Read the daily news to learn English

picture of article

Middle East crisis live: ‘Go get your own oil,’ Trump tells allies in angry outburst

The U.S. State Department is tracking reports of threats against locations where American citizens gather in Saudi Arabia, including hotels, U.S. businesses and educational institutions, the State Department said, advising U.S. citizens in the country to shelter in place until further notice. “We are tracking reports of threats against locations where American citizens gather,” the U.S. Embassy in Saudi Arabia said in a travel advisory. “We advise U.S. citizens that hotels and other gathering points including U.S. businesses and U.S. educational institutions may be potential targets.” The embassy asked Americans to remain inside and stay away from windows until further notice. The latest advisory came after Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they would target U.S. companies in the Middle East as of April 1 in retaliation for attacks on Iran, state media reported.

picture of article

Tendzin Choegyal Taklha obituary

Tendzin Choegyal Taklha, who has died aged 79, was confidant, sounding board and chief support of the Dalai Lama, his elder brother, throughout the transformation of the Tibetan leader from national political figure to global spiritual powerhouse. Although Tendzin Choegyal himself was recognised at birth as the 16th incarnation of the Ngari Rinpoché – meaning “precious one of Ngari” – an important reincarnation lineage whose origins lay in western Tibet (modern-day Ladakh), he took the opportunity to forswear monastic life as soon as he could after going into exile in India at the age of 13. Subsequently educated, at the Dalai Lama’s behest, at an English-style public school run by Jesuits in Darjeeling, Tendzin Choegyal gained a psychological insight into western ways. It was this that enabled him to counsel the Dalai Lama as his elder brother began his spiritual mission to the world. Born in Lhasa, on an unknown date during the March new year festival of the Fire Dog, Tendzin Choegyal was the youngest child of a family of petty-landowners who, when their fourth child was recognised as the reincarnation of the Great 13th Dalai Lama, had since become the most important in Tibet. Tendzin Choegyal himself was recognised not only as a reincarnate lama but also as the rebirth of an elder brother who had died shortly after childbirth. A senior monk then visiting the mourning family comforted the mother by assuring her that the child would come back. Taking some butter on his thumb, he anointed the baby’s corpse by pressing it on to one of its buttocks. She should look for such a mark on her next baby which, he told her, would be healthy. In later life, Tendzin Choegyal would delight in showing off the birthmark to friends – even while expressing scepticism as to the truth of the connection. Although he was formally inducted as a novice monk aged three, Tendzin Choegyal initially lived the life of a spoiled young aristocrat at his parents’ mansion in Lhasa, until being sent away to Drepung monastery at 12, an experience that he loathed. In the meantime, his youthful escapades included taking his ponies on to the palace roof as a prank. On another occasion, having discovered his songbirds had been killed by the family cat, he herded the cat and its litter of kittens into a sack and clubbed them to death. He told both stories against himself without any attempt at justification. When he was just three years old, China had moved to assert itself in Tibet by sending in the People’s Liberation Army to take over its administration. When the Dalai Lama went to visit Beijing in 1954, he took his youngest brother with him. The little boy quickly picked up some Chinese, becoming a serious liability for the delight he took in saying out loud what the adults would not say to their hosts. On the eve of the Dalai Lama’s flight from Lhasa in 1959, the PLA having made life impossible for the Tibetan leader, Tendzin Choegyal was collected from the monastery and taken to the Norbulingka Palace, where the Dalai Lama was then quartered. From there, the two brothers and their mother escaped under the noses of the Chinese army, which Mao Zedong had belatedly ordered to detain the Tibetan leader. They arrived safely in India a month later, having trekked across the southern reaches of the Himalayas. At 13 years of age, it was the boy’s special joy to be given a pistol to carry. Shortly after reaching Mussoorie, the British-Indian hill station that was the Tibetan exiles’ temporary home for a year, the Dalai Lama gave instructions for Tendzin Choegyal to be enrolled at St Joseph’s college in Darjeeling. Founded in the late 19th century, and run by the Jesuits, the school was modelled on the British public schools of the day but with a strongly Catholic ethos. The former Tibetan Buddhist monk was so taken by this unfamiliar religion that he became an altar boy, helping to serve at mass. While away at school, he kept up an occasional correspondence, in English, with the Dalai Lama – who signed himself “John” in order to keep his identity hidden. After leaving St Joseph’s, now highly proficient and widely read in English, Tendzin Choegyal spent a period studying in North America. In 1972, he took up a teaching position back in India at the Tibetan children’s village school in Dharamsala. There he met Rindchen Khando, whom he married that same year. They had a son, Tendzin Lodro, and a daughter, Tendzin Choensum. Tendzin Choegyal subsequently enlisted in the Special Frontier Force, the Indian army’s elite and secretive airborne mountain warfare unit set up in the aftermath of the 1962 Sino-Indian war. He rose to the rank of captain. Returning to civilian life, Tendzin Choegyal joined the Dalai Lama’s private office, serving for some years in the security department before being elected to the Tibetan government in exile, representing the people of Amdo province from 1991 to 1996. During the mid-1980s his mental health had begun to deteriorate, and he became known for flying into rages. On one occasion, he told me, he physically ejected a nun from the Dalai Lama’s helicopter as it took off in Zanskar, in 1988. Afterwards, he spoke of feeling that he was channelling a wrathful deity. He was eventually diagnosed with what is now known as bipolar disorder. Retirement from public service gave Tendzin Choegyal the opportunity to cultivate friendships among the westerners who had begun to flock to Dharamsala in search of spiritual nourishment. The role he subsequently carved out for himself was to act as a bridge between two radically different cultures. Increasingly relied on by the Dalai Lama for his insight, from the early 90s until the Dalai Lama ceased travelling, Tendzin Choegyal was invariably at his brother’s side offering support, counsel and, sometimes, contrary opinion. He also became a highly sought-after – if always reluctant and self-effacing – speaker on Buddhism. While he never accepted his identification as a reincarnate lama, and repudiated the elaborate teachings of the tantric tradition, in the last 10 years of his life, he became an increasingly devoted Buddhist practitioner. He is survived by his wife and their two children, as well as by a sister and the Dalai Lama. • Tendzin Choegyal Taklha, spiritual and political adviser, born March 1946; died 17 February 2026

