Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Donald Tusk tells Polish citizens to immediately leave Iran amid ‘very real’ prospect of war - Europe live

Meanwhile, despite growing animosity between US president Donald Trump’s administration and the French government, Americans flocked to the country in 2025, with US visits rising 17% on the previous year, the French tourism ministry said, as reported by Reuters. More than 5 million Americans came to France in 2025, part of a record 102 million foreign tourists during the year, tourism minister Serge Papin said. One hundred million foreigners visited in 2024, when Paris hosted the Olympics. The jump in US tourists suggests many Americans are nonplussed by Trump’s worsening relations with Europe, Reuters noted. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence that more and more Europeans choose not to travel to the US…

picture of article

What is Trump’s Boards of Peace and who is involved?

Donald Trump’s Board of Peace is set to convene for the first time in Washington DC, bringing together representatives to discuss the reconstruction of Gaza. The group was launched on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum last month and is viewed as Trump’s alternative to the United Nations, which he has repeatedly criticized. Despite more than 60 leaders being invited to join – with permanent membership requiring a $1bn contribution - key democratic allies such as the UK, Canada, France and Germany are notably absent, while Russia and China are also yet to sign on. Approximately 24 countries have joined, including Arab states such Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Armenia, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Indonesia and Vietnam have also signed up. Although the original UN mandate called for the baord to aid the 2.2 million Palestinians forcibly displaced by Israeli forces, the organisation’s charter makes no reference to either the Gaza or the UN. Palestine is not a member, but Israel and its prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu – who faces an arrest warrantover alleged war crimes in Gaza – are part of the board. Palestinians have been assigned to its lower-tier technocratic committee, while high-profile figures including former UK prime minister Tony Blair and Jared Kushner sit on the executive board. Member states have pledged $5bn towards rebuilding Gaza, a commitment that is expected to be formally unveiled at the board’s inaugural meeting. Writing on Truth Social, Trump claimed the Board of Peace would “prove to be the most consequential international body in history”.

