Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Mexico investigates whether US lied about role in capture of drug lord

Mexico has launched an investigation into whether the US lied about its involvement in the capture and secretive transfer of a top Sinaloa cartel member in 2024, in what would be a potential violation of the country’s sovereignty. The US has long denied it played any role in the operation to detain the drug lord Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada García, a founder of the Sinaloa cartel, inside Mexico. Recent reporting by the local media outlet Pie de Nota, however, suggested that the FBI was involved in his capture. “If recent reports are confirmed,” said the Mexico attorney general, Ernestina Godoy, on Wednesday, “then all signs point to three serious issues: a series of violations of Mexican and international law; a pact made outside the bounds of the law; and a lie told by a US diplomat, which would constitute a breach of the cornerstone principle of good faith in diplomatic relations.”“The issue here is whether there was a violation of sovereignty,” said the president, Claudia Sheinbaum, at a news conference on Thursday. Although the incident took place under the previous administration of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the row comes at an extremely delicate moment in US-Mexico relations. Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to launch a ground invasion in Mexico to attack the drug cartels, ratcheting up fears for Mexican sovereignty. Meanwhile, in April, reports emerged that several CIA agents had been involved in a raid on a drug lab in northern Mexico, apparently without the approval or knowledge of the federal government. Now, the potential direct involvement of a US agency in an operation on Mexican soil has again stirred fears over the presence of American operatives in Mexico. In July 2024, Zambada García was tricked by fellow trafficker Joaquín Guzmán López, whose father was the drug lord known as “El Chapo”, into getting on a small plane inside Mexico and flying into Texas, where US authorities arrested them both at an airport near El Paso. Mexico has questioned Washington numerous times about what role it played, and complained of being kept in the dark. The American ambassador at the time, Ken Salazar, insisted that the US was not involved. After Mexican authorities insinuated Salazar had lied, the former ambassador on Wednesday reiterated his position: “It was not our plane, not our pilot, and not our operation,” he wrote on X. “La verdad es la verdad, the truth is the truth.” But the plane in which the traffickers traveled was recently put on display in the War Eagles Air Museum in Santa Teresa, New Mexico. A plaque next to the plane shared on social media notes that two FBI agents “successfully executed a highly complex, secretive and daring arrest of two of the world’s most wanted fugitives”. Godoy said Mexican officials had attempted to inspect the plane in August 2024 but were barred from doing a thorough inspection or taking photographs. The Americans, she said, had also “provided false or inaccurate identification data for that aircraft”.

picture of article

Daphne Caruana Galizia screamed in panic before explosion that killed her, court hears

Moments before the explosion that killed Daphne Caruana Galizia, the journalist screamed in panic, a witness has told the trial of the man accused of ordering her murder. Caruana Galizia was killed in 2017 by a remotely detonated bomb placed under the driver’s seat of her car, after writing a series of reports on political and financial corruption in Malta. The government’s handling of the investigation led to mass protests and ultimately to the resignation of the Maltese prime minister, Joseph Muscat. Yorgen Fenech, the heir to a property and hotels fortune, is one of seven men accused by prosecutors of involvement in the killing, and the last to face trial. A jury was sworn in last week after a tortuous legal process and nearly nine years after her death. Fenech faces a life sentence if convicted. On Thursday, the court was told about the moment Caruana Galizia died, by a neighbour who witnessed it. The journalist had just left her house in the village of Bidnija and turned on to the main road. The neighbour, Francis Sant, was driving in the opposite direction and saw her coming towards him. “I realised that from the person inside it – I felt that something had happened to her. She appeared panicked.” Sant said he stopped his car, then he described what appears to have been a two-stage explosion. The first detonation left the victim conscious and in fear for her life, he said. “She wasn’t right. I thought, what’s wrong with her? A few seconds passed – things happened so fast. I saw the first spark, under her car, like a festa [celebration] firework going off. She was still conscious. I heard her scream. Her window was open, maybe in panic she tried to roll down her window and get out. “When that first spark happened. I think she either felt something, maybe the bomb device activating. She realised something was very wrong. “Then, a big explosion came out through the windscreen. “The car went out of control. The second explosion tore it apart. It flew into the field, where another fireball formed … The car was literally shredded.” Sant said he got out of his car but did not immediately call emergency services. “I knew there was no hope. I didn’t even think of my phone.” The court also heard from several police officers, who were among the first on the scene. Sgt Susanne Mifsud, who arrived 20 minutes after the explosion, described what she saw when she reached the field where Caruna Galizia’s car had ended up. “When I arrived on scene, I could see the victim’s car in the field on the left-hand side. It was a total loss. It had a roof that was blown up. This wasn’t a simple fire. It was a bomb. I started taking details. I noticed a number plate ... Further up, there were a large amount of the victim’s body parts.” The court fell quiet as jurors were shown photographs of the scene by Insp Kevin Manicolo. There were images of the victim’s burned body, showing how it was removed from the vehicle and placed on a white sheet. Aerial photos showed a crater in the road, marking the location of the explosion. Fenech, who is on trial for complicity in the voluntary homicide of Caruana Galizia, denies the charges. The trial continues. Transcription and translation by Amphora Media