picture of article

Merz criticised after calling for Syrians in Germany to ‘go back’ home

Friedrich Merz has drawn condemnation from NGOs and members of his own government after he called for the vast majority of Syrians living in Germany to “go back to their homeland.” The German chancellor, who was elected last year after promising a tough line on immigration in a bid to beat the far right, made the remarks during a visit to Berlin on Monday by the interim Syrian president Ahmed al-Sharaa. Explaining that Berlin’s priority in terms of removals was to send back Syrians who had committed crimes, Merz said he and al-Sharaa would in the longer-term work toward broad-scale returns from Germany, home to the biggest Syrian diaspora in the EU. “In the longer perspective of the next three years, that … was the wish of President al-Sharaa: [that] about 80% of the Syrians currently living in Germany should go back to their homeland,” Merz said, citing the necessity to rebuild the war-ravaged country. Al-Sharaa, a former Islamist rebel leader, did not confirm the goal of returning 80% of the more than 900,000 Syrian citizens registered in Germany by 2029, and the figure seemed to take political officials in Berlin by surprise. Anke Rehlinger, deputy leader of the co-ruling Social Democrats (SPD), tacitly accused Merz of playing into the hands of the anti-migration, anti-Islam Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) by setting a target for repatriations for 2029, when Germany’s next general election is expected. “It’s not a wise move on the part of the chancellor to put forward specific figures within specific timeframes, because that raises expectations he may not be able to meet,” she told newspaper group Funke. Rehlinger voiced understanding for al-Sharaa’s call for Syrians to help their country’s reconstruction. “However, many Syrians are now our fellow citizens because they have integrated here, work in occupations in which there are shortages, care for elderly people or drive buses, and have often even become German citizens,” she said. About 244,000 Syrian citizens received a German passport between 2016 and 2024, the largest group among those newly naturalised. Criticism also came from within Merz’s conservative CDU party, with its foreign policy spokesperson Roderich Kiesewetter calling the figures the chancellor cited “problematic in several respects”. He stressed that the AfD could capitalise on any unkept promises and also noted the role played by skilled Syrian workers in the German economy. “If they return, we face a challenge,” Kiesewetter told business newspaper Handelsblatt. The German Hospital Society, representing the sector’s interests, underlined the “considerable importance” of Syrian doctors, with 5,745 working in German clinics – the largest group of foreign physicians. Another 2,000 Syrians work as carers. “If these skilled workers were to leave the country again, it would have a significant impact on healthcare,” said its deputy chair Henriette Neumeyer. Franziska Brantner, co-leader of the opposition Greens, called Merz’s repatriation goal “reckless”. “For many people, returning to Syria is simply not an option at all”, said Brantner, given security risks and lack of faith among many Syrians in the political transition. Fellow Greens MP Luise Amtsberg denounced Merz’s remarks as “shameful”. Given Syria’s ongoing instability and the continued threats faced by minority groups there, immigration advocacy group Pro Asyl called for an immediate end to deportations to Syria and a policy “guided not by short-term deterrence in migration policy, but by human rights, protection and long-term stability”. Merz took office last May in a coalition with the centre-left SPD, vowing to break with the more welcoming border policy endorsed by fellow Christian Democrat Angela Merkel. Merkel, who governed Germany for 16 years until 2021, allowed about 1.3 million people fleeing war and oppression from across the Middle East and Afghanistan into Germany in 2015-16. That initially popular move eventually led to a backlash that has provided political fodder for the AfD, now the country’s largest opposition party. Merz acknowledged that many of the Syrians who arrived in Europe’s top economy under Merkel had made a vital contribution to German society. But he said that most wanted to return now that the regime of Bashar al-Assad was gone. Official statistics show more than 3,700 Syrians have voluntarily returned from Germany as of November 2025. Experts noted that forced deportations usually face lengthy legal challenges. In the face of criticism, Merz appeared on Tuesday to backtrack from the specific target. “The figure of 80% returnees within three years was cited by the Syrian president,” Merz was quoted by Bild newspaper as saying. “We have taken note of this figure, but we are aware of the scale of the task.”

picture of article

‘Discriminatory’ Israeli death penalty law would be war crime, says UN rights chief

A new Israeli law that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, but not Jewish extremists accused of similar crimes, would constitute a war crime if enacted, according to one of the UN’s most senior human rights officials. Speaking amid mounting international condemnation of the bill, the UN’s high commissioner for human rights, Volker Türk, described the law as “patently inconsistent with Israel’s international law obligations, including in relation to the right to life”. He added that it “raises serious concerns about due process violations, is deeply discriminatory, and must be promptly repealed”. “Its application in a discriminatory manner would constitute an additional, particularly egregious violation of international law. Its application to residents of the occupied Palestinian territory would constitute a war crime,” Türk said. The legislation, passed on Monday by the Israeli Knesset, has faced a wave of criticism, including from European leaders and human rights groups. “The death penalty bill in Israel is very concerning to us in the EU,” the EU spokesperson Anouar El Anouni said in Brussels. “This is a clear step backwards – the introduction of the death penalty, together with the discriminatory nature of the law.” The Spanish prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, wrote on X: “It is an asymmetric measure that would not apply to Israelis who committed the same crimes. Same crime, different punishment. That is not justice. It is a step closer to apartheid.” Germany, traditionally one of Israel’s closest allies in Europe, said it could not endorse the law. “The German government views the law passed yesterday with great concern,” the government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said in a statement. “The rejection of the death penalty is a fundamental principle of German policy,” Kornelius said, adding: “Such a law would likely apply exclusively to Palestinians in the Palestinian territories.” The legislation makes the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed acts of terrorism by a military court. According to the bill, those sentenced to death would be held in a separate facility with no visits except from authorised personnel, and legal consultations conducted only by video link. Executions would be carried out within 90 days of sentencing. Israel has rarely used the death penalty, applying it only in exceptional cases. The Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed, in 1962. The national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of the bill’s strongest backers, has repeatedly worn a noose-shaped lapel pin, symbolising executions under the proposal. A security committee made some amendments to the bill, which last week passed its first vote. Israel’s public broadcaster, KAN, reported that executions would be carried out by hanging. The measure would allow courts to impose the death penalty without a request from prosecutors and without requiring unanimity, instead permitting a simple majority decision. Military courts in the occupied West Bank would also be empowered to hand down death sentences, with the defence minister able to submit an opinion. Adam Coogle, the deputy Middle East director of Human Rights Watch, said: “Israeli officials argue that imposing the death penalty is about security, but in reality it entrenches discrimination and a two-tiered system of justice, both hallmarks of apartheid. “The death penalty is irreversible and cruel. Combined with its severe restrictions on appeals and its 90-day execution timeline, this bill aims to kill Palestinian detainees faster and with less scrutiny.” Shaista Aziz, Oxfam’s campaign engagement lead, said: “This bill is another horrifying act of violence. Israel is violating international law. This new law effectively ensures that the death penalty in Israel will apply only to Palestinians, even as the illegal Israeli occupation has lately seen a surge in the coordinated attacks and executions of Palestinians by settler militias and military. “Israel holds more than 9,000 Palestinians in its jails – many unlawfully and subject to inhumane conditions, starvation and torture as state policy.” In Israel, the law is already facing legal challenges. Several Israeli human rights groups and three members of parliament filed petitions to the supreme court seeking to overturn it. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel said the law created “two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians” and should be struck down on constitutional grounds.

picture of article

Tusk and Irish PM call Hungarian foreign minister’s alleged links to Russia ‘repulsive’ and ‘sinister’ – Europe live

… and on that note, it’s a wrap for today! Several EU leaders have strongly criticised Hungary after a media report disclosed new details about Hungarian foreign minister Péter Szijjártó’s conversations with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov. A joint investigation by five European outlets revealed what it said were alleged conversations between Szijjártó, Lavrov, and another Russian official, in which they seemed to discuss amending the EU sanctions lists, among other things (11:10). Szijjártó dismissed the findings, saying they only confirm that “I say the same publicly as I do on the phone,” pointing to his previous criticism of the bloc’s sanctions regime. Poland’s prime minister Donald Tusk said the disclosure was “a confirmation of the deeply disturbing political dependence” of Hungary on Russia, calling out “unacceptable” and “repulsive” tone of the reported conversations. Ireland’s prime minister Micheál Martin said it was “a very sinister development,” which “confirms what many suspected” about Hungary “doing the bidding for Russia” within the EU (16:50). Czech president and former Nato general Petr Pavel said the incident should prompt the Czech authorities to re-evaluate its relations and sharing of confidential information with Hungary, but his criticism got dismissed by the government (17:33). Separately, the EU’s top diplomat spoke with Szijjártó to remind him of the expectation of confidentiality for all EU discussions held behind the closed doors, the European Commission said (12:46). In other news, US president Donald Trump and US secretary of state Marco Rubio criticised European Nato allies for their refusal to support US offensive operations against Iran, after France, Italy and Spain reportedly denied requests to use their airspace or bases for these purposes (11:59, 12:03, 13:24, 14:36, 15:30, 16:12). The European Union has reaffirmed its support for Ukraine, marking the fourth anniversary of the liberation of Bucha, with a call to make Russia accountable for its war crimes in Ukraine (13:21). The Finnish prime minister, Petteri Orpo, has said the war in Ukraine has “come close” after two drones fell on Finnish territory, but insisted that it did not constitute a military threat (11:55), after similar incidents were reported across the Baltics in recent days. If you have any tips, comments or suggestions, email me at jakub.krupa@theguardian.com. I am also on Bluesky at @jakubkrupa.bsky.social and on X at @jakubkrupa.

picture of article

The world cannot allow Gaza’s horrors to be replayed in Lebanon | Letter

Your editorial on Israel’s military escalation in Lebanon (25 March) rightly warns against a repeat of the devastating tactics unleashed on Palestinians in Gaza. My colleagues in Lebanon are reporting the fear instilled by mass forced-displacement orders and military attacks, including on healthcare workers. Our team and partner organisations have been supporting Palestinian refugees who have had to flee their homes, while others have not been able to evacuate even if they wish to. This has instilled deepening panic within communities, including Palestinian refugees who already live in overcrowded camps, and experience poverty and limited access to essential services. In Lebanon, the Israeli military is absolutely mirroring the playbook it has deployed in Gaza: the terrorising of civilians, forced displacement and widespread attacks on humanitarian and healthcare facilities. Despite the “ceasefire agreement” in Gaza, Israeli military attacks have killed more than 690 Palestinians since October in the strip, and aid restrictions are causing deadly shortages of medical supplies and equipment. In the West Bank, Palestinians face spiralling settler violence and the Israeli government’s escalating annexation policy – which is now expanding to Lebanon. Impunity for Israel’s military aggression against civilians and healthcare services means that we at Medical Aid for Palestinians are gravely concerned for the safety of the people we serve and of our staff in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and Lebanon. The UK government cannot pick and choose when to uphold international law or whose lives are worth protecting. It must do everything in its power to hold all perpetrators of breaches accountable. Failure to act now will have devastating human consequences. The world cannot allow Gaza’s horrors to be replayed in Lebanon; nor should our government be an ally to Israel’s atrocities. Steve Cutts CEO, Medical Aid for Palestinians • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

picture of article

Pakistan and China propose five-part peace plan for Middle East

Pakistan and China have released a joint five-part proposal for peace in the Middle East, after Pakistan’s foreign minister flew to Beijing on Tuesday to seek Chinese support for the country’s faltering efforts to negotiate an end to end the war. The one-day meeting between Ishaq Dar and his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, came as Pakistan continues to push for the role of peacemaker between the United States and Iran, even as the war shows little sign of relenting. According to a statement from China’s foreign ministry, the trip was intended to “strengthen” cooperation between China and Pakistan on the ongoing conflict in Iran and “make new efforts toward advocating for peace”. So far, China has maintained a meticulous distance from the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and the Gulf, though it has ties with the regime in Tehran and is the largest buyer of Iranian oil. While Beijing condemned the initial US and Israeli strikes on Iran, it has since held a position largely of neutrality and focused its efforts on calling for a ceasefire, while negotiating directly with Tehran for the safe passage of its own oil tankers through the strait of Hormuz. In a statement after Tuesday’s meeting, Pakistan and China jointly called for an immediate ceasefire and for the safety of waterways, including the blockaded strait, to be protected, and released a five-part initiative for peace. The joint statement agreed that dialogue and diplomacy were “the only viable option to resolve conflicts” but there appeared to be little substantive progress in bringing the significant participants to the table to end the war. This week Trump claimed that negotiations with Iran were going “extremely well” while Tehran has maintained there are no direct talks happening at all. In recent weeks, Pakistan has put itself at the centre of efforts to bring about a ceasefire to end the war with Iran and has been pushing for Islamabad as the location for peace talks. Playing on its relationships with both sides, Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, and army chief, Syed Asim Munir, have been communicating with the US president, Donald Trump, and the Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, as well as dozens of other global leaders, and messages between the two warring countries have passed through Pakistani intermediaries. On Sunday, Islamabad hosted talks with the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt, in an effort to find a regional solution to ending the conflict, yet the absence of the US and Iran from the negotiations was seen to undermine their diplomatic heft. Analysts said Pakistan’s fervent embrace of the role of interlocutor between Iran and the US came after years of Islamabad being sidelined by Washington under previous presidents and a push by the government and Munir for the country to be seen as a regional diplomatic heavyweight. Rafiullah Kakar, a Pakistani columnist and political analyst, said: “Islamabad seeks to reinforce its standing as a consequential middle power within the broader Muslim world and to signal continued geopolitical importance to external partners, particularly Washington and the Gulf states.” Yet as analysts and political figures have emphasised, Pakistan also has its own significant stakes in ending the conflict, and has already been paying a heavy economic price for the blockade on fuel and gas through the strait of Hormuz. Pakistan shares a 560-mile (900km) land border with Iran, and there are fears that the conflict could spill over into the restive region of Balochistan, which is already battling a violent insurgency. It is also home to the world’s largest population of Shia Muslims outside Iran and there are fears the conflict could stir up sectarian tensions if it continues to drag on. Dozens were already killed in protests that broke out when the US and Israel began bombing Tehran. The country also has a freshly signed defence pact with Saudi Arabia, which could threaten to drag a reluctant Islamabad into the war if countries in the Gulf decide to shift to an offensive tack and fight back against Iran’s missile and drone strikes. Kakar said Pakistan’s strong interest in de-escalating the conflict in Iran reflected both geopolitical and domestic concerns, with fears it could further undermine the country’s already highly unstable security situation. “Pakistan remains economically dependent on the Gulf monarchies, particularly Saudi Arabia, and seeks to preserve stable relations with the United States – yet it also shares a long and sensitive border with Iran,” he said. “Serious instability in Iran would have direct implications for Pakistan’s security. Escalation risks placing Islamabad in a very difficult position.”