picture of article

For or against? Timeline of Trump’s meandering position on UK Chagos deal

Just when Keir Starmer thought it was safe to go back into the water, Donald Trump has struck again with another public broadside against the UK’s deal to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. Under the terms of the deal, the UK will give up control of the Chagos archipelago while paying to maintain control of a joint US-UK military base on the largest island, Diego Garcia, under a 99-year lease. The US president has played hokey cokey with his backing for the agreement, giving and withdrawing his support repeatedly over the last year. Here we look at Washington’s meandering position: 27 February 2025 For the deal In February 2025, Starmer visited the US in a high-stakes trip for transatlantic diplomacy. The so-called special relationship remained intact at its conclusion, with many commentators calling the visit a success for Starmer. During a Q&A, Trump was asked about the Chagos deal and replied: We’re going to have some discussions about that very soon, and I have a feeling it’s going to work out very well. He continued: They’re talking about a very long-term, powerful lease, a very strong lease, about 140 years actually. That’s a long time, and I think we’ll be inclined to go along with your country. 1 April 2025 For the deal Trump signed off the UK’s handover of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, paving the way for the UK to cede sovereignty over its last African colony. The prime minister’s spokesperson at the time said the deal was being finalised after receiving the green light from Trump. He said: My understanding is it’s now between us and the Mauritian government to finalise the deal, following the discussions with the US. 22 May 2025 For the deal The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who previously raised concerns about the Chagos deal while serving as the Florida senator, issued an emphatic statement giving the agreement his full backing on behalf of the US. The statement in full said: Today, the United States welcomed the historic agreement between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Mauritius on the future of the British Indian Ocean territory – specifically, the Chagos archipelago. We commend both the United Kingdom and Mauritius for their leadership, vision, and commitment to ensure that Diego Garcia remains fully operational for the duration of this agreement. We look forward to working closely with both governments to strengthen our collaboration in support of regional peace and stability. Following a comprehensive interagency review, the Trump administration determined that this agreement secures the long-term, stable, and effective operation of the joint US-UK military facility at Diego Garcia. This is a critical asset for regional and global security. President Trump expressed his support for this monumental achievement during his meeting with Prime Minister Starmer at the White House. This milestone reflects the enduring strength of the US-UK relationship – a relationship that, as demonstrated by the US-UK trade deal announced on 8 May, extends far beyond defense to encompass economic growth, innovation, and shared global leadership. Although the United States is not a party to this agreement, we remain responsible for operating the US naval support facility on Diego Garcia, which continues to play a vital role in supporting forward-deployed operational forces and advancing security across the region. The United States values its partnership with both the United Kingdom and Mauritius, and we stand ready to continue our collaboration to promote peace, security, and prosperity in the Indian Ocean and beyond. 20 January 2026 Against the deal As tensions rose over Trump’s pronouncements on Greenland – and European countries, including the UK, took a hardline stance on the Danish territory’s sovereignty – Trump rocked the special relationship with his first public criticism of the Chagos deal. He posted on his Truth Social platform: Shockingly, our ‘brilliant’ NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER. There is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness. These are International Powers who only recognize STRENGTH, which is why the United States of America, under my leadership, is now, after only one year, respected like never before. The UK giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY, and is another in a very long line of National Security reasons why Greenland has to be acquired. Denmark and its European Allies have to DO THE RIGHT THING. Thank you for your attention to this matter. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP 5 February 2026 For the deal It was reported that Trump and Starmer had spoken by phone, with Downing Street saying the two leaders “agreed on the importance” of the deal to secure the base. A spokesperson said they agreed the UK and US would “continue to work closely on the implementation of the deal”. Trump posted on Truth Social that his discussions with Starmer were “very productive”. He wrote: I understand that the deal Prime Minister Starmer has made, according to many, the best he could make. However, if the lease deal, sometime in the future, ever falls apart, or anyone threatens or endangers US operations and forces at our base, I retain the right to militarily secure and reinforce the American presence in Diego Garcia. Asked about Trump’s comments, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, told reporters: “He spoke with Prime Minister Starmer directly, he understands Prime Minister Starmer’s position – and he supports it. “But as the president reiterated in that statement, of course, the United States reserves the right to protect our assets.” 17 February 2026 For the deal The US state department issued a statement that once again emphasised the US government’s backing for the deal. It said: The United States supports the decision of the United Kingdom to proceed with its agreement with Mauritius concerning the Chagos archipelago. The United States reiterates its desire to conclude a bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom to guarantee continued use of basing and other facilities in the Chagos archipelago to advance U.S. national security, as well as security and stability across the Indian Ocean. 18 February 2026 Against the deal But just one day later, Trump blew this up again with a lengthy post on Truth Social urging Starmer to ditch the Chagos deal. It read: I have been telling Prime Minister Keir Starmer, of the United Kingdom, that Leases are no good when it comes to Countries, and that he is making a big mistake by entering a 100 Year Lease with whoever it is that is “claiming” Right, Title, and Interest to Diego Garcia, strategically located in the Indian Ocean. Our relationship with the United Kingdom is a strong and powerful one, and it has been for many years, but Prime Minister Starmer is losing control of this important Island by claims of entities never known of before. In our opinion, they are fictitious in nature. Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime – An attack that would potentially be made on the United Kingdom, as well as other friendly Countries. Prime Minister Starmer should not lose control, for any reason, of Diego Garcia, by entering a tenuous, at best, 100 Year Lease. This land should not be taken away from the U.K. and, if it is allowed to be, it will be a blight on our Great Ally. We will always be ready, willing, and able to fight for the U.K., but they have to remain strong in the face of Wokeism, and other problems put before them. DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA!

picture of article

South Korea’s former president Yoon Suk Yeol jailed for life for leading insurrection

