Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Jamaican police officer charged with murder after woman shot during protest

Authorities in Jamaica have taken the rare step of charging a police officer with murder after he was accused of shooting a 45-year-old woman in a case that prompted violent protests. According to the Independent Commission of Investigations (Indecom), Constable Andrew Wilson appeared in court on Wednesday and was denied bail. Another hearing is scheduled for mid-June. The killing of Latoya “Buju” Bulgin on 17 May in north-west Jamaica sparked protests after footage circulated on social media showing an officer firing at her vehicle during a demonstration over police violence. According to Indecom, police were “conducting crowd control duties” during a protest in Granville against a police shooting days earlier, in which 17-year-old Tjey Edwardson, identified by local media as Bulgin’s cousin, was killed. In the CCTV footage, Bulgin’s minivan is seen stationary at the side of the road as several people climb out. Police officers can be seen standing nearby. With one of the side doors still open, the vehicle starts to pull out into the road. Apparently without warning, an officer standing a few feet in front of the vehicle pulls a handgun and shoots at the driver, amid screams and cries from people nearby. Some people are seen running. Police officers are seen dragging Bulgin’s limp body out of the car and on to the ground and putting her in the back of a police pickup truck. The officers do not appear to make any attempt to offer first aid to the injured woman. Indecom and Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ), a human rights group, have been calling for strengthened accountability in police fatal shootings through mechanisms such as body-worn cameras. No body camera was worn by the police officer accused of shooting Bulgin, and JFJ said the incident demonstrated the importance of independent footage. “Without the availability of that CCTV footage, we would not be in the position to even be having this conversation and we would not perhaps have seen the JCF high command responding,” the group’s executive director, Mickel Jackson, told Radio Jamaica News last month. In a statement on Wednesday, Indecom said the “prompt collection and analysis of video evidence” during its independent investigation in Bulgin’s death “assisted in establishing an objective understanding of this fatal shooting incident”. The commission has reported 140 fatal shootings so far this year in the country of 2.8 million people. Last year, JFJ staged a protest against what it described as a “significant and alarming” increase in fatal shootings by police. The PNP Women’s Movement, a branch of the opposition People’s National party, said the CCTV footage “raises serious questions about the use of lethal force by members of the security forces”. It also said it was “disturbing” how Bulgin’s body was thrown into the back of a police vehicle after she was shot. “This conduct falls below the respect that should be afforded to our citizens by members of the Jamaica Constabulary Force,” the group said. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights denounced Bulgin’s killing and urged a “prompt, independent, impartial and transparent inquiry”. With reporting by the Associated Press

picture of article

Israel to continue ground operation in southern Lebanon despite agreed ceasefire – as it happened

Iran’s supreme leader Motjaba Khamenei said in a written statement read out by a cleric that “the enemy is experiencing a meaningful and profound humiliation in the field and the streets, and it is now focused on trickery.” “After Iran was able to repel the enemy, who was defeated on the battlefield, it now seeks to undermine the resilience of the Iranian people and sow discord. The US created a military base called Israel, and Iran will not back down from its stance toward Israel,” Khamenei wrote. Lebanon’s Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem said on Thursday that as long as Lebanese villages were being bombed and people were being killed, northern Israel will not be safe. It comes as Israeli strikes killed at least four people in Lebanon, according to local authorities, and a UN peacekeeper was killed in the crossfire on Thursday. Qassem also said that Hezbollah has rejected the latest ceasefire agreement reached between Israel and the Lebanese government, demanding a complete Israeli withdrawal. In a written statement read on Hezbollah’s Al-Manar TV on Thursday, the Iran-backed group’s leader said the agreement’s demand that Hezbollah fighters leave southern Lebanon under fire would mean “surrender, defeat and achieving the enemy’s goals.” Donald Trump has brushed off a House vote to rein in his powers to attack Iran without approval from Congress (see post at 12:34), saying it was “meaningless”. He singled out the four Republicans who joined Democrats to pass the bill in a vote of 215 to 208 yesterday. Lebanese prime minister Nawaf Salam said that the army would begin deploying in ‘pilot zones’ in the country’s south, a day after Israel and Lebanon agreed in Washington to implement a ceasefire. “The next step is practical and tangible: the deployment of the Lebanese army in pilot zones as a first phase,” Salam said, according to remarks read out by information minister Paul Morcos after a cabinet meeting, adding that “this does not prejudice our right to a full [Israeli] withdrawal, but brings us closer to it”. Israel’s Supreme Court has said Israel must allow visits to Palestinian prisoners by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), ruling in favour of a petition against a ban that was brought in at the start of the Gaza war. The bar on Red Cross visits to Palestinian detainees has restricted independent verification of their treatment, following reports of systemic abuse, starvation, and denial of medical care towards Palestinian prisoners. The UN peacekeeper who was killed in southern Lebanon (see post at 10:08) has been identified as a Serbian soldier. The Serbian defence ministry issued a statement naming the soldier as Milovan Jovanović. The UN nuclear watchdog has sent a report to member states repeating its calls on Iran to urgently inform the agency of the fate of its enriched uranium since its atomic sites were bombed a year ago and let inspections resume fully. “The [International Atomic Energy Agency] director-general has emphasised to Iran that it is indispensable and urgent to implement effectively the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) Safeguards Agreement... and that its implementation cannot be suspended by Iran under any circumstances,” the confidential report, seen by Reuters, said. Four Iranian-flagged oil tankers passed through the strait of Hormuz on Monday, a first since 15 April and the US blockade of Iranian ports, according to maritime tracking firm Kpler. In data published on Thursday, the firm detected the passage of the Hilda I, the Amber, the Silvia 1, and the Happiness I, which were carrying a total of seven million barrels of oil. In Gaza, at least nine people have been killed in overnight Israeli strikes, including members of the same family, according to Palestinian health officials. They were killed in at least four separate strikes in Gaza City, the al-Shifa hospital said, which received the bodies. Five members of one family were killed in a strike north-east of the city, the hospital reported, adding that 15 others were injured in the attacks.

picture of article

Hezbollah rejects Israel-Lebanon truce as Trump scrambles to end Iran war

Hezbollah has rejected a US-brokered ceasefire plan agreed by the Lebanese and Israeli governments, throwing the future of a truce in Lebanon and regional peace negotiations into question. The group’s leader, Naim Qassem, called the ceasefire plan a “roadmap to annihilate part of the Lebanese people” in a statement delivered on Thursday. He demanded a complete ceasefire and withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon, and said that as long as Lebanese villages were being bombed, northern Israel would not be safe. “As long as the occupation exists, the resistance will continue,” he said. “We call upon the officials to put an end to this farce and humiliation called direct negotiations.” The Israeli and the Lebanese governments had agreed a ceasefire to end hostilities on Monday night. The deal called for a complete cessation of fire from Hezbollah, which is aligned with Iran, and the evacuation of all its fighters south of the Litani River. Despite the agreement between the two governments, the Lebanese army is not a party to the conflict because the fighting has been between Hezbollah and Israel. The Lebanese government has been negotiating with Israel without Hezbollah as part of its effort to reassert control over the country and disarm the group. Hezbollah’s rejection of the ceasefire flies in the face of the Lebanese government’s announcement that it would come into effect in 24 hours, and raises further questions about how the Lebanese government can negotiate a ceasefire with Israel without Hezbollah at the table. Lebanese prime minister Nawaf Salam said those that delay or reject a ceasefire will bear the responsibility for the consequences, and that negotiations were the best option ahead of Lebanon. “The negotiation track we chose is the fastest and least costly road for Lebanon, the Lebanese people, the south and its residents,” Salam said. It also calls into question the arrangement in Lebanon after the 17 April ceasefire, under which Washington constrained Israel from striking Beirut in return for a halt in Hezbollah fire towards northern Israel. The group’s rejection of the ceasefire seems to echo demands from Tehran, which said hours after the ceasefire was announced that Israel should withdraw to its prewar positions. The head of the Quds Force, part of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said: “Supporting the resistance in Lebanon is the duty of all of us, and removing Israel from the region is an attainable goal for Muslims.” Esmail Qaani wrote in a post on a domestic social media platform: “The minimum demand of the resistance is the withdrawal of the usurping regime to the position it held before the start of the 40-day war.” Tehran has previously said that its own ceasefire with the US and Israel must include a halt to the fighting in Lebanon. It is unclear how Hezbollah’s rejection of a ceasefire in Lebanon will affect Tehran’s negotiations with Washington. Iran’s foreign ministry said on Thursday that Lebanon was an “integral part of any ceasefire and any final agreement.” Despite the earlier joint commitment to a ceasefire, both sides continued fighting on Thursday. Israel carried out several airstrikes in the Nabatieh area of southern Lebanon and the western Bekaa valley, killing four people, while Hezbollah targeted Israeli soldiers in the village of Qantara, southern Lebanon, according to a statement by the group. Israel’s defence minister, Israel Katz, said his country had “freedom of action, backed by the United States, to strike Beirut in response to attacks on Israeli communities and territory”. He said Israeli troops would remain in south Lebanon to maintain a “buffer zone”, which Israel says is designed to protect its residents in the north. It controls more than 600 sq km (230 sq miles) of territory in southern Lebanon, and has destroyed dozens of border villages, preventing hundreds of Lebanese people from returning to their homes. Lebanon and Israel, which do not have formal diplomatic relations, also agreed to create “pilot zones” in which the Lebanese armed forces would “take exclusive control of the territory to the exclusion of all non-state actors”. Lebanon’s president, Joseph Aoun, told reporters he had suggested the first pilot zone be in the area of Beaufort Castle, which Israeli soldiers captured earlier in the week. Lebanese media reported on Thursday that Israeli troops had begun withdrawing from the villages of Dibbine and Marjayoun and were being replaced by their Lebanese counterparts. The meetings in Washington were the fourth round of direct talks between Lebanese and Israeli diplomats since fighting erupted on 2 March, when Hezbollah launched attacks against Israel in support of Iran, which had been bombed by the US and Israel. The joint statement said the meetings would continue to flesh out a ceasefire and implement it in phases. In substance, the joint statement resembles a previous ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel in 2024, in which Hezbollah agreed to pull back from south of the Litani River so Lebanese armed forces could deploy there. The full disarmament of Hezbollah failed and Israel carried out more that 10,000 strikes in violation of the ceasefire in the following 15 months. Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he wanted to separate talks on the conflict in Lebanon and those on the war with Iran, but Tehran insists the two situations are linked and this week threatened to suspend talks with the US in protest against Israel’s offensive in Lebanon. The US president said on Monday that he had stopped an imminent Israeli strike on Beirut and had spoken to Benjamin Netanyahu, and Hezbollah representatives who had agreed that “all shooting will stop”. When asked by reporters on Wednesday about the flagging Lebanon ceasefire, Trump responded that “it’s a different part of the world.” “You know, I’d say in that part of the world, a ceasefire is when you’re shooting in a more moderate manner,” Trump said. He also confirmed reports that he had described the Israeli prime minister as “crazy”, saying he was “a little bit perturbed” that Israel’s campaign against Hezbollah was complicating US-led efforts to advance peace talks with Iran. According to analysts, Israel wants to inflict as much damage as possible on Hezbollah before any peace deal with Iran stops its offensive. Israeli strikes have killed at least 3,516 people in Lebanon, while Hezbollah strikes have killed two civilians in Israel and at least 21 Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. Trump is under pressure to resolve the Iran war as rising energy prices and economic uncertainty threaten Republican prospects in the US midterm elections and hamper global trade.

picture of article

Trump’s Iran war messaging is not winning over Americans – or their representatives

Donald Trump has two things to say about his war with Iran. The first is that it’s already over. And second, a symbolic congressional vote to end it – carried by four members of his own party – is a stab in the back that could derail the peace talks he’s conducting for the war that’s already over. By a 215-208 margin on Wednesday, the US House of Representatives voted to direct the president to withdraw US forces from hostilities with Iran, the first time either chamber has passed such a measure in the little over three months since Operation Epic Fury began on 28 February. By Thursday morning, Trump was on Truth Social calling the vote “unpatriotic” and blaming it on “Trump Derangement Syndrome”. The four Republicans who crossed the aisle, each with different ideologies, don’t exactly fit the bill for such a diagnosis. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is a libertarian-leaning constitutionalist who has opposed the war from day one, lost his primary to a Trump-backed challenger, and has, in Trump’s estimation, nothing left to lose. Warren Davidson of Ohio is a West Point graduate, former army ranger, and ex-Freedom Caucus member who voted against the war with Massie in March, but flipped back until recently. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, a former FBI agent representing Philadelphia’s suburbs, is well known as a moderate who framed his vote in the plainest possible terms “You either follow the law, or you change the law,” he said. “You can’t violate the law. That’s not an option.” Tom Barrett of Michigan voted in March against a war powers resolution, saying Trump had “earned the opportunity to resolve this conflict quickly”. By May, however, he had changed his mind, citing the economic pain hitting his constituents. All four lawmakers coalesced for last night’s vote. But none of this has stopped the administration from declaring, with some confidence, that the war is already over. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, told Congress this week that Operation Epic Fury had “concluded”. The Trump administration insists the US is now only conducting “completely defensive” strikes. And yet gas prices are averaging close to $4.24 per gallon nationwide, per AAA, and nearly $6 in California. The strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil normally flows, remains effectively closed, three months after the first strikes on Iran. Trump’s own Truth Social post – in which he condemned Wednesday’s vote as unpatriotic – describes active “final negotiations to end the War with the Islamic Republic of Iran”. The war that has concluded is, apparently, still being negotiated to a conclusion. The absurdity of calling anyone out for noticing the contradiction as disloyal does not appear to be winning over most Americans. A May Economist/YouGov survey found 59% disapproved of Trump’s handling of Iran, while only 31% approved. Around two-thirds of Americans told Reuters/Ipsos that rising gas prices had hurt their household finances, and Moody’s Analytics estimates the conflict has cost US households roughly $100bn in aggregate through higher energy costs. Now attention turns to the Senate, where four Republicans have already broken rank with the administration to advance a similar war powers measure, and a final vote still looms. And should it pass, it would require Trump’s signature. The Senate reached the simple 50-vote majority after Bill Cassidy, a senator of Louisiana, flipped his vote to yes, days after Trump helped defeat him in the Louisiana GOP primary. Texas senator John Cornyn, who has since lost in the primary to Trump-endorsed Ken Paxton, is one of three Republicans who have so far sat out of the vote, alongside Alabama senator Tommy Tuberville and retiring North Carolina senator and Trump critic Thom Tillis. Wednesday’s House vote is, as the White House correctly notes, largely symbolic. But symbols have a way of accumulating. In the Senate, the math is moving. The war remains unpopular. The strait of Hormuz is still closed. Trump is insisting the conflict is over and, in the same breath, that talking about it is unpatriotic. For a growing number of Americans, and their representatives on Capitol Hill, this is not a winning message.

picture of article

‘Embarrassing’: pressure on Merz after Germany’s failure to win UN security council seat

Germany’s unprecedented failure to win one of the rotating seats on the UN security council has prompted an intense round of soul searching in Berlin, and raised questions about its claims to international leadership under Friedrich Merz. The council vote on Wednesday, which elected Austria and Portugal to a two-year term along with Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe, was a blow to Merz’s struggling government, which has sought to position itself as a leading European voice on the world stage. In an awkward rivalry among EU partners, Portugal took 134 votes and Austria 131 while Germany garnered just 104, significantly below the required 127 votes despite Berlin’s expressed confidence just hours before that it would prevail. Both winners were seen to represent the interests of smaller countries, while Austria could benefit from its perceived neutrality as a non-Nato member and Portugal touted its strong ties in Africa and Latin America. The German foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, who had lobbied hard for the seat, attributed the “bitter defeat” to Germany’s active role in rallying support for Ukraine and its staunch backing for Israel. “We have always taken a clear stance on certain issues, and these are positions that not all member states share,” Wadephul told reporters. He called it “no secret” that Russia had rallied sentiment against Germany, now Kyiv’s biggest national provider of military aid. “There is our firm support for Ukraine; the fact that [permanent member] Russia does not want such a voice at the security council,” he said. “The fact that Germany must always assume a special responsibility for Israel in the Middle East conflict may also have cost votes,” he added, referring to Germany’s support for Israel as a key plank of its foreign policy in atonement for the Holocaust. Wadephul said Germany would stand by Israel even if it did voice criticism of its government’s actions in Gaza, West Bank settlements and military strikes in Lebanon. Merz himself, whose popularity has plunged in his first year in power, congratulated the winners of the secret ballot for five seats on the 15-member council and said Berlin’s commitment to the UN would remain unwavering. Germany, the second-largest contributor country to the UN, remains a “reliable pillar of multilateralism,” he said, “acting with determination and a sense of responsibility”. Since Merz took office last May at the helm of a loveless right-left coalition government, he has tried to steer Europe’s biggest economic power back to strength while making Berlin’s voice heard on global issues, backed up by a sharp increase in military spending. The results at home and abroad have been mixed, even prompting speculation in recent days that Merz could be replaced as chancellor by a fellow conservative, Hendrik Wüst, the premier of North Rhine-Westphalia, if he fails to right the ship. While such a scenario still seems highly unlikely, critics from across the political spectrum said Merz and his allies had themselves to blame for the latest debacle. The opposition Greens called it an “embarrassing defeat”, with its deputy parliamentary group leader, Agnieszka Brugger, calling out a failure to “underpin this bid with modern ideas” about leadership on climate protection, the international rules-based order and development aid. Alice Weidel, the co-leader of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party, now leading in German opinion polls, and a fierce critic of Berlin’s support for Kyiv, said in a scathing post on X that it confirmed a narrative of national decline. “One embarrassment follows the next: while Merz had intended to bring our country ‘back on to the international stage’ at the start of his chancellorship, Germany now finds itself without a seat on the UN security council,” she said. The Social Democrats, junior partners in the ruling coalition, joined in the criticism, saying the vote was “not a mere hiccup, but a warning sign”. Its foreign policy spokesperson, Adis Ahmetović, said Berlin was paying the price for perceived hypocrisy with its restraint in criticising allies including Israel and the US. “Anyone who claims to be the guardian of the rules-based international order must not apply double standards when it comes to international law,” he told Spiegel magazine. Merz initially withheld judgment on Donald Trump’s military attacks in Venezuela and Iran and their compliance with international law, before drawing the US president’s fury by saying the Americans were being “humiliated” by Tehran with their ill-prepared campaign. Because of Germany’s militaristic past and fears of its renewed dominance in Europe, during most of the postwar period the country has leveraged its power within international institutions with “chequebook diplomacy”, making the freeze-out at the UN particularly painful. Germany has served six times on the council, most recently in 2019-20. Manuel Fröhlich, a political scientist at the University of Trier, in western Germany, said the high-profile campaign to win the seat right down to the wire would be a further drag on Merz’s drive for a comeback. “The government would certainly have celebrated it as a success, and in that sense it will no doubt have to take responsibility for this defeat,” he told public broadcaster Phoenix. “In that sense, it is a significant setback.”

picture of article

Experts criticise plan for American-only Ebola quarantine centre in Kenya

Former top US officials and other experts are urging the Trump administration to abandon plans for an Ebola quarantine and treatment centre in Kenya, as the union for workers with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) calls for Americans exposed to Ebola to be brought home for treatment. Soon after the US revealed it was setting up a field hospital in Kenya for the Ebola quarantine and treatment of Americans, the Kenyan high court blocked the order – but the Kenyan and US governments moved forward anyway, with the first American responders reportedly landing at the Laikipia airbase on Saturday. Several former US health leaders, including previous top-level CDC officials, laid out their objections in a letter to Congress. “This policy raises profound clinical, ethical, operational and legal concerns,” they wrote. Daniel Jernigan, who spent 31 years at the CDC, including overseeing the agency’s Ebola response in 2014-15, before resigning last year, said it was not clear how current officials had arrived at this plan “because it’s against so many ethical underpinnings that we have relied on for all of the past responses”. The US is in the process of building a 50-bed unit at the airbase. Patients would have access to medications and some respiratory support, but those needing higher levels of care would be flown to as-yet unidentified hospitals in Europe. Yolanda Jacobs, the president of the AFGE Local 2883 government employees’ union, said in a statement that the Trump administration was “abandoning” CDC workers responding to the outbreak, in “a sharp departure from the standard upheld by every previous administration”. The White House did not respond to inquires about whether the facility would be accessible to Kenyans and others working on the Ebola response, and whether all Americans working on the Ebola response would be required to quarantine or whether it would be required only of Americans with high-risk exposures. Previously, the White House did not say whether Americans wishing to return home rather than going to Kenya would be allowed to do so. The US Department of Health and Human Services referred inquiries to the state department, which has been approached for comment. Last week the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said: “We cannot and will not allow any cases of Ebola to enter the United States.”. During the 2014 Ebola epidemic in west Africa, several people treating patients were safely evacuated to and treated at US facilities in Atlanta, Bethesda, Omaha and New York, with no onward transmission. The US president, Donald Trump, vehemently opposed the move at the time, saying that returning volunteers “must suffer the consequences” and should not be allowed into the US. Ronald Nahass, the president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the medical director of research at ID Care, said Americans could safely quarantine in place after a high-risk exposure to Ebola, and that if they developed symptoms, the US had some of the best quarantine and treatment facilities in the world. “We’ve spent taxpayer dollars to create some really first-class biocontainment units to specifically address this type of an issue and have trained staff who are extraordinarily expert in dealing with this,” Nahass said. Those facilities “can handle it in a better way than a field hospital in Kenya”, he added. “Why wouldn’t you evacuate American citizens if you’re concerned?” During the 2014 outbreak, the US created a field hospital specifically for health workers from all countries who might need Ebola care. “If you come over to west Africa to help, we’ve got your back,” Jernigan said of the 2014 approach. Creating a quarantine centre in another country for Americans only would be highly unusual and a major reversal from such plans, he said. It is also not clear what would happen to Americans in quarantine if they needed outside medical care for non-Ebola causes, such as a heart attack or appendicitis, Jernigan said. “Are you going to send them to Kenyatta hospital in Nairobi, and if so, are you going to send them in a bubble and have a dedicated ward there? If you would just send them back to the United States to a designated facility that has already been established with millions of dollars to do it, they’re surrounded by specialists.” Travel bans and restrictions such as these were ineffective at stopping the spread of disease, Nahass said. “Borders are porous, you can’t keep infectious diseases out of the country” in this way, he said. Instead, Nahass said, tried-and-true public health measures such as monitoring potential exposures and making sure health care providers are prepared for potential cases wooould be much more effective. International collaboration is also crucial for controlling outbreaks, Nahass said. “These are global events and not being part of the global discussion in which the platform for that is the WHO [World Health Organization] is problematic.” America’s absence on the world stage is notable and will have lasting repercussions, he added.

picture of article

Leftwing US commentator calls decision to ban him from UK ‘Kafkaesque’

A leftwing US political commentator has described the UK government’s decision to ban him from entering the country as “haunting and hilarious” and “Kafkaesque”. Cenk Uygur, the founder and a host on Young Turks, a well-established progressive media outlet, was banned earlier this week from entering the UK to attend a speaking engagement alongside Hasan Piker, a Twitch streamer who has become a popular figure on the US political left. The decision by the Home Office to cancel their electronic travel authorisations (ETA) because their presence in the UK “may not be conducive to the public good” has led to questions over government censorship of free speech, been criticised by the Green party leader, Zack Polanski, as “grim”, and described by the free speech advocates Index on Censorship as a “worrying escalation”. When asked about the government’s decision on Thursday morning by Sky News, Uygur said: “It’s both a little bit haunting and hilarious at the same time. “I don’t really know what I’m being charged with here,” he added. “Am I really not going to be allowed in Britain from now on? And how is someone who is almost religiously for nonviolence a threat to the public order?” The government has not commented on the specific reasons for the ban against Uygur, who travelled to the UK in 2025. Both Uygur and his nephew, Piker, were due to appear at SXSW London and will now speak virtually at an event run by the Oxford Union Society which they were due to attend. Any foreign national wanting to visit the UK needs permission to do so, either in the form of a visa or an ETA. Both can be refused for several reasons. The rules include wide discretionary powers for the home secretary to exclude individuals on the basis that their presence is “not conducive to the public good because of their conduct, character, associations or other reasons”. The government blocked 11 foreign far-right activists from entering the UK in May before a rally by Tommy Robinson, whom Keir Starmer has accused of “peddling hatred and division”. Earlier this year, Kanye West was blocked from coming to the UK on grounds that his presence would not be conducive to the public good, prompting an outcry and the cancellation of the Wireless music festival. The rapper has been criticised for making antisemitic remarks, including voicing admiration for Adolf Hitler, and has apologised for his antisemitic behaviour. Uygur, a 56-year-old activist and lawyer, has criticised Israel’s actions in Gaza as “genocide” and “savage”. He has said his criticisms are confined to an analysis of Israeli influence over US policymaking. When asked if the UK government’s decision was made over his views of Israel, Uygur said: “There’s no question.” While he had been given no reason by the government for the cancellation of his ETA, Uygur said that the Times, which first reported the ban on Monday, cited fears his presence “could fuel antisemitism” and that the decision was based on several grounds, including “antisemitic tropes” after the attacks on Israel by Hamas on 7 October 2023, as well as comments about grooming gangs that Uygur made on Piers Morgan’s YouTube show. Uygur said: “I’m curious if the British government is ever going to list the acceptable and unacceptable ways of criticising Israel and if they have these standards for any other country. “Obviously this is Kafkaesque, it’s Orwellian, and then the question is why? Why is your government, and also my government in America, so obsessed with this tiny, little country and whether their feelings have been hurt?” He added: “How about the feelings of the Palestinians, or the Lebanese as they’re being invaded by Israel right now, or Iran as they’re being attacked by Israel right now; are we not concerned about their feelings?”

picture of article

Thursday briefing: ​How Henry Nowak’s ​death has been twisted into a rallying cry for the far right

Good morning. When Henry Nowak’s father, Mark, stood on the court steps after his son’s murderer had been sentenced to life in prison, he was clear: “We want to use Henry’s heartbreaking story to make change for the better. We do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred, or tension. We want his story to make our streets safer for everyone”. Henry’s killer, Vickrum Digwa, 23, used a dagger to fatally stab the 18-year-old university student last December, falsely claiming Digwa had been racially abused and attacked by his victim. Harrowing body-camera footage released by Hampshire police shows Henry being handcuffed despite repeatedly telling police officers he could not breathe and had been stabbed. “I don’t think you have mate,” one officer replied. The chief constable of Hampshire police apologised directly to the family yesterday evening and the police watchdog, the IOPC, is now investigating. Mark Nowak called for their probe to be “fearless and transparent”, and urged the government to “treat knife crime as the national emergency it is”. And this is where our focus should remain, with Henry, who his father lovingly described as “one of the kindest, friendliest, and most inclusive people you could ever hope to meet.” But it can’t rest there entirely. Because, in crass disregard of the wishes of Henry’s family, bad faith actors in this country and farther afield have hijacked this singular tragedy for their own ends, fomenting violence on the streets . I spoke to the Guardian’s police and crime correspondent Vikram Dodd about all this, and the myth of two tier policing, but first the headlines. Five big stories UK politics | The prime minster’s close ally Darren Jones sent his commiserations to Peter Mandelson after he was sacked as US ambassador in messages that were not disclosed as part of the humble address release.. UK news | The NHS is taking action to tackle antisemitism after a government-ordered report found that Jewish patients and staff face “routine ostracism” in the service. Middle East | Israel and Lebanon have agreed to implement a ceasefire to end hostilities, the Trump administration has announced, as the US looks to overcome one of the largest barriers to reaching a broader deal to end the war with Iran. US news | Donald Trump has threatened tariffs of between 10% and 12.5% on 60 trading partners including the UK, the EU and Australia over alleged forced labour failures. UK news | Disability campaigners have called on the government to halt plans to cut funding for specialist tech support for tens of thousands of disabled students in England. In depth: ‘Nigel Farage’s cynical hijack of Henry’s murder is no surprise’ On the night of 3 December 2025, on the streets of Southampton, Vickrum Digwa stabbed Henry five times with a 21cm ceremonial dagger. Digwa’s brother called 999, claiming Digwa had been the victim of an assault. When police arrived, Digwa repeated the lie, claiming Henry had grabbed his turban and called him a racial slur. Henry tragically died from a fatal wound to the chest, shortly after being handcuffed. “The charge, pushed by the far right and their helpers, is that the police treated a claim of racism more seriously than the vicious attack suffered by Henry Nowak,” Vikram says. But, while the police watchdog inquiry is ongoing, “There are no facts to support that, there are facts to support a simpler explanation, which is still disturbing, but of little obvious help to the far right.” *** Why didn’t police realise at first Henry had been stabbed? The body cam footage suggests it took several minutes for the police to realise Henry had been stabbed. As the judge explains in his sentencing remarks: “It was dark and Henry was wearing a dark top. The entry damage caused by the knife through it, would not have been obvious … Henry was complaining that he had been stabbed and was struggling to breathe but that would not have necessarily told the officers how serious the situation had become … sometimes, someone arrested and handcuffed will feign injury in the hope they may be released.” According to the trial pathologist, Henry’s fatal injury caused catastrophic internal bleeding, so not the evident blood loss that would immediately indicate a stab wound to officers. But after the video that was made public ends, Vikram says, the police do realise that Henry’s situation is life-threatening. They uncuff him and administer CPR. As the court heard: no amount of intervention, no matter how quickly he received it, could have saved Henry’s life. *** Is it legal to carry a kirpan? The trial heard that Digwa wore a small kirpan, the ceremonial dagger carried by practising Sikhs to meet ceremonial obligations. It sat under his clothing around his neck, but Digwa also chose to carry a much larger blade that he used in the killing. Reform UK have called for kirpan to be banned, while Donna Jones, police and crime commissioner for Hampshire, is leading calls for a review of religious exemptions on the carrying of knives. But, as our community affairs correspondent Aamna Mohdin has reported, Sikh leaders, who have unanimously condemned the murder, said the blade used by Digwa was not in fact a kirpan, while the Sikh Press Association said plans were under way to ensure every initiated Sikh in the UK would be addressed directly regarding kirpan rules and responsibilities. In recent days Aamna has also spoken to community leaders who report Sikhs being aggressively questioned on the streets by groups of white people about whether they were carrying weapons, as fears of a violent backlash grow. *** What is the police strategy on race? In the wake of George Floyd’s 2020 murder in Minneapolis by a serving white police officer, and the Black Lives Matter movement, UK policing authorities published the police anti-racism commitment (pdf) in an effort to address concerns about racism within their ranks. Policing minister Sarah Jones said yesterday that this document was being reviewed because the language in it was “wrong”, while Conservative critics accused police chiefs of trying to reverse engineer results in its call for “equality of policing outcomes for people from different ethnic groups”. But only two months ago, Vikram reported that five years on from publication, independent monitors found this document to have had “no meaningful impact”. He makes the crucial point now that “it’s incredibly unlikely any frontline officer has heard of it, let alone read, it, let alone acted on it.” Addressing one of the its contested phrases – that equality in policing “does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’”, he suggests a clear example: someone Jewish may need reassurance from the police that a brick though their window will be investigated as a hate crime given the current antisemitic climate, not just an act of criminal damage. *** Two tier policing? As we reported in 2024, the myth that white far-right demonstrations are policed more harshly than, for example, Black Lives Matter or Palestine Solidarity protests is a pernicious one spread by apologists for far-right violence. When it was brought up again at prime minister’s questions yesterday, Keir Starmer was explicit: “I don’t believe there is two tier policing in this country.” The prime minister also accused Nigel Farage of ignoring the wishes of the dead teenager’s family, and later, a senior police source warned that politicians like Farage were attempting “to stoke up tensions for political gain” and “were reckless about whether their comments would lead to trouble on the streets”. The concept of institutionally racist policing was first formally identified over a quarter of a century ago in the Stephen Lawrence report. In 2023, a report by Louise Casey found the Met to be “institutionally racist”. Vikram notes there has been a consistent backlash to these findings, despite a lack of evidence from those who dispute it: “When you look at all the statistics for police use of force, Taser use, stop and search, these are all disproportionately used against people who are ethnic minority, especially those who are black.” In March, he revealed how black people are up to 48 times more likely than white people to be stopped and searched by police in some of London’s best-off areas. A recent report for Inquest found that black people are seven times more likely to die than white people following the use of restraint by police. What was striking about the Southampton protests, orchestrated by far-right activist Tommy Robinson, was the calculated co-option of language of the antiracist movement: crowds of white people chanting “racist police off our streets” and “I can’t breathe”. Nigel Farage’s cynical hijack of Henry’s murder is no surprise given that the Reform UK leader is eager to channel public anger. Farage faced being outflanked by those even further to his right, including his populist rival Rupert Lowe. As horrific as the case is, it is also almost tailor-made for those on the ethnonationalist far right who are driving an explicitly racist agenda. *** Who was Henry Nowak? When a tragedy is weaponised as this one has been, it’s too easy to lose sight of the individual at its heart, to forget to be curious about who they were in the years before their death became a matter of public discourse. Henry Nowak, the oldest of four children, was in his first year studying accountancy at Southampton University when he died. Growing up in Essex, he was a keen footballer, loved dancing and was a teenager who “would not tolerate racism, sexism or bullying”. He was a young man who wanted to do the right thing: he told his stepfather he felt guilty about accelerating to 32mph in a 30mph zone just after he had passed his driving test. It’s evident he loved Christmas – his last family outing was to the pantomime, a few days before he was murdered. When his family visited his university hall to clear out his room they found an Advent calendar, with only three windows open. What else we’ve been reading Lucy Knight, who appears to have one of the funnest jobs at the Guardian, has been trying the food trend of the summer: spicy fruit. Patrick Ian Sample’s fascinating interview with neurologist Orlando Swayne, who has seen breakthroughs in treating serious brain injuries, also raises some important questions on care, ethics and hidden damages. Jacqui Sam Wollaston’s brilliant six-part series on derelict buildings concludes with the story of 2-8A Rutland Gate, once Britain’s most expensive houses. Patrick The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 are “at risk of fading into grey”, Amy Hawkins warns in this compelling piece which looks at the intensifying fight to preserve the memory of it. Jacqui David Smith has spoken with novelist James Ellroy about his dislike of technology (he does not even own a computer) and his provocative new book Red Sheet. Patrick Sport Basketball | The New York Knicks, chasing their first NBA title since 1973, beat the San Antonio Spurs in the NBA finals opener as Jalen Brunson led the way with 30 points. Tennis | Aryna Sabalenka said she wanted “to quit tennis” in an immediate outburst after one of the worst meltdowns in her career, losing 10 consecutive games en route to a defeat to the 25th seed Diana Shnaider in the quarter-finals of the French Open. Cricket | Ben Stokes has defended England’s decision to excuse Jofra Archer from the start of the Test summer so he could compete in the Indian Premier League. The front pages “Rhetoric on Nowak murder ‘risks pushing policing back to the 60s’” is the Guardian’s front page today. The Mail goes with “Tories call for Henry police to be investigated”, while the Telegraph says “Officers ‘pressured’ by diversity course” and the Times, similarly, writes “Stab victim arrest force ‘pressured’ by racism course”. The Express has “Police chief apology for Henry Nowak tragedy”. The FT splashes “Vanguard EFT hits $1trn as investors queue up for blockbuster AI listings”. The Mirror, alongside a picture of Nigel Farage, says “This shows exactly who he is”. The i Paper leads with “Banned from Russia for exposing Putin’s crimes”. And lastly Metro’s headline is “Yusuf, you wazzock!” Today in Focus Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker: the US commentators banned from the UK The leftwing American commentator Cenk Uygur talks about the ban on him and his nephew, Hasan Piker, entering the UK this week. With reporting from Kiran Stacey Cartoon of the day | Ben Jennings The Upside A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad “You dance in my heart around a mighty fire to a systolic breakbeat, swinging from one coronary artery to the next.” That’s a line from one of the more than 60,000 love letters stored in a special German archive. With moving memos dating back to the 1700s, it’s a treasure trove of lust, affection and desire that tracks eras of history and the evolution of language, one love story at a time. Our correspondent Deborah Cole visited the archive at the University of Koblenz to meet the team now digitising the collection for us all to enjoy. “It’s really fascinating, especially when you can see parallels to your own life and love stories,” said one volunteer. “We start talking about the letters and end up talking about that time in our lives.” Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday Bored at work? And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Martin Belam’s Thursday news quiz Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply