adult novel – an urban fantasy about a girl internally displaced from eastern Ukraine to the Carpathian mountains – was originally due out in February 2025. It was finally published, by the imprint Zhorzh, in November. But half the print run was in the Ranok warehouse in Kharkiv when it was attacked. “I must say that it’s sad because it was my first published book,” said Shpak, “and now my publisher will focus on their bestsellers, and only after that if they get enough money will they reprint my book.” She mentioned other factors that had lately cooled the Ukrainian publishing boom: a levelling out of demand; the rise in the cost of living. “It feels like there is a snowballing of bad things for our publishing industry,” Shpak added. “It’s shaky,” said veteran poetry editor, poet and children’s publisher Ivan Malkovych. His premises – in central Kyiv, shared with a male-voice choir, the sound of whose rehearsal wafted through the editorial offices as he spoke – presented an absolute contrast to the desolation of the Ranok warehouse. In one room, a wall of shelves displayed ranks of exquisitely illustrated children’s titles, and handsome volumes of poetry. He began his company amid the economic chaos of the early 1990s, starting with a Ukrainian alphabet book, printed on board a supplier let him have on the vague promise he’d pay for it in six months (the book was a success, and he did). The alphabet began, “A is for Angel”, and the angel has been the publishing house’s good luck charm ever since. Malkovych has published many children’s books, but none in such quantity as Harry Potter. His editions hit the shelves faster, and were better translated, than the Russian versions (“We Ukrainianised a lot of children that way,” he said.) He lost 40,000 books in the same Nova Poshta warehouse attack that destroyed Krapky’s stock – about $500,000 (£377,800) of losses. “We were always proud of our delivery service – you could order a book at 4am and it would arrive by midday. Now we face big delays,” he said. He was particularly worried about the next Harry Potter release, on 6 October. There had been a lot of pre-orders and he wanted delivery to be synchronised with the rest of the world, despite the full-scale invasion. For publishers like Malkovych – whose staff have elected not to leave Kyiv, despite the oncoming winter and the new Russian jet-powered drones – the task now is to adapt: they will now spread stocks of book in smaller warehouses across the country, at the expense of super-fast delivery times. There is hope for Krapky too: Nova Poshta may reimburse it for some of their lost stock; there has been an outflowing of support from readers who have preordered forthcoming titles; and it has received a grant from an NGO towards reprinting costs. When Laiuk visits Frankfurt book fair this October, she will be promoting a ministry of culture and Kyiv School of Economics fundraiser for small Ukrainian publishers like Krapky. But she will also urge global publishers to translate Ukrainian titles. “It’s important to see that the industry is suffering and to see the devastating pictures of burned books. But that is not the whole story. The whole story is that Ukrainian literature is rich and diverse as never before. The best way is to see that is to translate, and to bring new voices to the discourse in your country.” As for Kruglov, despite the devastating loss of 8m books, he was, somehow, optimistic. Surveying the absolute ruin of his Kharkiv premises, he said, “I think that we will rebuild everything. And I even know how to do it better.”

picture of article

Polish activists launch abortion pill locker to bypass near-total ban

They call it the “world’s first parcel locker for abortion pills”. Polish campaigners have launched a new means of distribution as part of their ongoing effort to skirt the country’s near-total ban on abortion. Painted pink and framed by zebra-striped curtains, the 22-compartment “AbortOmat” in Warsaw allows women to access the pills swiftly and anonymously using a six-digit code. The service was envisaged for those who cannot or do not want to wait days for mail delivery due to a missed miscarriage or health complications, or who worry about receiving the pills at home. “And why not?” said Kinga Jelinska, the director of the Women Help Women foundation and co-founder of the Abortion Dream Team, the two groups behind last week’s launch. “You can order underwear, cosmetics, mascara, whatever and receive it practically the same or next day,” she said. “Why not abortion pills, where in some cases there might be more urgency?” The innovation comes six years after people across Poland took to the streets to protest against the tightening of abortion laws that already ranked among the strictest in Europe, setting off the country’s largest demonstrations since the fall of communism. In 2023, the protests were credited with helping to propel Donald Tusk, and his promises to overhaul the laws within 100 days, into power. Since then, political stagnation has set in, said Jelinska, citing comments made last year by Tusk in which the prime minister said there was “simply no majority” to change the laws to allow abortions until the 12th week of pregnancy. Tusk instead hinted that his government was intent on doing things differently, telling reporters that it would not prosecute those who helped to facilitate abortions. While the possession or ingestion of abortion pills is not outlawed in Poland, provision of the medication or helping someone to obtain it is considered a crime punishable by up to three years in prison. The locker offers a novel way to challenge these restrictions, said Jelinska. “It’s a little bit of a hack on the law,” she said. “The law is about directly giving to someone. So here we have a machine in between, which makes the legality of everything much more vague.” The locker sits inside the abortion centre that was opened in March 2025 by the Abortion Dream Team. Described as the first of its kind in democratic Poland, it offers a safe space for people to consult on abortion options or receive support while they take the pill. Symbolically located across the street from the Polish parliament, the centre has allowed campaigners to shine a spotlight on the continued need for abortion access in Poland while also providing services to a wide array of people, said Jelinska. “It has exceeded our expectations.” But it had also laid bare how few in power were willing to stand up for them, she said. “The one thing that has surprised us, and it speaks to the political situation, is that there are protests in front of the centre; three, sometimes four times a week.” While usually less than a dozen people turn up, the protesters regularly use sirens and vuvuzelas to make their point, leaving campaigners worried that the noise levels would eventually result in neighbours asking the centre to relocate. “Neither the city or the police have reacted. So that has been a big disappointment to us,” said Jelinska. It was a glimpse of how these organisations had increasingly felt abandoned by politicians, even as about 50,000 people in Poland contacted the wider network of pro-choice organisations last year seeking help, said Jelinska. “I think in Poland, abortion access won’t be solved by politics but by women and communities,” she said. “We cannot trust politicians with our own bodies.”