A South Korean court has sentenced the former president Yoon Suk Yeol to life imprisonment with labour over his failed martial law declaration in December 2024, finding him guilty of leading an insurrection and making him the first elected head of state in the country’s democratic era to receive the maximum custodial sentence. The Seoul central district court found that Yoon’s declaration of martial law on 3 December 2024 constituted insurrection, carried out with the intent to disrupt the constitutional order. Judge Jee Kui-youn said the purpose was “to send troops to the national assembly to blockade the assembly hall and arrest key figures, including the assembly speaker and party leaders, thereby preventing lawmakers from gathering to deliberate or vote”. In sentencing Yoon on Thursday, the court pointed to his lack of apology throughout the proceedings, his unjustified refusal to attend hearings, and the massive social costs his actions inflicted on South Korean society. The court said the martial law greatly damaged the political neutrality of the military and police and caused South Korea’s political standing and credibility in the international community to decline, leaving society “politically divided and experiencing extreme confrontation”. The court opted for life imprisonment over the death penalty, noting that while the crime was grave, Yoon’s planning did not appear meticulous, he had attempted to limit the use of physical force, and most of his plans ultimately failed. In a historical digression, the judge traced the history of insurrection law and cited the 1649 execution of England’s Charles I, who led troops into parliament, to establish that even heads of state can commit insurrection by attacking the legislature. The verdict was broadcast live on national television, capturing Yoon briefly smiling on arrival and later displaying no visible reaction as the sentence was delivered. Under South Korean law, the charge of leading an insurrection carries three possible penalties: death, life imprisonment with labour, or life imprisonment without labour. Prosecutors had sought the death penalty, arguing that Yoon committed “a grave destruction of constitutional order” by mobilising troops to surround parliament and attempting to arrest political opponents during the six-hour crisis. The verdict came 14 months after events that marked the most serious threat to South Korea’s democracy in decades. The charges stem from events on the night of 3 December 2024, when prosecutors said Yoon attempted to use military force to paralyse the legislature, arrest political opponents and seize control of the national election commission. Yoon claimed he was rooting out “anti-state forces” and alleged election fraud without providing evidence. Within hours of the declaration, 190 lawmakers broke through military and police cordons to pass an emergency resolution lifting martial law. Parliament impeached Yoon within 11 days, and the constitutional court removed him from office four months later. Outside the courthouse, hundreds of Yoon supporters – waving South Korean and US flags and chanting “Yoon again” – initially cheered when the judge dismissed some prosecution evidence but turned hostile as the ruling progressed. Some supporters shouted “political judge, step down” and hurled profanities at journalists. When the sentence was announced, some collapsed in tears, crying “the country is finished”. About 500 metres away, progressive groups erupted in cheers and embraced one another, though some expressed disappointment the death penalty had not been imposed. Yoon faces six additional criminal trials, two of which arise from the martial law crisis, including a treason charge alleging that he ordered drone incursions into North Korean airspace in an attempt to provoke a confrontation that could justify military rule. He has already been sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for obstructing his own arrest. Thursday’s verdict follows a series of related rulings that formally established the events of 3 December constituted an insurrection. In January, the former prime minister Han Duck-soo was handed a 23-year prison sentence in a ruling that described the martial law attempt as a “self-coup” by elected power that was more dangerous than traditional uprisings. The sentence far exceeded prosecutors’ 15-year demand, indicating judicial willingness to impose severe penalties. On 12 February, the former interior minister Lee Sang-min was jailed for seven years for his role in the insurrection, including relaying Yoon’s orders to cut power and water to media outlets. Legal experts said the rulings created a sentencing environment that made the most severe punishment more likely in Yoon’s case. The court also sentenced seven co-defendants: Kim Yong-hyun, the former defence minister, to 30 years; Noh Sang-won, a former intelligence commander, to 18 years; Cho Ji-ho, the former police chief, to 12 years; and Kim Bong-sik, the former Seoul police chief, to 10 years. Mok Hyun-tae, a police commander, received three years. Two defendants, Kim Yong-gun and Yoon Seung-young, were acquitted. Yoon’s legal team released a statement calling the verdict “a predetermined conclusion” and a “show trial”, saying they could not bring themselves to respect the judgment. They accused the judiciary of “kneeling to incited public opinion and political power” and applying double standards, pointing to President Lee Jae Myung’s suspended trials and opposition politicians acquitted on illegal evidence grounds. The legal team vowed to fight “to the end”, saying truth would eventually be revealed “in the court of history”. Yoon is expected to appeal. Life imprisonment carries no fixed release date, with parole theoretically possible after 20 years, on demonstration of good conduct and remorse. The former president Park Geun-hye was initially sentenced to a combined 32 years in prison for corruption and related offences in 2018. The term was later reduced on appeal and ultimately erased by a presidential pardon in 2021. In 1996, the military dictators Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo received death and 22-and-a-half-year sentences, respectively, for their roles in a 1979 coup and subsequent massacre in Gwangju. The sentences were later reduced on appeal, and both men were eventually pardoned. Every South Korean president who has served a prison sentence has ultimately been pardoned.

picture of article

Thursday briefing: ​Cutting migration won’t boost British jobs, so what can fix our skills shortage?