picture of article

IDF accused of ‘field execution’ of Palestinian driver bringing aid into Gaza

A Palestinian driver bringing food aid from the World Central Kitchen (WCK) into Gaza has been killed by an Israeli soldier “in a field execution”, according to witnesses and the local truckers’ association, which said it may suspend operations in protest. Ahmad Esleem was shot in the head on Wednesday when an aid convoy stopped because of a breakdown to one truck soon after entering Gaza, according to three accounts. Israeli soldiers ordered the drivers to dismount and one of them shot Esleem in the head when his hands were raised. Another driver in the four-truck convoy, Diaa Mansour, said the shooting happened on the Philadelphi corridor, a military road on the southern edge of the Gaza Strip. “After the truck broke down, we waited for authorisation to get out and inspect it, because every movement we make has to be coordinated in advance,” he said. “While we were waiting, an Israeli military vehicle arrived. The soldiers ordered Ahmad and me to get out of our trucks, and then they ordered another driver, Alaa Shaat, to get out as well. The driver at the front of the convoy, Fares Muheisen, remained inside his truck and didn’t get out. “They made us stand by the side of the road. They ordered me to take off my clothes and forced me to sit under the sun. Then they brought Ahmad out of his truck. One of the soldiers began talking to Ahmad while he stood with his hands raised. Ahmad did not speak Hebrew, and it seemed the soldiers did not understand his Arabic. Suddenly, they shot him. He was hit in the head and died at the scene. It appeared they were trying to find out why we had stopped, but they did not understand the situation and opened fire immediately, without any discussion or attempt to communicate.” Jihad Esleem, the deputy head of the Association of Transport Companies in Gaza and a distant relative of the victim, said that Wednesday’s convoy had been “100%” coordinated through the UN World Food Programme and the WCK food charity, and had just entered Gaza through the only crossing point still functioning for aid shipments. “An Israeli officer and several soldiers approached the drivers, asked why they were there, then ordered all of them out of their trucks. They assaulted the drivers, beat them, and forced them to strip,” Esleem said. “The moment Ahmad raised his hands in surrender, one of the soldiers drew his M16 rifle and shot him directly in the head. It was a field execution and a deliberate killing of a civilian driver who had complied with all instructions. He was wearing his orange safety vest and carried all the required permits, security clearances, and coordination that had been approved by the IDF [Israel Defense Forces].” Ahmad Esleem’s employers, Iyad Qamri Trading and Public Transport Company, also said that he had been killed at close range by a soldier after the convoy he was in had come to a halt, and two drivers were ordered to dismount by an army patrol. A photograph of Ahmad Esleem’s body on arrival in hospital showed his head heavily bandaged around what appeared to be a serious wound. The 30-year-old from Deir al-Balah was married, with two children under the age of two. Eyad Esleem, the owner of Iyad Qamri, and Jihad’s brother, said: “Drivers leave their homes at 3am, leaving behind their wives and children, and one of them may return to his family as a lifeless body. Ahmed left behind a one-month-old baby and a young daughter. Since the incident happened, five drivers from my company have told me that they will not return to work at the crossing under any circumstances. They have resigned. Those who remain are not continuing because they want to, but because they are forced to provide for their families.” The