Marine Le Pen appeal trial ends with presidential race at stake
Defence lawyers for Marine Le Pen have told a Paris appeals court she did not orchestrate a system to misuse European parliament funds, at the close of an embezzlement trial that will determine whether the far-right leader can run in the 2027 French presidential election. Le Pen’s lawyer, Sandra Chirac Kollarik, told the court on Wednesday: “At no moment did Marine Le Pen imagine that she broke the rules.” She added: “Never in her life would she have deliberately accepted making a false contract.” Le Pen, 57, has denied organising a fake jobs scheme to embezzle European parliament funds. She told the court any job contracts for European parliament assistants were transparent and “we don’t have the feeling of having committed the slightest crime”. The leader of the anti-immigration National Rally (RN) had been one of the top contenders for next year’s presidential election until last March, when her conviction in the fake jobs trial led to her being barred from running for public office. Judges in that trial ruled Le Pen had been “at the heart” of a carefully organised system of embezzlement of European parliament funds from 2004 to 2016. They banned her from running for office for five years, effective immediately, and handed out a four-year prison sentence, with two of those years suspended and two to be served outside jail with an electronic bracelet. They also ordered her to pay a €100,000 fine. Le Pen, who is trained as a lawyer, appealed. During the appeal trial she has sought to overturn the verdict and sentence, denying wrongdoing and insisting she wanted to run again for president. The verdict and sentence – to be delivered before the summer – will determine her political future and whether she can make a fourth presidential attempt next year. If not, she would be replaced by her protege and party president, 30-year-old Jordan Bardella. Last week, state prosecutors asked appeal court judges to maintain the five-year election ban on Le Pen. If the judges grant that request, she would probably not be able to run in France’s 2027 presidential election. State prosecutors told the appeal court that Le Pen had been at the heart of a “thought-out”, “centralised” and almost “industrial” system to embezzle European parliament funds. They said taxpayer money allocated to members of the European parliament to pay their assistants based in Strasbourg or Brussels had been siphoned off by the party from 2004 to 2016, to pay its own workers in France, in violation of the parliament’s rules. The staff in France had no connection to work undertaken at the European parliament, prosecutors said. The loss to European funds was estimated at €4.8m (£4.2m). The party, called Front National at the time, made substantial savings through the system, prosecutors said. One state prosecutor, Thierry Ramonatxo, criticised Le Pen for making public attacks on judges after last year’s verdict, when she said a “tyranny of judges” wanted to stop her running in a presidential race that she could otherwise win. Ramonatxo said judges simply applied the law that had been voted for by the people’s representatives in parliament. He said Le Pen had “made a choice to attack judges on the political stage rather than to reflect upon what she had been reproached for”. The judges will retire to consider their verdict over several months.