Good morning. We will wean our national economy off its reliance on cheap overseas labour. And we will instead have a reformed immigration system that no longer ignores the millions of people who want the opportunity to train and contribute. Lofty goals indeed, but that’s what Keir Starmer pledged in May 2025, in plans that aimed to help the British government “restore control over the immigration system”. To that end, the government’s white paper published last month largely focused on cutting health care visas and ending visa access for middle-skilled professionals such as butchers and chefs. However, new research released yesterday suggests that focusing on cutting migration doesn’t lead to hiring more British workers; meanwhile, up-skilling British people is not enough to plug skills gap shortages, nor to curb immigration. That’s bad news, considering the plans have led to a steep and potentially catastrophic decline in the international workforce, which industry leaders have said could push the NHS into “crisis”. The plans have also been lambasted as immoral, with nurses terrified their families will be torn apart. If the plan won’t curb migration or push recruitment of domestic workers, what can? For today’s newsletter, I spoke to Ben Brindle from the Oxford Migration Observatory, who conducted the research. That’s after the headlines. Five big stories Technology | Deepfake nudes and “revenge porn” must be removed from the internet within 48 hours or technology firms risk being blocked in the UK, Keir Starmer has said. Gaza | More than 75,000 people were killed in the first 16 months of the two-year war in Gaza, at least 25,000 more than the death toll announced by local authorities at the time, according to a study published in the Lancet medical journal. Politics | Labour figures in the county with the highest number of reinstated council elections, after the government’s recent U-turn, have said they fear the party will be “annihilated” when voters go to the polls in May. World | Donald Trump has urged Keir Starmer not to hand the Chagos Islands over to Mauritius, warning he was “making a big mistake”. Economy | Ministers are considering a slower rise in the minimum wage for younger workers, amid fears over rising youth unemployment. In depth: ‘Brits would rather work in the supermarket than take these jobs’ Ben Brindle was one of the researchers who sat down last July to study Labour’s plans to link immigration and skills policy more closely. His research (pdf) found that the plan to target overseas work visas was not likely to result in a reduction in migration. People on work visas make up a small share of overall migration – about 17%, according to Home Office data. Those coming to work in the UK as migrants are much more likely to be on other types of visas such as graduate visas, or non-work related visas. Brindle also found the government’s policies targeted work routes largely unattractive to many British workers, such as jobs in the care and seasonal agriculture industries, with employers highlighting a small proportion of domestic applicants with the necessary technical skills to do these jobs – not to mention the low pay and long training times often required to do them. Brindle references the international health care work visa scheme, which the government shut down in its plans, as one example. “The challenge here isn’t so much that it’s difficult to train people for [care] jobs – that’s a relatively short process that takes a number of weeks. The challenge is that people don’t want to work in the sector in the first place,” says Brindle. “Those roles just aren’t attractive to many Brits, there’s poor pay and poor working conditions, so often when faced with the chance of working a tricky job in the care sector or, say, a job in the supermarket, people will opt for the latter,” says Brindle. *** A crisis in the NHS and social care One institution that will surely be affected by the government’s immigration plans is the NHS. Doubling the time overseas workers will have to wait to qualify for permanent residence, from 5 years to 10, will have a huge impact on health care workers. And for migrants working in jobs below graduate level – which constitute many NHS workers – the wait would increase to 15 years. The NHS runs in large part on immigrant workers, and could be thrown into crisis by the plans. A leaked document in 2023 showed the NHS was already operating with 154,000 fewer full-time staff than it needed, a number which could exceed 570,000 in the next ten years if the problem isn’t fixed. And now unions are raising the alarm that the NHS could crumble under the pressure of Labour’s immigration plans. Migrant nurses come to the UK on graduate visas, explains Brindle, so their recruitment shouldn’t technically be hindered by Labour’s plans. However, the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) warns that changes to the route to permanent settlement could impact up to 50,000 nurses. This is also a profession currently facing huge shortages, with as many as 25,000 posts (about 12% of the total workforce) left unfilled even today. The shortage is so severe that nurses have mentioned working while sick and leaving patients to die alone. Beyond that, these policies cultivate a culture of fear that leaves a lasting impact. Last week, we reported on the devastating effect on morale, with nurses and care workers saying they fear their families being torn apart by these policies. Meanwhile, the RCN has painted the policy as a betrayal of the many migrant nurses who came over to take up roles after the pandemic, and now face uncertainty over their futures. *** What’s the solution? I asked Brindle whether his research paper shows that reducing migration, specifically in the way that the government has proposed, is not the most effective way to get more British jobs for British people. “There’s a lot more to this than migration,” he says. He points to the example of welders – one of the industries in which the government wants more domestic workers to be trained up. But there’s a problem here: the UK doesn’t have a public training programme for welders, says Brindle, and a welder working for a private