IDF confirmed the shooting incident but gave a different version of the sequence of events. “On Wednesday, IDF troops identified three aid truck drivers who had stopped along the Philadelphi corridor and exited their trucks contrary to established procedures,” a military spokesperson said. IDF troops operating in the area detained the drivers for questioning. Simultaneously, the driver of another truck that had stopped at a nearby roadblock ran toward the troops, they said. The troops initiated the suspect apprehension protocol and, after perceiving an immediate threat, opened fire toward the driver. “As a result of the fire, the driver was injured. The troops provided him with initial medical treatment at the scene. He was later transferred, in coordination with the Red Cross, for further medical treatment,” the military spokesperson said, adding that the incident was under review. Truckers from private companies are routinely hired by the UN and other humanitarian agencies to transport food and other essential goods into Gaza and around the strip. The flow of aid into the territory has increased markedly since a partly observed ceasefire in October, but with the Israeli army still occupying more than 60% of the territory and continuing to carry out strikes aimed at targets deemed to be linked to Hamas, working as a lorry driver is an extremely dangerous job. On 21 May, two Palestinian drivers were alleged to have been shot in similar circumstances to Ahmad Esleem. According to local accounts, Muhammad al-Heela and Mahmoud Awad were detained by Israeli soldiers for some days and then released near a roundabout in Rafah, and were then shot by their captors after they had walked a few metres away. The IDF told the truckers’ association that the drivers’ route had not been coordinated with the military, but Jihad Esleem denied the claim, insisting it had been registered and approved. The previous month, Israeli soldiers shot dead two drivers working for the UN child protection agency Unicef as they were filling their water trucks at an established distribution point at Mansoura in northern Gaza. Questioned on the incident, the IDF said its soldiers had “perceived a threat”, without providing further details. In April 2024, seven WCK employees were killed by an Israeli airstrike on a convoy in southern Gaza. The victims were from the UK, Australia, Poland and Palestine, and one was a US-Canada dual citizen. “Drivers are subjected to daily violations, including beatings, abuse, humiliation, and being forced to stand for long hours under the sun,” Esleem said. “Even more disturbing, the soldier who shot Ahmad talked to the three surviving drivers afterward and threatened them, saying they would meet the same fate as Ahmad. This clearly indicates that the attack was deliberate.” The Transport Companies’ Association is due to hold an emergency board meeting on Friday to discuss the suspension of operations at the Kerem Shalom crossing. “It is important that everyone understand that the Palestinian truck driver is the vital link and the first point of contact between the Israeli side and Gaza. They should not be prevented from carrying out this role,” Esleem said. On top of the risks from armed forces, he said the association’s drivers were being put further at risk by being asked to smuggle contraband, mostly cigarettes, by soldiers and traders. “I hold the IDF responsible for the continuation of these dangerous acts, because truck drivers have no role in smuggling,” Esleem said. He added that there had been an incident on Wednesday of traders attempting to smuggle cigarettes hidden inside hollowed-out pineapples.

picture of article

Tehran launches more strikes as Israel warns it is ready to strike Iran again ‘with even greater force’ – as it happened