picture of article

‘We are in a kind of war’: row over viral Amsterdam chip shop lands in court

People living in one of Amsterdam’s most exclusive neighbourhoods have taken the city to court for licensing a chip shop that has gone viral on TikTok. On busy days, the queue for Fabel Friet on Runstraat stretches across a bridge on the Keizersgracht – one of Amsterdam’s most famous canals – a court was told last week. The narrow street itself is crowded by tourists waiting for their orders seven days a week. And loitering with intent – on parked cars, on the street itself, and on steps and porches – gulls wait to swoop. “We are in a kind of war where a very unwelcome chip shop has polluted the whole area,” said Thomas van Leeuwen, who lives nearby. “Eating in the street is a shameful behaviour. It gets filthy food on our doorsteps and mayonnaise in the beautiful stone. The herring gulls have moved in as residents, and the worst thing is the rat infestation.” Nineteen neighbours have formally protested against the business licence for Fabel Friet, whose signature product is fries topped with parmesan cheese and truffle mayonnaise. Niek van der Heijden, the lead plaintiff, said the problem was the takeaway’s small size. “What we call the ‘TikTok queue’ for Fabel Friet causes the most nuisance,” he said. “The business takes place on the street: waiting to order, waiting to be served, eating. We want Fabel to go to a place where there is enough room to have clients inside.” In a packed courtroom on Tuesday morning, a lawyer for Amsterdam city council acknowledged that the city’s mayor, Femke Halsema, can refuse a licence to operate if the “residential and living environment” is negatively affected by a business. While the chip shop, she said, sticks to its licence obligations to manage the queue and clear litter “it has been going on for a long time, the impact remains severe, and you have to ask: how long can we tolerate this?” For the current licence, she said, the city would be guided by the court’s ruling. The shop’s owners, Abel Klatser and Floris Feilzer, said they employed a cleaning service seven days a week, four times a day, and that year-on-year visitor numbers had dropped by 23% this August after they opened four new locations. “A few neighbours have experienced nuisance, but other people enjoy eating chips,” said Gertjan Teeuwen, their lawyer. “It can be busy, but there are peaks and troughs.” Klatser and Feilzer said in a public statement that they felt unfairly attacked while doing their best to be good neighbours. “Fabel Friet is our child, and we have put our heart and soul into it,” they said. “It is painful if people talk about our business negatively.” The case goes beyond irritations about so-called performative tourism, where tourists flock to a place to post images on social media. “The tiny streets might be charming, but actually the space is not designed for so many people,” said Lisa-Bobbie Kamp, a lawyer for the neighbours. “This is a question of taking space, who owns the place and whether you can just use public space.” Marije Peute, a PhD student at the University of Amsterdam, has studied the effects of “viral urbanism” in the neighbourhood. “The municipality should really think about how they want to act, because this is about the public space. A lot of much older retail spaces have lost their local clients because they don’t want to go there any more,” she said. Rogier Havelaar, a councillor from the Christian Democratic Appeal party, said that, while Fabel Friet should probably be offered a “flagship store” licence in a more suitable location, the benefits of tourism to the city should not be overlooked. “Amsterdam would never have as many museums, restaurants, going-out spots and theatres if they were only for the residents,” he said. “And tourism provides 70,000 jobs. Amsterdam would have a gigantic financial problem if tourism went away.” Standing on the bridge over the Keizersgracht, some German laboratory apprentices drawn by TikTok were enjoying their chips. Natalie Stübben said crowd managers had just asked them to move away from people’s houses. “It’s pretty hard to get through here with a car or just by walking,” she said. “I don’t think we were thinking about annoying the neighbours, but it makes sense.” Some of those neighbours will be pleased if the business location has had its chips after the court verdict on 12 November. “There’s something very alarming about the fact that these people are all led by their higher power – influencers – and call themselves followers,” said van Leeuwen. “It’s Orwellian. This court case is part of the parasitic industry that lives on tourists.”