employer earns, on average, £70k a year, while somebody training welders in a further education college earns £30k a year. “When you put it like that, it’s not hugely surprising that there isn’t a queue of people lining up to train welders,” says Brindle. The question remains, if cutting migration won’t work, what will? Brindle says there are various ways to fill vacancies. “The government can improve pay or working conditions to make [undesired] roles more attractive [domestically],” he says, adding: “there is of course training as well, but there needs to be the right conditions for employers to put this all in place – such as more funding for local authorities to raise pay in the care sector.” The government has invested in many policies to increase pay and working conditions, including increasing doctor’s pay, and increasing pay and job progression for graduate nurses. But both of these policies, aimed at people already within the profession, may struggle to make a real dent in the backlog. In nursing, part of the lack of workers can be attributed to the Tories’ scrapping of the NHS bursary in 2017, which provided financial assistance for training nurses. But while Labour criticised this policy while in opposition, even directly linking it to staffing shortages back in 2021, it has announced no plans to replace the bursary. One thing that does look like it could help? Hiring migrants. One programme that did, at least temporarily manage to plug some of the gap in nursing jobs, says Brindle, was the Conservative party’s drive to recruit 50,000 new nurses – a plan which sourced almost all of its nurses internationally. But shortly after it was announced, it was very quickly dropped. “The target was set and then there was this big recruitment drive and once the target was hit, it was like ‘job done’ and then the number of visas dropped off shortly after,” says Brindle. The programme wasn’t perfect – it achieved its target, but failed to fully keep pace with rising demand for nurses, and there was widespread concern over the ethics of recruiting nurses largely from countries at risk of not being able to attend to their own population’s health care needs, due to global nursing shortages. But its success does raise a question – whether more favourable immigration policies, not hostile rhetoric, might be the solution to the NHS’s ongoing staffing crisis. What else we’ve been reading Oliver Eagleton has a fascinating column here on the ever-loosening definition of populism – while it may well have defined politics in the 2010s, what it truly means now is anyone’s guess. Charlie Lindlar, newsletters team Sumaiya Motara’s excellent piece explores the increasingly ludicrous hoops candidates must jump through to secure low-paid jobs. Spoiler: one involves marshmallows and uncooked spaghetti. Lucinda Everett, newsletters team We always try to sell you readers on these stories, but sometimes the headlines sell themselves, as is the case with this story from Maya Yang: “China’s dancing robots: how worried should we be?” Charlie Elle Hunt’s feature on the internet’s most famous ‘looksmaxxer’, Clavicular, whose profile is growing despite problematic behaviour, is a disturbing but important read. Lucinda For lunar new year, food magazine Vittles has published a stunning ten-part guide to Britain’s Chinatowns. It’s a beautiful, usable project pulled together by Angela Hui and dozens of conspirators, listing the best places to eat and shop across the UK and reflecting on the resilience of these cultural outposts. Charlie Sport Winter Olympics | Team GB’s curling teams each kept their hopes alive with vital wins on Wednesday. The British women now need to defeat Italy on Friday afternoon. Football | Premier League leaders Arsenal failed to produce a performance worthy of champions last night, drawing 2-2 with Wolves. Football | The anti-discrimination charity Kick It Out has accused José Mourinho of gaslighting for his response to Vinícius Júnior’s allegations of racist abuse during Real Madrid’s Champions League playoff first leg. On Wednesday, Uefa said it would “investigate allegations of discriminatory behaviour”. The front pages “Sites could be blocked over ‘revenge porn’ and deepfakes” is the lead of this morning’s Guardian. “Do not give away Chagos, Trump tells Starmer” is the splash of the Telegraph, while the Times has “Trump pulls his support for Chagos Islands deal”. “Epstein ‘trafficking’ police in plea for witnesses – as Met examines Andrew bodyguard claims” is the top story for the i paper. The Mail has “Britain faces ‘1936 moment’, defence chiefs warn PM”. The Sun leads with “swig when you’re winning”, and a report that ministers have agreed to extend pub opening hours during the World Cup this summer. “Lagarde to depart ECB helm early so Macron and Merz can pick successor” leads the FT. Today in Focus The ‘guinea pigs’ who had face transplant surgery Face transplant patient Robert Chelsea and writer Fay Bound Alberti talk through the promise – and darker side – of this pioneering surgery Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad The average British woman may change dress size 31 times in her adult life. Having fluctuated between sizes 10 and 14 throughout her forties, Hannah Rochell decided to sell the trousers that were “making [her] feel bad about [herself]” and buy some with adjustable waistbands – “to fit not only my new, fuller self, but other future selves.” Initially championed by smaller independent designers, adjustable waistbands are becoming more common on the high street, with brands such as Cos, Toast and Uniqlo joining the trend. It’s a step in the right direction for body diversity in the fashion industry. Hannah’s trouser collection, which includes a gingham linen, balloon-leg pair, has helped her save money, be more sustainable, and feel better about herself. “The size of my middle can vary wildly on any given day. I no longer need to feel as if I’m losing my mojo when this happens. I don’t want to micromanage my body, but this way, I can regain control of my style.” Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Martin Belam’s Thursday news quiz Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

picture of article

US funding for global internet freedom ‘effectively gutted’

For nearly two decades, the US quietly funded a global effort to keep the internet from splintering into fiefdoms run by authoritarian governments. Now that money is seriously threatened and a large part of it is already gone, putting into jeopardy internet freedoms around the world. Managed by the US state department and the US Agency for Global Media, the programme – broadly called Internet Freedom – funds small groups all over the world, from Iran to China to the Philippines, who built grassroots technologies to evade internet controls imposed by governments. It has dispensed well over $500m (£370m) in the past decade, according to an analysis by the Guardian, including $94m in 2024. Then came Doge, Donald Trump’s department of government efficiency, tasked with reducing the size of US government agencies and initiatives. Career employees who staffed Internet Freedom resigned or were sacked in 2025 as part of larger reductions. Many of its programmes were cut permanently; its main granting office issued no money in 2025. The Open Technology Fund (OTF), a nonprofit that works with the government to direct roughly half of this money, won a lawsuit to get some of this funding restored in December; the Trump administration is now appealing against that ruling. Meanwhile, the Trump administration this January withdrew from the Freedom Online Coalition, a global alliance set up by the US to defend digital rights. The cuts risk curtailing technologies that helped Iranians to coordinate during recent anti-government protests, and that allowed videos and images of massacres to reach the outside world. They could have a major impact in other nations too; the efforts of groups in Myanmar to get past the junta’s “digital iron curtain”, and the ability of users in China to avoid surveillance. “The programme was effectively gutted,” said a former US official. “They didn’t issue any grants this year.” “I would like to live in a world where a single US programme is not such a linchpin, such a load-bearing programme, but it has been. It’s hard to deny it has been,” said one digital rights expert based in Europe who has worked on a number of projects for Internet Freedom. To report this story, the Guardian spoke to 10 people with knowledge of Internet Freedom, including six of its grantees, and reviewed documents related to its operations and budget. The US Department of State has been approached for comment. The OTF declined to comment. The purpose of the programme was to make it extremely difficult to do what North Korea has accomplished through decades of censorship efforts, and what Iran succeeded in doing this January during a bloody crackdown on anti-government protests: cut an entire population off from the global internet. The US aimed to circumvent this by funding groups capable of building and harnessing technologies that evade such restrictions and censorship. These include familiar tools, such as the encrypted messaging service Signal and the Tor browser, which allows users to be anonymous online. They also include far more powerful tools. Advanced circumvention technologies can make it possible to get past even extremely powerful censorship regimes – to leap the firewall in China, for example, or to obtain international news in Iran even when mobile phone networks are out, through methods like satellite datacasting, in which data is broadcast in a similar way to television signal. Another technology has allowed Iranians to securely communicate during recent anti-government protests, alerting each other to shootings and police presence, even as the rest of the internet has been cut off. The soft-power aim behind this was to keep the internet as it is: mostly accessible, mostly a global commons. The groups it funded made censorship costly and difficult. “When you challenge censorship, the long-term effect is that oppressive governments must either open their internet, or to go in the direction of North Korea,” said the former US official. “But because each of those options is costly for them, they’ll keep trying to censor their networks so as to have the economic benefits of the internet without the drawbacks of freedom of speech and access to information. So the fight continues.” “Internet Freedom funded the development of many of the censorship-circumvention technologies that millions of people around the world depend on to maintain a link to the outside world,” said Doug Madory, an internet infrastructure expert who works closely with many of these groups. Their makers are “often operating on a shoestring and passion. They believe in the cause. There’s no fancy offices, they’re working out of their apartments. It’s not a moneyed industry.” Most recipients of this money keep it quiet; it’s a dangerous thing, in some places, to take state department funds. But even as the funds run out, more and more organisations – journalists, activists, and civil society – are seeking out these technologies, and the groups that build them. Censorship regimes are getting worse worldwide. “It’s a massive blow. The need is bigger and other funding is also gone. Organisations that provide these tools are being overwhelmed,” said the digital rights expert. “It’s not sustainable.” Some of the groups working on these technologies have laid off staff; others are continuing without pay. A few hold out hope that some money can be restored – although they fear that the Trump administration might more overtly politicise its aims. While a recent appropriations bill contains a budget line for Internet Freedom, it names no specific programmes as recipients of this cash. Others say they’re existing in a brief grace period as the rest of the funds run out. “Everybody’s just waiting right now, to be honest. But at the same time, wait at your own risk,” said an Iranian technologist funded through Internet Freedom. Meanwhile, censorship tech is growing cheaper and easier to access. Chinese companies have exported sophisticated middleboxes – devices that sit on network cables and allow authorities to monitor internet traffic – to countries across Africa and Asia in the past year. These allow regimes such as Iran’s to fine-tune their control over the domestic internet – allowing commerce to continue, for example, while communication is throttled. Several recipients of the US money expressed hope that Europe might fund these technologies in the future; some have already petitioned EU officials for funding. The cuts “make it easier to build a ‘digital iron curtain’. It makes it easier for the Kremlin to put Russians in a digital information bubble that reinforces specific narratives about people outside of Russia. This makes it easier for China to do this. For Iran to do this,” one said.

picture of article

‘It’s a catastrophe’: Wellington rages as millions of litres of raw sewage pour into ocean

A tide of anger is rising in New Zealand’s capital, Wellington, as the city’s toilets continue to flush directly into the ocean more than two weeks after the catastrophic collapse of its wastewater treatment plant. Millions of litres of raw and partially screened sewage have been pouring into pristine reefs and a marine reserve along the south coast daily since 4 February, prompting a national inquiry, as the authorities struggle to get the decimated plant operational. Abandoned beaches, public health warning signs and seagulls eating human waste are now features of the popular coastline, with the environmental disaster zone adjacent to the airport where thousands of international visitors alight every day. Fears for the safety of marine ecosystems – including vulnerable species such as the little blue penguin, or kororā, which nest along the shore – are mixed with concerns over the length and cost of disruption to those who depend on the coast for income, wellness, and recreation. As a southerly storm whipped through the lower North Island and churned up polluted seawater this week, hundreds of residents turned out to a public meeting to seek answers. “They’re warning us to close our windows because a shit-laden hurricane is coming at us,” said the south coast resident and environmentalist Eugene Doyle, whose house faces the sea. “Everyone in charge has done an appalling job, and they need to be held accountable.” Ray Ahipene-Mercer, 78, who led a 16-year campaign to get the treatment plant built throughout the 80s, said he felt gutted. Before 1998, the ocean smelled and looked terrible, with visible excrement on the rocks and surfers routinely emerging with ear infections and gastroenteritis. “I thought it was all done, and here we are back to where we were 30 years ago,” Ahipene-Mercer, of Ngāi Tara descent, said. “It’s a catastrophe.” On 4 February, an overnight electrical failure flooded the Moa Point wastewater treatment plant, destroying 80% of the equipment. Initially, raw sewage was being pumped directly out of a five-metre pipe near a beach at Tarakena Bay. Now, most sewage is being sent 1.8km offshore in the Cook Strait, after being screened for large objects such as tampons and wet wipes. Water management has long been a contentious issue in New Zealand, with legislation to centralise its control and overhaul outdated services thrown out by the National-led coalition government in favour of local reforms in early 2024. In Wellington, ageing pipes have caused issues with wastewater and stormwater flooding. The Moa Point plant is owned and overseen by two layers of local government and a council-owned water utility – Wellington Water – who contract the French-owned waste management company Veolia to run the plant. “It looked convoluted to me, and it wasn’t clear where actual authority lay,” the Wellington mayor, Andrew Little, who has been in the job four months, told the Guardian, adding that Wellingtonians were in a “state of shock”. A crown inquiry called by the local government minister, Simon Watts, will look into the causes of the disaster. “The public is owed the assurance that we understand what led to this failure and that we are taking steps to prevent it from happening again,” Watts told Radio New Zealand. He said that as part of the coalition government’s water reforms, a new entity, Tiaki Wai, would take over from Wellington Water in July, which he expected to improve services. Councils were responsible for underinvesting in water infrastructure, and new legislation would address this, he said. Little said he could not speculate on the causes due to the inquiry. Wellington Water did not respond to specific questions by deadline, and has said it could not comment publicly due to the ongoing inquiry. Veolia also declined to comment. Wellington Water chair Pat Dougherty previously told Radio New Zealand there had been underinvestment over a long period at Moa Point, and he backed an investigation. “I worry that there may have been some early warning signs that there were troubles with the discharge and we missed those. But everything needs to be on the table.” But for many, this is cold comfort. Locals say lower-level pollution has already marred the short Wellington summer, with recurring sewage discharges pointing to a deeper issue at the plant. Official reports showcontinuing issues and warnings about underfunding for years, and the authorities have said a fix could still be months away. “We are looking at generations of negligence, at a time where our climate is changing dramatically,” said Tamatha Paul, the Green party MP for Wellington Central and former city councillor who called this week’s meeting. “The way this will affect really vulnerable, delicate species that are already endangered, the fact their entire habitat is being devastated is heartbreaking.” Central government help is crucial, she said. Local iwi [tribes] have long opposed any wastewater going into the ocean, Taranaki Whanui chair Te Whatanui Winiata said. “This is our source of sustenance, we are relations to the moana [ocean]. We have been crying about this from the start, saying this kind of sewage system just causes havoc. The response from our people is outrage, shock, and anguish.” As beaches remain closed and businesses report losses, the Victoria University marine biologist Christopher Cornwall said “huge numbers” of marine creatures who call the various reefs around the south coast home would be suffering the most. Continued pollution could cause a mass kelp die-off in the Taputeranga Marine Reserve – home to species such as mussels, kina, pāua, sea sponges, fish, crayfish, octopus and penguins – killing their homes and food sources, he said. Human-borne bacteria and viruses could make these sea creatures sick, along with accumulating in shellfish, making them unsafe to eat. Microplastics get into the stomachs of seabirds and penguins who eat human waste, making them think they are full so that they die of starvation. The Department of Conservation has said the extent of the damage is not yet known, but would be affected by the length and volume of discharge, ocean currents and wind. New Zealanders needed to rethink why wastewater was going into oceans in the first place, Cornwall said. “I have no idea why you’d put a pipe in between two reefs anyway, and now all those fecal materials are just getting swept right in. Why are we pumping sewage out on to a kelp forest? It’s clearly not OK, and we should never have been in this situation.” It’s a feeling shared by many. From her home in Island Bay, Kayla Henderson often watches dolphins playing in Taputeranga reserve. Outside the meeting this week, the young ocean lover felt helpless. “I just care about the environment,” she said. “And I want to have faith that we won’t have raw sewage and rubbish going into protected marine waterways. I didn’t think it would be that hard.”

picture of article

Ukraine war briefing: Trump sees conflict as ‘very unfair’ for war dead and US taxpayers, says White House

Donald Trump views the Ukraine war as very unfair on not only those killed but also on US taxpayers, the White House has said. Speaking in Washington after two days of trilateral peace talks in Geneva ended without a breakthrough, the White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said there had been “meaningful progress made” with pledges “to continue to work towards a peace deal together”. But she also said Trump viewed the situation – nearly four years into the war – as “very unfair, not just for Russians and Ukrainians who have lost their lives, but also for the American people and the American taxpayer who were footing the bill for this war effort before President Trump put a stop to it”. In March last year the Trump administration suspended delivery of all US military aid to Ukraine, blocking billions of dollars’ worth of crucial shipments, as the White House piled pressure on Kyiv to reach a peace deal with Russia. The US and its allies later developed a mechanism where Ukraine is supplied with weapons from US stocks bought with funds from Nato countries. After the two days of US-brokered talks in Geneva between Ukraine and Russia ended on Wednesday, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he was dissatisfied with the outcome. Officials from Kyiv and Moscow both said the discussions were difficult. At the conclusion the delegations said they would meet again, without providing a date, while Zelenskyy and the White House suggested discussions could occur soon. As fighting continued in the war, Zelenskyy said in his nightly video address: “As of today, we cannot say that the result is sufficient. The military discussed certain issues seriously and substantively. Sensitive political matters, possible compromises and the necessary meeting of leaders have not yet been sufficiently addressed.” Zelenskyy wrote on X as the two sides met in the US-mediated talks that Russia was “trying to drag out negotiations that could already have reached the final stage”. Moments after his statement, the delegations broke off the talks after just two hours. Pjotr Sauer reports that Zelenskyy said after the talks that “some groundwork” had been done, “but for now the positions differ, because the negotiations were not easy”. The Ukrainian president said the status of Russian-occupied territories in eastern Ukraine and the future of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which remains under Moscow’s control, were among the most contentious unresolved issues. Russian crude shipments in January made up the smallest portion of India’s oil imports since late 2022, according to data from industry sources. India, the world’s third-biggest oil importer and consumer, ramped up purchases of discounted Russian oil after Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with volumes topping 2m barrels per day in some months. However, western sanctions over the war and pressure to clinch a trade deal with the US have forced India to scale back Russian oil purchases, the data showed. China has, since November, replaced India as Russia’s top buyer of seaborne crude. Ukraine imposed sanctions against the Belarusian president, Alexander Lukashenko, on Wednesday, vowing to “increase countermeasures” against Minsk for wartime assistance to close ally Russia. “We will significantly intensify countermeasures against all forms of [Lukashenko’s] assistance in the killing of Ukrainians,” Zelenskyy said on social media. The Belarusian presidency’s press service did not immediately respond to a request for comment. With Lukashenko already under US and European sanctions, the move is largely symbolic. The owner of Ukrainian football club Shakhtar Donetsk has donated more than $200,000 to the skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych. The athlete was disqualified from the Winter Olympics before competing over the use of a helmet depicting Ukrainian athletes killed in the war with Russia, the club said on Tuesday. A delegation of Democratic US senators was returning Wednesday from a trip to Ukraine, hoping to spur action in Congress for a series of sanctions meant to economically cripple Moscow and pressure President Vladimir Putin to make key concessions in peace talks. It was the first time US senators have visited Odesa, an economically crucial Ukrainian Black Sea port city that has been particularly targeted by Russia in the war. “One of the things we heard wherever we stopped today was that the people of Ukraine want a peace deal, but they want a peace deal that preserves their sovereignty, that recognises the importance of the integrity of Ukraine,” said the senator Jeanne Shaheen. Hungary is suspending its shipments of diesel to neighbouring Ukraine until interruptions to Russian oil supplies via a pipeline that crosses Ukrainian territory are resolved, Hungary’s foreign minister said. Amid accusations from Hungary and Slovakia that Kyiv has deliberately held up supplies, Péter Szijjártó said in a video posted on social media that the interruption to oil deliveries was “a political decision made by the Ukrainian president himself”. Ukraine has denied such accusations.