Iran accused the US of launching a strike near its only civilian nuclear plant as renewed hostilities continued between the warring parties for a second day. Iranian media reported several explosions in the Bushehr province in southern Iran, including near the nuclear power plant located in the provincial capital of the same name. Local officials said there were no reports of casualties. Iranian authorities also said that US overnight strikes hit three railways bridges, including one on a line that connects the capital Tehran to the north-eastern city of Mashhad. Thousands of people have gathered there where the assassinated former supreme leader Ali Khamenei will be buried at the Shrine of Imam Reza. It follows a week of mass funeral processions around Iran and Iraq that has coincided with the fresh bout of fighting with the US. In the enormous crowds, a massive banner reading “We Will Kill Trump” was pulled along by mourners, and there have been many chants of “Trump, we will kill you” and “death to America”. See here and here for more. The recent wave of US strikes in Iran killed 14 people and injured 78 others, the Iranian health ministry said. “Of the injured, 47 remain hospitalised,” said the head of public relations for Iran’s ministry of health. Tehran responded with retaliatory strikes against what it described as US bases across the Gulf, including in Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Jordan. A US official told AFP on Thursday that the dozens of missiles and drones fired by Iran caused no significant damage or injuries to US personnel. Meanwhile, Israel’s defence minister Israel Katz said his country was prepared to resume its military campaign against Iran if needed, vowing to do so “with even greater force”. Benjamin Netanyahu also said Iran had been weakened by the two previous military campaigns Israel launched against it, but he also said “the campaign is not over”. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) navy said that US ⁠attacks ⁠on Iran and intervention in redirecting shipping through ⁠the strait of Hormuz were disrupting the ⁠strategic waterway’s gradual reopening ‌and jeopardising the ‌interests of countries benefiting ‌from it.

picture of article

US launches new airstrikes against Iran hours after Trump threatens to escalate

The US has launched new airstrikes against Iran, hours after Donald Trump threatened to escalate the conflict unless Iran stopped attacking ships in the strait of Hormuz. Iran, which was burying its former supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Thursday, responded by targeting US-allied Kuwait and Qatar and accused the US of striking near its sole nuclear power plant. The tit-for-tat strikes were the largest since Tehran and Washington signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on 17 June aimed at extending the ceasefire and giving space for negotiations for a permanent truce. They came as Israel’s defence minister, Israel Katz, said his country was prepared to resume its military campaign against Iran if needed, threatening to do so “with even greater force”. Sirens sounded at least three times in Bahrain, where the US navy’s fifth fleet is headquartered. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it fired 10 ballistic missiles at Jordan’s Azraq military base on Thursday afternoon, which the US air force uses. There were no immediate reports of any damage in Jordan or the Gulf. In Iran, officials said strikes targeted the perimeter of Iran’s only civilian nuclear plant in Bushehr province, an area where the UN’s nuclear watchdog has previously warned that attacks could “pose a very real danger to nuclear safety”. “Several areas in Bushehr province were targeted today, including the perimeter of the nuclear power plant, a military base in the town of Choghadak and a fishing pier in the south of the province,” said Ehsan Jahanian, the deputy governor of Bushehr, adding there were no reports of casualties so far. The attacks came hours after Trump said the MoU was “over” because of Iranian attacks on ships in the strait of Hormuz. After the strikes, the US president posted videos of explosions in Iran and threatened the country once again. “This is in retribution for yesterday’s bombing of ships by Iran. If it happens again, it will get much worse!