Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

US-Iran talks laid ‘very good foundation for a successful final deal’, says Vance – as happened

JD Vance said the talks with Iran created a “good foundation for a successful final deal” to end the war. “The final deal is the house,” the US vice-president told reporters. “We set the foundation. We haven’t built the house, but we’ve laid a successful foundation to get to a good place for the American people.” When asked how soon IAEA inspectors could come to Iran, JD Vance said nuclear inspectors were called at 2am last night – but no one picked up the call. “As you can expect, not many people are answering their phone at two in the morning,” the vice president said. US secretary of state Marco Rubio will begin a trip to three Gulf countries on Tuesday amid negotiations with Iran to end the war in the Middle East, his spokesperson said. Visiting the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain, Rubio will discuss “the memorandum of understanding with Iran, efforts to secure full and free safe transit through the strait of Hormuz, and the importance of peace and stability in the region,” state department spokesman Tommy Pigott said in a statement. Tehran ⁠did not negotiate on its nuclear ⁠programme ⁠and did not accept any ⁠new commitments in Sunday’s talks with the ⁠US in Switzerland, ‌foreign ministry spokesperson ‌Esmaeil Baghaei told ‌the official IRNA news agency on Monday. Iran’s interaction with the International ‌Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will continue in accordance with current procedures, subject to the approval ⁠of Iran’s parliament and the decisions of the Supreme National Security ‌Council, Baghaei added. Iran’s ⁠top negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf ⁠is ⁠on his way to Oman ⁠to discuss joint efforts ⁠to “consolidate” Iranian arrangements ‌for ‌managing shipping ‌in the strait of Hormuz, according to a statement ‌on his Telegram channel on Monday. The Iranian delegation also includes foreign ⁠minister Abbas Araqchi, the statement said. The US Treasury said it was temporarily lifting sanctions on Iran to allow the Islamic Republic to produce, sell and deliver crude oil and related products until 21 August. “All transactions” that were previously prohibited involving the production, sale, and transport of Iranian-origin crude oil “are authorized through 12:01 am eastern daylight time, 21 August, 2026,” according to a license published by the Treasury Department, which administers US economic sanctions. Iranian ⁠president ⁠Masoud Pezeshkian will visit ⁠Pakistan on ⁠Tuesday, Pakistan’s ‌foreign ministry ‌has said. He described the visit ‌as an “important opportunity” to discuss ongoing ⁠diplomatic engagements following the Iran-US peace deal. The Israeli military lifted safety restrictions in eight communities near the Lebanese border beginning at 6am (0300 GMT) on Monday. A senior Lebanese security official told the Reuters news agency that adherence to the ceasefire had been “almost total” since Saturday ⁠evening, but said an Israeli ⁠tank fired shells towards a village near the coastal city of Tyre and Israeli forces fired sound grenades in two other locations earlier today. Direct damage to buildings in south Lebanon in the latest war between Israel and Hezbollah is estimated at around $1.38 billion, a UN agency and Lebanese research centre said on Monday. “In total, 11,095 buildings were completely destroyed, impacting 17,891 housing units, while 2,242 buildings sustained partial damage... and 9,311 buildings incurred minor damage,” the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Lebanon’s government-linked National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS) said. According to Palestinian news agency Wafa, a high school student was killed and several other civilians were injured earlier today in an Israeli attack on a civilian vehicle in Gaza City. The Gaza health ministry says at least 1,021 people have been killed in Israeli attacks since the ‘ceasefire’ between Israel and Hamas came into effect in October 2025.

picture of article

Iran agrees to UN nuclear inspectors’ return as part of agreement with US

Iran has agreed to allow UN nuclear inspectors back into the country as part of an agreement under which Washington will lift sanctions on Tehran’s oil exports and the strait of Hormuz will reopen, the US vice-president, JD Vance, has said. Long-term independent monitoring of Iran’s nuclear programme, which it says is for energy purposes only, was in effect halted last summer after Israel and the US attacked the country. Tehran suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in response to strikes on its nuclear facilities. But Tehran, sensitive to domestic criticism, said it had made no new concessions on its nuclear programme, and the outcome of any negotiation would be subject to the supreme national security council, the body that brings together political and military decision makers inside Iran. A “deconfliction” mechanism has also been set up involving Washington, Tehran and Beirut to try to bring about a working ceasefire in Lebanon, which Israel has continued to bomb and where the Iran-aligned militant group Hezbollah is based. A Lebanon ceasefire is one of Iran’s key demands. Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, and Vance hailed the progress made during nearly 18 hours of talks in Bürgenstock, Switzerland. Technical experts from the two sides and mediators from Qatar and Pakistan are to stay behind at the Doha-owned Lake Lucerne resort to work on the detailed implementation of the plan, including working parties on Iran’s nuclear programme and the establishment of a high-level political committee to oversee the process intended to seal a comprehensive deal between the two sides in under two months. Early signs on Monday suggested commercial oil tankers were starting to move through the strait of Hormuz. Four liquefied natural gas tankers controlled by Qatar headed into the Gulf and through the strait on Monday, while two supertankers, which can carry up to 4m barrels of crude oil, crossed into the Gulf heading for the Iraqi port of Basra. The talks nearly broke down on Sunday when a stream of violent threats from Donald Trump infuriated the Iranian delegation. Vance told a press conference: “What we told the Iranians yesterday is that when you guys engage in what us millennials might call trash talk, you can’t expect the president of the United States not to respond and not to correct the record. “Yes there was a little bit of threatening and a little bit of whining but at the end of the day the talks continued and we made great progress.” He hailed Tehran’s decision to let UN nuclear inspectors back into Iran for the first time since Israel attacked the country last year. “That is a major milestone for the American people, and the first step in permanently denuclearising or permanently ending a nuclear weapons programme in Iran,” he said. In practice, lengthy talks lie ahead on the intrusiveness and scale of the IAEA inspectors’ mandate, including their access to Iran’s bombed nuclear sites. In a development vital to unlocking progress, the US treasury is preparing to issue a 60-day waiver that will lift sanctions on Iran’s oil, petrochemicals and derivatives. Tehran said this meant its central bank would be able to sell oil to customers, principally China, and receive payments without the threat of repercussions. Qatar and Iran also signed a memorandum about the release of Iranian assets frozen in Qatari bank accounts as a result of secondary US sanctions. Vance said the deal required Iran to spend its unfrozen assets on food such as soya produced by US farmers. The economic measures may help lift some of the pressure on Iran’s exchange markets and gradually slow runaway inflation, the country’s biggest domestic concern at present. The joint statement by the mediators focused on new implementation mechanisms to turn the memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed last week into reality over the next 60 days – the timeline set out to reach a comprehensive agreement on the future of Iran’s nuclear programme and the lifting of sanctions on its economy. Araghchi said in a statement that the first real test of the understandings would be the cessation of Israeli attacks on Lebanon, which has emerged as the biggest threat to the MoU between Washington and Tehran. Explaining the thinking behind the deconfliction body on which neither Israel or Hezbollah will sit, Vance said: “Sometimes a junior guy fires a drone that didn’t have approval from the high command. Of course, Israel has to respond to that, but then sometimes we could have a more peaceful situation if Israel responds in the context of a conversation that is ongoing between Hezbollah, Lebanon, Israel and other partners in the region. “There has not been a mechanism to have those conversations.” He said the US wanted Israel’s security and Lebanon’s sovereignty to be protected. Iran had said over the weekend that it had reinstated its blockade of the strait of Hormuz in protest at the continued Israeli strikes on Lebanon, and that Trump was allowing Israel to breach the MoU, which calls for a ceasefire on all fronts. Israel killed more than 30 people in attacks in central and southern Lebanon on Saturday. The US military denied the strait had been closed again, but Trump responded strongly on Sunday. “You close it and you won’t have a country,” he wrote on social media. “You won’t even make it back to your fucking country,” he added in a threat to the Iranian negotiators. Iran had sought to hold back the nuclear element of the talks until the US blockade of its oil ports was lifted, a clear sanctions waiver on oil sales was in place and half of its estimated $24bn (£18bn) in overseas assets were unfrozen and returned to Tehran. Most of those goals have been achieved although the US treasury did not issue a formal sanctions waiver on Sunday.

picture of article

‘Institutional threat’: election of far-right leader raises fears for democracy in Colombia

When more than 20 women accused a Colombian evangelical pastor in 2012 of sexually abusing them, the defendant’s lawyer sought to discredit the allegations by telling the court that they were “trepadoras” – a pejorative term meaning social climbers. He ultimately secured his client’s acquittal – although the case remains under review by the supreme court – but footage of the remark resurfaced during Colombia’s presidential campaign, sparking outrage among many progressive voters. On Sunday, that lawyer was elected Colombia’s next president. Abelardo de la Espriella, who calls himself “El Tigre” (The Tiger), a millionaire who launched his legal career defending paramilitary leaders and has never held public office, defeated the leftwing senator Iván Cepeda by a razor-thin margin of just 250,000 votes out of an electorate of 41 million. On 7 August, he will replace Gustavo Petro, the country’s first and only leftist president, marking a sharp swing back to the right for the country – and De la Espriella is seen as considerably further to the right than Colombia’s long line of conservative presidents. Although De la Espriella said in his victory speech that he would respect the constitution and the rights of “all Colombians”, the election of a 47-year-old self-styled “outsider” who promised to “disembowel” the left, use lethal force against protesters and kill criminals like “rats and cockroaches”, has left many analysts and activists concerned about the risks he could pose to Colombian democracy. “It frightens me,” said Catalina Ruiz-Navarro, a co-founder and editor of the feminist magazine Volcánicas. “Despite Colombia’s strong institutions, we’re facing an institutional threat unlike anything we’ve experienced before.” His election is also the latest confirmation of a far-right wave sweeping presidential elections across Latin America. An outspoken admirer of the US president, Donald Trump, who endorsed his campaign, De la Espriella has drawn inspiration from him and other conservative leaders in the region, particularly El Salvador’s populist autocrat, Nayib Bukele. Colombia’s next president has vowed to emulate Bukele’s controversial crackdown on gangs in an effort to confront the decades-long armed conflict, in which criminal groups fight each other – and the military – for control of territory and cocaine trafficking routes, fuelling killings, forced displacement, massacres and kidnappings. Inspired by Brazil’s Bolsonaro family, he has turned Colombia’s national football shirt into a symbol of the far right. From Argentina’s Javier Milei, De la Espriella borrowed the feline mascot – a lion in the Argentine’s case – and the promise to take a “chainsaw” to the state, shrinking it by 40%. Some analysts see cuts on that scale as particularly concerning, arguing that they could trigger an economic crisis and – given that the state already struggles to maintain a presence across large parts of the country – inadvertently strengthen criminal groups by creating a vacuum for them to fill. “We’ve never confronted a threat of this magnitude,” said Ana Bejarano Ricaurte, a lawyer and co-director of El Veinte, a legal advocacy organisation that defends freedom of expression. “He has promised a regressive agenda in terms of civil rights and fundamental rights: an anti-abortion agenda, an anti-LGBTQ+ agenda … He has vowed to withdraw Colombia from the inter-American human rights system, which has been the guiding light for the protection of human rights here. “He has embraced an almost tailor-made formula for rightwing populism in Latin America.” De la Espriella was born in the capital, Bogotá, but grew up in the department of Córdoba, in Colombia’s Caribbean. The son of a former Liberal state congressman and lawyer who twice unsuccessfully sought election as governor, De la Espriella followed in his father’s legal footsteps, initially taking on small civil and labour cases. The turning point came in the early 2000s, when paramilitaries – private armies created by rightwing landowners to fight leftwing guerrilla groups – began negotiating their demobilisation with the government. De la Espriella entered the talks as a “member of civil society”, but soon became the lawyer for some of the militia’s leaders. As his profile grew, he took on other high-profile clients, including the pastor Álvaro Gámez, who was accused of abusing female followers; the head of a financial pyramid scheme allegedly used to launder drug-trafficking money; and Alex Saab, accused by US authorities of being the main financial frontman for Nicolás Maduro’s regime in Venezuela. His campaign said it was “his success in the courts … that laid the foundations of his fortune” and allowed him to expand into other ventures, including rum, wine, menswear, construction and agribusiness. He has also published five books and recorded two albums on which he croons popular classics. An investigation by the Colombian news outlet La Silla Vacía reported that, apart from his law firm, most of his other businesses were operating at a loss. He spent years in Miami and obtained US citizenship in 2023; he also holds Italian citizenship. On social media, he frequently showcased his lavish lifestyle, including yacht trips and private jet travel between his various homes. In July last year, a month after the rightwing senator and presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe Turbay was shot during a campaign event – he died in August – De la Espriella announced that he would run for president to fight “with an iron fist the corrupt, unpunished criminals and all those who threaten Colombia’s existence”. With heavy investment in social media, he gradually won the backing of influencers and footballers. His rallies resembled pop concerts, with drone shows, giant screens flooded with AI-generated videos, and songs. De la Espriella appeared in a bulletproof vest behind bulletproof glass; the vehicle that carried him to his victory speech, fitted with a transparent armoured enclosure, drew comparisons with the popemobile and was nicknamed the “tigermobile”. Rather than distributing campaign merchandise to supporters, he sold everything from $6 stickers and $17 keyrings to a roaring tiger-head statue painted in the colours of the Colombian flag for $640 and a $5,800 watch. De la Espriella promised to withdraw the country from the UN, to extradite Petro to the US, to build 10 maximum-security “mega-prisons”, to legalise civilian gun ownership, and to “capture or kill” 10 major crime leaders within his first three months in office. He also supports fossil fuel extraction, fracking and a loosening of environmental licensing requirements. With minimal legislative support, the president-elect has vowed to issue 90 executive decrees on his first day in office, a governing style reminiscent of neighbouring Ecuador’s far-right president, Daniel Noboa, who has been widely criticised for his extensive use of presidential decrees, particularly states of emergency. “Those 90 decrees De la Espriella has promised may be illegal and can eventually be challenged in court, but by the time the courts resolve the issue, the rights in question may already have been lost. We have seen that happen in the US,” said Ruiz-Navarro. Over the years, De la Espriella filed more than 100 lawsuits against journalists. “He has tried to silence anyone who says something he disagrees with,” said Ricaurte. An atheist who became a devout Catholic after the death of a relative, Colombia’s next president has been accused of homophobia for mockingly imitating a gay candidate and of sexism on multiple occasions. In a statement, he said that under his government, “no person will be persecuted, discriminated against or excluded because of their sexual orientation, personal convictions or way of life”. Ricaurte said his rhetoric was “misogynistic and full of hatred and exclusion, and it’s not that people voted for him despite that rhetoric. People voted for him because of it. And that is a deeply alarming sign for the health of our nation.”

picture of article

Spanish PM’s former right-hand man jailed for 24 years for corruption

Spain’s supreme court has jailed the former transport minister José Luis Ábalos for 24 years for taking bribes on public contracts for sanitary equipment such as ‌face masks during the Covid pandemic. Ábalos’s aide, Koldo García, was jailed for 19 years in a trial that is one of several scandals to have enveloped the government of Pedro Sánchez over recent months. The case is seen as particularly damaging for Sánchez because Ábalos was his trusted right-hand man for many years. Ábalos and Koldo heard the sentencing via video-conference in the Madrid prison where they have both been held in preventive custody since November. Presided over by seven judges, the court heard evidence from public officials, civil servants, expert witnesses and police, and found Ábalos and García guilty of being part of a criminal organisation, bribery, misuse of public funds, money laundering and influence peddling. The court concluded that “the seriousness of the charges derives from the fact that they erode the fundamentals of a democratic state and distort the purpose of public power into an instrument at the service of individual interests”. The sentencing comes two days after a separate court ruled that Sánchez’s wife, Begoña Gómez, who faces corruption and influence-peddling charges, is a flight risk and must hand over her passport. Gómez is awaiting trial over accusations she used her influence as the prime minister’s wife to secure sponsors for a university master’s degree course she ran, and that she used state funds to pay her assistant for help with personal matters. The case was triggered by a complaint from the rightwing pressure group Manos Limpias, which translates as Clean Hands. Gómez lives in the Moncloa palace, which is the seat of government and probably one of the most secure buildings in Spain, but the judge Juan Carlos Peinado said members of her security detail might help her to escape. This in turn has led Spain’s judicial watchdog, the General Council for Judicial Power, to take disciplinary action against Peinado for the “serious offence” of impugning the integrity of public servants, in this case, Gómez’s personal protection agents. Spain’s national police also released a rare statement calling the judge’s reasoning unjustified and stressing the force’s political neutrality. The government has denounced Peinado for what it described as his obsession with Gómez who, even if found guilty, would apparently have derived no personal benefit from the alleged influence peddling. Sánchez has not been named in any of the ‌cases, but his brother, David, is on trial over allegations that he was handed a bespoke job by the Socialist-led council of the south-western town of Badajoz in July 2017, when his brother was the national leader of the party but not yet prime minister. Gómez and David Sánchez have denied any wrongdoing, and the prime minister has said his family have been the victims of a harassment and bullying operation. The case against David Sánchez was also brought by Manos Limpias, leading many to believe there has been a concerted effort by rightwing forces to damage the Sánchez government. So-called “lawfare” has become increasingly common in Spain, where the courts are obliged to consider cases brought by private organisations or individuals, however frivolous the charge might initially appear. During her eight years in office, Barcelona’s leftwing mayor Ada Colau faced 22 legal challenges to her policies, every one of which was eventually dismissed. Ábalos is the fifth government minister to be jailed since Spain’s transition to democracy in 1978. Víctor de Aldama, a businessman linked to the scandal was also jailed for four and half years on Monday, but his sentence was suspended because he had cooperated with the court. Nor will he have to hand back the €3.7m (£3.2m) he received in commissions over the procurement of masks.

picture of article

Zelenskyy pledges to ‘bring war back to Russia’ after drones swarm toward Moscow – as it happened

… and on that note, it’s a wrap for today! Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has pledged for the Ukrainian army to “bring the war back to Russia,” as he said the country’s “response will grow stronger with each passing day” (9:28). He also criticised Russia’s “unjustifiable killings” in Ukraine, urging other leaders to bring the Russian aggression to an end (11:25), as Ukraine intensified attacks on Crimea to raise the cost of Russian occupation (12:30). Zelenskyy was also locked in a bitter dispute with Poland’s president Karol Nawrocki over the decision to rename a contemporary Ukrainian army unit after the controversial Ukrainian Insurgent Army (10:06). In other news, Western Europe is enduring a ferocious heatwave forecast to break temperature records, with half of France on red alert, rail services in Belgium disrupted and sports events in Spain and Germany cancelled or postponed (16:40). The much-awaited EU-UK summit, scheduled for July, is likely to be postponed after the resignation of the British prime minister Keir Starmer (13:24, 16:10). Czech prime minister Andrej Babiš also confirmed that its president and former senior Nato general Petr Pavel will not be part of the Czech delegation for the next month’s Nato summit in Ankara (15:27). If you have any tips, comments or suggestions, email me at jakub.krupa@theguardian.com. I am also on Bluesky at @jakubkrupa.bsky.social and on X at @jakubkrupa.

picture of article

European leaders pay tribute to Starmer as EU-UK summit is postponed

European leaders have paid tribute to Keir Starmer after he announced his resignation as the British prime minister, triggering the postponement of an upcoming EU-UK summit. The European Council president, António Costa, said: “For sure we need to postpone it, but we are reassessing the opportunity to hold this new summit … “My wish is ⁠that [Starmer’s] successor will give continuity on this path to reset ‌our relationship with the UK.” Soon after Starmer’s resignation speech at No 10, the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, tweeted: “It can take many leaders years to grow into the statesman you became in just two years. European and Ukrainian security is stronger because of you. Thank you, dear Keir.” The annual EU-UK summit was announced for 22 July only last week, after weeks of uncertainty and delay. With Andy Burnham hot favourite to be the next British prime minister and unlikely to face a contest, Starmer’s last outing on the world stage could be the Nato summit in Ankara on 7-8 July. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, thanked Starmer for “all our cooperation, your support, and the joint decisions that have helped make our Europe and our protection of life stronger”. While Kyiv expressed frustration with UK support during the early part of Starmer’s premiership, Zelenskyy offered warm praise: “Keir, you are always a welcome guest in Ukraine.” The Kremlin’s chief spokesperson said Starmer had “not done anything to distinguish himself on the issue of British-Russia relations” adding that it was unlikely anyone on the British political scene would take a different position. German chancellor Friedrich Merz’s spokesperson said Starmer had always been “a reliable and close partner in foreign policy questions, particularly regarding Ukraine”. Starmer is expected to attend an E5 meeting on Wednesday in Berlin, where Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Poland will prepare for the Nato summit. Donald Trump offered his best wishes, laced with characteristic attack lines, even before Starmer made his Downing Street announcement. “Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of The United Kingdom,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. “He failed badly on two very important subjects- IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY (OPEN NORTH SEA OIL!). I wish him well!” After an unexpectedly smooth start between the pair, differences were revealed when Trump disparaged Nato allies, prompting an angry rebuttal from Starmer over the “insulting and frankly appalling” comments about British troops in Afghanistan. Trump also criticised the UK over the Chagos Islands and, most significantly, over Starmer’s refusal to offer military support in the US-Israeli attacks on Iran. Trump, who waged an unsuccessful legal battle with the Scottish government to stop a windfarm development near his Aberdeenshire golf course, has also accused Starmer of “windmilling the country to death”. Other traditional allies struck a different note. Australia’s prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said he was thinking of his friend on “what must be a very tough day. Serving in public life is a tremendous privilege but politics can also be a harsh business.” Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre, also a centre-left leader, said: “The United Kingdom is Norway’s close ally in Europe, and over the past two years our countries have grown even closer through important agreements.” Before he announced the postponement of the summit, Costa said under Starmer’s premiership “we turned a new page in EU-UK relations”. “The EU is committed to continued cooperation in this spirit,” he added, describing Starmer as a friend. At the postponed EU-UK summit, the two sides hoped to sign agreements on a food and drink deal to ease border checks, linking emissions trading systems and a youth mobility programme. Post-referendum EU-UK relations turned a corner under the last Conservative prime minister, Rishi Sunak, in 2023 with the signing of a Northern Ireland Brexit deal. Relations became warmer when Starmer won power in July 2024, although many EU officials thought the government’s reset hopes were unrealistic. While the EU and UK signed a security partnership in May 2025, the two sides failed to find an agreement on British participation in the EU’s €150bn Safe defence loans scheme. Speaking to the Guardian earlier this month, Germany’s former Europe minister Micael Roth, who was Starmer’s counterpart during the Brexit negotiation years, said: “We cannot be happy if a close partner is in such a very, very challenging, difficult situation. “We very much hoped for a more stable government.” He added that Germany, France and Spain were among the European countries also afflicted by political troubles.

picture of article

Marius Borg Høiby rape conviction renews focus in Norway on consent in digital age

In many ways, the case of Marius Borg Høiby, who was sentenced to four years in prison last week after being found guilty of offences including domestic violence and two counts of rape, was exceptional. The king’s 29-year-old step-grandson grew up in the public eye alongside the royal family, mixing in Oslo’s wealthiest circles, partying at exclusive nightclubs and having afterparties at his family’s official royal residence. But at its core the case also highlights a dark universal truth, one that has resonated with Norwegians and people around the world: the prevalence of violence, particularly sexual violence, in daily life, even in one of the world’s supposedly most gender equal countries, and how it has been exacerbated by the digital age. It has also exposed, despite important changes to Norway’s consent law last year, a severe lack of understanding of the issue across Norwegian society, experts say, from children to teenagers to prosecutors. “The verdict has been on everyone’s lips, both in my personal world with my friends, but also here at the office we have discussed this quite a bit,” said Åsne Solberg, a legal adviser at JURK, which provides free advice to women at their offices in Oslo. Like many other Norwegian women, Solberg has been personally shaken by the combination of the trial, and the publication of the Epstein files, which revealed details of the years-long friendship between Høiby’s mother, Crown Princess Mette-Marit, and the late US sex offender. “You really get a glimpse of how some of these men resonate, or don’t resonate, with their own actions,” she said. “And how, deep down on the inside, they perceive women and the worth of women and what they can do to women. I think it’s just very dark, honestly.” She also knows from professional experience that the Høiby case is not unique. Despite Norway’s reputation as a global leader on gender equality, one in five women have been raped at least once, and one in 10 have experienced serious partner violence. “We call it the Nordic paradox,” said Solberg. “That on paper we are very equal but when it comes to our violence statistics it is quite dire still.” Norway’s new consent laws, which came into effect last year, criminalise sex without explicit consent, meaning prosecutors don’t need to prove violence or threats or the incapacity of the victim to resist to get a rape conviction. The charges against Høiby related to incidents that took place from before the new laws came into effect. Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland have also introduced consent-based rape laws. Officials in Sweden said changing the legal definition of rape to sex without consent led to a 75% increase in convictions. Solberg, who has campaigned for years for the law change, said she thinks it would have made a difference in the Høiby case. “This whole case and the proceedings illustrate why we needed the change in the penal code,” she said. It was especially apparent, she said, in the focus on whether or not victims were asleep during the rapes. Under the new law, this would not have been necessary, she believes. “The most relevant theme of evidence would be whether she consented or not, not whether she was actually asleep or not.” Nok Norge (Enough Norway) is an umbrella organisation for government-funded centres that provide support to sexual abuse victims around the country, including in some schools. It says behaviour demonstrated in the Høiby trial was representative of a broader culture around sex and explicit image sharing. Ingvild Hestad Torkelsen, the organisation’s leader, said: “Porn is getting into bedrooms very early … We have a lot of girls that come to our centres that say the first time they had sex the boys wanted to strangle them because they’ve seen that done in porn … It’s more brutal or aggressive very early.” Increased screen time has also left gaps in knowledge about how to communicate and read body language effectively, she said. While schools teach sex education, it is more about the “mechanics” of sex than feelings, boundaries or communication. Kari Helene Partapuoli, the secretary general of the Norwegian women’s public health association Sanitetskvinnene, said the issue of intimate photos and videos – including those taken with consent – are an added concern for children and young people. “There are a lot of closed groups,” she said. “It’s something that keeps coming up. And I think everyone who is a parent today has those discussions with their children, teenagers especially, boys or girls.” Before the start of the trial, Sanitetskvinnene reported a rise in the number of women reporting abuse and sexual assault at the hands of their partners. Partapuoli hopes the verdicts, some of which have been appealed by Høiby, will have a much wider impact on Norwegian society: “All of history shows that you have to speak up. Unfortunately, often an individual has to go through that kind of public scrutiny, like these women have done in this court case, and also in rape cases.” But, she added, there is some way to go. “We have to keep talking about it, learning, changing attitudes and taking it through court cases. This does not have an easy fix, but you have to keep working.”

picture of article

Ukraine intensifies attacks on Crimea to raise cost of Russian occupation

Ukraine has stepped up its strikes on Crimea as part of a strategy to isolate the occupied peninsula from mainland Russia and raise the cost of the occupation. On Sunday, Russian-installed authorities suspended civilian fuel sales until at least Wednesday, a move that underscored Ukraine’s growing ability to disrupt supply lines linking Crimea to Russia. “Fuel will be sold only to government agencies that ensure the functioning and security of the Republic of Crimea,” the Russian-appointed governor, Sergei Aksyonov, said. “I ask everyone to remain calm and only trust official sources of information.” Local authorities also announced that parts of the peninsula would be left without street lighting and that all public events had been cancelled. A wave of Ukrainian medium-range strikes has targeted occupied Crimea and the transport routes connecting it to Russia in recent weeks. Kyiv hopes to turn the peninsula “into an island” by disrupting Russian supply chains and isolating Crimea from mainland Russia. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said on Sunday that a Crimean oil depot and an oil transport facility in Russia’s southern Krasnodar region were among the targets. He described the attacks as part of Ukraine’s campaign of “long-range sanctions” against Russia. Ukrainian Telegram channels also reported that Kyiv had struck at least three Russian ferries transporting vehicles operating on the Kerch crossing between Crimea and mainland Russia. Ukraine has focused its strikes on the main transport routes supplying Crimea, particularly the Novorossiya highway, a key logistics corridor linking the peninsula to Russia’s Rostov region through the occupied cities of Melitopol and Mariupol. Russia had already sharply restricted traffic on the Kerch Bridge, the other major route connecting Crimea to Russia. Moscow has largely stopped using the bridge for rail fuel shipments since a 2022 Ukrainian attack damaged the crossing and set a fuel train ablaze. The recent strikes have left residents queueing for hours at petrol stations, dealing a significant blow to Crimea’s economy during the peak holiday season, when tens of thousands of Russian tourists normally visit the peninsula. Yelena Shtringel, the director of the tour company TurEtno, told the RBC news site that about 80% of June bookings had been cancelled, while roughly half of reservations for July and August had also been abandoned. “I want to go back to Moscow. This is just horrible,” one Russian tourist said in a video circulating online after her train service in Crimea was suspended over the weekend owing to another Ukrainian drone attack. On Monday, Aksyonov said all children’s summer camps would be cancelled until September, the latest sign of the growing disruption caused by the attacks. With other routes under strain, Russian voices close to the Kremlin suggested that Ukraine was likely to intensify its efforts to target the Kerch Bridge in the coming weeks. “The pressure on the Crimean [Kerch] Bridge will clearly increase in the coming weeks as part of Ukraine’s strategy to sever links between Crimea and the mainland … the strikes will intensify,” wrote Rybar, a pro-war Telegram channel with 1.5 million followers run by a former Russian defence ministry official. “We need to prepare for such a scenario in advance and understand what weapons the Ukrainian armed forces might use,” the channel added. The 12-mile-long Kerch Bridge, also known as the Crimean Bridge, is the jewel in the crown of Putin’s infrastructure projects – described by Russian media as the “construction of the century” and intended to reify Russia’s claimed ownership of Crimea. The bridge was severely damaged in October 2022, when a truck bomb detonated on Putin’s 70th birthday, collapsing sections of the roadway and setting a fuel train ablaze. Although Moscow has since strengthened its defences around the crossing, it remains one of Ukraine’s most important targets.