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Hours before, he had promised strikes would not lead to long-term fighting but would be “very fast”. His comments and the exchange of fire prompted worries that the ceasefire could break down and raised concerns about the long-term prospects of negotiations. Significant gaps remain between the two countries over issues such as Iran’s control over the strait, as well as inspections of nuclear facilities. Back-and-forth attacks have happened since the MoU was signed, but Thursday’s strikes were the most intense in weeks. The attacks caused oil prices to rise, before they recovered later in the day after calm was restored. They came as Iran prepared to bury Khamenei in his home city of Mashhad. A fighter jet escorted the plane carrying Khamenei’s coffin amid the tense security situation. Crowds of people gathered for the occasion, some holding banners promising vengeance against the US. More than 10 million people took part in a funeral procession for the late leader in Iraq, according to an Iraqi official, while thousands rallied in the southern suburbs of Beirut in a ceremony organised by Hezbollah on Wednesday night. Observers waited to see if Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, would attend the burial. He was wounded in the same series of strikes that killed his father and has since communicated only through written statements. The US military said it hit about 90 targets in Iran, showing footage of strikes on missile launchers and a runway. It said the attacks were meant to degrade Iran’s capacity to “threaten freedom of navigation” in the strait of Hormuz, a critical choke point for about 20% of the world’s oil and gas. Iran accused the US of war crimes after it said two bridges in the eastern provinces leading to Mashhad were targeted. The bridges constitute key infrastructure for Iran’s cross-border trade with China, which has sharply increased since the start of the war. Trump has repeatedly threatened to hit bridges, power plants and other civilian infrastructure in Iran. Targeting civilian infrastructure if it is not a military objective could amount to a war crime. Iranian state media also reported explosions in several cities, including Bushehr, which houses Iran’s nuclear power plant complex. At least three people were killed in Iran’s south-western Khuzestan province, while a firefighter was killed in an airport in the south-eastern city of Iranshahr. Nine members of Iran’s military also died in strikes on Wednesday. The US attack came after Iran struck three ships in the strait of Hormuz on Tuesday. Iran stopped virtually all shipping out of the strait during the war, sending global energy prices soaring and putting pressure on Trump domestically before midterm elections. The MoU calls for the reopening of the strait to commercial shipping for 60 days. Iran says it wants to charge fees to ships transiting through the strait, conflicting with the US, which says it is an international waterway and should not have tolls. Iran continues to view its control over the strait as an important source of leverage in its negotiations with the US, while Trump appears to view strikes on Iran as a way of increasing pressure on Tehran. Iran’s navy claimed in a statement that the number of ships transiting the strait had been restored to 50% of prewar levels and that permission to go through the strait was only being given to ships using routes designated by Iran. It further warned that any further US military action would trigger a “crushing response”. “The adventurous actions of the American terrorist army and their interference in determining traffic routes, in addition to provoking a decisive response, will also seriously disrupt the gradual reopening process and jeopardise the interests of countries that benefit from the strait of Hormuz,” the navy said in a statement. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, a senior Iranian negotiator and parliament speaker, said US pressure would not lead anywhere. “America still hasn’t learned that bullying and breaking promises are no longer cost-free,” he said in a post on X. “Let me put it plainly: if you strike, you’ll get hit.” Mediators attempted to de-escalate tensions between the US and Iran in an effort to salvage negotiations. The Qatari prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, a key intermediary between the countries, spoke to Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, on Thursday, condemning Tehran’s strikes on ships in the strait. Negotiations towards reaching a final deal were intended to start after the conclusion on Thursday of Khamenei’s seven-day funeral. Additional reporting by Patrick Wintour

picture of article

Furore in Nigeria over fake federal agency set up in government HQ

A fictitious federal entity that was allocated 1.3bn naira (£700,000) in Nigeria’s 2026 budget has precipitated a political storm in Africa’s largest democracy in the run-up to a general election set for January. The fake agency came to light last October when Femi Gbajabiamila, the president’s chief of staff, wrote to the police alleging that his signature, along with official seals and reference numbers, had been forged by Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew, who was claiming to have been appointed by the presidency to head the presidential foreign intervention promotion council (PFIPC). The case is due to be heard in a court in the capital, Abuja, on 27 July, more than six months after the police filed an eight-count charge including criminal forgery, impersonation and obtaining by false pretence against Adeyemi and two others. In a 1 July statement, the Nigerian presidency also claimed Adeyemi had met ambassadors without the knowledge of the foreign affairs ministry and misled the country’s accountant-general’s office into opening accounts for PFIPC with the central bank and 33 commercial banks. The actual Nigerian investment promotion council had also reportedly raised an alarm about the similarities with the PFIPC. Apart from being included in the budget, the PFIPC was also allocated office space in the federal secretariat in Abuja, a huge complex housing the headquarters of Nigeria’s civil service and many government ministries and agencies. That has raised questions about how Adeyemi was able to gain access, with some critics speculating collusion with officials at the highest echelons of government. “Politicians and members of the public who are weaponising Adeyemi’s claim against the chief of staff should refrain from swallowing his narrative hook, line and sinker,” the presidency statement said, defending Gbajabiamila. Local reports say Adeyemi has claimed he was given the appointment letter by Gbajabiamila, who has denied knowing him or ever being in touch. On Monday, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu directed the independent corrupt practices and other related offences commission (ICPC) to open a probe. Days later, a Senate motion to independently investigate the presidential foreign intervention promotion council (PFIPC) did not pass. Meanwhile the House of Representatives set up a committee to question Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, the minister of budget and economic planning. The presidency and supporters of the ruling party have pointed out that Adeyemi had previously misrepresented himself as the newly elected president-general of a UN youth agency called World Youth Organisation back in 2017. His aides had said he was seeking permission from the UN security council to appoint staff across the world. “The 967 nominees will work with my office across the globe,” one of his representatives was quoted as saying in Nigerian daily Punch. “This will enable the organisation to function effectively and bring coordination across the world.” It later turned out that the WYO was not affiliated with or part of the UN. Critics of the Tinubu administration have pointed to the controversial record of key government officials mentioned in the scandal. In 2007, the supreme court of the US state of Georgia handed Gbajabiamila a three-year suspension from practising law in Atlanta after he failed to pass on $25,000 awarded as an injury settlement to a client four years earlier. Gbajabiamila paid back the money in 2006, and later admitted he violated professional conduct rules, but blamed the incident on a paralegal who “closed the files as per my instruction, but unfortunately never paid the woman”. Bagudu spent six months in a federal prison in Houston in 2003. According to the US Department of Justice, he was arrested for being an alleged accomplice to former dictator Sani Abacha who “embezzled, misappropriated and extorted billions of dollars from the government of Nigeria” amounting to more than $282m in one instance. Bagudu reportedly agreed to return $163m to Nigerian authorities, who in turn dropped all cases against him, leading to his release without admission of wrongdoing. The latest scandal has piled pressure on Tinubu, 74, ahead of January’s election, thrusting endemic corruption in Africa’s largest economy back into the spotlight. Former vice-president Atiku Abubakar, who is due to challenge Tinubu’s re-election bid in January, called on his rival to set an independent commission of inquiry comprising neutral parties such as civil society leaders, opposition parties and the Nigerian Bar Association, to establish , exactly who was involved with the scheme. “Nigerians deserve the whole truth, not carefully scripted press statements,” his spokesperson Phrank Shuaibu said earlier this month, adding: “We therefore demand a truly independent investigation that follows the evidence wherever it leads. No sacred cows. No political protection. No selective justice.”

picture of article

People in the UK: have you used prediction markets to bet on the World Cup or other events?

We’d like to find out more about how people in the UK are using prediction markets and what has attracted them to these platforms. Prediction markets allow people to buy and sell contracts based on the outcome of future events, such as sporting tournaments, elections and financial markets. They have become increasingly popular in recent years, particularly in the US. We’d like to hear confidentially from people in the UK who have used prediction markets, whether to trade on the World Cup, elections, financial events or something else. What attracted you to prediction markets? How did you first hear about them? How do you think they compare with traditional betting or investing? We are also interested in the practicalities. How easy was it to access a prediction market from the UK? Did you encounter any difficulties or concerns? If you’ve traded on the World Cup, we’d like to hear how your experience compared with other ways of placing a bet. If you’re having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.

picture of article

Extra Edition: Iran mourns Khamenei united against Trump – and uncertain of its future

Good afternoon. This is an interruption to your regular First Edition programming. I appreciate it’s unusual for us to make a post-breakfast appearance in your inbox. Only, all week we’ve wanted to bring you an update on events inside Iran, and quite honestly, Nigel “making money is not a crime” Farage just kept getting in the way. And so today, we bring you this one-off Extra Edition. It has been dubbed the “funeral of the century”, though admittedly by its organisers. After a week of elaborate events across Iran and Iraq to mourn the late supreme leader’s death, today Ali Khamenei is being buried in his home town of Mashhad. It’s all happening against a backdrop of waves of US airstrikes on Iran, as Trump declared the fragile, never-quite-fleshed-out truce “over”, with 170 targets claimed to have been hit during the past two nights. It was in similar circumstances that the 86-year-old Khamenei was killed, along with much of his immediate family, when the US/Israeli airstrikes first began in February. This week’s long-delayed events – with millions taking to the streets for processions, protests and public outpourings of patriotism and grief – mark the final episode of his almost 40 years in power. In March, Khamenei’s son Mojtaba replaced his father as supreme leader. Before his appointment, Mojtaba was a mid-ranking, somewhat elusive cleric. He has yet to appear in public. I spoke to Dr Evaleila Pesaran, a fellow at the University of Cambridge specialising in the politics of power in modern Iran, about the unique role of the supreme leader, and the significance of this transition of power. Plus, Patrick Wintour, our Diplomatic Editor, has the latest from Tehran. In depth: ‘Many people were only there because of how America attacked Iran’ It appears the most remarkable of turnarounds for the Iranian regime. Barely six months ago, the nation’s streets were made ungovernable by waves of protests – a communication blackout saw the internet taken down. Massacres and executions followed: some estimate 30,000 were killed by the state. Since then, countless military and civilian sites have been battered by US/Israeli warplanes, killing thousands, including much of the Iranian leadership. Regime change was (at points, at least) the stated motivation for intervention. Certainly that was Israel’s wishful thinking. What exactly this latest bout of US bombing aims to achieve remains a mystery. “What I’ve seen is a story of two Tehrans,” Patrick told me from the city. “Yes, the streets here are full, but so were the roads out. With an extended holiday in place for the funeral, plenty of Tehran’s residents took the opportunity to head north to the sea and their holiday homes.” He heard a wide range of views from those who remained in the capital. Whether or not they attended the funeral march, or support the regime, one refrain came up repeatedly. “Many people were only there because of how America attacked Iran. They’re not supporters of the government, but couldn’t stomach their leader being assassinated, and their country destroyed.” However tightly choreographed and meticulously controlled, scenes this week in Tehran and beyond highlight what was already clear: for now, the regime maintains a grip on power. US foreign policy failures and violent repression have played their part in consolidating this – and western onlookers were often more optimistic of the potential of popular protests to usher in a new era in Iran than its residents – but the killing of Khamenei also proved not to be the catalyst for change Iran’s enemies desired. The scale of this week’s funeral, despite the renewed US bombing campaign, reflects the unique position Iran’s supreme leader holds, transcending politics and religion. *** Institutions of power Only three people have held the office of supreme leader: revolutionary Ruhollah Khomeini from 1979-1989, his successor Ali Khamenei until his death in 2026, and now 56-year-old his son, Mojtaba. Iran’s political structures are complex. “Convoluted, even,” says Pesaran. “There are democratically elected positions: the president, a parliament with limited power.” On economic strategy, and foreign diplomacy, they play a major part. The supreme leader, in fact, has de facto control over these electoral processes, through his proxies on the 12-member Guardian Council – six of whom he selects directly. Alongside other tasks, the Guardian Council vets and vetoes all parliamentary and presidential candidates. And vet they do: ahead of the 2024 presidential election, only six out of 80 hopefuls were approved to run. His sphere of influence extends far further, “charged with safeguarding the Islamic system – Nizam in Persian – and approves almost every governance decision. He is the head of the armed forces, state media and has a representative inside every ministry. It’s a shadow government, as it were, wielding power quietly.” Recent repression of protest and dissent, adds Pesaran, is also very much in his domain. Supreme leaders aren’t elected, but chosen by the Assembly of Experts. The public votes for the 88-strong body of “virtuous and learned” religious leaders. They appoint, then monitor and (theoretically) can dismiss the supreme leader. In practice, the Assembly of Experts has never collectively utilised the latter power. The constitution entrenches the supreme leader’s power, “while a web of institutions and infrastructure centred around him wants to hold on to the status quo,” says Pesaran. “Some regime support is ideological, but others are motivated by economic interests, or self-preservation. Capillaries of power spread deeply and widely into Iranian society that prop up the supreme leader, rather than him simply holding them all tightly in his clutches.” *** A revolutionary idea Nearly a decade before the 1979 Iranian revolution, an exiled Ruhollah Khomeini floated the prospect of his future position. “His idea was that the Supreme Leader would be a primarily religious role,” says Pesaran, “shaping government to be more moral, and authentic to Iranian culture and beliefs.” It was a response to the rule of the then Shah. “His opponents felt he was bringing in immorality and ‘westoxification’ – Gharbzadegi, in Persian – the corrupting influence of western cinema, fashion and ideas.” “Many in the revolution did not share a vision for clerical rule,” says Pesaran, “and Khomeini himself declared he had no interest in politics. The revolution involved communists, leftists, nationalists, democrats … who hoped Iran would become a democracy.” Post-revolution, the Supreme Leader job spec was designed in Khomeini’s image: a fine balance of political and religious experience. “A spiritual, learned leader who had reached the high rank of Grand Ayatollah in the state religion of Twelver Shi’ism.” A swift shift followed. “The Islamic Republican party over the next decade was brutal in eliminating threats to the system.” This included expanding the supreme leader’s political sway during the Iran/Iraq war in the 1980s. Iran’s second supreme leader, Ali Khamenei – a former president – ruled in his predecessor’s image. (For more on Khamenei’s approach to power, this 2008 pamphlet by Karim Sadjadpour remains obligatory reading). Now his son takes the reins – less qualified, religiously, than his predecessors. “The revolution aimed to rid Iran of monarchy, but it now looks suspiciously like a hereditary position.” *** A funeral for the ages Patrick’s dispatches from Tehran capture the mood at the six-day funeral. “We the people are Iran’s true missiles,” one banner read. Violent anti-Trump chants echoed loudly. As Patrick told me: “It was impossible not to take away the key message as revenge.” Those in attendance coalesced around anti-American sentiment. People are mourning different things, Pesaran continues: “loved ones lost in the war, attacks on infrastructure and cultural heritage. They can’t afford to buy a bag of rice – [it’s] the same as a working person’s monthly wages.” Inflation hit 88.60% percent in June. Iran’s population is more than 90 million. “Among them of course are genuine supporters of the system. The culture of grief within Iranian Shiism is far from the British stiff upper lip. At a funeral, you sob and wail.” Now the final burial rites are complete, a new chapter in Iran’s political history begins. Only, its central character remains invisible. Rumours that Mojtaba would emerge from hiding for his father’s funeral never came to fruition. If and when Mojtaba appears, Pesaran expects some change will inevitably be forthcoming. “He appears to view the world in a similar way to his father,” she says. The two were close: Mojtaba was part of his tight-knit inner circle. “But, Mojtaba’s close ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will have made him aware of how bad killing all your customers is for business.” The IRGC is not just a security force in Iran, but a major employer and financial actor. Certainly, Mojtaba is close to conservative clerical factions, but his lack of prior public life makes him something of an unknown entity. “And with total economic collapse, as and when peacetime returns, he will be forced to deviate from his father’s approach if he hopes to maintain any sense of domestic legitimacy, or to create economic recovery. I would expect some pragmatism – he’ll need to gain credibility.” All that remains to be seen. For now, at least, Iran’s most powerful figure is invisible. We’ll be back at our scheduled time tomorrow morning. What else we’ve been reading Ahead of tomorrow morning’s First Edition, why not have a look at our fantastic reporting on Nigel Farage, led by Anna Isaac, and the questions surrounding the large sums of money flowing into his bank account. World Cup 2026 France v Morocco | Kicking off at 9pm (BST) tonight, the first of the quarter-finals is a mouth-watering tie between the favourites, France, and one of the dark horses for the tournament, Morocco – who could field six players born in France in the match. Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply